Iğdır Şartlarında Yetiştirilen Halep Keçilerinin Süt Verimi, Döl Verimi, Meme Özellikleri ve Çiğ Süt Somatik Hücre Sayısı

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı Halep keçilerinde somatik hücre sayısı (SHS), meme özellikleri ve bazı verim özelliklerinin belirlenmesidir. Bu çalışma, Türkiye'nin Iğdır iline ilk kez 2013 yılında getirilen ve özel bir işletmede yetiştirilen Halep keçilerinde yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada 2019 yılında 62 baş keçide 620 adet süt örneğinde SHS, aylık süt verimi ve meme özellikleri ölçülmüştür. Çalışmada meme çevresi, meme genişliği, meme alt yüksekliği, meme üst yüksekliği, meme başı açısı, meme hacmi, meme başı çapı ve meme başı uzunluğuna ait ortalama değerler sırasıyla 41.83±0.13 cm, 13.07±0.04 cm, 30.57±0.14 cm, 51.01±0.15 cm, 38.02±0.13º, 1754.84±10.65 ml, 6.09±0.09 mm ve 5.44±0.06 cm olarak belirlenmiştir. Sürüde iki parçalı ve düz meme olarak iki meme tipi tespit edilmiştir. Çiğ sütlerde ortalama SHS ve logaritmik Log10SHS değerleri sırasıyla 503.120±40.020 hücre ml-1 ve 5.543±0.037 hücre ml-1 olarak bulunmuştur. Doğum şekli ve laktasyon sırasının SHS ve Log10SHS üzerindeki etkisi anlamlı bulunmuştur (p<0.01). Süt verimini etkileyen faktörlerden ortalama günlük süt verimi, laktasyon süresi ve laktasyon süt verimi sırasıyla 2,14±0,05 kg, 292,15±0,60 gün ve 626,23±12,94 kg olarak tespit edilmiştir. Ortalama günlük süt verimi üzerine laktasyon süresi ve mevsimin etkisi anlamlı bulunmuştur (p<0.01). Meme tipinin laktasyon uzunluğuna (p<0.05), laktasyon süresinin laktasyon süt verimi üzerine etkisi anlamlı (p<0.01) bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak Halep keçilerinin Iğdır ili koşullarında başarılı bir şekilde yetiştirilebileceği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Halep keçisi
• süt verimi
• süt kalitesi
• SHS
• meme özellikleri

Milk Yield, Fertility, Udder Characteristics, and Raw Milk Somatic Cell Count of the Damascus Goats Reared in Iğdır Conditions

Öz

The aim of this study is to determine the somatic cell number (SCC), udder characteristics and some yield characteristics in Damascus goats. This study was carried out on the Damascus goats raised on a private farm brought the first time in Iğdır province of Turkey in 2013. In the study, 62 Damascus goats were measured SCC of 620 milk samples, monthly milk yields, and udder characteristics in 2019. In the study, mean values of some udder characteristics such as udder circumference, udder width, udder bottom height, udder upper height, teat angle, udder volume, teat diameter, and teat length were determined as 41.83±0.13 cm, 13.07±0.04 cm, 30.57±0.14 cm, 51.01±0.15 cm, 38.02±0.13º, 1754.84±10.65 ml, 6.09±0.09 mm and 5.44±0.06 cm, respectively. In raw milk, mean values of SCC and logarithmic Log10SCC were found as 503,120±40,020 cells ml-1 and 5,543±0.037 cells ml-1, respectively. The effect of birth type and lactation order on SCC and Log10SCC was found to be significant (p<0.01). Average daily milk yield, lactation length, and lactation milk yield, which are among the factors affecting milk yield, were found as 2.14±0.05 kg, 292.15±0.60 day, and 626.23±12.94 kg, respectively. The effect of lactation length and season on average dairy milk yield was found to be significant (p<0.01). The effects of udder type on lactation length (p<0.05), and lactation duration on lactation milk yield were found significant (p<0.01). As a result, it has been concluded that Damascus goats can be successfully raised under the conditions of Iğdır province.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Damascus goat
• milk yield
• milk quality
• SCC
• udder characteristics

Kaynakça

1. Aktaş, Z., Kaygısız, A., & Sinan, B. (2012). The Relationships between Turkish Saanen goats milk yield traits, some udder measurements and SCC at Kahramanmaraş breeders conditions. Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University Journal of Nature Science, 15(4), 7-17.
2. Anitaş, O., Göncü, S., & Koluman, N. (2017). The Importance of somatic cell counts in dairy goat husbandry and effect on milk quality. Çukurova Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, 32(1), 35-42.
3. Anonymous (2019). Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Igdır Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry. Our city. https://igdir.tarimorman.gov.tr/Menu/20/Ilimiz , [Accessed on: 21 December, 2019].
4. Barıtçı, I., & Adıgüzel, C. (2017). Aleppo (Damascus) Goat Breeding. Dicle University Journal of the Institute of Natural and Applied Science, 6(1), 39-42.
5. Darbaz, I., Salar, S., Sayiner, S., Baştan, I., Ergene, O., & Baştan, A. (2019). Evaluation of milk glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase in subclinical mastitis in Damascus goats. Turkish Journal of Veterinary Animal Science, 43, 259-263. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1810-60
6. DeLaval. (2018). DeLaval cell counter DCC. https://www.delaval.com/globalassets/inriver-resources/document/ brochure/au-dcc-cell-counter-brochure-2018-oceania.pdf [Accessed on: 7 October, 2018].
7. Doaa, F. T., Hafasa, F. H. Y., El-Baz, A. M., & El-Sherbieny, M. A. (2014). Relationship between somatic cell count and udder health in Damascus goats. Egyptian Journal of Sheep and Goat Science, 9(1), 31-42.
8. El-Gendy, M. E., Youssef, H. F., Saifelnasr, E. O. H., El-Sanafawy, H. A., & Saba, F. E. (2014). Relationship between udder characteristics and each of reproductive performance and milk production and milk composition in Zaraibi and Damascus dairy goats. Egyptian Journal of Sheep and Goat Science, 9(3), 95- 104. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsgs.2014.26679

9. FDA. (2017). Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Grade “A” Pasteurized Milk Ordinance. https://www.fda.gov/media/114169/download, [Accessed on: 2 September, 2020].
10. Fernández, H., Hughes, S., Vigne, J. D., Helmer, D., Hodgins, G., Miquel, C., Hänni, C., Luikart, G., & Taberlet, P. (2006). Divergent mtDNA Lineages of goats in an early neolithic site, far from the initial domestication areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 103(42), 15375-15379. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602753103
11. Göçmen, H., Darbaz, I., Ergene, O., Esendal, O. M., & Aslan, S. (2019). The relationships between somatic cell count, total bacterial count and intramammary infection in milk samples of Damascus goats during postpartum days. Small Ruminant Research, 180, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.09.018
12. Granado, R. J., Rodríguez, M. S., Arce, C., & Estévez, V. R. (2014). Factors affecting somatic cell count in dairy goats: a review. Spanish Journal of Agriculture Research, 12(1), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014121-3803
13. Gül, S., Keskin, M., Göçmez, Z., & Gündüz , Z. (2016). Effects of supplemental feeding on performance of Kilis Goats kept on pasture condition. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 15, 110-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2015.1132542
14. Güney, O., Torun, O., Özüyanık, O., & Darcan, N. (2006). Milk Production, reproductive and growth performances of Damascus goats under Northern Cyprus conditions. Small Ruminant Research, 65, 176-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.07.026
15. Günlü, A., & Alaşahan, S. (2010). Evaluations on the future of goat breeding in Turkey. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Association, 81, 15-20.
16. Kaçar, C., Zonturlu, A. K., Karapehlivan, M., Ari, U.C., Ogun, M., & Citil, M. (2010). The Effects of L-Carnitine administration on energy metabolism in pregnant Halep (Damascus) goats. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 34, 163-171. https://doi:10.3906/vet-0805-11
17. Kaymakçı, M. (2006). İleri koyun yetiştiriciliği. İzmir İli Damızlık Koyun ve Keçi Yetiştiricileri Birliği Yayınları.
18. Keskin, M. (2000). Determination of some morphological characteristics and performance of Shami (Damascus) goats under intensive breeding condition in Hatay region [Doctoral dissertation, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
19. Keskin, M., Avsar, Y. K., Bicer, O., & Guler, M. B. (2004). A comparative study on the milk yield and milk composition of two different goat genotypes under the climate of the Eastern Mediterranean. Turkish Journal of Veterinary Animal Science, 28, 531-536.
20. Khazaal, K. (2009). Comparison of the performance of Shami (Damascus) and Saanen goats raised under similar environmental conditions in Lebanon. Options Mediterraneennes, 85, 379-385. http://om.ciheam.org/om/pdf/ a85/00801031.pdf
21. Lu, C. D., & Miller, B. A. (2019). Current status, challenges, and prospects for dairy goat production in the Americas. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 32, 1244. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0256
22. Mavrogenis, A. P., Papachristoforou, C., Lysandrides, P., & Roushias, A. (1988). Environmental and genetic factors affecting udder characters and milk production in Chios sheep. Genetic Selection Evolution 20, 477-487. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-20-4-477
23. Omar-Musa, M. O. (2015). The Evaluation of Some Production and Reproduction Traits of the Shami Cyprus Goats in Eastern Sudan Kassala State. [Doctoral dissertation, Sudan University of Science and Technology]. http://repository.sustech.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/11038/The%20Evaluation%20of%20Some%20...pdf?sequence=1&_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_sch=http
24. Önal, M. (2016). Comparison of the performance of Turkish Saanen goats and Damascus goats under Çanakkale conditions. [Master dissertation, Mustafa Kemal University]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
25. Özcan, L. (1989). Small ruminants breeding I (Goat production). Cukurova University Faculty of Agriculture Textbooks Series, No: 111, Adana, Turkey. 318.
26. Özüyanık, O (2004). A study on performances and adaptation parameters of Damascus goats under dry climate conditions of North Cyprus. [Master dissertation, Cukurova University]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
27. Paape, M. J., Wiggans, G. R., Bannerman, D. D., Thomas, D. L., Sanders, A. H., Contreras, A., Moroni, P., & Miller, R. H. (2007). Monitoring goat and sheep milk somatic cell counts. Small Ruminant Research, 68, 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.014
28. Raynal-Ljutovac, K., Pirisi, A., Crémoux, R., & Gonzalo, C. (2007). Somatic cells of goats and sheep milk: Analytical, sanitary, productive and technological aspects. Small Ruminant Research, 68, 126-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.012
29. SPSS. (2013). SPSS for Windows (version 20.0) [Computer software]. IBM SPSS.
30. Tatar, A. M., Tuncer, S. S., & Şireli, H. D. (2019). Comparison of yield characteristics of Damascus and Kilis goats in dry climatic conditions. Austral journal of veterinary sciences, 51(2), 61-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0719-81322019000200061
31. Ünalan, A., & Ceyhan, A. (2017). Determination of sex effect on body weight and some body measurements of Kilis goat. Harran Journal of Agricultural and Food Science, 21(2), 219-226.
32. Yakan, A. (2012). Milk recording methods and calculation of lactation milk production in sheep and goats. Adana Veterinary Control Research Institute Journal, 2, 18-23.
33. Yakan, A., Özkan, H., Eraslan Şakar, A., Ateş, C. T., Ünal, N., Koçak, Ö., & Özbeyaz, C. (2019). Milk yield and quality traits in different lactation stages of Damascus goats: Concentrate and pasture based feeding systems. Ankara University Veterinary Faculty Journal, 66, 117-129. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.547470