Negative Attitudes toward Robots Scale: Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version

Öz

Rapidly developing technology has made great progress in robot design and production. One of the reflections of this vision is the social robots that can communicate. The study of the interaction between robots and people, which increase their visibility in everyday life and business life in many developed countries of the world, is very important in terms of acceptance and efficient production of this technology. To this end, Nomura and colleagues developed the Negative Attitudes towards Robots scale. In this study, it is desired to adapt this scale to Turkish. The data obtained from the students of five universities in Istanbul were investigated through internal consistency coefficient, confirmatory factor analysis, and discriminant validity. As a result of the study, it was observed that the 14 items in the scale were divided into 3 factors. According to the confirmatory factor analysis, the fit index values of the model have acceptable values. Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency reliability coefficients were reliable for three subscales, and there was discriminant validity. This study shows that Turkish version of Negative Attitudes toward Robots Scale is a reliable and valid measurement tool regardless of robot type. The creation of a Turkish version of this scale, which measures an important effect in the interaction of human robots, will also open up the work to be done in this area with Turkish samples.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Attitude,Robot,Technology,Human Robot Interaction

Robotlara Karşı Negatif Tutumlar Ölçeği: Türkçe Versiyonunun Geçerlilik ve Güvenirliği

Öz

Hızla gelişen teknoloji robot dizaynı ve üretimlerinde büyük bir ivme kaydetmiştir. Bu ivmenin yansımalarından biri de iletişim kurabilen sosyal robotlardır. Hali hazırda dünyanın birçok gelişmiş ülkesinde gündelik yaşamda ve iş yaşamında görünürlüklerini arttıran robotlarla insanlar arasında kurulacak olan etkileşimin incelenmesi, bu teknolojinin kabullenilmesi ve verimli şekilde üretilebilmesi açısından oldukça önemlidir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, Nomura ve meslektaşları Robotlara Karşı Negatif Tutumlar ölçeğini geliştirmiştir.  Bu çalışmada ise bu ölçeğin Türkçeye adaptasyonu yapılmak istenmiştir. İstanbul’da bulunan beş üniversitenin öğrencilerinden elde edilen veri ile iç tutarlılık katsayısı, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve ayrışma geçerliliği incelenmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda ölçekte bulunan 14 madde 3 faktöre bölünmüştür. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucuna göre modelin uyum indeksi kabul edilebilir değerlere sahiptir. Cronbach’ın alfa iç tutarlılık güvenilirlik katsayıları üç alt ölçek için de güvenilirdir ve ayırıcı geçerlilik sağlanmıştır. Bu çalışmayla robot tipine bağlı kalmaksızın Robotlara Karşı Negatif Tutumlar Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilir ve geçerli bir ölçüm aracı olduğunu göstermektedir. İnsan robot etkileşiminde önemli bir etkeni ölçen bu ölçeğin Türkçe versiyonunun oluşturulması bu alanda yapılan çalışmaların Türk örneklemlerle yapılmasının da önünü açacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tutum,Robot,Teknoloji,İnsan Robot Etkileşimi

Kaynakça

1. Aksöz, M. (2016). Examining the adoption of intention of internet of things in healthcare technology products with innovation diffusion theory and technology acceptance model, Unpublished Master Thesis, Istanbul: Bahçeşehir University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences.
2. Bartneck, C., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Nomura, T. (2007). The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots. Ai & Society, 21(1-2), 217-230.
3. Capek, K. (1920). RUR - Rossum's Universal Robots : kolektivní drama o vstupní komedii a 3 dejstvích. Praha : Aventinum, 90 pages.
4. Chaplin, J. P. (1999). Dictionary of Psychology, terj. Kartini Kartono.
5. Dario, P., Guglielmelli, E., & Laschi, C. (2001). Humanoids and personal robots: Design and experiments. Journal of Robotic Systems, 18(12), 673-690.
6. Do, H. M., Pham, M., Sheng, W., Yang, D., & Liu, M. (2018). RiSH: A robot-integrated smart home for elderly care. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 101, 74-92.
7. Erebak, S., & Turgut, T. (2018). Caregivers’ attitudes toward potential robot coworkers in elder care. Cognition, Technology & Work, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0512-0
8. Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C., & Williams, C. J. (1989). The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-to-behavior process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 280-288.

9. Gates, B. (2007). A robot in every home. Scientific American, 296(1), 58-65.
10. IFR. (2017). How robots conquer industry worldwide. https://ifr.org/downloads/press/Presentation_PC_27_Sept_2017.pdf
11. Katz, J. E., & Halpern, D. (2014). Attitudes towards robots suitability for various jobs as affected robot appearance. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(9), 941-953.
12. M Tsui, K., Desai, M., A Yanco, H., Cramer, H., & Kemper, N. (2011). Measuring attitudes towards telepresence robots. International Journal of Intelligent Control and Systems, 16.
13. Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., & Kato, K. (2004, September). Psychology in human-robot communication: An attempt through investigation of negative attitudes and anxiety toward robots. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2004. ROMAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 35-40). IEEE.
14. Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., & Kato, K. (2005, August). People's assumptions about robots: Investigation of their relationships with attitudes and emotions toward robots. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 125-130). IEEE.
15. Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., & Kato, K. (2008). Prediction of human behavior in human--robot interaction using psychological scales for anxiety and negative attitudes toward robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24(2), 442-451.
16. Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Kato, K. (2006a). Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 437-454.
17. Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Kato, K. (2006b). Altered attitudes of people toward robots: Investigation through the Negative Attitudes toward Robots Scale. In Proc. AAAI-06 workshop on human implications of human-robot interaction (Vol. 2006, pp. 29-35).
18. Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2015). An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59-74.
19. Piçarra, N., Giger, J. C., Pochwatko, G., & Gonçalves, G. (2015). Validation of the Portuguese version of the Negative Attitudes towards Robots Scale. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 65(2), 93-104.
20. Ray, C., Mondada, F., & Siegwart, R. (2008). What do people expect from robots?. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ 2008 international conference on intelligent robots and systems (No. LSRO-CONF-2008-049, pp. 3816-3821). IEEE Press.
21. Richardson, K., Coeckelbergh, M., Wakunuma, K., Billing, E., Ziemke, T., Gomez, P., ... & Belpaeme, T. (2018). Robot Enhanced Therapy for Children with Autism (DREAM): A Social Model of Autism. IEEE TEchnology and SocIETy MagazInE, 37(1), 30-39.
22. Santini, F. (2018). U.S. Patent No. 9,993,129. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
23. Takayama, L., Ju, W., & Nass, C. (2008, March). Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: what everyday people think robots should do. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on (pp. 25-32). IEEE.