Moderating Role of Subordinates’ Personality Traits on the Relationship between Military Leadership and Subordinates’ Satisfaction with Leaders

Öz

This research was implemented by 390 personnel from a defense industry organization in order to investigate moderating role of subordinates’ personality traits on the relationship between military leadership and subordinates’ satisfaction with leader. Fit indexes of the scales were analyzed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the relations between variables were examined with Correlation Analysis and Linear Regression Analysis, moderating role of personality traits was analyzed by Hierarchical Regression Analysis and Simple Slopes Test. Correlation Analysis revealed the positive correlation between military leadership and subordinates’ satisfaction with leader. Regression Analysis demonstrated the impact of people-related interest and awareness dimensions of military leadership on subordinates’ satisfaction with leader. In addition, moderating role of openness was found on this relationship. Findings were discussed based on the Conservation of Resources Theory framework. Theoretical and practical implications were explained, and recommendations for future researches were discussed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Military Leadership,Satisfaction with Leader; Five-Factor Personality Traits

Askeri Liderlikle Astların Liderden Tatmininde Astların Kişilik Özelliklerinin Düzenleyici Rolü

Öz

Bu araştırma askeri liderlikle astların liderden tatmini arasındaki ilişkide astların kişilik özelliklerinin düzenleyici etkisini belirlemek maksadıyla savunma sanayindeki bir kurumun 390 çalışanı üzerinde yapılmıştır. Araştırmada kullanılan ölçeklerin uyumu Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi ile, değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler korelasyon ve basit regresyon analizi ile, kişiliğin düzenleyici etkisi ise düzenleyici değişkenli hiyerarşik regresyon analizi ve eğim testi analizi ile test edilmiştir. Korelasyon analizi sonucu askeri liderlikle liderden tatmin arasında pozitif yönde ilişki bulunduğu; regresyon analizi sonucunda, askeri liderliğin asta yönelik ilgi ve farkındalık boyutlarının astların liderden tatminini etkilediği; beş faktör kişilik özelliklerinden gelişime açıklığın bu ilişkide düzenleyici rolü bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular Kaynakların Korunması Teorisi çerçevesinde tartışılarak, yazına ve uygulamaya katkısı açıklanmış ve gelecek araştırmalar için önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Askeri Liderlik,Liderden Duyulan Tatmin; Beş Faktör Kişilik Özellikleri

Kaynakça

1. Abdel-Halim, A. A. & Rowland, K. M. (1976). Some personality determinants of the effects of participation: A further investigation. Personnel Psychology, 29(1), 41-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1976.tb00400.x
2. Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. (1991) Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, Newbury Park CA: SAGE.
3. Andrews, L. C. (2009). Leadership. İçinde R.L. Taylor, W.E. Rosenbach & E.B. Rosenbach (Ed.), Military Leadership: In Pursuit of Excellence (s.s. 7-24) (6. Baskı), Boulder: Westview Press.
4. Aude, S. N., Mitchell, D. & Cordes, G. B. (2006). Development and validation of leadership assessment instruments for United States army commanders, staff officers, and non-commissioned officers (NCOs). International Military Testing Association (IMTA) 2006 Annual Conference, Kingston, Ontario, Kanada, 2-5 Ekim.
5. Aude, S. N., Karrasch, A., Leonard, A. & Hatfield, J. (2006). U.S. army multi-rater (360) leader assessment and feedback pilot program. International Military Testing Association (IMTA) 2006 Annual Conference, Kingston, Ontario, Kanada, 2-5 Ekim.
6. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
7. Barrick, M. R. & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
8. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial application (3.Baskı), New York: Free Press.

9. Bauer, T. N. & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538-1567. doi: 10.2307/257068
10. Benet-Martinez, V. & John, O. P. (1998). Los cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analysis of the big five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729-750. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.729
11. Benoliel, P. & Somech, A. (2014). The health and performance effects of participative leadership: Exploring the moderating role of the big five personality dimensions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(2), 277-294. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2012.717689
12. Brower, H. H., Schoorman, F. D. & Tan, H. H. (2000). A model of relational leadership: The integration of trust and leader-member exchange. Leadership Quarterly, 11(2), 227-250. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00040-0
13. Cicerali, E. E. (2012). The effects of post-M&A cultural change in organizations on individual and organizational performance: Moderated by personality and political skill (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Yeditepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
14. Chaplin, W. F. (1991). The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 59(2), 143–178.
15. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G. & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression / correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3. Baskı), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 668–678. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.668
17. Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised neo personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and neo five-factor (NEO-FFI): Inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
18. Dilek, H. (2005). Liderlik tarzlarının ve adalet algısının; Örgütsel bağlılık, iş tatmini ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerine etkilerine yönelik bir araştırma (Yayımlanmamış Doktora tezi). Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Gebze.
19. Dobbins, G. H. & Zaccaro, S. J. (1986). The effects of groups cohesion and leader behavior on subordinate satisfaction. Group & Organization Studies, 11(3), 203-219. doi: 10.1177/105960118601100305
20. Downey, H. K., Sheridan, J. E. & Slocum, J. W. (1975). Analysis of relationships among leader behavior, subordinate job performance and satisfaction: A path-goal approach. Academy of Management Journal, 18(2), 253-262. doi: 10.2307/255528
21. Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L. & Ferris, G. R. (2011). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715-1739. doi: 10.1177/0149206311415280
22. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J. & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 125–145.
23. Edwards, R. (2008). Discipline. İçinde B. Horn & R. W. Walker (Ed.), Military Leadership Handbook (s.s. 228-243), Toronto: Dundurn Press.
24. Fernandez, S. (2008). Examining the effects of leadership behavior on employee perceptions of performance and job satisfaction. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(2), 175-205. doi: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576320201
25. Fiedler, F. E. (1954). Assumed similarity measures as predictors of team effectiveness. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49(3), 381-388. doi: 10.1037/h0061669
26. Fiedler, F. E., Bass, A. M. & Fiedler, J. M. (1961). The leader's perception of coworkers, group climate, and group creativity: A cross validation. Urbana, Illinois: Group Effectiveness Research Laboratory, University of Illinois.
27. Field Manual (FM) 22-100. (1999). Army leadership: be, know, do. Washington D.C.: Department of the Army.
28. Gerstner, C. R. & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analysis review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlation and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827-844.
29. Gürbüz, S. & Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
30. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513.
31. Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress rocess: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(3), 337-369. doi: 10.1111/1464-0597.00062
32. Hobfoll, S. E. & Lily, R. S. (1993). Resource conservation as a strategy for community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 21(2), 565-589. doi: 10.1002/1520-6629(199304)21:2<128::AID-JCOP2290210206>3.0.CO;2-5
33. Hobfoll, S. E. & Shirom, A. (2001). Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace. İçinde R.T. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior (s.s. 57-80), New York, NY: Dekker.
34. Horn, B. (2008). Combat Motivation. İçinde B. Horn & R. W. Walker (Ed.), Military Leadership Handbook (s.s. 73-90), Toronto: Dundurn Press.
35. Horn, B. & Walker, R. W. (2008). Military Leadership Handbook. Toronto: Dundurn Press.
36. Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F. & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36–51. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36
37. Hunt, J. G. (1991). Leadership: A New Synthesis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Künter, N. (2014). Askeri liderlik: Kavramlaştırma ve askeri liderin etkinliğinin ölçümüne ilişkin bir ölçek geliştirme çabası (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Kara Harp Okulu Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
39. Meuwese, W. A. T. (1964). The effect of the leader's ability and interpersonal attitudes on group creativity under varying conditions of stress (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
40. Morris, T. (1995). Employee satisfaction: Maximizing the return on human capital. CMA - The Management Accounting Magazine, 69(10), 15-18.
41. Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Harding, F. D., Jacobs, T. O. ve Fleishman, E. A. (2000). Leadership skills for a changing world: Solving complex social problems. Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 11-35.
42. Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P. & Ilies, R. (2009). The development of leader-member exchanges: Exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 256-266. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.09.002
43. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee, J. Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
44. Randall, E. W. (2006). Military leadership: The effect of leader behavior on soldier retention in the army national guard (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Capella Üniversitesi.
45. Schmitt, D. P., Allick, J., McCrae, R. R. & Benet-Martinez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of big five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 173-212. doi: 10.1177/0022022106297299
46. Spector, E. P. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the job satisfaction survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13(6), 693-713. doi: 10.1007/BF00929796
47. Stogdill, R. M. (1974). The handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press.
48. Sun, Ö. (2002). İş doyumu üzerine bir araştırma: Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası (Yayımlanmamış Uzmanlık Yeterlilik Tezi), Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası Banknot Matbaası Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
49. Sümer, N. & Sümer. H. C. (2005). Beş faktör kişilik özellikleri ölçeği (Yayınlanmamış çalışma). Ankara.
50. Şahin, F. (2011). The interaciton of self-leadership and psychological climate on job performance. African Journal of Business Management, 5(5), 1787-1794. doi: 10.5897/AJBM10.763.
51. Tabak, A. (1997). Askeri liderlik ve uygulama (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
52. Taylor, R. L., Rosenbach, W. E. & Rosenbach, E. B. (2009). Military leadership: In pursuit of excellence (6. Baskı), Boulder: Westview Press.
53. Tosi, H. L. (1973). The effect of the interaction of leader behavior and subordinate authoritarianism. Personnel Psychology, 26(3), 339-350. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1973.tb01141.x
54. Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 654-676.
55. Vecchio, R. P. (1981). Situational and behavioral moderators of subordinate satisfaction with supervision. Human Relations, 34(11), 947 – 963. doi: 10.1177/001872678103401103
56. Walker, R. W. (2008). The professional development framework. B. Horn ve R. W. Walker (Ed.), Military Leadership Handbook içinde (s.s. 436-450), Toronto: Dundurn Press.
57. Watson, D. & Clark, L. A. (1997). Extraversion and its positive emotional core. İçinde R. Hogan, J. A. Jobnson ve S. R. Briggs (Ed.), Handbook of Personality Psychology (s.s. 767-793), San Diego: Academic Press.
58. Wells, J. E. & Peachey, J. W. (2011). Turnover intentions: Do leadership behaviors and satisfaction with the leader matter? Team Performance Management, 17(1/2), 23-40. doi: 10.1108/13527591111114693
59. Wong, L., Bliese, P. & McGurk, D. (2003). Military leadership: A context specific review. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 657-692. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.08.001
60. Wood, M. T. & Sobel, R. S. (1970). Effects of similarity of leadership style at two levels of management on the job satisfaction of the first level manager. Personnel Psychology, 23(4), 577-590. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1970.tb01374.x
61. Yukl, G. A. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7. Baskı), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
62. Zhang, Z., Wang, M. & Shi, J. (2012). Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 111-130. doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.0865