Perceptions of the Staff of the General Directorate of the Staff of the General Directorate of Sports About Organizational Justice

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 55 - 65, 15.10.2014

Yakup Akyel Mustafa Yaşar Şahin Mehmet Günay

Öz

In this study, it was aimed to determine the perceptions of the staff of the general directorate of sports about organizational justice, and to analyse according to some specific variables. 

As a survey study, this study included 345 participants which were selected randomly. The data was collected through The Scale of Organizational Justice Perception including 20 items and four sub categories. The data was analysed with SPSS 16.0 applying independent samples t-test and ANOVA. 

Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that: the participants have medium level justice perception, and the sub category ‘Informational Justice’ is the leading one. In terms of gender variable, it was concluded that male participants have higher level of perception for the sub category ‘procedural justice’ and the sub category ‘distributive justice’ than female participants do. On the other hand, it was found out that female participants have higher level of perception for the sub category ‘interpersonal justice’ than male participants do. Furthermore, a negative correlation was found between the years of experience and the sub categories ‘Procedural, Interpersonal and Informational Justice’. It was determined that the staff graduated from elementary level have higher means level for the sub categories ‘Procedural Justice’, ‘Distributive Justice’, ‘Informational Justice’. Based on the variable of working place it was reached that the staff of the central organization (SGM) have higher level of perception in terms of ‘Procedural justice’ and ‘Interpersonal justice’. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sport, Justice

Kaynakça

• Altınkurt, Y. (2010). Örgütsel Adalet. Memduhoğlu, H. B. & Yılmaz, K. (Eds.). Yönetimde Yeni Yaklaşımlar. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
• Cohen, R.L.,DistributiveJustice: theory and research,SocialJusticeResearch, 1987;1: 19-40.
• Cropanzano R.,Prehar C. A., ve Chen P. Y. Using socialexchange theory to distinguishprocedural from ınteractionaljustice. Group&Organization Management, 2002; 27 (3): 324-351.
• Çetinkaya M, Çimenci S. Örgütsel Adalet Algısının Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisi ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Aracılık Rolü: Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli Çalışması. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2014; 12(23): 237-278.
• Greenberg, J. Organizationaljustice: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 1990, 16(2): 389-412.
• Greenberg, J.A taxonomy of organizationaljusticetheories, The Academy of Management Review,1987;12 (1): 9-22.
• Griffin, R.,Moorhead, G. Organizationalbehavior. HoughtonMifflinCompany, 1986.
• Gültekin, V. (1983). Hayat Ansiklopedisi. İstanbul: Doğan Kardeş Yayınevi.