European Union Democracy Promotion via Conditionality in Regional Context

Öz

International organisations are among the key external actors promoting democratisation process of nation states. The tools international organisations utilise to externally impact on political transformations at the domestic level are centred on their democratic norms, rules and values. In that respect, the European Union (EU) has been acknowledged as primary democracy promoter within its region, attributable to its effective influence mechanisms based on democratic conditionality. This paper aims to analyse the formation of the characteristics of the EU as a democracy promoter and intends to unveil its contributions to the spread of democracy within its regional sphere, and democratisation processes particularly in Southern, Central and Eastern Europe.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• International Organisations,European Union,Democracy Promotion,Conditionality,Democratisation

Bölgesel Düzeyde Koşulluluk Üzerinden Avrupa Birliği’nin Demokrasi Tesisi

Öz

Uluslararası örgütler, devletlerin demokratikleşme süreçlerine etki eden aktörlerin başında yer almaktadır. Uluslararası örgütlerin ulusal düzeyde oluşan siyasi dönüşüm süreçlerine dışarıdan etki etmelerine olanak sağlayan araçları ise bu örgütlerin demokratik norm, kural ve değerleri ile bağlantılıdır. Bu bağlamda Avrupa Birliği (AB), demokratik koşulluluk ilkesine bağlı ve etkin olarak nitelendirilebilecek etki mekanizmaları sebebiyle, kendi bölgesindeki başlıca demokrasi destekçisi olarak tanınmaktadır. Bu çalışma temel olarak AB’nin demokrasi destekçisi olarak tanımlanmasına imkân sağlayan niteliklerinin oluşum sürecini analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda ayrıca, AB’nin kendi bölgesinde demokrasi yayılımına ve özellikle Güney, Merkez ve Doğu Avrupa’da görülen demokratikleşme süreçlerine olan katkısı da incelenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Uluslararası Örgütler,Avrupa Birliği,Demokrasi Tesisi,Koşulluluk,Demokratikleşme

Kaynakça

1. BÖRZEL, Tanja A., Thomas RISSE, “Conceptualising the Domestic Impact of Europe”, K. Featherstone, C. Radaelli (eds.) The Politics of Europeanisation, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 57-83.
2. BURNELL, Peter, “Democracy Assistance: The State of the Discourse”, P. Burnell (ed.) Democracy Assistance: International Co-operation for Democratization, London and Portland, Frank Cass Publishers, 2000, pp. 3-33.
3. CAROTHERS, Thomas, Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve, Washington, DC: Endowment for International Peace, 1999.
4. CLOSA, Carlos, Paul M. HEYWOOD, Spain and the European Union, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
5. CRAWFORD, Gordon, “European Union Development Co-operation and the Promotion of Democracy”, P. Burnell (ed.) Democracy Assistance International Co operation for Democratisation, London and Portland: Frank Cass Publishers, 2000, pp. 90-127.
6. DAHL, Robert A., On Democracy, New Heaven and London, Yale University Press, 1998.
7. DI PALMA, Giuseppe, To Craft Democracies. An Essay on Democratic Transitions, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press, 1990.
8. FEATHERSTONE, Kevin, “Introduction: In The Name of ‘Europe’”, K. Featherstone, C. Radaelli (eds.) The Politics of Europeanisation, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 3-26.

9. KARL, Terry L., “Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America”, D. A. Rustow, K. P. Erickson (eds.) Comparative Political Dynamics: Global Research Perspectives, New York, Harper Collins, 1990, pp. 163-191.
10. KUBICEK, Paul J., “International Norms, the European Union, and Democratization: Tentative Theory and Evidence”, Paul J. Kubicek (ed.) The European Union and Democratization, London, Routledge, 2003, pp. 1-29.
11. LINZ, Juan J., Alfred, STEPAN, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation – Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe, Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
12. PHINNEMORE, David, “Romania and Euro-Atlantic Integration” D. Phinnemore (ed.) The EU and Romania: Great Expectations, London, The Federal Trust, 2006, pp. 38-48.
13. PRIDHAM, Geoffrey, “The European Union, Democratic Conditionality and Transnational Party Linkages – The case of Eastern Europe”, J. Grugel (ed.) Democracy Without Borders, London, Routledge, 1999, pp. 59-75.
14. PRIDHAM, Geoffrey, Designing Democracy: EU Enlargement and Regime Change in Post-Communist Europe, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
15. SCHMITTER, Philippe C., “An Introduction to Southern European Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Italy, Greece, Portugal, Spain and Turkey”, G. O’Donnell, P. C. Schmitter, L. Whitehead (eds.) Transition from Authoritarian Rule, Maryland and London, The John Hopkins University Press, 1986, pp. 3-10.
16. SCHMITTER, Phillippe C., “The International Context of Contemporary Democratization” G. Pridham (ed.) Transitions to Democracy: Comparative Perspectives from Southern Europe, Latin America and Eastern Europe, Dartmouth, Aldershot, 1995, pp. 499-534.
17. SMITH, Karen E., “The Evolution and Application of EU Membership Conditionality”, M. Cremona (ed.) The Enlargement of the European Union, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 105-140.
18. WHITEHEAD, Laurence, The International Dimensions of Democratisation: Europe and the Americas, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996.
19. BÖRZEL, Tanja A., “The Transformative Power of Europe Reloaded – The Limits of External Europeanization”, KFG Working Papers, No.11, Free University Berlin, 2010.
20. BURNELL, Peter, “From Evaluating Democracy Assistance to Appraising Democracy Promotion”, Political Studies, Vol. 56, 2008, pp. 414-434.
21. CHECKEL, Jeffrey T., “Compliance and Conditionality”, Arena Working Paper 00/18, ARENA/Universitetet i Oslo, 2000.
22. CIRTAUTAS, Arista Maria, SCHIMMELFENNIG Frank, “Europeanisation Before and After Accession: Conditionality, Legacies and Compliance”, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 62, No. 3, 2010, pp. 421-441.
23. DAĞI, İhsan “Human rights and democratization: Turkish politics in the European context”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2001, pp. 51-68.
24. DOORENSPLEET, Renske, MUDDE, Cas, “Upping the Odds: Deviant Democracies and Theories of Democratization”, Democratization, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2008, pp. 815- 832.
25. GRABBE, Heather, “How Does Europeanization Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion and Diversity”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 8, No. 6, 2001, pp. 1013-1031.
26. GRABBE, Heather, “European Union Conditionality and the Acquis Communautaire”, International Political Science Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2002, pp. 249-268.
27. HAUGHTON, Tim, “When Does the EU Make a Difference? Conditionality and the Accession Process in Central and Eastern Europe”, Political Studies Review, Vol. 5, 2007, pp. 233-246.
28. HEYWOOD, Paul, “Spain and the European Dimension: The Integrated Market, Convergence and Beyond”, Strathclyde Papers on Government and Politics, Vol. 94, 1993, pp. 1-31.
29. LAFFAN, Brigid, “The European Union: a distinctive model of internationalization”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1998, pp. 235-253.
30. McLAREN, Lauren M., Constructing Democracy in Southern Europe – A comparative analysis of Italy, Spain and Turkey, Abingdon, Oxon, Routledge, 2008.
31. O’DONNELL, Guillermo A., SCHMITTER, Phillippe C., “Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies”, G. O’Donnell, P. C. Schmitter (eds.) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Prospects for Democracy, Baltimore, MD, The John Hopkins University Press, 1986.
32. ÖZBUDUN, Ergun, GENÇKAYA, Ömer F., Democratization and the Politics of Constitution-Making in Turkey, Budapest: Central European University Press, 2009.
33. PHINNEMORE, David, “Beyond 25-The Changing Face of EU Enlargement: Commitment, Conditionality and the Constitutional Treaty”, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2006, pp. 7-26.
34. RUSTROW, Dankwart A., “Transitions to Democracy; Toward a Dynamic Model”, Comparative Politics, Vol. 2, No.3, 1970, pp. 337-363.
35. SADURSKI, Wojciech, “Accession’s Democracy Dividend: The Impact of the EU Enlargement upon Democracy in the New Member States of Central and Eastern Europe”, European Law Journal, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2004, pp. 371-401.
36. TORREBLANCA, Jose I., “The Enlargement acquis and external strategy: a prelude to deliberative foreign policy?”, CPA Estudios/Working Papers, 4/2003, 2003. Available at: http://www.uned.es/dcpa/estudios_workingpapers/CPAestudios4_2003.pdf
37. COUNCIL OF EUROPE, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 1950.
38. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Commission Decision on the Annual Action Programme 2009 for the European Instrument for the Promotion of Democracy and the Human Rights, C(2009) 7082, 2009.
39. EUROPEAN COUNCIL, Presidency Conclusions, Copenhagen European Council, 21-22 June, 1993.
40. EUROPEAN UNION, Treaty on European Union, C191, 1992.
41. EUROPEAN UNION, European Union Observations on an Evolving EU Human Rights Policy, 2001.
42. UNITED NATIONS, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948.