Gelgite Bayrak Dikmek: Doğu ve Güney Çin Denizi’nde Egemenlik, Çevreleme ve Çatışma Çözümü

Öz

Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nin stratejik çıkarları Asya’ya yönelirken, Çin’in ekonomik ve askeri gücü küresel politikayı dönüştürmektedir. Bu arada, Doğu ve Güney Çin Denizlerindeki sınırlar ve adalar üzerindeki ihtilaflar, bölgedeki polis ve orduları karşı karşıya getirmektedir. Bu makale, Güney Çin Denizi’ndeki egemenlik meseleleri üzerine olan söylemleri konu etmektedir. Makale uluslararası hukuk, çoktaraflılık ve geleneksel diplomasinin ihtilaf çerçevesinde oynadıkları rollere değinmekte ve ihtilafın gerek Çin’in gelecekteki diplomasisi gerekse geleneksel normları olan müdahale etmeme ve barışçıl yükseliş için nasıl * Associate Professor, Department of Government, California State University, Sacramento, [e-mail] test vakası olduğuna işaret etmetedir. Çalışma son olarak çatışmaların çözümü için öneriler getirerek, ihtilaflı ancak üzerinde yerleşim olmayan deniz sınırları için teritoryal ve ulusal olmayan aidiyet fikirleri üzerinde duracaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çin
• Güney Çin Denizi
• adalar üzerinde hak iddiaları deniz hukuku
• Doğu Asya çoktaraflılığı

Planting Flags on the Tide: Sovereignty, Containment, and Conflict Resolution in the East and South China Seas

Öz

The rise of China’s economic and military power is transforming global politics while U.S. strategic interests are re-balancing toward Asia. Meanwhile, tensions over maritime boundaries and island claims within the region are punctuated by police and military stand-offs in the East and South China Seas. This paper considers the discourse surrounding the dispute over sovereignty in the South China Sea. It also examines the roles international law, multilateralism, and traditional diplomacy play in the conflict, and how it serves as a test case for China’s future diplomacy and traditional norms of non-interference and a peaceful rise. Finally, the paper suggests pathways toward conflict resolution of the immediate disputes, including de-territorialized and de-nationalized ideas of possession when it applies to contested yet uninhabited maritime frontiers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• China
• South China Sea
• island claims
• law of the sea
• East Asian multilateralism

Kaynakça

1. BRESLIN, J. William and Jeffrey Z. Rubin (eds.), Negotiation Theory and Practice, Cambridge, Mass: Program on Conflict Resolution at Harvard University, 1991.
2. BUSZYNSKI, Leszek, “ASEAN, the Declaration on Conduct, and the South China Sea”, Contemporary Southeast Asia 25, no. 3 (December 2003), p. 343-362.
3. BUSZYNSKI, Leszek and Iskandar Sazlan, “Maritime Claims and Energy Cooperation in the South China Sea”, Contemporary Southeast Asia 29, No. 1 (April 2007), p. 143-171.
4. CALLAHAN, William, Contingent States: Greater China and Transnational Relations, Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press 2004.
5. DJALAL, Hasjim and Ian Townsend-Gault, “Managing Potential Conflicts in the South China Sea: Informal Diplomacy for Conflict Prevention”, in Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall, Herding Cats: Multiparty Mediation in a Complex World, Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press, 1999, p. 107-134.
6. DUARA, Prasenjit, “De-Constructing the Chinese Nation”, in Jonathan Unger, ed., Chinese Nationalism, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1996, p. 31-55.
7. HUANG, Teh-yi, “State Preferences and International Institutions: Boolean Analysis of China’s Use of Force and South China Sea Territorial Disputes,” Journal of East Asian Studies 4, no. 2 (May–August 2004), p. 227-262.
8. KIM Shee Poon, “The South China Sea in China’s Strategic Thinking,” Contemporary Southeast Asia 19, no. 4 (March 1998), p. 369-387.

9. LEE Jae-hyung, “China’s Expanding Maritime Ambitions in the Western Pacific and the Indian Ocean”, Contemporary Southeast Asia 24, no. 3 (December 2002), p. 549-568.
10. LEIFER Michael, The ASEAN Regional Forum: Extending ASEAN’s Model of Regional Security, Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1996.
11. MCDONALD John W. and D.B. Bendahmane (eds.), Conflict Resolution: Track Two Diplomacy, Washington, DC: Foreign Service Institute, 1987.
12. ROWAN, Joshua P., “The U.S.-Japan Security Alliance, ASEAN, and the South China Sea Dispute”, Asian Survey 45, no. 3 (May/June 2005), p. 414-436.
13. STOREY, Ian James, “Creeping Assertiveness: China, the Philippines and the South China Sea Dispute”, Contemporary Southeast Asia 21, no. 1 (April 1999), p. 95-118.
14. THUCYDIDES, The Peloponnesian War, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press 1989.
15. TOWNSEND-GAULT, Ian, “Preventive Diplomacy and Pro-Activity in the South China Sea”, Contemporary Southeast Asia 20, no. 2 (August 1998), p. 171-190.
16. VAN DYKE Jon and Mark Valencia, “How Valid are the South China Sea Claims under the Law of the Sea Convention?” Southeast Asian Affairs (2000): 47-63.
17. VASQUEZ, John A., James Turner Johnson, Sanford Jaffe and Linda Stamato, Beyond Confrontation: Learning Conflict Resolution in the Post-Cold War Era, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1995, p. 155-177.
18. ZARTMAN I. William, Ripe for Resolution: Conflict Resolution in Africa, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1989.
19. ZARTMAN I. William and J. Lewis Rasmussen (eds.), Peacemaking in International Conflict: Methods and Techniques, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1997, p. 155-189.
20. ZHA Diaojong, “Security in the South China Sea,” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 26, no. 1, January-March 2001, p. 33-51.
21. ZHAO Hong, “Sino-Philippines Relations: Moving Beyond South China Sea Dispute?” The Journal of East Asian Affairs 26, no. 2 (Fall/Winter 2012), p. 57-76.