Yenilikçi Davranış Gösteren Çalışanların Örgütlerde Dijital Dönüşüm Sürecine Etkisinde Açık Liderliğin Düzenleyici Rolü

Öz

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, çalışanların yenilikçi davranışlarının örgütlerin dijital dönüşüm süreci üzerindeki etkisini incelemek ve bu etkide açık liderliğin düzenleyici rolünü analiz etmektir. Günümüz iş dünyasında dijital dönüşüm, yalnızca teknolojik bir değişim değil; aynı zamanda bireylerin ve liderlik yaklaşımlarının dönüşümüdür. Bu bağlamda çalışmada, açık liderlik anlayışının dijitalleşme süreçlerindeki yönlendirici gücü değerlendirilmektedir. Yöntem: Araştırma verileri, Kayseri ilindeki üniversitelerde görev yapan akademik ve idari personelden elektronik anket yoluyla toplanmıştır. Analizler 365 geçerli anket üzerinden gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yenilikçi Davranış, Dijital Dönüşüm ve Açık Liderlik değişkenleri için daha önce geliştirilmiş güvenilir ölçekler kullanılmıştır. Veriler, basit regresyon ve Hayes (2018) PROCESS makrosu ile düzenleyici etki analizleri kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Analiz sonuçlarına göre, çalışanların yenilikçi davranışlarının dijital dönüşüm üzerinde pozitif ve anlamlı bir etkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ancak, açık liderliğin bu ilişki üzerinde düzenleyici bir etkisinin bulunmadığı görülmüştür. Elde edilen bulgular, açık liderliğin yenilikçi davranış ile dijital dönüşüm arasındaki etkileşimi anlamlı biçimde yönlendirmediğini ortaya koymuştur. Sonuçlar: Yenilikçi bireysel davranışlar dijital dönüşüm süreçlerinde önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Ancak bu etkinin açık liderlik aracılığıyla güçlenmediği bulgusu, liderlik tarzlarının etkililiğinin bağlamsal faktörlere bağlı olabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yenilikçi Davranış
• Dijital Dönüşüm
• Açık Liderlik
• Akademik Personel
• İdari Personel

The Moderating Role of Open Leadership in the Effect of Employees Showing Innovative Behavior on the Digital Transformation Process in Organizations

Öz

Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to examine the effect of employees' innovative behavior on the digital transformation process of organizations and to analyze the moderating role of open leadership in this relationship. In today’s business world, digital transformation is not only a technological shift but also a transformation of individuals and leadership approaches. In this context, the guiding power of open leadership during digitalization processes is evaluated. Methods: The research data were collected via an online survey from academic and administrative staff working at universities in Kayseri, Turkey. A total of 365 valid responses were analyzed. Previously validated and reliable scales were used to measure Innovative Behavior, Digital Transformation, and Open Leadership. Data were analyzed using simple regression and moderation analysis with Hayes’ (2018) PROCESS macro. Findings: The results revealed that employees' innovative behavior has a positive and significant effect on digital transformation. However, open leadership did not have a statistically significant moderating effect on this relationship. The findings revealed that open leadership did not significantly shape the interaction between innovative behavior and digital transformation. Conclusion: Individual innovative behaviors play a crucial role in digital transformation processes. However, the finding that this effect is not strengthened through open leadership suggests that the effectiveness of leadership styles may vary depending on contextual factors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Innovative Behavior
• Digital Transformation
• Open Leadership
• Academic Staff
• Administrative Staff

Kaynakça

1. AFSAR, B. and MASOOD, M., (2017), Transformational leadership, creative self-efficacy, trust in supervisor, uncertainty avoidance, and innovative work behavior of nurses, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54(1), 36-61, doi:10.1177/0021886317711891.
2. ALDOSERİ, A., AL-KHALIFA, K., & HAMOUDA, A. (2024). AI-Powered Innovation in Digital Transformation: Key Pillars and Industry Impact. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051790
3. AMABILE, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
4. ANTONOPOULOU, K., BEGKOS, C., & ZHU, Z. (2023). Staying afloat amidst extreme uncertainty: A case study of digital transformation in Higher Education. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
5. ASLAN N. (2025) Eğitimde dijital dönüşüm: Dijital ekosistem kullanımının öğretmenlerin dijital yeterliliklerine ilişkin bir karma yöntem araştırması, Doktora Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı, İstanbul
6. BAGHERI, A. & AKBARI, M., (2017), The impact of entrepreneurial leadership on nurses’ innovation behavior, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 50(1), 28-35, doi:10.1111/jnu.12354.
7. BENNIS, W., & NANUS, B. (2007). Leaders: Strategies for taking charge. HarperBusiness.
8. BERMAN, S. J., BOWMAN, C., & WEST, J. (2019). Digital Renaissance: What Data and Economics Tell Us about the Future of Popular Culture. MIT Press.

9. BISRI, A., PUTRI, A., & ROSMANSYAH, Y. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review on Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Revealing Key Success Factors. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., 18, 164-187.
10. BOLDEN, R., PETROV, G., & GOSLING, J. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education: Rhetoric and reality. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(2), 257–277.
11. BOND, M., MARÍN, V. I., DOLCH, C., BEDENLIER, S., & ZAWACKI-RICHTER, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 15(1), 1-20.
12. CORTELLAZZO, L., BRUNI, E., & ZAMPIERI, R. (2019). The role of leadership in a digitalized world: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1938. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938
13. ÇALIŞKAN, A. (2011). Gelişim kültürü ve lider desteğinin yenilikçi davranış ve iş performansına etkisi: İş-aile çatışmasının aracılık rolü. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 13(4), 83-114.
14. CUNHA, M., CHUCHU, T., & MAZIRIRI, E. (2020). Threats, Challenges, And Opportunities for Open Universities and Massive Online Open Courses in The Digital Revolution. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., 15, 191-204.
15. DAHISTRÖM, P., DESMET, D., & SINGER, M. (2017, Şubat 22). McKinsey Digital, The seven decisions that matter in a digital transformation: A CEO’s guide to reinvantion.
16. DE JONG, J. J. (2004). How can leaders trigger bottom-up innovation?. An Empirical Research into Knowledge-intensive Services: Scientific Analysis
17. DECI, E. L., & RYAN, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
18. DERİCİ, S. (2023). Dijital Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi ve Büyük Veri. Akademisyen Kitabevi.
19. DEWEY, B. I. (2019). Open leadership for a vibrant future. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 19(3), 359-364.
20. DOĞAN, N. Ö., & DERİCİ, S. (2025). Historical Evolution of Supply Chain Management in The VUCA Age: Sustainable, LARG and Digital Supply Chain Managements. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 24(1), 273-293.
21. DYER, J. H., GREGERSEN, H. B., & CHRISTENSEN, C. M. (2011). The innovator's DNA: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
22. EBERT C., & DUARTE, C. H. C. (2018). Digital transformation. Software Technology, 35(4), 16-21.
23. EL SAWY, O. A., KRÆMMERGAARD, P., AMSINCK, H., & VINTHER, A. L. (2020). How LEGO built the foundations and enterprise capabilities for digital leadership. In Strategic information management (pp. 174-201). Routledge.
24. ELDEN B. (2024) İşletmelerde Dijitalleşme Sürecinde Dijital Liderliğin Önemi, Yönetım Ve Organızasyon Alanında Uluslararası Araştırma ve Değerlendirmeler, Süreven Yayınevi
25. EYİTMİŞ, A. M. & YILDIRIM, A. (2022). Sağlık çalışanlarının çalışma yaşam kalitesinin covid-19’a bağlı hastalık kaygısı, iş stresi ve iş tatmini çerçevesinde incelenmesi: alternatif model analizleri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 13(35), 714-730. https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.1011440
26. GEBERT D, BOERNER S & KEARNEY E (2006) Cross Functionality And Innovation In New Product Development Teams: A Dilemmatic Structure And Its Consequences For The Management Of Diversity. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 15:431–458
27. GÜRBÜZ, S. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde aracı, düzenleyici ve durumsal etki analizleri, (2.baskı), Seçkin Yayıncılık.
28. HAMEL, G. (2006). The Why, What and How ot Management Innovation. Harvard Business Review (Fehruary): 72-84.
29. HASHIM, M., TLEMSANI, I., & MATTHEWS, R. (2022). A sustainable University: Digital Transformation and Beyond. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 8961 - 8996.
30. HÉNARD, F., & ROSEVEARE, D. (2012). Fostering quality teaching in higher education: Policies and practices. An IMHE guide for higher education institutions, 1(1), 7-11.
31. HSU, M., & CHEN, F. (2017). The Cross‐Level Mediating Effect of Psychological Capital on the Organizational Innovation Climate–Employee Innovative Behavior Relationship. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51, 128-139.
32. HURT, H. T., JOSEPH, K., & COOK, C. D. (1977). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58-65.
33. IBARRA-CISNEROS, M., REYNA, J., & HERNÁNDEZ-PERLINES, F. (2023). Interaction between knowledge management, intellectual capital and innovation in higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 9685-9708.
34. IQBAL, A., LATIF, K.F. & AHMAD, M.S., (2020), Servant leadership and employee innovative behaviour: exploring psychological pathways, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 41(6), 813-827, doi: 10.1108/LODJ-11-2019-0474.
35. JANSSEN, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
36. JIN, H., SU, Y., WANG, Z., & ZHOU, X. (2025). Cross-level influence mechanisms of digital transformation on employee innovation behaviour from a multidimensional capital perspective. Management Decision.
37. JIN, X., QING, C., & JIN, S. (2022). Ethical leadership and innovative behavior: Mediating role of voice behavior and moderated mediation role of psychological safety. Sustainability, 14(9), 5125.
38. KANE, G. C., PALMER, D., PHILLIPS, A. N., KIRON, D., & BUCKLEY, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press.
39. KANTER. R, (1988). Wben a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw ve L. L. Cummings (Eds,), Research in organizational behavior, vol 10: 169-211. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
40. KHIN, S., & HO, T. C. F. (2019). Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2018-0083
41. KIRTON, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of applied psychology, 61(5), 622.
42. KRAUS, S., JONES, P., KAILER, N., WEINMANN, A., CHAPARRO‐BANEGAS, N., & ROIG-TIERNO, N. (2021). Digital Transformation: An Overview of the Current State of the Art of Research. SAGE Open, 11.
43. KRAUSE, D. E. (2004), „Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors: An empirical investigation”, Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 79-102.
44. KUMARI, R., KWON, K., LEE, B., & CHOI, K. (2019). Co-Creation for Social Innovation in the Ecosystem Context: The Role of Higher Educational Institutions. Sustainability, 12, 307.
45. LEE, E., & JUNG, Y. (2024). Linking innovation climate to innovative behavior in public organizations: Exploring the role of psychological needs. International Public Management Journal.
46. LI, C. (2010). Open leadership: How social technology can transform the way you lead (1st Edition) USA, San Francisco: Press by A Wiley Imprint.
47. LOU, Y., HONG, A., & LI, Y. (2024). Assessing the Role of HRM and HRD in Enhancing Sustainable Job Performance and Innovative Work Behaviors through Digital Transformation in ICT Companies. Sustainability.
48. LUKES, M. & STEPHEN, U. (2017). Measuring employee innovation: A review of existing scales and the development of the ınnovative behavior and ınnovation support ınventories across cultures. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 23(1), 136-158.
49. MACKINNON, D. P., LOCKWOOD, C. M. & WILLIAMS, J. (2004). Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
50. MARETTO, L.,FACCIO M., BATTINI, D. (2022). A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model Based on Fuzzy Logic and AHP for the Selection of Digital Technologies, IFACPapersOnline, 55(2),319-324.
51. ISMAIL, M. H., KHATER, M., & ZAKI, M. (2017). Digital business transformation and strategy: What do we know so far. Cambridge Service Alliance, 10(1), 1-35.
52. MEDHESAP (2024) https://www.medhesap.com/orneklem-boyutu-hesaplama/
53. MAHRAZ, M. I., BENABBOU, L., & BERRADO, A. (2019, October). A systematic literature review of digital transformation. In Proceedings of the international conference on industrial engineering and operations management (pp. 917-931). Southfield, MI, USA: IEOM Society.
54. NADEEM, A., ABEDIN, B., CERPA, N. & CHEW, E. (2018). Editorial: Digital Transformation & Digital Business Strategy in Electronic Commerce-The Role of Organizational Capabilities, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 13(2), 1-8.
55. NADKARNI, S. & PRÜGL, R. (2020). Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 1-109.
56. NAMBISAN, S., WRIGHT, M., & FELDMAN, M. (2017). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 46(3), 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.003
57. OSTERLOH, M. & FREY, B. (2000), Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms, Organization Science, 11, s. 538-550.
58. PALA, O., VE TURAN, N. (2020). Yenilikçi Davranış Ölçeğinin (YDÖ) Türkiye’ye uyarlama çalışması. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(3), 65-80.
59. PEARCE, C., WOOD, B., & WASSENAAR, C. (2018). The Future of Leadership in Public Universities: Is Shared Leadership the Answer?. Public Administration Review, 78, 640-644.
60. POLAT, M., & ARABACI, I. B. (2016). Açık Liderlik Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi. Kastamonu Education Journal, 24(1), 79-96.
61. SALMI, J. (2017). The tertiary education imperative: Knowledge, skills and values for development. Springer.
62. SANTOSO, N., SULISTYANINGTYAS, I., & PRATAMA, B. (2022). Transformational Leadership During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Strengthening Employee Engagement Through Internal Communication. The Journal of Communication Inquiry.
63. SARIKÖSE S, TÜRKMEN E., (2020), The relationship between demographic and occupational variables, transformational leadership perceptions and individual innovativeness in nurse, Journal of Nursing Management, 28(5), 1126-1133, doi: 10.1111/jonm.13060.
64. SASTRY, M. A. (1999), Managing Strategic Innovation and Change, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44:2, s. 420-422.
65. SCHWAB, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Portfolio. Penguin. Geneva, Switzerland: Crown Publishing Group, 184, 12-15.
66. SCOTT, SG & BRUCE, RA (1994). Yenilikçi davranışın belirleyicileri: İşyerinde bireysel inovasyonun bir yol modeli. Yönetim Akademisi dergisi , 37 (3), 580-607.
67. SEÇKİN, Ş. N. (2021). İşyeri nezaketsizliğinin geri çekilme davranışlarına etkisi: tükenmişliğin aracı, kişisel adil dünya inancının düzenleyici rolü, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 28(2), 421-439.
68. SHOEMAKER, A. (2023). Communication and Leadership. Standardization: Journal of Research and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.58831/2831-7920-2.1.2
69. SIBASSAHA, J., PEA-ASSOUNGA, J., & BAMBI, P. (2025). Influence of digital transformation on employee innovative behavior: roles of challenging appraisal, organizational culture support, and transformational leadership style. Frontiers in Psychology, 16.
70. SÖNMEZ, B., ISPİR, O., ONAL, M. AND EMİRALİOGLU, R., (2019), Turkish psychometric properties of the innovative behavior inventory and innovation support inventory: a model analysis on nurses, Nursing Forum, 54(2), 254-262, doi: 10.1111/nuf.12325.
71. TAGGAR, S. (2002). A Multi-Level Model Of Creativity In Intact Workgroups. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 315-331.
72. SAĞLAM, M. (2021). İşletmelerde Geleceğin Vizyonu Olarak Dijital Dönüşümün Gerçekleştirilmesi ve Dijital Dönüşüm Ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlaması. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(40), 395-420. doi: 10.46928/iticusbe.764373
73. SCHWARZMÜLLER, T., BROSI, P., DUMAN, D., & WELPE, I. M. (2018). How does the digital transformation affect organizations? Key themes of change in work design and leadership. Management Revue, 29(2), 114-138.
74. TAŞKIRAN, E. (2024). Dijital liderliğin otel çalışanlarının yenilikçi iş davranışı üzerindeki etkisi: Değişime direncin düzenleyici rolü. Akademik Hassasiyetler, 11(26), 318-346.
75. THURLINGS, M., EVERS, A. T., & VERMEULEN, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ ınnovative behavior: a literature review.Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430-471. doi: 10.3102/00346543145579
76. TURAN, A. (2019). Dijitalleşme Çağında İnsan-Nesnelerin İnterneti Entegrasyonu
77. VAN DE VEN, A. (1986). Central Problems in The Management Of Innovation, Management Science, 32, 590-607.
78. VEENENDAAL, A., & BONDAROUK, T. (2015). Perceptions of HRM and their effect on dimensions of innovative work behaviour: Evidence from a manufacturing firm. Management Revu, 26(2), 138–160.
79. VERHOEF, P., BROEKHUIZEN, T., BART, Y., BHATTACHARYA, A., DONG, J., FABIAN, N., & HAENLEIN, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research.
80. VIAL, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
81. WANG, Y., YANG, Y. H., WANG, Y., SU, D., LI, S.W., ZHANG, T. and LI, H., 2019, The Mediating Role of Inclusive Leadership: Work Engagement and Innovative Behaviour Among Chinese Head Nurses, Journal of Nursing Management, 27(4), 688-696, doi:10.1111/jonm.12754
82. WOODMAN, R. W., SAWYER, J. E., & GRIFFIN, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of management review, 18(2), 293-321.
83. YENGİN, D., BAYRAK, T., & BAYINDIR, B. (2022). Dijital Dönüşüm-Kitlesel Yok Oluş Çağında Hayatta Kalmak ve Başarılı Olmak.
84. YOU, Y., HU, Z., LI, J., WANG, Y., & XU, M. (2022). The Effect of Organizational Innovation Climate on Employee Innovative Behavior: The Role of Psychological Ownership and Task Interdependence. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
85. YUKL, G. (2002), Leadership in Organizations, Nj: Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River.
86. YUKL, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
87. ZAINAL, H., S., IBRAHIM, S., & ABDULLAH, H. (2023). Cultivating Open Science: a quantitative exploration of leadership practices in Malaysian academic libraries. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science.
88. ZHANG, X., & BARTOL, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
89. ZHU, W., LIAO, Z., YAM, K. C., & JOHNSON, R. E. (2018). Shared leadership: A state-of-the-art review and future research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(7), 834–852. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2296