Araştırma Makalesi

The Effect of Different Application Times of Some Registered Nematicides on the Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne javanica

Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3 29 Aralık 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

The Effect of Different Application Times of Some Registered Nematicides on the Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne javanica

Abstract

Root-knot nematodes (RKNs) (Meloidogyne spp.) are considered the most economically important plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) for vegetable production, particularly for tomatoes. One control option for managing RKN is the application of nematicides, which is still widely used today. This study evaluated the efficacy of three nematicides (abamectin, fosthiazate and fluopyram) against the RKN species Meloidogyne javanica (Treub, 1885) (Tylenchida: Meloidogynidae). The nematicides were applied at five different times: three to six days before transplanting (A); just after transplanting (B); 15 days after transplanting (DAT) (C); 30 DAT (D); and 45 DAT (E). The results showed that, compared to the control (+), the lowest gall formation was observed in the following order: fluopyram (B) (1.60 ± 0.24), fosthiazate (A) (2.20 ± 0.20), and abamectin (B) (3.20 ± 0.37). The highest gall formation was observed in the abamectin (E) treatment (5.60 ± 0.24). Application of fluopyram (B), fosthiazate (A) and abamectin (B) reduced the number of second-stage juveniles (J2) by 94.62%, 91.38% and 72.88% respectively. These results point to the significance of application timing in the efficacy of nematicides and suggest that fluopyram is an effective option for the management of RKN, therefore advocating for high yields and sustainable agriculture.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Abad, P., Favery, B., Rosso, M. N., & Castagnone-Sereno, P. (2003). Root-knot nematode parasitism and host response: Molecular basis of a sophisticated interaction. Molecular Plant Pathology, 4(4), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1364-3703.2003.00170.X
  2. Abad, P., Gouzy, J., Aury, J. M., Castagnone-Sereno, P., Danchin, E. G., Deleury, E., & Wincker, P. (2008). Genome sequence of the metazoan plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Nature Biotechnology, 26, 909–915. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1482
  3. Burns, A. R., Luciani, G. M., Musso, G., Bagg, R., Yeo, M., Zhang, Y., & Roy, P. J. (2015). Caenorhabditis elegans is a useful model for anthelmintic discovery. Nature Communications, 6, 7485. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8485
  4. Calderón-Urrea, A., Vanholme, B., Vangestel, S., Kane, S. M., Bahaji, A., Pha, K., & Gheysen, G. (2016). Early development of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. BMC Developmental Biology, 16, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12861-016-0109-x
  5. Dejene, T. A. (2014). Opportunities for biological control of root-knot nematodes in organic farming systems: A review. International Journal of Organic Agriculture Research and Development, 9, 87–107.
  6. Dionisio, A. C., & Rath, S. (2016). Abamectin in soils: Analytical methods, kinetics, sorption, and dissipation. Chemosphere, 151, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.058
  7. El-Aziz, A., & El-Khouly, A. (2022). Optimization the impact of fluopyram and abamectin against the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on tomato plants by using Trichoderma album. Egyptian Journal of Agronematology, 21, 79–90. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/ejaj.2022.257672
  8. El-Nagdi, W. M., Hafez, O. M., & Saleh, M. A. (2015). Impact of a biocide abamectin for controlling plant parasitic nematodes, productivity and fruit quality of some date palm cultivars. Scientia Agricultura, 11, 20–25. https://doi.org/10.15192/PSCP.SA.2015.11.1.2025

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Nematoloji

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

29 Aralık 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

29 Mayıs 2025

Kabul Tarihi

23 Temmuz 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Ulaş, F., & İmren, M. (2025). The Effect of Different Application Times of Some Registered Nematicides on the Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne javanica. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(3), 304-313. https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.1708965

 

17365   17368      17366                       

 

88x31.png    Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic License a