OPPORTUNITIES FOR TRANSFORMATION THROUGH ADAPTIVE DESIGN: EMERGENT STUDENT WORK

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 29 - 40, 01.09.2019

Stella Papanıcolaou Mıchael Louw

Öz

The Design Research Studio, Studio Adapt in the post-graduate architecture programme at the University of Cape Town, engaged with transformation through the adaptive redesign of existing structures. This paper will look at activities undertaken by students in the studio environment during the 2017 and 2018 academic years. Starting with the premise that a building could be understood as standing in for abstract thought, the studio introduced the students to a range of theories. Seminars on the found object in art, significance in heritage studies, gentrification, the right to the city, conflicting rationalities, social transformation through spatial transformation and sustainability, encouraged the students to address the problem from multiple angles.More specific concepts were identified by each individual student through field work, including mappings and conversations with the various stakeholders of their selected sites. The students were required to identify the specific characteristics, challenges and potentials of their sites of study and to allow the found potentials to guide their investigations and design moves. Students were encouraged to treat their design interventions as a means through which to instigate dialogue between various conflicting positions surrounding their sites and areas of investigation, and they were required to consider the social and material implications of interventions on a site.Projects by students, both theoretical and practical, are used in this paper to illustrate concepts that hold potential for transformative design practices in adaptive reuse. The research reveals issues of interest embedded in the selected sites and presents possible approaches towards the transformation of the city through a series of design propositions presented by students. These include issues such as the right to the city and social justice, typological disruptions, programmatic adaptations, memory and archaeology, and the adaptation of ways of making.In all cases, the students built on the theoretical framework offered by the studio seminars through a careful reading of the specific character of the existing building, following the narratives provided by the tension between the found form and the new demands brought about by a changed context. In every case the existing was evaluated for what it might offer. Through a series of imaginative explorations, interventions involving various combinations of preservation, erasure and addition, were tested for how they might unlock the hidden potential of these found buildings to contribute to social transformation through their spatial and material transformation

Anahtar Kelimeler

Adaptive reuse, specificity, socio-spatial transformation, student work

Kaynakça

• Allen, S. 2000. Practice: Architecture, Technique, and Representation. London, Routledge: 29-45.
• Bhabha, H. 2007. Architecture and Thought. In Intervention Architecture: Building for Change. P. Johnston (ed.) London: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.
• De Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. S. Rendall (translator). Berkley: University of California Press.
• Douet, J. (Ed.), 2012. Industrial Heritage Retooled: The TICCIH Guide to Industrial Heritage Conservation. New York: Routledge.
• Güney, Y. İ., 1992. Type and Typology in Architectural Discourse, in Journal of Balikesir University, Institute of Science and Technology, Volume 9, Number 1, July 2007, pp. 3-18.
• Harvey, D., 2012. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. New York: Verso.
• Hertzberger, H., 1991. Functionality, Flexibility and Polyvalence, in Hertzberger, H. (Ed.), 1991. Lessons for Students in Architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers. Pp. 147-149.
• Koolhaas, R., 1978. Delirious New York: A Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan. New York: Monacelli Press Inc.
• Nora, P., 2002. Reasons for the Current Upsurge in Memory, in Eurozine, 19 April 2002, first published in Transit 22/2002. pp. 1-12. [Online] Available: https://www.eurozine.com/reasons-for-the-current-upsurge-in- memory/?pdf (Accessed 3 February 2019).
• Lefebvre, H. 1995. The right to the city. in Writings on Cities. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Low, I. 2003. Space and Transformation: Architecture and Identity. In Digest of South African Architecture 2002 — Emerging Identities.
• Pillay, S., Russell, S., Sendin, J., Sithole, M., Budlender, M. & Knoetze, D., 2017. I Used to Live There: A Call for Transitional Housing for Evictees in Cape Town. Cape Town: Ndifuna Ukwazi.
• Ramphele, M., 1993. A Bed Called Home: Life in the Migrant Labour Hostels of Cape Town. Cape Town: David Philip.
• Tschumi, B. and M. Berman (Eds). 2003. Index Architecture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Watson, V. 2003. Conflicting Rationalities: Implications for Planning Theory and Ethics. In Planning Theory & Practice 4 (4): 395-407.