TR
EN
Thermodynamic performance comparison of a mobile air conditioning system for various HFO and HC alternative refrigerants to replace R134a
Öz
The thermodynamic performance of a mobile air conditioning (MAC) system with R134a was compared with the performance offered by some Hydrofluoroolefin (HFO) and Hydrocarbon (HC) refrigerants, namely R1234yf, R1234ze(e), R152a, R290 and R600a. Both the energy and exergy performance merits of the MAC system, including the COP, the rates of exergy destroyed in the components and the exergetic efficiency, were taken into account. In this comparison, the cooling load of the evaporator was varied between 3 kW and 7 kW, both the superheat and subcooling at the outlets of the heat exchangers were assumed to be 5 °C. The refrigerant properties were determined using the REFPROP 9.1 software for a typical evaporating temperature of −2 °C, condenser temperatures of 40 and 50 °C and compressor isentropic efficiency of 55%. Then, the proposed performance parameters of the MAC system were calculated. R1234yf, R1234ze(e) and R290 yielded on average 4.41%, 0.20% and 1.69% lower COP, respectively, whereas R600a and R152a resulted in on average 2.45% and 3.39% higher COP, respectively, relative to R134a. In agreement with the COP findings, R1234yf, R1234ze(e) and R290 provided on average 4.34%, 0.22% and 1.64% lower exergetic efficiency, while R600a and R152a yielded on average 2.38% and 3.35% higher exergetic efficiency, respectively than R134a.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Bhatti, M.S., “Riding in Comfort Part II: Evolution of Automotive Air Conditioning”, ASHRAE Journal, 41, 44-50, 1999.
- UNEP, “Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer, final act”, United Nations Environment Programme, 1987.
- Lee, Y. and Jung, D., “A brief performance comparison of R1234yf and R134a in a bench tester for automobile applications”, Applied Thermal Engineering, 35, 240-242, 2012.
- UNEP, “Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change”, United Nations Environment Programme, 1997.
- EU, “Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on fluorinated greenhouse gases and repealing Regulation (EC) No 842/2006”, Official Journal of European Union, L 150/195, 2014.
- Zhang, Z., Wang, J., Feng, X., Chang, L., Chen, Y. and Wang, X., “The solutions to electric vehicle air conditioning systems: A review”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91, 443-463, 2018.
- Devecioğlu, A.G. and Oruç, V., “A comparative energetic analysis for some low-GWP refrigerants as R134a replacements in various vapor compression refrigeration systems”, Journal of Thermal Sciences and Technology, 38, 51-61, 2018.
- Zilio, C., Brown, J.S., Schiochet, G. and Cavallini, A., “The refrigerant R1234yf in air conditioning systems”, Energy, 36, 6110-6120, 2011.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Otomotivde Isı Transferi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
25 Mart 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi
20 Ağustos 2024
Kabul Tarihi
20 Ocak 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2025 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1
APA
Kabak, E., & Hoşöz, M. (2025). Thermodynamic performance comparison of a mobile air conditioning system for various HFO and HC alternative refrigerants to replace R134a. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies, 14(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.18245/ijaet.1536150
AMA
1.Kabak E, Hoşöz M. Thermodynamic performance comparison of a mobile air conditioning system for various HFO and HC alternative refrigerants to replace R134a. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies. 2025;14(1):25-37. doi:10.18245/ijaet.1536150
Chicago
Kabak, Eren, ve Murat Hoşöz. 2025. “Thermodynamic performance comparison of a mobile air conditioning system for various HFO and HC alternative refrigerants to replace R134a”. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies 14 (1): 25-37. https://doi.org/10.18245/ijaet.1536150.
EndNote
Kabak E, Hoşöz M (01 Mart 2025) Thermodynamic performance comparison of a mobile air conditioning system for various HFO and HC alternative refrigerants to replace R134a. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies 14 1 25–37.
IEEE
[1]E. Kabak ve M. Hoşöz, “Thermodynamic performance comparison of a mobile air conditioning system for various HFO and HC alternative refrigerants to replace R134a”, International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies, c. 14, sy 1, ss. 25–37, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.18245/ijaet.1536150.
ISNAD
Kabak, Eren - Hoşöz, Murat. “Thermodynamic performance comparison of a mobile air conditioning system for various HFO and HC alternative refrigerants to replace R134a”. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies 14/1 (01 Mart 2025): 25-37. https://doi.org/10.18245/ijaet.1536150.
JAMA
1.Kabak E, Hoşöz M. Thermodynamic performance comparison of a mobile air conditioning system for various HFO and HC alternative refrigerants to replace R134a. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies. 2025;14:25–37.
MLA
Kabak, Eren, ve Murat Hoşöz. “Thermodynamic performance comparison of a mobile air conditioning system for various HFO and HC alternative refrigerants to replace R134a”. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies, c. 14, sy 1, Mart 2025, ss. 25-37, doi:10.18245/ijaet.1536150.
Vancouver
1.Eren Kabak, Murat Hoşöz. Thermodynamic performance comparison of a mobile air conditioning system for various HFO and HC alternative refrigerants to replace R134a. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies. 01 Mart 2025;14(1):25-37. doi:10.18245/ijaet.1536150
Cited By
Comparison of the Thermodynamic Performance and Total Equivalent Warming Impacts of Various Refrigerants Alternative to R134a in Automobile Air Conditioning Systems for Cooling Mode Operations
International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology
https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1827501