Z Kuşağı Boş Zamanını Nasıl Değerlendiriyor?: Neulinger’in Boş Zaman Teorisi'ne Odak Grup Görüşmesi ile Güncel Bir Bakış

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, Z kuşağı bireylerinin boş zaman etkinliklerine yönelik yaklaşımlarını derinlemesine incelemeyi ve bu süreçte etkili olan belirleyici içsel motivasyon faktörlerini ortaya koyarken, Neulinger’in boş zaman teorisi çerçevesinde güncel bir perspektif sunarak alana katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Yöntem: Araştırmada nitel araştırma yaklaşımı benimsenmiş ve veri toplama yöntemi olarak odak grup görüşmesi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında, 12 kişilik üniversite öğrencisinden oluşan katılımcı grubu ile gerçekleştirilen görüşmelerden elde edilen veriler, içerik analizi yöntemiyle sistematik olarak çözümlenmiştir.

Bulgular: Analiz sonucunda, Z kuşağı bireylerinin boş zaman aktivitelerine ilişkin eğilimleri ile bu eğilimleri şekillendiren içsel motivasyon unsurları ortaya konmuştur. Katılımcıların boş zaman aktiviteleri, “fiziksel ve zihinsel rahatlama”, “sosyal etkileşim” ve “kişisel gelişim” olmak üzere üç ana tema altında sınıflandırılmıştır. Bulgular, katılımcıların etkinlik tercihlerini büyük ölçüde içsel motivasyona dayalı olarak gerçekleştirdiklerini; bu süreçte zihinsel üretkenlik, sosyal bağların güçlenmesi ve yeni bilgiler edinme gibi kazanımların öne çıktığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca spor ve doğa temelli etkinliklerin disiplin ve liderlik becerileri kazandırması; kültürel ve sanatsal etkinliklerin ise yaratıcılık, araştırma eğilimi ve kendini ifade etme fırsatı sunması, çalışmanın dikkat çekici bulguları arasında yer almaktadır.

Sonuç: Araştırma sonucunda, Z kuşağı bireylerinin boş zaman alışkanlıkları anlaşılmış ve turizm, rekreasyon, eğitim ile yerel yönetim gibi çeşitli alanlarda gençlere yönelik strateji geliştirilmesine teorik ve pratik bir zemin oluşturulmasına katkı sağlanmıştır. Ayrıca araştırma, ilgili literatüre özgün bir bakış açısı sunarak, gelecekte yapılacak çalışmalara teorik ve pratik katkılar sağlamayı hedeflemektedir. Dolayısıyla, araştırma sonuçları, Z kuşağı bireylerinin boş zaman yaklaşımlarının Neulinger’in teorisinde vurguladığı içsel motivasyon ve özgür seçim temelindeki saf boş zaman kavramı ile önemli ölçüde örtüştüğünü göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Z Kuşağı
• Boş Zaman Teorisi
• İçsel Motivasyon
• Neulinger
• Odak Grup Görüşmesi

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmada kullanılan odak grup görüşme tekniği için Kırklareli Üniversitesi Etik Kurulu’ndan 28.04.2025 tarihli toplantısında E-35523585-199-158691 sıra sayılı kararı ile izin alınmıştır. Aksi bir durumun tespiti halinde İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi’nin hiçbir sorumluluğu olmayıp, tüm sorumluluk çalışmanın yazar (lar) ına aittir.

How Does Generation Z Spend Their Leisure Time?: A Contemporary Perspective on Neulinger’s Leisure Theory Through Focus Group Interviews

Öz

Purpose: This study aims to examine in depth the leisure activity approaches of Generation Z individuals and to identify the key intrinsic motivational factors influencing these approaches, while providing a contemporary perspective within the framework of Neulinger’s leisure theory to contribute to the field.

Method: A qualitative research approach was adopted, and data were collected through a focus group interview. The study involved a participant group consisting of 12 university students, and the data obtained from these interviews were systematically analyzed using the content analysis method.

Findings: As a result of the analysis, the leisure activity tendencies of Generation Z individuals and the intrinsic motivational factors shaping these tendencies were revealed. Participants’ leisure activities were classified under three main themes: physical and mental relaxation, social interaction, and personal development. The findings indicate that participants largely engage in leisure activities based on intrinsic motivation, with outcomes such as mental productivity, strengthened social bonds, and the acquisition of new knowledge coming to the fore. Furthermore, it is a noteworthy finding of the study that sports- and nature-based activities contribute to discipline and leadership skills, while cultural and artistic activities provide opportunities for creativity, research orientation, and self-expression.

Conclusion: As a result of the study, the leisure habits of Generation Z individuals were better understood, contributing to the development of theoretical and practical foundations for strategies targeting young people in various fields such as tourism, recreation, education, and local governance. Moreover, the study offers a novel perspective to the relevant literature, aiming to provide theoretical and practical contributions for future research. Consequently, the findings indicate that Generation Z individuals’ approaches to leisure significantly align with the concept of pure leisure based on intrinsic motivation and free choice, as emphasized in Neulinger’s theory.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Generation Z
• Leisure Theory
• Intrinsic Motivation
• Neulinger
• Focus Group Interviews

Kaynakça

1. ALDABBAS, H., PINNINGTON, A., LAHRECH, A., & BLAIQUE, L. (2025). Extrinsic Rewards for Employee Creativity? The role of Perceived Organisational Support, Work Engagement and Intrinsic Motivation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 17(2), 237-260.
2. BARHATE, B., & DIRANI, K. M. (2021). Career Aspirations of Generation Z: A Systematic Literature Review. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(1/2), 139-157.
3. CHALA, N., POPLAVSKA, O., DANYLEVYCH, N., IEVSEITSEVA, O., & SOVA, R. (2022). Intrinsic Motivation of Millennials and Generation Z in the New Post-Pandemic Reality. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 536-550.
4. CHEN, C. H., & CHANG, C. L. (2024). Effectiveness of AI-assisted Game-based Learning on Science Learning Outcomes, Intrinsic Motivation, Cognitive Load, and Learning Behavior. Education and Information Technologies, 29(14), 18621-18642.
5. COŞKUN, G., & DİLMAÇ, E. (2024). Leisure Behavior through the Life Span: Leisure Constraints, Motivation, and Self-Efficacy among Gen Z and Millennials. Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure, 1-29.
6. COŞKUN, G. (2023). Leisure Constraints among Turkish Families: a Multi-Level Approach. Leisure/Loisir, 48(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2023.2211586
7. CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M., & LARSON, R. (2014). Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology 10, 978-94.
8. CZIKSENTMIHALYI, M. (1990). Flow–the Psychology of Optimal Experience. 1990.

9. DILLARD, J. E., & BATES, D. L. (2011). Leisure Motivation Revisited: Why People Recreate. Managing Leisure, 16(4), 253-268.
10. DJAFAROVA, E., & BOWES, T. (2021). ‘Instagram Made Me Buy It’: Generation Z Impulse Purchases In Fashion Industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102345.
11. ĐURANOVİĆ, M. (2024). Leisure Activities of Young People as a Predictor of Life Satisfaction. International Journal of Instruction, 17(3), 475-490.
12. ERDEM, D. (2024a). “Boş Zaman ve Teknoloji”. Boş Zaman Hakkında (Tarihsel Gelişim, Kavramlar ve İlişkiler) Ed. Kutluk Bozkurt, A., Erdem, D. (Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 2024), 1-258.
13. ERDEM, D. (2024b). Z Kuşağını Instagram Platformunda Rekreatif Amaçlı Akışa Yönelten Motivasyon Kaynakları Mutluluk-Bağımlılık İkilemi. Yayınlanmış Doktora Tezi. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi. Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü.
14. ERDEM, D., ve YAYLI, A. (2022). Rekreasyon Bağlamında Csikszentmihalyi’nin Akış Teorisine Kuramsal Bir Bakış. Journal of Recreation and Tourism Research, 9(4).
15. FUSCH, P., FUSCH, G. E., HALL, J. A., WALKER, N. A., & BOOKER, J. M. (2022). How to Conduct A Focus Group Interview: Tips, Strategies, and Examples for Novice Researchers. Education For Information, 38(2), 171-187.
16. GRAEF, R., CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M., & MCMANAMA GIANINNO, S. (1983). Measuring Intrinsic Motivation in Everyday Life. Leisure Studies, 2(2), 155-168.
17. GRIBANOVA, S. (2024). What Motivates The Creativity of Generation Z Employees? The Influence of Extrinsic And Incristic Motivating Factors on The Example of IT Specialists From EU Countries. In Environment. Technologies. Resources. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. 2, 380-386.
18. GREENE, D., & LEPPER, M. R. (1974). Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Children's Subsequent Intrinsic Interest. Child Development, 1141-1145.
19. KAMENIDOU, I., STAVRIANEA, A., & BARA, E. Z. (2020). Generational Differences Toward Organic Food Behavior: Insights From Five Generational Cohorts. Sustainability, 12(6), 2299.
20. KELLER, J., & BLESS, H. (2008). Flow and Regulatory Compatibility: An Experimental Approach to The Flow Model of Intrinsic Motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 196-209.
21. KITZINGER, J. (1995). Qualitative Research: Introducing Focus Groups. Bmj, 311(7000), 299-302.
22. KRUEGER, R. A., CASEY, M. A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Sage Publications.
23. KWON, M., & SONDAY, L. (2024). The Moralization of Intrinsic Motivation: Opportunities and Perils. Academy of Management Review, doi.org/10.5465/amr.2021.0467.
24. LI, L., HEW, K. F., & DU, J. (2024). Gamification Enhances Student Intrinsic Motivation, Perceptions of Autonomy and Relatedness, but Minimal Impact on Competency: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(2), 765-796.
25. HAMAMA, L., & ITZHAKI, M. (2023). Coping with Fibromyalgia-a Focus Group Study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 18(1), 2204622.
26. HAMMOURI, Q., NUSAIRAT, N. M., ALSOKKAR, A. A., JDAITAWI, A. M., MISTARIHI, A. M., AKHUIRSHAIDEH, D. A. A., & ALFRAIHAT, S. F. (2025). Engaging Gen Z through Personalized Social Media Content: The Mediating Role of Perceived Relevance on Platform Engagement. Data and MetaData 4-918.
27. HEKTNER, J. M., & CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. (1996). A Longitudinal Exploration of Flow and Intrinsic Motivation in Adolescents. American Educational Research Association. April, Amerika.
28. HULL, C. L. (1945). Principles of Behavior. 396.
29. HULTSMAN, J. T., & BLACK, D. R. (1989). Primary Meta-Analysis in Leisure Research: Results for Neulinger's “What Am I Doing?” Instrument. Journal of Leisure Research, 21(1), 18-31.
30. İSKENDER, A. (2017). Neulinger Boş Zaman Paradigması ve Boş Zaman Katılım Motivasyonları Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(3), 819-825.
31. ISO-AHOLA, S. E., & BAUMEISTER, R. F. (2023). Leisure and Meaning in Life. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1074649.
32. MAHMOUD, A. B., FUXMAN, L., MOHR, I., REISEL, W. D., & GRIGORIOU, N. (2021). “We aren't your Reincarnation!” Workplace Motivation Across X, Y and Z Generations. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 193-209.
33. MANTHA, M. S., & KRISHNA, P. V. (2024). A Literature Review of Learning Preferences, Motivational Factors and Training Needs Among Different Generations of Baby Boomers, Gen x, Gen y and Gen z Students and Professionals. Education and Society, 48(1), 53-64.
34. MENDOZA, N. B., YAN, Z., & KING, R. B. (2023). Supporting Students’ Intrinsic Motivation for Online Learning Tasks: The Effect of Need-Supportive Task Instructions On Motivation, Self-Assessment, And Task Performance. Computers & Education, 193, 104663.
35. MIRÓ-LLINARES, F. (2025). Crime Opportunities, Lockdowns, and Online Video Games: The Digital Leisure Hypothesis (and More on the Impact of Digitalization on Crime Trends). In Understanding Crime Trends in a Hybrid Society: The Digital Drift (pp. 77-99). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
36. MORGAN, D. L. (1996). Focus Groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 129-152.
37. MORRIS, L. S., GREHL, M. M., Rutter, S. B., Mehta, M., & Westwater, M. L.. On What Motivates Us: A Detailed Review Of Intrinsic V. Extrinsic Motivation. Psychological Medicine, 52(10), 1801-1816.
38. NEULINGER, J., & BREIT, M. (1969). Attitude Dimensions of Leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 1(3), 255-261.
39. NEULINGER, J. (1981). To leisure: An introduction. Boston Allyn & Bacort.
40. NEULINGER, J. (1982). Leisure Lack and the Quality of Life: The Broadening Scope of the Leisure Professional. Leisure Studies, 1(1), 53-63.
41. NEULINGER, J. (1986). What am 1 doing? The WAID.
42. OSÓCH, B., MACIEJEWSKA, K., & DMYTRÓW, K. (2025). Leisure Activity Patterns of an Academic Environmental Group of Szczecin University Students—An Interdepartmental Analysis. Sustainability, 17(3), 1218.
43. POLIANDRI, D., PERAZZOLO, M., PILLERA, G. C., & GIAMPIETRO, L. (2023). Dematerialized Participation Challenges: Methods and Practices for Online Focus Groups. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1145264.
44. POWELL, R. A., & SINGLE, H. M. (1996). Focus Groups. International Journal for Quality In Health Care, 8(5), 499-504.
45. RANA, M. Q., FAHIM, S., SAAD, M., LEE, A., OLADINRIN, O. T., & OJO, L. D. (2024). Exploring the Underlying Barriers for the Successful Transition for Women from Higher Education to Employment in Egypt: A Focus Group Study. Social Sciences, 13(4), 195.
46. RAGUŽ, N. (2023). Impact of Feedback on Intrinsic Motivation and Persistence in Generation Z (Doctoral dissertation, RIT Croatia).
47. RAZ-YUROVICH, L. (2022). Leisure: Definitions, Trends and Policy Implications. Population Research and Policy Review, 41(3), 981-1019.
48. REISS, S. (2004). Multifaceted Nature of Intrinsic Motivation: The Theory of 16 Basic Desires. Review of General Psychology, 8(3), 179-193.
49. ROALD, G. M., SCHRUIJER, S., & NEERGÅRD, G. B. (2024). The Researcher’s Facilitating Role in Stimulating a Constructive Group Climate in Online Focus-Group Interviews. Qualitative Inquiry, 10778004241260656
50. RYAN, R. M., & DECI, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
51. SEYFI, S., HALL, C. M., VO-THANH, T., & ZAMAN, M. (2023). How Does Digital Media Engagement Influence Sustainability-Driven Political Consumerism among Gen Z Tourists? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(11), 2441-2459
52. SURUGIU, C., SURUGIU, M. R., GRĂDINARU, C., & GRIGORE, A. M. (2025). Factors Motivating Generation Z in the Workplace: Managerial Challenges and Insights. Administrative Sciences, 15(1), 29.
53. SUSANTO, P. C., YUNTINA, L., SARIBANON, E., SOEHADITAMA, J. P., & LIANA, E. (2024). Qualitative Method Concepts: Literature Review, Focus Group Discussion, Ethnography and Grounded Theory. Siber Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary, 2(2), 262-275.
54. URICK, M. J., HOLLENSBE, E. C., MASTERSON, S. S., & LYONS, S. T. (2017). Understanding and Managing Intergenerational Conflict: an Examination of Influences and Strategies. Work, Aging and Retirement, 3(2), 166-185.
55. THANGAVEL, P., PATHAK, P., & CHANDRA, B. (2022). Consumer Decision-Making Style of Gen Z: A Generational Cohort Analysis. Global Business Review, 23(3), 710- 728.
56. VOLK, S. C., SCHULZ, A., BLASSNIG, S., MARSCHLICH, S., NGUYEN, M. H., & STRAUß, N. (2025). Selecting, Avoiding, Disconnecting: A Focus Group Study of People’s Strategies for Dealing with Information Abundance in the Contexts of News, Entertainment, and Personal Communication. Information, Communication & Society, 28(1), 21-40.
57. YULIANTI, T., & SULISTYAWATI, A. (2021). Enhancing Public Speaking Ability Through Focus Group Discussion. JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran), 5(2), 287-295.
58. XU, Y. (2024). Into the Wild: Sailing Through Leisure Hybridity and Self-Other Interculturality Upon an Ocean-Crossing Tall Ship. World Leisure Journal, 66 (1), 26-48.
59. WANKA, F., VOGEL, M., GRAFE, N., AßMANN, M., KIESS, W., & POULAIN, T. (2025). Leisure Activities of Adolescents—Associations with Demographic Characteristics, Well-Being and Parental Leisure Engagement. Pediatric Research, 1-9.
60. WILLEMSEN, R. F., AARDOOM, J. J., CHAVANNES, N. H., & VERSLUIS, A. (2023). Online Synchronous Focus Group Interviews: Practical Considerations. Qualitative Research, 23(6), 1810-1820.