Beyond Negative Peace: The Limits of NATO’s Role in Fostering Sustainable Peace in the Western Balkans

Öz

Aim: This research aims to examine the association between the Balkan Peace Index (BPI), Galtung's theoretical framework of positive peace, and sustainability dimensions in order to critically asses the effectiveness and long-term viability of NATO's peacebuilding initiatives in the Western Balkans region. Method: The study applies a mixed-methods research design, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative analytical approaches. The methodological framework encompasses the examination of environmental sustainability indicators, democratic governance structures, and regional cooperation patterns. It is supported by qualitative data analysis from sources such as NATO policy documents, EU Enlargement Reports, and analyzing news related to the topic. Results: The empirical findings demonstrate that NATO has achieved considerable success in establishing negative peace throughout the Western Balkans via systematic conflict resolution mechanisms. However, the study reveals significant limitations regarding the establishment of sustainable and positive peace results. The research identifies substantial inadequacies within NATO's traditional security architecture when confronting contemporary multifaceted challenges, including climate related security threats, persistent economic disparities, and deteriorating social cohesion across the region. Conclusion: The study reveals that NATO needs to review its operational approach in order to achieve lasting and sustainable peace in the Western Balkans. In this context, it is crucial to adopt comprehensive and region-specific strategies that systematically integrate security requirements with development goals and environmental considerations, operating specifically within Galtung's positive peace theoretical framework.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• NATO
• Sustainable Peace
• Western Balkans
• EU
• Sustainability
• Peacebuilding

Negatif Barışın Ötesinde: Batı Balkanlar'da Sürdürülebilir Barışı Teşvik Etmede NATO'nun Rolünün Sınırları

Öz

Amaç: Bu araştırma, Balkan Barış Endeksi (BPI), Galtung'un pozitif barış kuramsal çerçevesi ve sürdürülebilirlik boyutları arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyerek NATO'nun Batı Balkanlar bölgesindeki barış inşa girişimlerinin etkinliğini ve uzun vadeli sürdürülebilirliğini eleştirel bir perspektifle değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yöntem: Araştırma, nicel ve nitel analitik yaklaşımları içeren karma yöntem araştırma tasarımını kullanmaktadır. Metodolojik çerçeve, çevresel sürdürülebilirlik göstergelerinin, demokratik yönetişim yapılarının ve bölgesel işbirliği örüntülerinin incelenmesini kapsamaktadır. Bu, NATO politika belgeleri, AB Genişleme Raporları ve ilgili haber ve raporların analizleri gibi kaynaklardan elde edilen nitel veri analizleriyle desteklenmektedir. Bulgular: Ampirik bulgular, NATO'nun sistematik çatışma çözüm mekanizmaları aracılığıyla Batı Balkanlar genelinde negatif barışın tesisinde kayda değer başarı elde ettiğini göstermektedir. Ancak çalışma, sürdürülebilir ve pozitif barış sonuçlarının elde edilmesi konusunda önemli sınırlılıklar ortaya koymaktadır. Araştırma, iklimle ilgili güvenlik tehditleri, kalıcı ekonomik eşitsizlikler ve bölge genelinde kötüleşen sosyal uyum dahil olmak üzere çağdaş çok boyutlu zorluklarla karşılaştığında NATO'nun geleneksel güvenlik mimarisinde önemli yetersizlikler ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuç: Çalışma, NATO'nun Batı Balkanlar'da kalıcı ve sürdürülebilir barışa ulaşmak için operasyonel yaklaşımını gözden geçirmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çerçevede, Galtung'un pozitif barış kuramsal perspektifi içinde faaliyet göstererek güvenlik gereksinimlerini kalkınma hedefleri ve çevresel değerlendirmelerle sistematik olarak bütünleştiren kapsamlı ve bölgeye özgü stratejilerin benimsenmesi kritik önem taşımaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• NATO
• Sürdürülebilir Barış
• Batı Balkanlar
• AB
• Sürdürülebilirlik
• Barış İnşası

Kaynakça

1. AKGÜN, S. (2012). "Current Situation in the Scope of Kosovo Reconstruction Process." Gazi Akademik Bakış, 5(10): 249-268.
2. ANASTASAKIS, O. and BOJICIC-DZELILOVIC, V. (2002). Balkan regional cooperation and European integration. The Hellenic Observatory: The European Institute, LSE.
3. Balkan Insight. (2024). BIRN Doc Lifts Lid on Russian Disinformation in Balkans. https://balkaninsight.com/2024/05/10/birn-doc-lifts-lid-on-russian-disinformation-in-balkans/ (Accessed October 28, 2025).
4. BELIS, C. A., DJATKOV, D., DOBRICIC, S., DE MEIJ, A., KOLAREVIĆ, S., ARIAS NAVARRO, C., ... & LETTIERI, T. (2024). Environment and Climate Status in the Western Balkans: 2024 Report, Publications Office of the European Union. Belgium. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/2x5uogn (Accessed May 5, 2025). COI: 20.500.12592/2x5uogn.
5. BELLONI, R. (2012). Hybrid peace governance: Its emergence and significance. Global Governance, 21-38.
6. BIEBER, F. (2006). Post-War Bosnia: Ethnicity, Inequality and Public Sector Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
7. CHANDLER, D. (2017). Peacebuilding: The twenty years' crisis, 1997-2017. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
8. COUSENS, E. M., & CATER, C. K. (2001). Peacebuilding as Politics: Cultivating Peace in Post-Conflict Societies. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

9. CSAKY, Z. (2024). Enlargement and the rule of law: Diverging realities. Enlargement and the rule of law: Diverging realities | Centre for European Reform. https://www.cer.eu/insights/enlargement-and-rule-law-diverging-realities (Accessed October 28, 2025).
10. ÇELIKKAN, O., & PROGONATI E. (2012). “NATO’s Balkan Adventure”. In M.S. Erol (Ed.), Hot Peace's Cold Organization: New NATO. Barış Kitapevi, Ankara.
11. DAALDER, I. H. (1998). Decision to Intervene: How the War in Bosnia Ended. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/decision-to-intervene-how-the-war-in-bosnia-ended/ (Accessed October 15, 2025).
12. DE CONING, C. (2016). From peacebuilding to sustaining peace: Implications of complexity for resilience and sustainability. Resilience, 4(3), 166-181.
13. ĐOKIĆ, K. (2019). Does NATO Facilitate Regional Defence and Security Cooperation in the Balkans?. Belgrade Centre for Security Policy, Belgrade.
14. DONAIS, T. (2009). Empowerment or imposition? Dilemmas of local ownership in post-conflict peacebuilding processes. Peace and Change, 34(1), 3-26.
15. DOYLE, M. W. (1986). Liberalism and world politics. American political science review, 80(4), 1151-1169.
16. DŽUVEROVIĆ, N. (2023). Balkan Peace Index 2022: Trends and Analysis. Journal of Regional Security, 18(2), 127-134.
17. DŽUVEROVIĆ, N., TEPŠIĆ, G., MILOŠEVIĆ, A., REČEVIĆ, T., VUKELIĆ, M., VOJVODIĆ, S., & VARDA M. (2024). The Balkan Peace Index 2023. MIND Project Publications. University of Belgrade – Faculty of Political Science.
18. DŽUVEROVIĆ, N., RADOVANOVIĆ, S., TEPŠIĆ, G., & KRIVOKAPIĆ, Đ. (2025). Balkan Peace Index decision EXpert model and data. Data in Brief, 58, 111181.
19. DŽUVEROVIĆ, N. (2025). Local turn in knowledge production about post-conflict societies: the case of the Balkan peace index. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 19(1), 44-65.
20. European Commission. (2024). Commission adopts 2024 Enlargement Package. Commission adopts 2024 Enlargement Package - Enlargement and Eastern Neighbourhood. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-adopts-2024-enlargement-package-2024-10-30_en (Accessed November 11, 2025).
21. European Commission. (2025a). Commission Staff Working Document Bosnia and Herzegovina 2025 Report Accompanying the Document Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2025 Communication on EU enlargement policy. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/5d8fc547-f8f8-456f-84e3-b38998acfafd_en?filename=bosnia-and-herzegovina-report-2025.pdf (Accessed November 7, 2025).
22. European Commission. (2025b). Commission Staff Working Document Albania 2025 Report Accompanying the Document Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2025 Communication on EU enlargement policy. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/fe9138b7-90fe-4277-a12c-3a03f6d1957f_en?filename=albania-report-2025.pdf (Accessed November 11, 2025).
23. European Commission. (2025c). Commission Staff Working Document Kosovo 2025 Report Accompanying the document Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2025 Communication on EU enlargement policy. 2025 Communication on EU enlargement policy. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/127563ea-4c03-44a4-b56c-2d569afd86a5_en?filename=kosovo-report-2025.pdf (Accessed November 11, 2025).
24. European Commission. (2025d). Commission Staff Working Document Montenegro 2025 Report Accompanying the document Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2025 Communication on EU enlargement policy. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/9ae69ea7-81d6-4d6a-a204-bd32a379d51d_en?filename=montenegro-report-2025.pdf (Accessed November 10, 2025).
25. European Commission. (2025e). Commission Staff Working Document North Macedonia 2025 Report Accompanying the document Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2025 Communication on EU enlargement policy. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/267b368e-6b55-4a42-bb72-6395593de4da_en?filename=north-macedonia-report-2025.pdf (Accessed November 10, 2025).
26. FIERKE, K. M., & WIENER, A. (1999). Constructing institutional interests: EU and NATO enlargement. Journal of European public policy, 6(5), 721-742.
27. FUNG, C. J., GEHRMANN, B., MADENYIKA, R. F., & TOWER, J. G. (2021). New Paths and Policies towards Conflict Prevention: Chinese and Swiss Perspectives. New York.: Taylor & Francis.
28. GALTUNG, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167-191.
29. GALTUNG, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291-305.
30. GALTUNG, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict development and civilization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. GALTUNG, J., & HÖIVIK, T. (1971). Structural violence, peace and future. Journal of Peace Research, 8(3/4), 213-228.
32. GHECIU, A. (2005). NATO in the New Europe: The Politics of International Socialization After the Cold War. Stanford University Press.
33. GOLA, G. (2023). Case Study: Western Balkans. Global State of Democracy 2023 Report, Global State of Democracy Initiative.
34. GRILLOT, S. R., CRUISE, R. J., & D'ERMAN, V. J. (2010). Developing security community in the Western Balkans: The role of the EU and NATO. International Politics, 47(1), 62-90.
35. GROPAS, R. (2004). Functional borders, sustainable security and EU-Balkan relations. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 4(1), 49-76.
36. GÜL, M. (2015). "From Establishment to 21st Century: Continuity and Transformation in NATO in the 1990s." Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 1(10): 247-265.
37. HADŽIKADUNIĆ, E. (2022). Peacebuilding Process in Bosnia And Herzegovina - The Initial Success That Has Been Reversed. In M. Mulalić, E. Topcu, & J. Muhasilović (Eds.), The Western Balkans Cooperation, Geopolitics and Economic Transitions and Relations. International University of Sarajevo. (pp. 72-86).
38. HEYWOOD, A. (2013). Global Politics. (Translated by N. Uslu, H. Özdemir). Adres Yayınları, Ankara.
39. IDE, T., BRUCH, C., CARIUS, A., CONCA, K., DABELKO, G. D., MATTHEW, R., & WEINTHAL, E. (2021). The past and future (s) of environmental peacebuilding. International Affairs, 97(1), 1-16.
40. IGNATIEFF, M. (2003). The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror. Princeton University Press.
41. IISS (The International Institute for Strategic Studies). (2024). The Armed Conflict Survey 2024. Routledge. Institute for Economics and Peace. (2023). Global Peace Index 2023: Measuring Peace in a Complex World. Sydney: IEP.
42. IZZI, V., ANGELOV, E., DAVIDOVIC, M. D., DJUKANOVIC, N., JOJKIC, I., DIKA, A. M., & PONI, M. (2021). Supporting the Western on Reconciliation: Building Capacity and Momentum for the Regional Youth Cooperation Office (Ryco).
43. KARABULUT, B. (2012). “Strategic Concepts and NATO’s Transformation”. In M.S. Erol (Ed.), Hot Peace’s Cold Organization: New NATO. Barış Kitapevi, Ankara.
44. KRAMPE, F., O’DRISCOLL, D., JOHNSON, M., SIMANGAN, D., HEGAZI, F., & DE CONING, C. (2024). Climate change and peacebuilding: sub-themes of an emerging research agenda. International Affairs, 100(3), 1111-1130.
45. KULKOVA, M. (2019). From negative to positive peace in western Balkans: A case for eclectic Theory. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, 13 (3): 26-47.
46. LIRËZA, L. (2023). The Impact of Environmental Issues to Security in the Balkans. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, 10(1), 36-41.
47. MAC GINTY, R. (2010). Hybrid peace: The interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace. Security dialogue, 41(4), 391-412.
48. MAC GINTY, R. (2025). The liberal peace is over and it is not coming back: hybridity and the emerging international peace system. Third World Quarterly, 1-20.
49. MULALIĆ, M., & KARIĆ, M. (2022). Cosmopolitanism, Global Risks, and Framing of the Western Balkans Relations. In M. Mulalić, E. Topcu, & J. Muhasilović (Eds.), The Western Balkans: Cooperation, Geopolitics and Economic Transitions and Relations. International University of Sarajevo.
50. NATO. (1991). The Alliance's New Strategic Concept (1991). https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_23847.htm (Accessed May 15, 2025).
51. NATO. (1994). Partnership for Peace Framework Document. Brussels: NATO.
52. NATO. (1999a). Strategic Concept. Washington D.C.: NATO. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_27433.htm (Accessed May 15, 2025).
53. NATO. (1999b). Membership Action Plan (MAP). Brussels: NATO.
54. NATO. (2001). Operation Essential Harvest and beyond. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_18568.htm?selectedLocale=en (Accessed May 16, 2025).
55. NATO. (2010). Strategic Concept for the Defence and Security of the Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Lisbon: NATO. https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_publications/20120214_strategic-concept-2010-eng.pdf (Accessed May 15, 2025).
56. NATO. (2022). Madrid Summit Declaration. Madrid: NATO.
57. NATO. (2024a). Enlargement and Article 10. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_49212.htm (Accessed May 5, 2025).
58. NATO. (2024b). Deep Dive Recap: The Balkans and the Gender Perspective. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_222406.htm?selectedLocale=en (Accessed May 7, 2025).
59. NATO. (2024c). Membership Action Plan (MAP). https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_37356.htm (Accessed May 5, 2025).
60. NATO. (2024d). Peace support operations in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1995-2004). https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_52122.htm (Accessed May 10, 2025).
61. NATO. (2025). NATO’s role in Kosovo. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_48818.htm (Accessed May 5, 2025).
62. PARIS, R. (2004). At war's end: building peace after civil conflict. Cambridge University Press.
63. PEJKOVIĆ, L., & LAZIĆ, N. (2024). Socio-Economic Development and Instability in the Western Balkans. Journal of Southeastern European Economy, 22(1), 50-75.
64. RICHMOND, O. P. (2006). The problem of peace: understanding the ‘liberal peace’. Conflict, security & development, 6(3), 291-314.
65. RISSO, L. (2022). A Forgotten Success: Operation Essential Harvest, 2001. The RUSI Journal, 166(6-7), 96-105.
66. SAMORUKOV, M. (2023). Surviving the War: Russia-Western Balkan Ties After the Invasion of Ukraine. https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2023/04/surviving-the-war-russia-western-balkan-ties-after-the-invasion-of-ukraine?lang=en (Accessed May 10, 2025).
67. SCHIMMELFENNIG, F., & SEDELMEIER, U. (2004). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European public policy, 11(4), 661-679.
68. SHARIFI, A., SIMANGAN, D., KANEKO, S., & VIRJI, H. (2021a). The sustainability-peace nexus: why is it important?. Sustainability Science, 16(4), 1073-1077.
69. SHARIFI, A., SIMANGAN, D., & KANEKO, S. (2021b). The literature landscape on peace-sustainability nexus: a scientometric analysis. Ambio, 50(3):661–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01388-8.
70. SIMANGAN, D., SHARIFI, A., & KANEKO, S. (2021). Positive peace pillars and sustainability dimensions: An analytical framework. International Studies Review, 23(4), 1884-1905.
71. SMITH, L. (1999). NATO's IFOR in Action Lessons from the Bosnian Peace Support Operations. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA394097.pdf (Accessed October 29, 2025).
72. SPERLING, J., & WEBBER, M. (2009). NATO: from Kosovo to Kabul. International Affairs, 85(3), 491-511.
73. STOJKOVSKI, L., & BRSAKOSKA BAZERKOSKA, J. (2024). Climate Change As a Security Issue in the Western Balkans. Contemporary Macedonian Defense/Sovremena Makedonska Odbrana, 24(46), 11-22.
74. STORCHI, L. (2021). Corruption and violation: suppression of press freedom and justice in the Western Balkans. https://www.eurac.edu/en/blogs/eureka/corruption-and-violation-suppression-of-press-freedom-and-justice-in-the-western (Accessed October 29, 2025).
75. SUNTER, D. (2020). Disinformation in the Western Balkans. NATO Review - Disinformation in the Western Balkans. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2020/12/21/disinformation-in-the-western-balkans/index.html (Accessed October 30, 2025).
76. TEPŠIĆ, G. (2024). The Balkan Peace Index 2023: Monitoring the Regional Peace. Journal of Regional Security, 19(1), 119-126.
77. United Nations. (2015). The challenge of sustaining peace, Report of the advisory group of experts for the 2015 review of the United Nations peacebuilding architecture. New York, NY: United Nations.
78. United Nations Development Programme. (2022). Human Development Report 2022. New York: UNDP.
79. United Nations Development Programme. (2023). Human Development Report 2023. New York: UNDP.
80. United Nations General Assembly. (2016). Review of the United Nations peacebuilding architecture (Resolution 70/262). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_262.pdf. (Accessed October 30, 2025).
81. United Nations Office on Drugs. (2024). World Drug Report 2024 (Set of 3 Booklets). Stylus Publishing, LLC.
82. U.S. Department of State. (1997). "NATO Involvement in Balkan Crisis." State Department Archives. https://1997-2001.state.gov/regions/eur/natobalk.html (Accessed May 30, 2025).
83. UVALIĆ, M. (2025). Challenges of economic development in the Western Balkans. https://revistaidees.cat/en/reptes-per-al-desenvolupament-economic-als-balcans-occidentals/ (Accessed May 29, 2025).
84. VACHUDOVA, M. A. (2014). EU leverage and national interests in the Balkans: The puzzles of enlargement ten years on. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 122-138.
85. WATKINS, A. (2007). NATO and the Balkans: The case for greater integration. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2007/04/01/nato-and-the-balkans-the-case-for-greater-integration/index.html (Accessed May 20, 2025).
86. WILLIAMS, P. D. (2013). Security Studies: An Introduction. Routledge.
87. WILSON, W. (1965). The Political Thought of Woodrow Wilson. Edited by E. David Cronon. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
88. World Bank Group. (2020). Air Quality Management in the Western Balkans. https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/eca/publication/air-quality-management-in-western-balkans (Accessed May 20, 2025).
89. World Bank Group. (2021). Going Green Means Cleaner Air, Healthier Living in the Western Balkans. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2021/05/17/going-green-means-cleaner-air-healthier-living-in-the-western-balkans (Accessed October 28, 2025).
90. World Bank. (2025). An Evaluation of the World Bank Group Strategy for Fragility, Conflict, and Violence 2020-2025 (Approach Paper). World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/42784 License: CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO." (Accessed May 20, 2025).
91. Yale Environmental Performance Index. (2024). Environmental Performance Index 2024 Report. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
92. YANNIS, A. (2001). Kosovo under international administration. Survival, 43(2), 31-48.
93. YAPICI, M. İ. (2007). “The Place of Military Intervention in International Law in Bosnia-Herzegovina”. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 2(8): 1-24.
94. YOUNES, B. (2024). The Role of International Actors in Sustainable Peacebuilding: A Critical Perspective. International Studies Review, 26(1), 1-15.