An overview for effects on aerodynamic performance of using winglets and wingtip devices on aircraft

Öz

In this study, the effects of different types of winglets and wingtip devices on aerodynamic performance in aircraft were investigated. Mostly, CFD analyzes were performed with different turbulence models in the examined studies, as well as experimental studies were also conducted. It has been observed that especially k-ε, k-ω and Sparlat Almaras turbulence models are used in calculations. As a result of the investigations, it has been observed that both the use of winglets and the use of a wingtip devices significantly reduce the vortex formation in the wingtips compared to the plain wing. It has been determined that the most effective method in reducing wing tip vortexes is the use of winglet. The reduction of these vortexes resulted in an increase in lift force and a decrease in drag force. Thus, the L/D ratio has increased and as a result; better fuel economy, longer range and higher payload are provided.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Aircraft
• Drag force
• Lift force
• Winglet
• Wingtip device

Kaynakça

1. European Aviation Safety Agency. Part 66 Cat. B1 / B2 Module 8: Basic Aerodynamics, Kazimiero Simonavičiaus University, Lithuania, 2017.
2. Duncan, J.S. Pilot’s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge, U.S. Department of Transportation-Federal Aviation Administration-Flight Standards Service, USA, 2008.
3. Ekinci, M.B. 2018. “Vortex Control at The Wing Tip Region of CN 235 Aircraft”. Msc. Thesis, Erciyes University, Graduate School of Natural Sciences, Kayseri, Turkey, 5-10, 24-50.
4. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1a/Form-drag-and-skin-friction-ratio.svg (30.11.2020)
5. https://www.flightliteracy.com/forces-acting-on-the-aircraft-drag/ (30.11.2020)
6. https://www.asa2fly.com/The-Student-Pilots-Flight-Manual-P3827.aspx (30.11.2020)
7. Budziak, K. Aerodynamic Analysis with Athena Vortex Lattice (AVL), Department of Automotive and Aeronautical Engineering, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences (HAW Hamburg), Germany, 2015.
8. https://www.cfinotebook.net/graphics/aerodynamics-and-performance/principles-of-flight/wingtip-vorticies.webp (30.11.2020)

9. https://i.imgur.com/lJEmAzV.jpg (30.11.2020)
10. Bayındırlı, C. and Çelik, M. 2018. The experimentally and numerically determination of the drag coefficient of a bus model. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies, 7(3), 117-123.
11. Jahanmiri, M. Aircraft Drag Reduction: An Overview, Division of Dynamics Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, 2011.
12. Gavrilović, N.N., Rašuo, B.P., Dulikravich, G.S. and Parezanović, V.B. 2015. Commercial aircraft performance improvement using winglets. FME Transactions, 43(1), 1-8.
13. Bargsten, C.J. and Gibson, M.T. NASA Innovation in Aeronautics: Select Technologies that have Shaped Modern Aviation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), USA, 2011.
14. Bravo-Mosquera, P.D., Cerón-Muñoz, H.D., Díaz-Vázquez, G. and Catalano, F.M. 2018, Conceptual design and CFD analysis of a new prototype of agricultural aircraft. Aerospace Science and Technology, 80, 156–176.
15. Panagiotou, P., Kaparos, P. and Yakinthos, K. 2014. Winglet design and optimization for a MALE UAV using CFD. Aerospace Science and Technology, 39, 190–205.
16. Eguea, J.P., Gouveia da Silva, G.P. and Catalano, F.M. 2020. Fuel efficiency improvement on a business jet using a camber morphing winglet concept. Aerospace Science and Technology, 96, 105542.
17. Guerrero, J.E., Maestro, D. and Bottaro, A. 2012. Biomimetic spiroid winglets for lift and drag control. Comptes Rendus Mecanique, 340, 67-80.
18. Narayan, G. and John, B. 2016. Effect of winglets induced tip vortex structure on the performance of subsonic wings. Aerospace Science and Technology, 58, 328–340
19. Flechner, S.G., Jacobs, P.F. and Whitcomb, R.T. A High Subsonic Speed Wind-Tunnel Investigation of Winglets on a Representative Second-Generation Jet Transport Wing, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), USA, 1976.
20. Gratzer, L.B. Blended Winglet, United States Patent, Patent Number: 5348253, 1994.
21. Babigian, R. and Hayashibara, S. 2009. Computational Study of the Vortex Wake Generated by a Three-Dimensional Wing with Dihedral, Taper, and Sweep. 27th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 22 - 25 June, San Antonio, Texas, USA, AIAA 2009-4107.
22. Mattos, B.S., Macedo, A.P. and Filho, D.H.S. 2003. Considerations about Winglet Design. 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 23 - 26 June, Orlando, Florida, USA, AIAA 2003-3502.
23. Kim, U. 2015. “Numerical Analysis and Optimization of Wing-tip Designs”. Msc. Thesis, San Jose State University, The Faculty of the Department of Aerospace Engineering, San Jose, California, USA, 28-60.
24. Yahaya, N., Ismail, A.M.M., Sabrin, N.A., Amilin, N., Nalisa, A., Izyan, I. and Ramli, Y. 2015. Investigation of Whitcomb’s Winglet Flow Behaviour using PIV and FLUENT. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 13(1), 22-28.
25. Brüderlin, M., Zimmer, M., Hosters, N. and Behr, M. 2017. Numerical simulation of vortex generators on a winglet control surface. Aerospace Science and Technology, 71, 651–660.
26. Hossain, A., Arora, P.R., Rahman, A., Jaafar, A.Z. and Iqbal, A.K.M.P. 2008. Analysis of Longitudinal Aerodynamic Characteristics of an Aircraft Model with and Without Winglet. Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 2(3), 143-150.
27. Karapğlu, İ. 2015. “The Analysis of Waved Winglet Design on CN-235 CASA by Using Computational Fluid Dynamics”. Msc. Thesis, National Defense University Air Force Academy, Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Technology, İstanbul, Turkey, 20-46.
28. Wan, T. Chou, H.C. and Lien, K.W. 2006. Aerodynamic efficiency study of modern spiroid winglets, 25th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical, Sciences, September, Germany, Paper ICAS 2006-3.7S.
29. Reddy, S.R., Sobieczky, H., Abdoli, A. and Dulikravich, G.S. 2014. Winglets–Multiobjective Optimization of Aerodynamic Shapes. 11th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM XI), 20 – 25 July, Barcelona, Spain.
30. Falcao, L., Gomes, A.A. and SulemanA. 2011. Design and Analysis of an Adaptive Wingtip. 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 4 - 7 April, Denver, Colorado, USA, AIAA 2011-2131.
31. Ashrafi, Z.N. and Sedaghat, A. 2014. Improving the Aerodynamic Performance of a Wing with Winglet. International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences, 8(3), 52-57.
32. Shelton, A., Tomar, A., Prasad, J.V.R., Smith, M.J. and Komerath, N. 2006. Active Multiple Winglets for Improved Unmanned-Aerial-Vehicle Performance. Journal of Aircraft, 43(1), 110-116.
33. Gölcük, A.İ. 2016. “Winglet Design and Analysis for Low Altitude Solar Powered UAV”. Msc. Thesis, Middle East Technical University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara, Turkey, 33-94.
34. Panagiotou, P., Kaparos, P. Salpingidou, C. and Yakinthos, K. 2016. Aerodynamic design of a MALE UAV. Aerospace Science and Technology, 50, 127–138.
35. Turanoğuz, E. 2014. “Design of a Medium Range Tactical UAV and Improvement of Its Performance by Using Winglets”. Msc. Thesis, Middle East Technical University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara, Turkey, 50-83.