AN INTEGRATED SLIP RISK ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK FOR HOSPITAL ENVIRONMENTS USING IN SITU FRICTION MEASUREMENTS AND MACHINE LEARNING

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 , 117 - 134 , 30.04.2026

Gültekin Çoşkun , Gencay Sarıışık

https://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.1841998

https://izlik.org/JA43GH48GM

Öz

Slip-related accidents remain a critical safety challenge in hospital environments due to high pedestrian traffic, frequent contamination, and heterogeneous flooring conditions. This study proposes a novel and integrative framework for slip risk assessment based on in situ friction measurements, statistical analysis, machine learning, and explainable artificial intelligence. Dynamic Coefficient of Friction (DCOF) measurements were collected from two public hospitals across five functional zones (corridors, patient rooms, toilets, showers, and examination rooms), under both dry and wet conditions, resulting in a dataset of 540 observations. A composite Slip Risk Index (SRI) was developed by integrating frictional performance with environmental, spatial, and material-related factors through a weighted aggregation scheme. Paired-sample statistical analyses confirmed a very strong inverse relationship between DCOF and SRI, while correlation and feature importance analyses revealed that environmental condition and flooring material act as significant secondary contributors. Ensemble-based machine learning models, including Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Bagging, CatBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM, were employed to predict SRI values. Among these, Gradient Boosting demonstrated the most robust and balanced performance, achieving near-perfect goodness-of-fit and minimal prediction error. Explainable machine learning analysis using SHAP further validated the dominance of frictional performance in slip risk formation and ensured model transparency. The proposed framework bridges the gap between traditional tribological assessment and data-driven predictive safety management by providing an interpretable, accurate, and scalable decision-support tool. The findings offer actionable insights for hospital designers, facility managers, and safety engineers, supporting evidence-based flooring selection, environmental control, and preventive maintenance strategies aimed at reducing slip-and-fall accidents in healthcare environments.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Slip Risk Index , Dynamic Coefficient of Friction , Hospital Floor Safety , Machine Learning.

Kaynakça

• 1. US Bureau of Labor, Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses, USBOL, Report No: USDL-21-1927, 2021.1
• 2. Turkish Social Security Directorate, 2019 Workplace Accidents and Illnesses in Turkey, Ankara, 2020.
• 3. Kim, I.J., Smith, R., Nagata, H., “Microscopic observations of the progressive wear on the shoe surfaces that affect the slip resistance characteristics”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 18, Pages 17–29, 2001.
• 4. Mokhtar, A., “Challenges of designing ablution spaces in mosques”, Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol. 9, Issue 2, Pages 55–61, 2003.
• 5. Kim, I.J., Bendak, S., “Emerging safety risks from public facilities: A field study for ablution spaces in mosques”, Facilities, Vol. 39, Issue 13–14, Pages 843–858, 2021.
• 6. Coşkun, G., Sarıışık, G., “Analysis of slip safety risk by portable floor slipperiness tester in state institutions”, Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 27, Article No. 100953, 2020.
• 7. Li, K.W., Chang, W.R., Leamon, T.B., Chen, C.J., “Floor slipperiness measurement: friction coefficient, roughness of floors, and subjective perception under spillage conditions”, Safety Science, Vol. 42, Issue 6, Pages 547–565, 2004.
• 8. Ricotti, R., Delucchi, M., Cerisola, G.A., “Comparison of results from portable and laboratory floor slipperiness testers”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 39, Pages 353–357, 2009.
• 9. Waluś, K.J., Warguła, Ł., Wieczorek, B., Krawiec, P., “Slip risk analysis on the surface of floors in public utility buildings”, Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 54, Article No. 104643, 2022.
• 10. Beschorner, K.E., Randolph, A.B., “Friction performance of resilient flooring under contaminant conditions relevant to healthcare settings”, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 108, Article No. 103960, 2023.
• 11. Çoşkun, G., Bendak, S., “Safety of hospital floor coverings: A mixed method study”, Safety Science, Vol. 163, Article No. 106145, 2023.
• 12. Kim, I.J., “Investigation of floor surface finishes for optimal slip resistance performance”, Safety and Health at Work, Vol. 9, Issue 1, Pages 17–24, 2018.
• 13. Midtfjord, A.D., De Bin, R., Huseby, A.B., “A decision support system for safer airplane landings: Predicting runway conditions using XGBoost and explainable AI”, Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 199, Article No. 103556, 2022.
• 14. Sarıışık, G., Çoşkun, G., “Safer floors in public service buildings based on machine learning”, Journal of Tribology, Vol. 147, Issue 9, Article No. 091105, 2025.
• 15. Lau, K., Fernie, G., & Fekr, A. R. Estimating the slip resistant quality of winter footwear using Artificial Intelligence. Safety Science, Vol. 181, 106686, 2025.
• 16. Lau, K., Yamaguchi, T., Shibata, K., Nishi, T., Fernie, G., & Fekr, A. R. (2024). Machine learning prediction of footwear slip resistance on glycerol-contaminated surfaces: A pilot study. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 117, 104249.
• 17. Wieczorek, B., Gierz, Ł., Warguła, Ł., Kinal, G., Kostov, B., & Waluś, K. J. (2025). Slip Risk on Surfaces Made with 3D Printing Technology. Materials, Vol. 18, Issue 3, Pages 573.
• 18. Beschorner, K. E., & Randolph, A. B. Friction performance of resilient flooring under contaminant conditions relevant to healthcare settings. Applied ergonomics, Vol. 108, 103960, 2023.
• 19. Zhang, C., & Liu, L. Machine learning prediction model for medical environment comfort based on SHAP and LIME interpretability analysis. Scientific Reports, Vol. 15, Issue 1, 39269, 2025.
• 20. Aylak, B. L. SustAI-SCM: Intelligent Supply Chain Process Automation with Agentic AI for Sustainability and Cost Efficiency. Sustainability, Vol. 17, Issue 6, 2453, 2025.
• 21. Aylak, B. L., & Oral, O. Yapay zeka ve makine öğrenmesi tekniklerinin lojistik sektöründe kullanımı. El-Cezeri, Vol. 8, Issue 1, Pages 74-93, 2021.
• 22. Taş, M. A., & Aylak, B. L. Analysing the impacts of European Green Deal on logistics through CIMO-Logic. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Vol. 34, Pages 568-572, 2022.
• 23. Kayikci, Y., Durak Usar, D., & Aylak, B. L. Using blockchain technology to drive operational excellence in perishable food supply chains during outbreaks. The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 33, Issue 3, Pages 836-876, 2022.
• 24. German Institute for Standardization (DIN), Testing of floor coverings – Determination of the antislip property – Method for measurement of the sliding friction coefficient, DIN 51131:2014, Berlin, 2014.
• 25. Xu, P., Ji, X., Li, M., Lu, W., “Small data machine learning in materials science”, npj Computational Materials, Vol. 9, Issue 1, Article No. 42, 2023.
• 26. Breiman, L., “Random forests”, Machine Learning, Vol. 45, Pages 5–32, 2001.
• 27. Sharma, S., Gupta, V., Mudgal, D., “Response surface methodology and machine learning based tensile strength prediction in ultrasonic assisted coating of poly lactic acid bone plates manufactured using fused deposition modeling”, Ultrasonics, Vol. 137, Article No. 107204, 2024.
• 28. Friedman, J.H., “Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine”, Annals of Statistics, Vol. 29, Pages 1189–1232, 2001.
• 29. Breiman, L., “Bagging predictors”, Machine Learning, Vol. 24, Pages 123–140, 1996.
• 30. Zhou, Z.H., Ensemble Methods: Foundations and Algorithms, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2025.
• 31. Hussain, S., Mustafa, M.W., Jumani, T.A., Baloch, S.K., Alotaibi, H., Khan, I., Khan, A., “A novel feature engineered CatBoost-based supervised machine learning framework for electricity theft detection”, Energy Reports, Vol. 7, Pages 4425–4436, 2021.
• 32. Ibrahim, A.A., Ridwan, R.L., Muhammed, M.M., Abdulaziz, R.O., Saheed, G.A., “Comparison of the CatBoost classifier with other machine learning methods”, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 11, Issue 11, Pages 738–746, 2020.
• 33. Re, M., Valentini, G., “Ensemble methods: A review”, In: Kumar, V. (Ed.), Advances in Machine Learning and Data Mining for Astronomy, Pages 563–594, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2012.
• 34. Sharma, S., Gupta, V., Mudgal, D., Srivastava, V., “Machine learning for forecasting the biomechanical behavior of orthopedic bone plates fabricated by fused deposition modeling”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 30, Issue 3, Pages 441–459, 2024.
• 35. Chen, T., Guestrin, C., “XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system”, Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Pages 785–794, San Francisco, USA, 2016.
• 36. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Liu, T.Y., “LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 30, Pages 3146–3154, 2017.
• 37. Zhou, Y., Wang, W., Wang, K., Song, J., “Application of LightGBM algorithm in the initial design of a library in the cold area of China based on comprehensive performance”, Buildings, Vol. 12, Article No. 1309, 2022.
• 38. Iraqi, A., Vidic, N.S., Redfern, M.S., Beschorner, K.E., “Prediction of coefficient of friction based on footwear outsole features”, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 82, Article No. 102963, 2020.
• 39. Beschorner, K.E., Iraqi, A., Redfern, M.S., Moyer, B.E., Cham, R., “Influence of averaging time-interval on shoe–floor–contaminant available coefficient of friction measurements”, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 82, Article No. 102959, 2020.
• 40. National Floor Safety Institute (NFSI), Test Method for Measuring the Wet Dynamic Coefficient of Friction (DCOF) of Hard Surface Walkways, NFSI B101.3-2022, USA, 2022.
• 41. American National Standards Institute (ANSI), Dynamic Coefficient of Friction (DCOF) of Hard Surface Flooring Materials, ANSI A326.3-2021, USA, 2021.
• 42. Kim, I.J., Smith, R., “Observation of the floor surface topography changes in pedestrian slip resistance measurements”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 26, Issue 6, Pages 581–601, 2000.
• 43. Lau, K., Yamaguchi, T., Shibata, K., Nishi, T., Fernie, G., Fekr, A.R., “Machine learning prediction of footwear slip resistance on glycerol-contaminated surfaces: A pilot study”, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 117, Article No. 104249, 2024.