ATIK OLİVİN TOZU İKAMESİ İLE ÜRETİLEN SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR ÇİMENTONUN EĞİLME DAYANIMININ OPTİMİZASYONU: YANIT YÜZEYİ METODOLOJİSİNİN BİR UYGULAMASI

Öz

Çimentoda atık olivin tozu (AOT) ikamesi, kabul edilebilir mekanik özelliklere sahip çimento üretiminin yanı sıra maden atıklarının geri dönüşümü ve çevre sorunlarının azaltılması için de uygun bir alternatiftir. Bu araştırma, AOT ile üretilen çimento karışımlarının hem atık geri dönüşümü hem de yüksek eğilme dayanımı açısından optimum karışım oranını belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, çimento ve AOT içeriği ile hidratasyon süresi olmak üzere üç bağımsız değişkenin, çimentoların eğilme dayanımı tepki değişkeni üzerindeki etkisi deneysel olarak incelenmiştir. Bağımsız ve yanıt değişkenleri ilişkisinin modellenmesi ve optimizasyon senaryosunun çok amaçlı optimizasyonu için yanıt yüzeyi metodolojisi (YYM) ve arzu edilirlik fonksiyonu yönteminin bir kombinasyonu uygulanmıştır. Sonuçlar, atık geri dönüşümü ve çimento üretimi açısından en iyi optimizasyon senaryosunun, AOT ve eğilme dayanımını en üst düzeye çıkarmak ve çimento miktarını en aza indirmek olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu senaryo için çimento içeriği ve hidratasyon süresinin optimum değerleri sırasıyla 410 kg/m3 ve 90 gün ve bu durumda çimento eğilme dayanımı ise yaklaşık 11.23 MPa olarak tespit edilmiştir. Sürdürülebilirliğe doğru bir adım olarak bu çalışmanın sonuçları, araştırmacılara hem atık geri dönüşümü hem de çimento üretimi açısından en verimli koşulu bulma konusunda yeni bilgiler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Atık
• Çimento
• Sürdürülebilirlik
• Olivin
• Yanıt yüzey yöntemi

OPTIMIZATION OF THE FLEXURAL STRENGTH OF SUSTAINABLE CEMENT PRODUCED BY WASTE OLIVINE DUST SUBSTITUTION: AN APPLICATION OF THE RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY

Öz

The substitution of waste olivine dust (WOD) in cement is a suitable alternative for the production of cement with acceptable mechanical properties, as well as for the recycling of mining waste and the reduction of environmental problems. This study aims to determine the optimum mixture ratio in terms of both waste recycling and high flexural strength of cement mixtures produced with WOD. For this purpose, the effect of three independent variables, namely cement content, WOD content and hydration time, on the flexural strength response of cements was studied experimentally. A combination of response surface methodology (RSM) and desirability function method was applied for modeling the relationship between independent and response variables and multi-purpose optimization of the optimization scenario. The results showed that the best optimization scenario in terms of waste recycling and cement production is to maximize the WOD and flexural strength and minimize the amount of cement. For this scenario, the optimal values of cement content and hydration time were determined to be 410 kg/m3 and 90 days, respectively, and in this case, the cement flexural strength was determined as approximately 11.23 MPa. As a step towards sustainability, the results of this study provide new information to researchers about finding the most efficient condition in terms of waste recycling and cement production.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Waste
• Cement
• Sustainability
• Olivine
• Response surface methodology

Kaynakça

1. 1. Praneeth, S., Guo, R., Wang, T., Dubey, B.K., and Sarmah, A.K., “Accelerated carbonation of biochar reinforced cement-fly ash composites: Enhancing and sequestering CO2 in building materials.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 244, Page 118363, 2020.
2. 2. Suescum-Morales, D., Fernández-Rodríguez, J.M., and Jiménez, J.R., “Use of carbonated water to improve the mechanical properties and reduce the carbon footprint of cement-based materials with recycled aggregates.”, Journal of CO2 Utilization, Vol. 57, Page 101886, 2022.
3. 3. Goergens, J., Belli, R., Schulbert, C., and Goetz-Neunhoeffer, F., “Influence of different CA2/CA-ratios on hydration degree, AH3 content and flexural strength investigated for a binder formulation of calcium aluminate cement with calcite.”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 165, Page 107090, 2023.
4. 4. Gulmez, N., “Roles of aluminium shavings and calcite on engineering properties of cement-based composites.”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 277, Page 124104, 2020.
5. 5. Li, L., Cao, M., and Yin, H., “Comparative roles between aragonite and calcite calcium carbonate whiskers in the hydration and strength of cement paste.”, Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 104, Page 103350, 2019.
6. 6. Li, C., Krishnya, S., Ogino, M., Owaki, E., and Elakneswaran, Y., “Investigating the hydration characteristics of a new composite cementitious binder containing of slag and calcite.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 361, Page 129629, 2022.
7. 7. McDonald, L.J., Carballo-Meilan, M.A., Chacartegui, R., and Afzal, W., “The physicochemical properties of Portland cement blended with calcium carbonate with different morphologies as a supplementary cementitious material.”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 338, Page 130309, 2022.
8. 8. Goergens, J., Manninger, T., and Goetz-Neunhoeffer, F., “In-situ XRD study of the temperature-dependent early hydration of calcium aluminate cement in a mix with calcite.”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 136, Page 106160, 2020.

9. 9. Oyebisi, S., Olutoge, F., Raheem, A., Dike, D., and Bankole, F., “Sustainability assessment of cement concrete modified with bagasse ash and calcite powder.”, Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 86, Pages 1–6, 2023.
10. 10. Özkan, Ş. and Ceylan, H., “The effects on mechanical properties of sustainable use of waste andesite dust as a partial substitution of cement in cementitious composites.”, Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 58, Page 104959, 2022.
11. 11. Hamidi, M., Kacimi, L., Cyr, M., and Clastres, P., “Evaluation and improvement of pozzolanic activity of andesite for its use in eco-efficient cement.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 47, Pages 1268–1277, 2013.
12. 12. Adhikary, S.K., Rudžionis, Ž., and Tučkutė, S., “Characterization of novel lightweight self-compacting cement composites with incorporated expanded glass, aerogel, zeolite and fly ash.”, Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 16, Page e00879, 2022.
13. 13. Ma, B., Fernandez-Martinez, A., Mancini, A., and Lothenbach, B., “Spectroscopic investigations on structural incorporation pathways of FeIII into zeolite frameworks in cement-relevant environments.”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 140, Page 106304, 2021.
14. 14. Ledesma, R.B., Lopes, N.F., Bacca, K.G., et al., “Zeolite and fly ash in the composition of oil well cement: Evaluation of degradation by CO2 under geological storage condition.”, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 185, Page 106656, 2020.
15. 15. Rudžionis, Ž., Adhikary, S.K., Manhanga, F.C., et al., “Natural zeolite powder in cementitious composites and its application as heavy metal absorbents.”, Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 43, Page 103085, 2021.
16. 16. Weibel, R., Olivarius, M., Jakobsen, F.C., et al., “Thermogenetic degradation of early zeolite cement: An important process for generating anomalously high porosity and permeability in deeply buried sandstone reservoirs?”, Marine and Petroleum Geology, Vol. 103, Pages 620–645, 2019.
17. 17. MolaAbasi, H., Saberian, M., and Li, J., “Prediction of compressive and tensile strengths of zeolite-cemented sand using porosity and composition.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 202, Pages 784–795, 2019.
18. 18. Chen, J.J., Ng, P.L., Kwan, A.K.H., and Li, L.G., “Lowering cement content in mortar by adding superfine zeolite as cement replacement and optimizing mixture proportions.”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 210, Pages 66–76, 2019.
19. 19. Ahdal, A.Q., Amrani, M.A., Ghaleb, A.A.A., et al., “Mechanical performance and feasibility analysis of green concrete prepared with local natural zeolite and waste PET plastic fibers as cement replacements.”, Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 17, Page e01256, 2022.
20. 20. Xuan, Z. and Jun, Z., “Influence of zeolite addition on mechanical performance and shrinkage of high strength Engineered Cementitious Composites.”, Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 36, Page 102124, 2021.
21. 21. Sami, N.M., Moamen, O.A.A., El-Dessouky, M.I., and El-Kamash, A.M., “Assessment the leaching characteristics and long-term leaching behavior of some radionuclides from synthesized zeolite cement matrix.”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 143, Page 106357, 2021.
22. 22. Zheng, X., Liu, K., Gao, S., Wang, F., and Wu, Z., “Effect of pozzolanic reaction of zeolite on its internal curing performance in cement-based materials.”, Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 63, Page 105503, 2023.
23. 23. Kaufhold, S., Dohrmann, R., and Ufer, K., “Determining the extent of bentonite alteration at the bentonite/cement interface.”, Applied Clay Science, Vol. 186, Page 105446, 2020.
24. 24. Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, B., et al., “A preliminary investigation of the properties of potassium magnesium phosphate cement-based grouts mixed with fly ash, water glass and bentonite.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 237, Page 117501, 2020.
25. 25. Zhao, Z., Chen, M., Zhong, X., et al., “Effects of bentonite, diatomite and metakaolin on the rheological behavior of 3D printed magnesium potassium phosphate cement composites.”, Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 46, Page 102184, 2021.
26. 26. Wei, J. and Gencturk, B., “Hydration of ternary Portland cement blends containing metakaolin and sodium bentonite.”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 123, Page 105772, 2019.
27. 27. Yang, H., Long, D., Zhenyu, L., et al., “Effects of bentonite on pore structure and permeability of cement mortar.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 224, Pages 276–283, 2019.
28. 28. Man, X., Aminul Haque, M., and Chen, B., “Engineering properties and microstructure analysis of magnesium phosphate cement mortar containing bentonite clay.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 227, Page 116656, 2019.
29. 29. Chen, M., Liu, B., Li, L., et al., “Rheological parameters, thixotropy and creep of 3D-printed calcium sulfoaluminate cement composites modified by bentonite.”, Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 186, Page 107821, 2020.
30. 30. Khandelwal, S. and Rhee, K.Y., “Evaluation of pozzolanic activity, heterogeneous nucleation, and microstructure of cement composites with modified bentonite clays.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 323, Page 126617, 2022.
31. 31. Niu, M., Li, G., Cao, L., Wang, X., and Wang, W., “Preparation of sulphate aluminate cement amended bentonite and its use in heavy metal adsorption.”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 256, Page 120700, 2020.
32. 32. Rahman, F., Adil, W., Raheel, M., Saberian, M., Li, J., and Maqsood, T., “Experimental investigation of high replacement of cement by pumice in cement mortar: A mechanical, durability and microstructural study.”, Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 49, Page 104037, 2022.
33. 33. Karaaslan, C., Yener, E., Bağatur, T., Polat, R., Gül, R., and Hakkı Alma, M., “Synergic effect of fly ash and calcium aluminate cement on the properties of pumice-based geopolymer mortar.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 345, Page 128397, 2022.
34. 34. Karaaslan, C., Yener, E., Bağatur, T., and Polat, R., “Improving the durability of pumice-fly ash based geopolymer concrete with calcium aluminate cement.”, Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 59, Page 105110, 2022.
35. 35. Kabay, N., Miyan, N., and Özkan, H., “Utilization of pumice powder and glass microspheres in cement mortar using paste replacement methodology.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 282, Page 122691, 2021.
36. 36. Adil, W., Ur Rahman, F., M.S Abdullah, G., Tayeh, B.A., and Zeyad, A.M., “Effective utilization of textile industry waste-derived and heat-treated pumice powder in cement mortar.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 351, Page 128966, 2022.
37. 37. Szabó, R., Kristály, F., Nagy, S., Singla, R., Mucsi, G., and Kumar, S., “Reaction, structure and properties of eco-friendly geopolymer cement derived from mechanically activated pumice.”, Ceramics International, Vol. 49, Issue 4, Pages 6756–6763, 2023.
38. 38. Dener, M., Karatas, M., and Mohabbi, M., “Sulfate resistance of alkali-activated slag/Portland cement mortar produced with lightweight pumice aggregate.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 304, Page 124671, 2021.
39. 39. Pınarcı, İ. and Kocak, Y., “Hydration mechanisms and mechanical properties of pumice substituted cementitious binder.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 335, Page 127528, 2022.
40. 40. Sarıdemir, M., Çelikten, S., and Yıldırım, A., “Mechanical and microstructural properties of calcined diatomite powder modified high strength mortars at ambient and high temperatures.”, Advanced Powder Technology, Vol. 31, Issue 7, Pages 3004–3017, 2020.
41. 41. Mota dos Santos, A.A. and Cordeiro, G.C., “Investigation of particle characteristics and enhancing the pozzolanic activity of diatomite by grinding.”, Materials Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 270, Page 124799, 2021.
42. 42. Luan, X., Li, J., Liu, L., and Yang, Z., “Preparation and characteristics of porous magnesium phosphate cement modified by diatomite.”, Materials Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 235, Page 121742, 2019.
43. 43. Li, J., Zhang, W., Li, C., and Monteiro, P.J.M., “Eco-friendly mortar with high-volume diatomite and fly ash: Performance and life-cycle assessment with regional variability.”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 261, Page 121224, 2020.
44. 44. Hassan, H.S., Abdel-Gawwad, H.A., Vásquez-García, S.R., et al., “Cleaner production of one-part white geopolymer cement using pre-treated wood biomass ash and diatomite.”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 209, Pages 1420–1428, 2019.
45. 45. Chen, M., Li, L., Wang, J., et al., “Rheological parameters and building time of 3D printing sulphoaluminate cement paste modified by retarder and diatomite.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 234, Page 117391, 2020.
46. 46. Sun, M., Zou, C., and Xin, D., “Pore structure evolution mechanism of cement mortar containing diatomite subjected to freeze-thaw cycles by multifractal analysis.”, Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 114, Page 103731, 2020.
47. 47. Ma, R., Wang, M., Li, X., and Liu, T., “Experimental investigation on dynamic mechanical properties of sandy clay treated with alkali-activated metakaolin cement and discrete polypropylene fibers.”, Underground Space, Vol. 7, Issue 6, Pages 1036–1055, 2022.
48. 48. Perez-Cortes, P., Cabrera-Luna, K., and Escalante-Garcia, J.I., “Alkali-activated limestone/metakaolin cements exposed to high temperatures: Structural changes.”, Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 122, Page 104147, 2021.
49. 49. Burciaga-Díaz, O. and Escalante-García, J.I., “Structural transition to well-ordered phases of NaOH-activated slag-metakaolin cements aged by 6 years.”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 156, Page 106791, 2022.
50. 50. Shah, V., Parashar, A., and Scott, A., “Understanding the importance of carbonates on the performance of Portland metakaolin cement.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 319, Page 126155, 2022.
51. 51. Li, Q. and Fan, Y., “Rheological evaluation of nano-metakaolin cement pastes based on the water film thickness.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 324, Page 126517, 2022.
52. 52. Ramadan, M., Kohail, M., Abadel, A.A., Alharbi, Y.R., Tuladhar, R., and Mohsen, A., “De-aluminated metakaolin-cement composite modified with commercial titania as a new green building material for gamma-ray shielding applications.”, Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 17, Page e01344, 2022.
53. 53. Rakhimova, N.R. and Rakhimov, R.Z., “Reaction products, structure and properties of alkali-activated metakaolin cements incorporated with supplementary materials – a review.”, Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 8, Issue 1, Pages 1522–1531, 2019.
54. 54. Shah, V. and Scott, A., “Pozzolanic characteristics of silica recovered from olivine.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 332, Page 127378, 2022.
55. 55. Westgate, P., Ball, R.J., and Paine, K., “Olivine as a reactive aggregate in lime mortars.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 195, Pages 115–126, 2019.
56. 56. Wang, X., Guo, M.Z., and Ling, T.C., “Review on CO2 curing of non-hydraulic calcium silicates cements: Mechanism, carbonation and performance.”, Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 133, Page 104641, 2022.
57. 57. Gao, X., Yu, Q.L., Lazaro, A., and Brouwers, H.J.H., “Investigation on a green olivine nano-silica source based activator in alkali activated slag-fly ash blends: Reaction kinetics, gel structure and carbon footprint.”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 100, Pages 129–139, 2017.
58. 58. Lazaro, A., Brouwers, H.J.H., Quercia, G., and Geus, J.W., “The properties of amorphous nano-silica synthesized by the dissolution of olivine.”, Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 211–212, Pages 112–121, 2012.
59. 59. Quercia, G., Brouwers, H.J.H., Garnier, A., and Luke, K., “Influence of olivine nano-silica on hydration and performance of oil-well cement slurries.”, Materials & Design, Vol. 96, Pages 162–170, 2016.
60. 60. Achang, M. and Radonjic, M., “Adding olivine micro particles to Portland cement based wellbore cement slurry as a sacrificial material: A quest for the solution in mitigating corrosion of wellbore cement.”, Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 121, Page 104078, 2021.
61. 61. Azizpour, F. and Qaderi, F., “Optimization, modeling and uncertainty investigation of phenolic wastewater treatment by photocatalytic process in cascade reactor.”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 22, Issue 7, Pages 6315–6342, 2020.
62. 62. Khalegh, R. and Qaderi, F., “Optimization of the effect of nanoparticle morphologies on the cost of dye wastewater treatment via ultrasonic/photocatalytic hybrid process.”, Applied Nanoscience (Switzerland), Vol. 9, Issue 8, Pages 1869–1889, 2019.
63. 63. Tamadoni, A. and Qaderi, F., “Environmental-economical assessment of the use of ultrasonication for pre-treatment of the soils contaminated by phenanthrene.”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 259, Page 109991, 2020.
64. 64. Qaderi, F., Sayahzadeh, A.H., and Azizi, M., “Efficiency optimization of petroleum wastewater treatment by using of serial moving bed biofilm reactors.”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 192, Pages 665–677, 2018.
65. 65. Rouzafzay, F., Shidpour, R., Al-Abri, M.Z.M., Qaderi, F., Ahmadi, A., and Myint, M.T.Z., “Graphene@ZnO nanocompound for short-time water treatment under sun-simulated irradiation: Effect of shear exfoliation of graphene using kitchen blender on photocatalytic degradation.”, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 829, Page 154614, 2020.
66. 66. Amiri, H., Azadi, S., Karimaei, M., Sadeghi, H., and Farshad Dabbaghi, “Multi-objective optimization of coal waste recycling in concrete using response surface methodology.”, Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 45, Page 103472, 2022.
67. 67. Sheikholeslami, Z., Kebria, D.Y., and Qaderi, F., “Application of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles for pollution removal from water with visible light.”, Journal of Molecular Liquids, Vol. 299, Page 112118, 2020.
68. 68. Qaderi, F., Sayahzadeh, A.H., Azizpour, F., and Vosughi, P., “Efficiency modeling of serial stabilization ponds in treatment of phenolic wastewater by response surface methodology.”, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 16, Issue 8, Pages 4193–4202, 2019.
69. 69. Paruthi, S., Khan, A.H., Kumar, A., et al., “Sustainable cement replacement using waste eggshells: A review on mechanical properties of eggshell concrete and strength prediction using artificial neural network.”, Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 18, Page e02160, 2023.
70. 70. Abdellatief, M., Elemam, W.E., Alanazi, H., and Tahwia, A.M., “Production and optimization of sustainable cement brick incorporating clay brick wastes using response surface method.”, Ceramics International, Vol. 49, Issue 6, Pages 9395–9411, 2023.
71. 71. Hafez, H., Teirelbar, A., Kurda, R., Tošić, N., and de la Fuente, A., “Pre-bcc: A novel integrated machine learning framework for predicting mechanical and durability properties of blended cement concrete.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 352, Page 129019, 2022.
72. 72. TS EN 197-1, Çimento - Bölüm 1: Genel çimentolar - Bileşim, özellikler ve uygunluk kriterleri, Ankara, 2012.
73. 73. TS EN 196-1, Çimento deney metodları- Bölüm 1: Dayanım tayini, Ankara, 2016.
74. 74. TS EN 196-6: Çimento deney yöntemleri - Bölüm 6: İncelik tayini, 2020.
75. 75. Montgomery, D.C., Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley & Sons, Mishawaka, IN, U.S.A, 2017.
76. 76. Jimma, B.E. and Rangaraju, P.R., “Chemical admixtures dose optimization in pervious concrete paste selection – A statistical approach.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 101, Pages 1047–1058, 2015.
77. 77. Achang, M. and Radonjic, M., “Adding olivine micro particles to Portland cement based wellbore cement slurry as a sacrificial material: A quest for the solution in mitigating corrosion of wellbore cement.”, Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 121, Page 104078, 2021.
78. 78. Elemam, W.E., Abdelraheem, A.H., Mahdy, M.G., and Tahwia, A.M., “Optimizing fresh properties and compressive strength of self-consolidating concrete.”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 249, Page 118781, 2020.
79. 79. Koçak, B., İslam Şahin, Y., and Koçak, Y., “Portland Çimentosunun Eğilme Dayanımına Yüksek Fırın Cürufu Etkisinin Bulanık Mantık ve ANFIS ile Tahmini”, Eskişehir Türk Dünyası Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Bilişim Dergisi, Cilt 4, Sayı 1, Sayfa 17-24, 2023.
80. 80. Ng, K.M., Tam, C.M., and Tam, V.W.Y., “Studying the production process and mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete: a Hong Kong study.”, http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/macr.9.00063, Vol. 62, Issue 9, Pages 647–654, 2015.