Oviedo Azim Ölçeği’nin (EGO) Batılı Olmayan Bir Bağlamda Geçerlilik Kanıtı

Yıl 2024, , 1 - 10, 27.04.2024

Neslihan Turnalar-çetinkaya

https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.1389105

Öz

Azim, uzun vadeli hedeflere yönelik sebat ve tutku ile ilgili bilişsel olmayan olumlu bir kişilik özelliğidir. Yaşamın çeşitli yönleri üzerinde olumlu etkiye sahiptir, ancak özellikle Türkçede azimi ölçmek için sınırlı araç mevcuttur. Bu nedenle, bu araştırma Postigo ve diğerleri (2021) tarafından geliştirilen Oviedo Grit (EGO) ölçeğinin Türkçe versiyonunun psikometrik değerlerini belirlemeyi amaçlamıştır. Örneklem 458 Türk üniversite öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Madde, yapısal geçerlilik, ölçme değişmezliği ve ölçeğin kişilik özellikleri (örn. beş büyük kişilik boyutu) ve dış değişkenlerle (örn. not ortalaması) ilişkisi için yapılan analizler, Postigo ve arkadaşları (2021) tarafından İspanyolca olarak geliştirilen Oviedo Azim Ölçeği’nin Türkçe çevirisinin azim kişilik özelliğini ölçmek için güvenilir, tek boyutlu bir araç olduğu iddiasını desteklemiştir. Sınırlılıklar ve gelecekteki araştırmalar için potansiyel yollar da tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

azim, EGO azim ölçeği, bilişsel olmayan karakteristik özellikler, uyarlama, güvenirlik, geçerlik

Validation Evidence for the Oviedo Grit Scale (EGO) in a Non-Western Context

Öz

Grit is a positive non-cognitive characteristic related to perseverance and passion for long-term goals. It positively impacts various aspects of life, but limited tools are available for measuring it, particularly in Turkish. Thus, this research aimed to establish the psychometric values for the Turkish version of the Oviedo Grit (EGO) scale by Postigo et al. (2021). The sample consisted of 500 Turkish university students. The analyses for single items, structural validation, measurement invariance, and the scale’s relationship with personality traits (i.e., big five personality dimensions) and external variables (i.e., grade point average) supported the claim that the EGO scale, originally developed in Spanish by Postigo et al. (2021), is a reliable, unidimensional tool to measure grit Turkish language. Some limitations and potential paths for future research were also discussed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

grit, EGO scale, non-cognitive characteristic, validation

Kaynakça

• Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory (2nd ed.). ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
• Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750.
• Bulgur, N. E., & Esen, E. (2021). The relationship between grit, hope and career optimism at work. Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, 26, 24–35.
• Caza, A., & Posner, B. Z. (2019). How and when does grit influence leaders’ behavior? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(1), 124–134.
• Cheung, G. W., & Renswold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255.
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
• Credé, M., Tynan, M. C., & Harms, P. D. (2017). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 492–511.
• Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101.
• Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT–S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174.
• Eskreis-Winkler, L., Shulman, E. P., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Survivor mission: Do those who survive have a drive to thrive at work? Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(3), 209–218.
• Eskreis-Winkler, L., Shulman, E. P., Beal, S., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 36.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
• Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
• Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory principles and applications. Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
• Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.
• Jiang, S., Wang, C., & Weiss, D. J. (2016). Sample size requirements for estimation of item parameters in the multidimensional graded response model. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.
• Jordan, S. L., Ferris G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., & Wright, T. A. (2019). Toward a work motivation conceptualization of grit in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 44(2), 320–360.
• Kurt Taşpınar, H., & Külekçi, G. (2018). GRIT: An essential ingredient of success in the EFL classroom. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 6(3), 208–226.
• Lovering, M. E., Heaton, K. J., Banderet, L. E., Neises, K., Andrews, J., & Cohen, B. S. (2015). Psychological and physical characteristics of U.S. marine recruits. Military Psychology, 27, 261–275.
• McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Van Nostrand.
• Mia, M. V., & Daiva, D. (2016). Grit and different aspects of well-being: direct and indirect relationships via sense of coherence and authenticity. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(5), 2119–2147.
• Novick, M. R. (1966). The axioms and principal results of classical test theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 1–18.
• Postigo, Á., Cuesta, M., García-Cueto, E., Menéndez-Aller, Á., González-Nuevo, C., & Muñiz, J. (2021). Grit assessment: Is one dimension enough? Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(6), 786–796.
• Reeve, B. B., & Fayers, P. (2005). Applying item response theory modeling for evaluating questionnaire item and scale properties. In P. Fayers & R. D. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials: Methods of practice (2nd ed., pp. 55–73). Oxford University Press.
• Samejima, F. (2004). Graded response model. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social measurement (pp. 77–82). Academic Press.
• Sarıçam, H., Celik, I., & Oğuz, A. (2016). Kısa azim (sebat) ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Turkish adaptation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S): Validity and Reliability Study]. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education (TLCE), 5, 927–935.
• Schmidt, F. T. C., Fleckenstein, J., Retelsdorf, J., Eskreis-Winkler, L., & Möller, J. (2019). Measuring grit. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(3), 4367–447.
• Singh, J., & Chopra, V. G. (2018). Workplace spirituality, grit and work engagement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 14(1–2), 50–59.
• Southwick, D. A., Tsay, C-J., & Duckworth, A. L. (2019). Grit at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 39, Article 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2020.100126
• Suzuki, Y., Tamesue, D., Asahi, K., & Ishikawa, Y. (2015). Grit and work engagement: A cross sectional study. PLoS ONE, 10(9), Article e0137501. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137501
• Sümer, N., Lajunen, T. J., & Özkan, T. (2005). Big five personality traits as the distal predictors of road accident involvement. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Traffic and transport psychology (pp. 215–227). Elsevier.
• Thurstone, L. L. (1925). A method of scaling psychological and educational tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 16, 433–451.