Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE MATERIAL AND BUILDING DESIGN IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WITH ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 361 - 369, 30.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.1537779

Öz

Building production with additive manufacturing techniques increase. This technique accelerated building construction works. Building production with additive manufacturing techniques increase. This technique accelerated building construction works. Building construction using additive manufacturing techniques draws attention because it requires less skilled labor, can be built in a shorter time, reduces costs, and contributes to sustainability. On the other, this technique enables the on-site production of buildings and the construction of complex building designs. This study aims to investigate the effect of using sustainable materials on building energy consumption in constructing complex-designed buildings. The effect of using geopolymer, a sustainable material, on building energy performance in square and free-form buildings was investigated. Additionally, the buildings in these forms were modelled with single-layer and double-layer walls, and the impact of layers on energy consumption was examined. On the other side, the effects of building forms in different directions were also examined. In the study, the effects of different scenarios were examined using the building energy simulation program. As a result of the study, it was determined that the building form was effective in the energy consumption of the building. It was also found that in the free-form building, the exterior wall orientation affected the building energy consumption. When the exterior walls of buildings of the same form and orientation were made double-layer instead of single-layer, a 60% decrease in heating energy consumption and a 12% decrease in cooling energy consumption was observed. The study is important in terms of the relationship between free building form and energy consumption.

Kaynakça

  • 1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA), “World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results”, https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications, 5 May 2024.
  • 2. Glavic, P., “Evolution and current challenges of sustainable consumption and production”, Sustainability, Vol.13, Issue 16, Pages 9379, 2021. 3. Sümer-Haydaraslan, K., Yaşar, Y., “Evaluation of building design strategies according to the effects of climate change by simulation-based optimisation: a case study for housing in different climate regions”, International Journal of Global Warming, Vol.30, Issue 1, Pages 33-59, 2023.
  • 4. Zhan, J., Liu, W., Wu, F., Li, Z., Wang, C., “Life cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of urban residential buildings in Guangzhou City”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.194, Pages 318-326, 2018.
  • 5. International Energy Agency, “Global Energy & CO2 Status Report”, https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-co2-status-report-2019, 15 January 2024.
  • 6. www.iea.org/ International Energy Agency, Energy Technology Perspectives. 20 Temmuz 2023.
  • 7. EPBD 2018, Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of Council of 30 May 2018 on the energy performance of buildings (recast), EU Commission, Official Journal of the European Union, 2018.
  • 8. Energy Information Administration, “International Energy Outlook 2021”, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=49876, 10 January 2024.
  • 9. Sümer-Haydaraslan, K., Dikmen, N., “Investigation of the effects of curtain wall angle on energy consumption in buildings”, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, Vol.39, Issue 1, Pages 315-326, 2024.
  • 10. Linner, T., Pan, W., Hu, R., Zhao, C., Iturralde, K., Taghavi, M., Trummer, J., Schlandt, M., Bock, T., “A technology management system for the development of single-task construction robots”, Construction Innovation, Vol.20, Pages 96-111, 2020.
  • 11. Ghaffar, S.H., Corker, J., Fan, M., “Additive manufacturing technology and its implementation in construction as an eco-innovative solution”, Automation in Construction, Vol.93, Pages 1-11, 2018.
  • 12. Brischetto, S., Maggiore, P., Ferro, C.G., “Special Issue on Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Applications”, Technologies, Vol.5, Issue 3, Page 58, 2017.
  • 13. Dong S., Yu Y., “Numerical and experimental studies on capturing behaviors of the inflatable manipulator inspired by fluidic origami structures”, Engineering Structures, Vol.245, 112840, 2021.
  • 14. Zhu A., Pauwels P., De Vries B., “Smart component-oriented method of construction robot coordination for prefabricated housing”, Automation in Construction, Vol.129, 103778, 2021.
  • 15. Gebhard L., Mata-Falc´on J., Anton A., Dillenburger B., Kaufmann W., “Structural behaviour of 3D printed concrete beams with various reinforcement strategies”, Engineering Structures, Vol.240, 112380, 2021.
  • 16. Ma, G., Wang, L., Ju, Y., “State-of-the-art of 3D printing technology of cementitious material an emerging technique for construction”, Science China Technological Sciences, Vol.61, Pages 475-495, 2018.
  • 17. Weng, Y., Li, M., Ruan, S., Wong, T.N., Tan, M.J., Yeong, K.L.O., Qian, S., “Comparative economic, environmental and productivity assessment of a concrete bathroom unit fabricated through 3D printing and a precast approach”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.261, 121245, 2020.
  • 18. Sümer-Haydaraslan K., “Examining the effect of digital manufacturing and traditional building construction techniques on the building production process”, Journal of Science and Technology, Vol.3, Issue 3, Pages 1-13, 2024.
  • 19. Robayo-Salazar, R., Mejía de Gutiérrez, R., Villaquirán-Caicedo, M. A., Arjona, S.D., “3D printing with cementitious materials: Challenges and opportunities for the construction sector”, Automation in Construction, Vol.146, 104693, 2023.
  • 20. Youssef, N., Rabenantoandro, A.Z., Lafhaj, Z., Dakhli, Z., Chehade, F.H., Ducoulombier, L., “A novel approach of geopolymer formulation based on clay for additive manufacturing”, Construction Robotics, Vol.5, Pages 175-190, 2021.
  • 21. Davidovits, J., “Properties of Geopolymer Cements”, International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, Pages 120-128, Kiev, 1994. 22. Khale D., Chaudhary, R., “Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: a review”, Journal of Materials Science, Vol.42, Pages 729-746, 2007.
  • 21. Brooks, J.J., Megat Johari, M.A., Mazloom, M., “Effect of admixtures on the setting times of high-strength concrete”, Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol.22, Issue 4, Pages 293-301, 2000.
  • 24. Bouzoubaâ, N., Lachemi, M., “Self-compacting concrete incorporating high volumes of class F fly ash”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol.31, Issue 3, Pages 413-420, 2001.
  • 25. Ciampa, D., Cioffi, R., Colangelo, F., Diomedi, M., Farina, I., Olita, S., “Use of unbound materials for sustainable road infrastructures” Applied Sciences, Vol.10, Issue 10, 3465, 2020.
  • 26. Galvez-Martos, J.L., Styles, D., Schoenberger, H., Zeschmar-Lahl, B., “Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 136, Pages 166-178, 2018.
  • 27. Poblocki, K., Pawlak, M., Drzezdzon, J., Gawdzik, B., Jacewicz, D., “Clean production of geopolymers as an opportunity for sustainable development of the construction industry”, Science of The Total Environment, Vol.928, 172579, 2024. 28. Singh, N.B., Middendorf, B., Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: an Overview, Construction and Building Materials, Vol.237, 117455, 2020.
  • 29. Abdel-Ghani, N.T., Elsayed, H.A., Abdel Moied, S., Geopolymer synthesis by the alkali-activation of blastfurnace steel slag and its fire-resistance. HBRC Journal, Vol.14, Issue 2, Pages 159-164, 2019.
  • 30. Lv, X., Wang, K., He, Y., Cui, X., A green drying powder inorganic coating based on geopolymer technology, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 214, Pages 441-448, 2019.
  • 31. Youssef, N., Rabenantoandro, A.Z., Lafhaj, Z., Dakhli, Z., Chehade, F. H., Ducoulombier, L., A novel approach of geopolymer formulation based on clay for additive manufacturing, Construction Robotics, Vol 5, Pages 175-190, 2021.
  • 32. Pacheco-Torgal, F., Alkali-activated binders: a review. Part 2. About materials and binders manufacture. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 22, Pages 1315-1322, 2008.
  • 33. Liu, Y., Su, P., Li, M., You, Z., Zhao, M., Review on evolution and evaluation of asphalt pavement structures and materials, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Vol. 7, Issue 5, Pages 573-599, 2020.
  • 34. Shill, S.K., Al-Deen, S., Ashraf, M., Hutchison, W., Resistance of fly ash based geopolymer mortar to both chemicals and high thermal cycles simultaneously, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 239, 117886, 2020.
  • 35. Panda, B., Singh, G.B., Unluer, C., Tan, M.J., “Synthesis and characterization of onepart geopolymers for extrusion-based 3D concrete printing”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 220, Pages 610-619, 2019.
  • 36. Saruhan, V., Keskinateş, M., Felekoğlu, B., “A comprehensive review on fresh state rheological properties of extrusion mortars designed for 3D printing applications”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 337, 127629, 2022.
  • 37. Xia, M., Sanjayan, J., “Method of formulating geopolymer for 3D printing for construction applications”, Materials & Design, Vol. 110, Pages 382-390, 2016.
  • 38. Pegna, J., “Exploratory investigation of solid freeform construction”, Automation in Construction, Vol.5, Issue 5, Pages 427-437, 1997.
  • 39. Mohsen, A., “Design to manufacture of complex building envelopes”, Pages 42-100, Springer, Berlin, 2020. 40. Nguyen, L., Moseson, A.J., Farnam, Y., Spatari, S., “Effects of composition and transportation logistics on environmental, energy and cost metrics for the production of alternative cementitious binders”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.185, Pages 628-645, 2018.
  • 41. Turkish Standardization Institute, ‘TS825: thermal insulation requirements for buildings’, TSE, 2018.
  • 42. Al-Sallal, K.A., Solar access/shading and building form: Geometrical study of the traditional housing cluster in Sana'a, Renewable Energy, Vol.8, Issues 1-4, Pages 331-334, 1996.
  • 43. Chan, A.L.S., “Developing future hourly weather files for studying the impact of climate change on building energy performance in Hong Kong”, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 43, Issue 10, Pages 2860-2868, 2011.
  • 44. Alam, M., Jamil, H., Sanjayan, J., Wilson, “Energy saving potential of phase change materials in major Australian cities”, Energy and Buildings, Vol.78, Pages 192-201, 2014.
  • 45. Kuznik, F., Virgone, J., “Experimental assessment of a phase change material for wall building use”, Applied Energy, Vol.86, Issue 10, Pages 2038-2046, 2009.
  • 46. DesignBuilder Software, “Tutorials”, www.designbuilder.co.uk, June 3, 2024.
  • 47. Rashdi, W., and Embi. M., Analysing Optimum Building Form in Relation to Lower Cooling Load, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.222 Pages 782-790, 2016.
  • 48. Kocagil, I. E., and Oral, G. K., The Effect of Building Form and Settlement Texture on Energy Efficiency for Hot Dry Climate Zone in Turkey. Energy Procedia, Vol. 78, Issue 2315, Pages 1835-40, 2015.
  • 49. de Oliveira Neves, L. and Marques, T. H. T., Building Envelope Energy Performance of High-rise Office buildings in Sao Paulo City, Brazil, Procedia Environmental Sciences, Vol. 38, Pages 821-29, 2017.
  • 50. Haydaraslan, E., Çuhadaroğlu, B., “Analysis of the Effect of Hollow Geometry of Wall Blocks on Heat Transfer”, Düzce University Journal of Science and Technology, Vol.10, Issue 4, Pages 2028-2038, 2022.

EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE MATERIAL AND BUILDING DESIGN IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WITH ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 361 - 369, 30.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.1537779

Öz

Building production with additive manufacturing techniques increase. This technique accelerated building construction works. Building production with additive manufacturing techniques increase. This technique accelerated building construction works. Building construction using additive manufacturing techniques draws attention because it requires less skilled labor, can be built in a shorter time, reduces costs, and contributes to sustainability. On the other, this technique enables the on-site production of buildings and the construction of complex building designs. This study aims to investigate the effect of using sustainable materials on building energy consumption in constructing complex-designed buildings. The effect of using geopolymer, a sustainable material, on building energy performance in square and free-form buildings was investigated. Additionally, the buildings in these forms were modelled with single-layer and double-layer walls, and the impact of layers on energy consumption was examined. On the other side, the effects of building forms in different directions were also examined. In the study, the effects of different scenarios were examined using the building energy simulation program. As a result of the study, it was determined that the building form was effective in the energy consumption of the building. It was also found that in the free-form building, the exterior wall orientation affected the building energy consumption. When the exterior walls of buildings of the same form and orientation were made double-layer instead of single-layer, a 60% decrease in heating energy consumption and a 12% decrease in cooling energy consumption was observed. The study is important in terms of the relationship between free building form and energy consumption.

Kaynakça

  • 1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA), “World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results”, https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications, 5 May 2024.
  • 2. Glavic, P., “Evolution and current challenges of sustainable consumption and production”, Sustainability, Vol.13, Issue 16, Pages 9379, 2021. 3. Sümer-Haydaraslan, K., Yaşar, Y., “Evaluation of building design strategies according to the effects of climate change by simulation-based optimisation: a case study for housing in different climate regions”, International Journal of Global Warming, Vol.30, Issue 1, Pages 33-59, 2023.
  • 4. Zhan, J., Liu, W., Wu, F., Li, Z., Wang, C., “Life cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of urban residential buildings in Guangzhou City”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.194, Pages 318-326, 2018.
  • 5. International Energy Agency, “Global Energy & CO2 Status Report”, https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-co2-status-report-2019, 15 January 2024.
  • 6. www.iea.org/ International Energy Agency, Energy Technology Perspectives. 20 Temmuz 2023.
  • 7. EPBD 2018, Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of Council of 30 May 2018 on the energy performance of buildings (recast), EU Commission, Official Journal of the European Union, 2018.
  • 8. Energy Information Administration, “International Energy Outlook 2021”, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=49876, 10 January 2024.
  • 9. Sümer-Haydaraslan, K., Dikmen, N., “Investigation of the effects of curtain wall angle on energy consumption in buildings”, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, Vol.39, Issue 1, Pages 315-326, 2024.
  • 10. Linner, T., Pan, W., Hu, R., Zhao, C., Iturralde, K., Taghavi, M., Trummer, J., Schlandt, M., Bock, T., “A technology management system for the development of single-task construction robots”, Construction Innovation, Vol.20, Pages 96-111, 2020.
  • 11. Ghaffar, S.H., Corker, J., Fan, M., “Additive manufacturing technology and its implementation in construction as an eco-innovative solution”, Automation in Construction, Vol.93, Pages 1-11, 2018.
  • 12. Brischetto, S., Maggiore, P., Ferro, C.G., “Special Issue on Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Applications”, Technologies, Vol.5, Issue 3, Page 58, 2017.
  • 13. Dong S., Yu Y., “Numerical and experimental studies on capturing behaviors of the inflatable manipulator inspired by fluidic origami structures”, Engineering Structures, Vol.245, 112840, 2021.
  • 14. Zhu A., Pauwels P., De Vries B., “Smart component-oriented method of construction robot coordination for prefabricated housing”, Automation in Construction, Vol.129, 103778, 2021.
  • 15. Gebhard L., Mata-Falc´on J., Anton A., Dillenburger B., Kaufmann W., “Structural behaviour of 3D printed concrete beams with various reinforcement strategies”, Engineering Structures, Vol.240, 112380, 2021.
  • 16. Ma, G., Wang, L., Ju, Y., “State-of-the-art of 3D printing technology of cementitious material an emerging technique for construction”, Science China Technological Sciences, Vol.61, Pages 475-495, 2018.
  • 17. Weng, Y., Li, M., Ruan, S., Wong, T.N., Tan, M.J., Yeong, K.L.O., Qian, S., “Comparative economic, environmental and productivity assessment of a concrete bathroom unit fabricated through 3D printing and a precast approach”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.261, 121245, 2020.
  • 18. Sümer-Haydaraslan K., “Examining the effect of digital manufacturing and traditional building construction techniques on the building production process”, Journal of Science and Technology, Vol.3, Issue 3, Pages 1-13, 2024.
  • 19. Robayo-Salazar, R., Mejía de Gutiérrez, R., Villaquirán-Caicedo, M. A., Arjona, S.D., “3D printing with cementitious materials: Challenges and opportunities for the construction sector”, Automation in Construction, Vol.146, 104693, 2023.
  • 20. Youssef, N., Rabenantoandro, A.Z., Lafhaj, Z., Dakhli, Z., Chehade, F.H., Ducoulombier, L., “A novel approach of geopolymer formulation based on clay for additive manufacturing”, Construction Robotics, Vol.5, Pages 175-190, 2021.
  • 21. Davidovits, J., “Properties of Geopolymer Cements”, International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, Pages 120-128, Kiev, 1994. 22. Khale D., Chaudhary, R., “Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: a review”, Journal of Materials Science, Vol.42, Pages 729-746, 2007.
  • 21. Brooks, J.J., Megat Johari, M.A., Mazloom, M., “Effect of admixtures on the setting times of high-strength concrete”, Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol.22, Issue 4, Pages 293-301, 2000.
  • 24. Bouzoubaâ, N., Lachemi, M., “Self-compacting concrete incorporating high volumes of class F fly ash”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol.31, Issue 3, Pages 413-420, 2001.
  • 25. Ciampa, D., Cioffi, R., Colangelo, F., Diomedi, M., Farina, I., Olita, S., “Use of unbound materials for sustainable road infrastructures” Applied Sciences, Vol.10, Issue 10, 3465, 2020.
  • 26. Galvez-Martos, J.L., Styles, D., Schoenberger, H., Zeschmar-Lahl, B., “Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 136, Pages 166-178, 2018.
  • 27. Poblocki, K., Pawlak, M., Drzezdzon, J., Gawdzik, B., Jacewicz, D., “Clean production of geopolymers as an opportunity for sustainable development of the construction industry”, Science of The Total Environment, Vol.928, 172579, 2024. 28. Singh, N.B., Middendorf, B., Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: an Overview, Construction and Building Materials, Vol.237, 117455, 2020.
  • 29. Abdel-Ghani, N.T., Elsayed, H.A., Abdel Moied, S., Geopolymer synthesis by the alkali-activation of blastfurnace steel slag and its fire-resistance. HBRC Journal, Vol.14, Issue 2, Pages 159-164, 2019.
  • 30. Lv, X., Wang, K., He, Y., Cui, X., A green drying powder inorganic coating based on geopolymer technology, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 214, Pages 441-448, 2019.
  • 31. Youssef, N., Rabenantoandro, A.Z., Lafhaj, Z., Dakhli, Z., Chehade, F. H., Ducoulombier, L., A novel approach of geopolymer formulation based on clay for additive manufacturing, Construction Robotics, Vol 5, Pages 175-190, 2021.
  • 32. Pacheco-Torgal, F., Alkali-activated binders: a review. Part 2. About materials and binders manufacture. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 22, Pages 1315-1322, 2008.
  • 33. Liu, Y., Su, P., Li, M., You, Z., Zhao, M., Review on evolution and evaluation of asphalt pavement structures and materials, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Vol. 7, Issue 5, Pages 573-599, 2020.
  • 34. Shill, S.K., Al-Deen, S., Ashraf, M., Hutchison, W., Resistance of fly ash based geopolymer mortar to both chemicals and high thermal cycles simultaneously, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 239, 117886, 2020.
  • 35. Panda, B., Singh, G.B., Unluer, C., Tan, M.J., “Synthesis and characterization of onepart geopolymers for extrusion-based 3D concrete printing”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 220, Pages 610-619, 2019.
  • 36. Saruhan, V., Keskinateş, M., Felekoğlu, B., “A comprehensive review on fresh state rheological properties of extrusion mortars designed for 3D printing applications”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 337, 127629, 2022.
  • 37. Xia, M., Sanjayan, J., “Method of formulating geopolymer for 3D printing for construction applications”, Materials & Design, Vol. 110, Pages 382-390, 2016.
  • 38. Pegna, J., “Exploratory investigation of solid freeform construction”, Automation in Construction, Vol.5, Issue 5, Pages 427-437, 1997.
  • 39. Mohsen, A., “Design to manufacture of complex building envelopes”, Pages 42-100, Springer, Berlin, 2020. 40. Nguyen, L., Moseson, A.J., Farnam, Y., Spatari, S., “Effects of composition and transportation logistics on environmental, energy and cost metrics for the production of alternative cementitious binders”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.185, Pages 628-645, 2018.
  • 41. Turkish Standardization Institute, ‘TS825: thermal insulation requirements for buildings’, TSE, 2018.
  • 42. Al-Sallal, K.A., Solar access/shading and building form: Geometrical study of the traditional housing cluster in Sana'a, Renewable Energy, Vol.8, Issues 1-4, Pages 331-334, 1996.
  • 43. Chan, A.L.S., “Developing future hourly weather files for studying the impact of climate change on building energy performance in Hong Kong”, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 43, Issue 10, Pages 2860-2868, 2011.
  • 44. Alam, M., Jamil, H., Sanjayan, J., Wilson, “Energy saving potential of phase change materials in major Australian cities”, Energy and Buildings, Vol.78, Pages 192-201, 2014.
  • 45. Kuznik, F., Virgone, J., “Experimental assessment of a phase change material for wall building use”, Applied Energy, Vol.86, Issue 10, Pages 2038-2046, 2009.
  • 46. DesignBuilder Software, “Tutorials”, www.designbuilder.co.uk, June 3, 2024.
  • 47. Rashdi, W., and Embi. M., Analysing Optimum Building Form in Relation to Lower Cooling Load, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.222 Pages 782-790, 2016.
  • 48. Kocagil, I. E., and Oral, G. K., The Effect of Building Form and Settlement Texture on Energy Efficiency for Hot Dry Climate Zone in Turkey. Energy Procedia, Vol. 78, Issue 2315, Pages 1835-40, 2015.
  • 49. de Oliveira Neves, L. and Marques, T. H. T., Building Envelope Energy Performance of High-rise Office buildings in Sao Paulo City, Brazil, Procedia Environmental Sciences, Vol. 38, Pages 821-29, 2017.
  • 50. Haydaraslan, E., Çuhadaroğlu, B., “Analysis of the Effect of Hollow Geometry of Wall Blocks on Heat Transfer”, Düzce University Journal of Science and Technology, Vol.10, Issue 4, Pages 2028-2038, 2022.
Toplam 46 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Makine Mühendisliği (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Kübra Sümer Haydaraslan 0000-0003-0663-6141

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Aralık 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 23 Ağustos 2024
Kabul Tarihi 12 Aralık 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Sümer Haydaraslan, K. (2024). EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE MATERIAL AND BUILDING DESIGN IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WITH ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, 8(3), 361-369. https://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.1537779
AMA Sümer Haydaraslan K. EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE MATERIAL AND BUILDING DESIGN IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WITH ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING. IJ3DPTDI. Aralık 2024;8(3):361-369. doi:10.46519/ij3dptdi.1537779
Chicago Sümer Haydaraslan, Kübra. “EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE MATERIAL AND BUILDING DESIGN IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WITH ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING”. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry 8, sy. 3 (Aralık 2024): 361-69. https://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.1537779.
EndNote Sümer Haydaraslan K (01 Aralık 2024) EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE MATERIAL AND BUILDING DESIGN IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WITH ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry 8 3 361–369.
IEEE K. Sümer Haydaraslan, “EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE MATERIAL AND BUILDING DESIGN IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WITH ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING”, IJ3DPTDI, c. 8, sy. 3, ss. 361–369, 2024, doi: 10.46519/ij3dptdi.1537779.
ISNAD Sümer Haydaraslan, Kübra. “EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE MATERIAL AND BUILDING DESIGN IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WITH ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING”. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry 8/3 (Aralık2024), 361-369. https://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.1537779.
JAMA Sümer Haydaraslan K. EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE MATERIAL AND BUILDING DESIGN IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WITH ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING. IJ3DPTDI. 2024;8:361–369.
MLA Sümer Haydaraslan, Kübra. “EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE MATERIAL AND BUILDING DESIGN IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WITH ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING”. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, c. 8, sy. 3, 2024, ss. 361-9, doi:10.46519/ij3dptdi.1537779.
Vancouver Sümer Haydaraslan K. EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE MATERIAL AND BUILDING DESIGN IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WITH ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING. IJ3DPTDI. 2024;8(3):361-9.

 download

Uluslararası 3B Yazıcı Teknolojileri ve Dijital Endüstri Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.