THE INFLUENTIAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND LEARNING ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE

Abstract

This study examined the two factors of organisational capability namely organisational leadership and learning in Malaysian public agencies by using Resourse Based View (RBV). We proposed two models which showed a significant results. However, model of complementary organisational capability is better than individually factor model in gaining higher organisational performance. The structural complementary model exhibits that both organizational capability (ß = 0.63, p

Keywords

• Resource based-view, leadership, learning, information technology

Kaynakça

1. Amit and Schoemaker (1993), “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent.”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 33-46.
2. Andreu and Ciborra (1996), “Organizational Learning and Core Capabilities Development: The Role of IT’, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 111-127.
3. Barney (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, 99-120.
4. Benamati and Lederer (2000), “Rapid Change: Nine Information Technology Management Challenges”, INFOR, Vol. 38. No. 4, pp. 336-358.
5. Cater and Cater (2009), “Intangible Resources as Antecedents of a Company’s Competitive Advantage and Performance”, Journal for East European Management Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 186-209.
6. Cater and Pucko (2006), “Model of Competition Between Firms”, Journal for East European Management Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 140-172.
7. Dickson (1996), “The Statistics and Dynamics of Competition: A Comment on Hunt and Morgan’s Comparative Advantages Theory”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 102-106.
8. Fazli, Mokhtar, Ashari and Nooreha (2003), “Integrating Resource Based View and Stakeholder Theory in Developing the Malaysian Excellence Model: Conceptual Framework”, Singapore Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 91- 109.

9. Grant (1991), “The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation”, California Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 114-135.
10. Hoque, Mia and Alam (2001), “Market Competition: Computer-aided Manufacturing and Use of Multiple Performance Measures: An Empirical Study”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 33, pp. 23-45.
11. Kaplan and Norton (1996), “Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 75-85.
12. Kohli and Jaworski (1990), “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 (April), pp. 1-18.
13. Mahoney (1995), “The Management of Resources and the Resource of Management”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 33, pp. 91-101.
14. Moingeon, Ramanantsoa, Metais and Orton (1998), “Another Look at Strategy- Structure Relationship: The Resource-based View”, European Management Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 297-305.
15. Peppard and Ward (2004), “Beyond Strategic Information Systems: Towards an IS Capability”, Journal of Strategic Information System, Vol. 13, pp. 167-194.
16. Rafferty and Griffin (2004), “Dimension of Transformational Leadership: Conceptual and Empirical Extensions”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 15, pp. 329-354.
17. Ramlah, Nor Shariza, Norshidah and Rahman (2007), “The Influence of Organizational Factors on Information Systems Success in E-government Agencies in Malaysia”, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, Vol. 29, No.1, pp. 1-17.
18. Sethi and King (1994), “Development of Measures to Assess the Extend to which an Information Technology Application Provides Competitive Advantage”, Management Science, Vol. 40, No. 12, pp. 1601-1627.
19. Wade and Hulland (2004), “Review: The Resource-based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension and Suggestions for Future Research”, MIS Quarterly, Vol 28, No. 1, pp. 107-142.
20. Zehir, Acar and Tanriverdi (2006), “Identifying Organizational Capabilities as Predictors of Growth and Business Performance”, The Business Review, Cambridge, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 109- 116.