BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2016, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 31 - 40, 01.01.2016

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Bruce, N.; Condie, J.; Henshaw, V. and Payne, S.V., 2015. Analysing olfactory and auditory sensescapes in English cities: sensory expectation and urban environmental perception. Ambiances. URL: http://ambiances.revues.org/560
  • Fairbairn, D.; Andrienko, G.; Buziek, GG. And Dykes, J., 2001. Representation and its relationship with cartographic visualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, Volume 28, Issue 1.
  • Flügge, E., 2014. Sonic thinking: how sound-art practices teach us critical listening to space. Invisible Places, 18– 20 July 2014, Viseu, Portugal.
  • Forster, S.M.; Gowans, S.; Case, J and Maciej, K., 2014. An examination of the role of sound in defining the city in the context of Edinburgh. European Academic Research, Vol. I, Issue 10.
  • Hallsten, J., 2014. Sonic movements – spatial reflexivity. Somatechnics, 4.1, pp.133–148.
  • Kekou, E. and Marangoni, M., 2010. A new sense of city through hearing and sound. AMBER art and technology festival: Istanbul. URL: http://www.humbug.me/ANewSenseofCity.pdf
  • Leus, M., 2011, The soundscape of cities: a new layer in city renewal. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol 150.
  • Low, K.E.Y, 2015. The sensuous city: sensory methodologies in urban ethnographic research. Ethnography, Vol. 16(3), pp.295–312.
  • MacEachren, A., 2004. How maps work: representation, visualization, and design. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Relph, E., 1976. Place and placelessness. London: Pion.
  • Sacks, O., 1989. Seeing voices. USA: First Vintage Books.
  • Schafer, R.M., 1994. The soundscape: our sonic environment and the tuning of the world. Rochester VT: Destiny.
  • Tausig, B., 2011 Creative reception in urban space or the art of listening. Journal of Urban Culture Research, Vol. 2, pp.80-95.
  • Tuan, Y.F., 1974. Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes and values. New Jersey: PrenticeHall.
  • Varanka, D., 2006. Interpreting map art with a perspective learned from J.M. Blaut Cartographic Perspectives, Number 53, pp.15-23.
  • Wissmann, T., 2014. Geographies of urban sound. New York: Routledge.
  • (1)http://worldarchitecture.org/architecture-news/hevv/city-perception-through-psychogeography.html
  • (2) http://www.inenart.eu/?tag=psychogeographic-maps
  • (3)http://worldarchitecture.org/architecture-news/hevv/city-perception-through-psychogeography.html
  • (4) http://www.inenart.eu/?tag=psychogeographic-maps
  • (5) http://www.inenart.eu/?tag=psychogeographic-maps
  • (6) http://www.inenart.eu/?tag=psychogeographic-maps

A SENSORY EXPERIENCE IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT: SOUND-WALKS AND SOUND-MAPS

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 31 - 40, 01.01.2016

Öz

Sensory studies are important to develop an understanding of the relationship between people and the environment and to see the need to relate buildings and the spaces between them. Stimuli from the sense organs are transformed into perception through processes that take place in mind and they are signified by mechanisms, interpreted, and thus perception occurs. The aim of this study is to introduce a way to obtain sensory information from the spatial environment, to understand and realize the methods to express the results of such an experience visually. A case study is conducted with first grade architectural students in Haskoy, Beyoglu in order to acquire auditory knowledge from the environment and to visualize them. The case study consists of three steps: understanding the issue of environmental sounds, acquiring environmental sounds with direct experience, and visualizing the data as forms of sense-maps using various techniques

Kaynakça

  • Bruce, N.; Condie, J.; Henshaw, V. and Payne, S.V., 2015. Analysing olfactory and auditory sensescapes in English cities: sensory expectation and urban environmental perception. Ambiances. URL: http://ambiances.revues.org/560
  • Fairbairn, D.; Andrienko, G.; Buziek, GG. And Dykes, J., 2001. Representation and its relationship with cartographic visualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, Volume 28, Issue 1.
  • Flügge, E., 2014. Sonic thinking: how sound-art practices teach us critical listening to space. Invisible Places, 18– 20 July 2014, Viseu, Portugal.
  • Forster, S.M.; Gowans, S.; Case, J and Maciej, K., 2014. An examination of the role of sound in defining the city in the context of Edinburgh. European Academic Research, Vol. I, Issue 10.
  • Hallsten, J., 2014. Sonic movements – spatial reflexivity. Somatechnics, 4.1, pp.133–148.
  • Kekou, E. and Marangoni, M., 2010. A new sense of city through hearing and sound. AMBER art and technology festival: Istanbul. URL: http://www.humbug.me/ANewSenseofCity.pdf
  • Leus, M., 2011, The soundscape of cities: a new layer in city renewal. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol 150.
  • Low, K.E.Y, 2015. The sensuous city: sensory methodologies in urban ethnographic research. Ethnography, Vol. 16(3), pp.295–312.
  • MacEachren, A., 2004. How maps work: representation, visualization, and design. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Relph, E., 1976. Place and placelessness. London: Pion.
  • Sacks, O., 1989. Seeing voices. USA: First Vintage Books.
  • Schafer, R.M., 1994. The soundscape: our sonic environment and the tuning of the world. Rochester VT: Destiny.
  • Tausig, B., 2011 Creative reception in urban space or the art of listening. Journal of Urban Culture Research, Vol. 2, pp.80-95.
  • Tuan, Y.F., 1974. Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes and values. New Jersey: PrenticeHall.
  • Varanka, D., 2006. Interpreting map art with a perspective learned from J.M. Blaut Cartographic Perspectives, Number 53, pp.15-23.
  • Wissmann, T., 2014. Geographies of urban sound. New York: Routledge.
  • (1)http://worldarchitecture.org/architecture-news/hevv/city-perception-through-psychogeography.html
  • (2) http://www.inenart.eu/?tag=psychogeographic-maps
  • (3)http://worldarchitecture.org/architecture-news/hevv/city-perception-through-psychogeography.html
  • (4) http://www.inenart.eu/?tag=psychogeographic-maps
  • (5) http://www.inenart.eu/?tag=psychogeographic-maps
  • (6) http://www.inenart.eu/?tag=psychogeographic-maps
Toplam 22 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Emine Köseoğlu

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Köseoğlu, E. (2016). A SENSORY EXPERIENCE IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT: SOUND-WALKS AND SOUND-MAPS. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies, 1(2), 31-40.
AMA Köseoğlu E. A SENSORY EXPERIENCE IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT: SOUND-WALKS AND SOUND-MAPS. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies. Ocak 2016;1(2):31-40.
Chicago Köseoğlu, Emine. “A SENSORY EXPERIENCE IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT: SOUND-WALKS AND SOUND-MAPS”. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies 1, sy. 2 (Ocak 2016): 31-40.
EndNote Köseoğlu E (01 Ocak 2016) A SENSORY EXPERIENCE IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT: SOUND-WALKS AND SOUND-MAPS. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies 1 2 31–40.
IEEE E. Köseoğlu, “A SENSORY EXPERIENCE IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT: SOUND-WALKS AND SOUND-MAPS”, International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies, c. 1, sy. 2, ss. 31–40, 2016.
ISNAD Köseoğlu, Emine. “A SENSORY EXPERIENCE IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT: SOUND-WALKS AND SOUND-MAPS”. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies 1/2 (Ocak 2016), 31-40.
JAMA Köseoğlu E. A SENSORY EXPERIENCE IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT: SOUND-WALKS AND SOUND-MAPS. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies. 2016;1:31–40.
MLA Köseoğlu, Emine. “A SENSORY EXPERIENCE IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT: SOUND-WALKS AND SOUND-MAPS”. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies, c. 1, sy. 2, 2016, ss. 31-40.
Vancouver Köseoğlu E. A SENSORY EXPERIENCE IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT: SOUND-WALKS AND SOUND-MAPS. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies. 2016;1(2):31-40.