Elektronik Ağızdan Ağıza Pazarlamanın Tüketim Türleri ile İlişkisinde Gelirin Düzenleyici Rolü

Öz

eWOM, günümüz dijital çağında tüketicilerin ürün ve hizmetleri değerlendirmek, deneyimlerini paylaşmak ve önerilerde bulunmak için kullandığı güçlü bir iletişim aracıdır. Tüketiciler artık çevrimiçi platformlarda, sosyal medya, forumlar ve inceleme siteleri gibi ortamlarda eWOM yoluyla ürünleri ve hizmetleri hakkında görüşlerini açıkça ifade etmektedirler. Bu nedenle, eWOM'un tüketici davranışları üzerindeki etkilerini anlamak, pazarlama stratejilerinin şekillendirilmesi açısından kritik bir öneme sahiptir. Bu makale, eWOM'un özellikle gösterişçi tüketim ve sembolik tüketim ile nasıl ilişkilendirildiğini ve bu ilişkilerin gelir düzeyi tarafından nasıl düzenlendiğini incelemektedir. Bu çalışma, elektronik ağızdan ağıza pazarlamanın (eWOM) gösterişçi tüketim ve sembolik tüketim ile olan ilişkisini ve gelirin bu ilişkideki düzenleyici rolünü incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Bu kapsamda Karabük ilinde yaşayan 455 katılımcı üzerinde gerçekleştirilen bir anket çalışması, Amos 20 ve SPSS Process 21 programlarıyla analiz edilip, sonuçlar incelenmiştir. Sonuçlar incelendiğinde, eWOM'un her iki tüketim türünü de etkilediğini doğrulamıştır. Ancak, gelirin bu ilişkideki düzenleyici etkileri farklıdır. Sembolik tüketim açısından, gelirin düzenleyici bir rolü bulunmamaktadır, yani tüketicilerin sembolik ürün veya hizmetlere olan ilgisi gelir düzeyine bağlı olarak değişmemektedir. Ancak, gösterişçi tüketimde yüksek gelire sahip bireylerin, eWOM'u daha fazla dikkate aldığı ve bu tüketim biçimini daha sık tercih ettiği gözlemlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ewom
• Gösterişçi Tüketim
• Sembolik Tüketim
• Tüketici Davranışları

The Relationship Between Electronic Word-of-Mouth Marketing and Consumption Types: The Moderating Role of Income

Öz

eWOM, a potent communication tool in today's digital age, is extensively utilized by consumers to evaluate products and services, share their experiences, and offer recommendations. Consumers now openly express their opinions about products and services through eWOM on online platforms such as social media, forums, and review websites. Therefore, understanding the impact of eWOM on consumer behaviour holds critical significance in shaping marketing strategies. This article examines how eWOM is specifically associated with conspicuous consumption and symbolic consumption and how these relationships are moderated by income levels. This study investigated the relationship between electronic word-of-mouth marketing (eWOM) and conspicuous consumption and symbolic consumption while considering the moderating role of income. A survey was conducted among 455 participants in the Karabük province, and the data were analyzed using Amos 20 and SPSS Process 21 software. The results confirm that eWOM influences both types of consumption. However, the moderating effects of income differ in this context. Income does not play a moderating role in symbolic consumption, meaning that consumers' interest in symbolic products or services remains unaffected by income levels. On the other hand, high-income individuals are observed to pay more attention to eWOM and prefer conspicuous consumption more frequently.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ewom
• Conspicuous Consumption
• Symbolic Consumption
• Consumer Behavior

Kaynakça

1. Abubakar, A. M., & Ilkan, M. (2016). Impact of online WOM on destination trust and intention to travel: A medical tourism perspective. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 5(3), 192-201.
2. Aslan, M. (2021). Gösterişçi Tüketim Eğilimi Ölçeği’nı̇n (GTE) Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(15), 271-281.
3. Augusto, M., & Torres, P. (2018). Effects of brand attitude and eWOM on consumers’ willingness to pay in the banking industry: Mediating role of consumer-brand identification and brand equity. Journal of retailing and Consumer Services, 42, 1-10.
4. Babić Rosario, A., De Valck, K., & Sotgiu, F. (2020). Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 422-448.
5. Babić Rosario, A., Sotgiu, F., De Valck, K., & Bijmolt, T. H. (2016). The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: A meta-analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors. Journal of marketing research, 53(3), 297-318.
6. Bayraktaroğlu, G., & Akyol, B. (2009). The Effect Of Favorability of Online Word-Of Mouth Information On Consumer Purchase Decision. Gazi Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 57-92.
7. Bayram, Nuran (2010); Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: AMOS uygulamaları. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
8. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168.

9. Belk, R. W. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595-1600.
10. Blazevic, V., Hammedi, W., Garnefeld, I., Rust, R. T., Keiningham, T., Andreassen, T. W., ... & Carl, W. (2013). Beyond traditional word‐of‐mouth: An expanded model of customer‐driven influence. Journal of Service Management, 24(3), 294-313.
11. Bronner, F., & de Hoog, R. (2018). Conspicuous consumption and the rising importance of experiential purchases. International Journal of Market Research, 60(1), 88-103.
12. Brown, J. (2007). Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) in the marketing context: A state of the art analysis and future directions. Psychology & Marketing, 24(11), 903-917.
13. Buttle, F. A. (1998). Word of mouth: understanding and managing referral marketing. Journal of strategic marketing, 6(3), 241-254.
14. Çakır, F., Aybar, N., & Akel, G. (2017). E-wom’un tüketicilerin tatil satın alma niyetine etkisi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(4), 110-127.
15. Carvalho, F. G. D., Araujo, I. S. D., & Vasconcellos, M. S. D. (2023). Symbolic consumption in digital games: an analysis model. Intercom: Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação, 46, e2023117.
16. Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345-354.
17. Chu, S. C., Lien, C. H., & Cao, Y. (2019). Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) on WeChat: Examining the influence of sense of belonging, need for self-enhancement, and consumer engagement on Chinese travellers’ eWOM. International Journal of advertising, 38(1), 26-49.
18. Davis, R. W. (2019). Symbolic values. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 5(4), 449-467.
19. De Angelis, M., Florio, R., & Amatulli, C. (2020). Electronic word-of-mouth in the service industry: an empirical analysis on sharing economy services. In Exploring the Power of Electronic Word-of-Mouth in the Services Industry (pp. 179-197). IGI Global.
20. Dholakia, U. M. (1999). Going shopping: Key determinants of shopping behaviors and motivations. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 27(4), 154-165.
21. Doi, N., & Hayakawa, H. (2020). Electronic word-of-mouth: a survey from an economics perspective. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 27(2), 303-320.
22. Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., ... & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168.
23. Dyego, A., & Oktavianti, R. (2020). The Impact of Electronic Word-of-Mouth on the Purchase Intention. In The 2nd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2020) (pp. 410-415). Atlantis Press.
24. eMarketer. (2022). eMarketer Lookbook: Digital Advertising Trends [https://on.emarketer.com/LookBook-20221216-TransUnion_New-Bus-Reg-Page.html]. Access Date: [16.12.2023].
25. Ennew, C. T., Banerjee, A. K., & Li, D. (2000). Managing word of mouth communication: empirical evidence from India. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18(2), 75-83.
26. Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2016). The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption. Computers in human behaviour, 61, 47-55.
27. Erkan, I., Gokerik, M., & Acikgoz, F. (2019). The impacts of facebook ads on brand image, brand awareness, and brand equity. In Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship and Marketing for Global Reach in the Digital Economy (pp. 442-462). IGI Global.
28. Gilal, N. G., Zhang, J., & Gilal, F. G. (2018). Linking product design to consumer behavior: the moderating role of consumption experience. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 169-185.
29. Goenka, S., & Thomas, M. (2020). The malleable morality of conspicuous consumption. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(3), 562.
30. Gökcek, H. A. (2023). Sembolik tüketime yönelik tüketici davranışlarını kapsayan tanımlayıcı ve bağlam boyutlarında bir meta analiz. Social Science Development Journal, 8(35), 110-124
31. Gökerik, M., Gürbüz, A., Erkan, I., Mogaji, E., & Sap, S. (2018). Surprise me with your ads! The impacts of guerrilla marketing in social media on brand image. Asia Pacific journal of marketing and logistics, 30(5), 1222-1238.
32. Göktaş, F., & Gökerik, M. (2024). A Novel Robust Theoretical Approach on Social Media Advertisement Platform Selection. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 16(1), 373-382.
33. Gordillo-Rodriguez, M. T., & Sanz-Marcos, P. (2020). Symbolic Consumption in the Online World: The Construction of Social Identity and Fashion Influencers. In Handbook of Research on Transmedia Storytelling, Audience Engagement, and Business Strategies (pp. 130-146). IGI Global.
34. Gürbüz, C., & Bozkurt, Ö. Ç. (2022). Gösterişçi, deneyimsel ve sembolik tüketim ölçeklerinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(1), 193-218.
35. Harris Interactive. (2022). Consumer Insights on Brand Advocacy. [https://theharrispoll.com/insights-news/reports/the-american-consumer/]. Access Date: [16.12.2023].
36. Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd edition). New York: The Guilford Press.
37. Hennig-Thurau, T., Walsh, G., Walsh, G. (2003). Electronic word-of-mouth: Motives for and consequences of reading customer articulations on the Internet. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(2), 51-74.
38. Huete-Alcocer, N. (2017). A literature review of word of mouth and electronic word of mouth: Implications for consumer behavior. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1256.
39. Ismagilova, E., Dwivedi, Y. K., Slade, E., Williams, M. D., Ismagilova, E., Dwivedi, Y. K., ... & Williams, M. D. (2017). Impact of eWOM. Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) in the Marketing Context: A State of the Art Analysis and Future Directions, 73-96.
40. Jalilvand, M. R., Esfahani, S. S., & Samiei, N. (2011). Electronic word-of-mouth: Challenges and opportunities. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 42-46.
41. Jeong, E., & Jang, S. S. (2011). Restaurant experiences triggering positive electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) motivations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(2), 356-366.
42. Johnson, C. M., Tariq, A., & Baker, T. L. (2018). From Gucci to green bags: Conspicuous consumption as a signal for pro-social behavior. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 26(4), 339-356.
43. Kartika, T., & Pandjaitan, D. (2023). Electronic Word-of-Mouth and Social Media Marketing on Brand Image and Purchase Intention. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 11(3), 687-694.
44. Keinan, A., Bellezza, S., & Paharia, N. (2019). The symbolic value of time. Current opinion in psychology, 26, 58-61.
45. Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
46. Kozinets, R. V., de Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 71-89.
47. Kudeshia, C., & Kumar, A. (2017). Social eWOM: does it affect the brand attitude and purchase intention of brands?. Management Research Review, 40(3), 310-330.
48. Kuo, H. C., & Nakhata, C. (2019). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth on customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 27(3), 331-348.
49. Kurnaz, A., & Duman, O. (2021). The Effect of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication (e-WOM) on the Conspicuous and Materialist Consumption: Research on Generation Z. International Journal of Business and Management, 16(5), 103-114.
50. Liu, H., Jayawardhena, C., Osburg, V. S., Yoganathan, V., & Cartwright, S. (2021). Social sharing of consumption emotion in electronic word of mouth (eWOM): A cross-media perspective. Journal of Business Research, 132, 208-220.
51. Liu, H., Shaalan, A., & Jayawardhena, C. (2022). The Impact of Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM) on Consumer Behaviours. The SAGE Handbook of Digital Marketing, 136.
52. Luxury Society. (2022). Luxury Marketing Trends in 2022: Why Brands Invest More in Digital Content [https://medium.com/cappasity-blog/luxury-marketing-trends-in-2022-why-brands-invest-more-in-digital-content-d43dd6eb3b9d]. Access Date: [16.12.2023].
53. Melo, H., Lins, S., & Poeschl, G. (2021). Systematic review of conspicuous consumption scales. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 20(1-2), 125-152.
54. Meydan, C. H. ve Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık.
55. Mick, D. G., & Buhl, C. (1992). A meaning-based model of advertising experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 317-338.
56. Mishra, A., Maheswarappa, S. S., Maity, M., & Samu, S. (2018). Adolescent's eWOM intentions: An investigation into the roles of peers, the Internet and gender. Journal of Business Research, 86, 394-405.
57. Murphy, J. L. (2018). Measuring Conspicuous Consumption. Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications, 6(2), 26-33
58. Özdamar, K. (2002). Paket programları ile istatistiksel veri analizi 2 (çok değişkenli analizler). Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
59. Pursiainen, E. (2010). Consumer motivations for providing electronic word-of-mouth in virtual pet communities.
60. Qattan, J., & Al Khasawneh, M. (2020). The psychological motivations of online conspicuous consumption: a qualitative study. International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), 16(2), 1-16.
61. Rabjohn, N., Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2008, January). Examining the perceived credibility of online opinions: information adoption in the online environment. In Proceedings of the 41st annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS 2008) (pp. 286-286). IEEE.
62. Ransbotham, S., Lurie, N. H., & Liu, H. (2019). Creation and consumption of mobile word of mouth: how are mobile reviews different?. Marketing Science, 38(5), 773-792.
63. Sahin, O., & Nasir, S. (2022). The effects of status consumption and conspicuous consumption on perceived symbolic status. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 30(1), 68-85.
64. Şimşek, Ömer Faruk (2007); Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş: Temel İlkeler ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayınevi.
65. Srivastava, M., & Sivaramakrishnan, S. (2021). The impact of eWOM on consumer brand engagement. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(3), 469-484.
66. Statista. (2022). Number of social media users worldwide 2017-2027. [https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/]. Access Date: [16.12.2023].
67. Suma, V. P. (2018). Symbolic Consumption in the Indian Markets: Analysis of Determining Factors. Archives of Business Research, 6(4).
68. Topçu, U. C. (2018). Conspicuous consumption in relation to self-esteem, self-image and social status: an empirical study. In Economy, Finance and Business in Southeastern and Central Europe: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Economies of the Balkan and Eastern European Countries in the Changing World (EBEEC) in Split, Croatia, 2016 (pp. 697-709). Springer International Publishing.
69. Veblen, T. (2005). Aylak Sınıfın Teorisi,(Çev.) Gültekin. Z. ve Atay, C., Babil Yayınları, İstanbul.
70. Verma, S., & Yadav, N. (2021). Past, present, and future of electronic word of mouth (EWOM). Journal of Interactive Marketing, 53, 111-128.
71. Wai, L. K., & Osman, S. (2022). Conspicuous consumption via social media. In Research Anthology on Social Media Advertising and Building Consumer Relationships (pp. 887-907). IGI Global.
72. Wang, Zheying. (2023). Influences of Income on Luxury Products Consumption. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. 10. 285-291. 10.54254/2754-1169/10/20230486.
73. Weng Marc, A., Pervaiz Khalid, A., Md Yunus, A. (2022). Giving electronic word of mouth (eWOM) as a prepurchase behavior: The case of online group buying. Journal of Business Research, 582-604.
74. Woodside, A. G., & Delozier, M. W. (1976). Effects of word of mouth advertising on consumer risk taking. Journal of advertising, 5(4), 12-19.
75. Yang, D. (2018). The symbolic trend of design in consumer society. In 2018 International Conference on Economics, Politics and Business Management, Birleşik Krallık (pp. 62-65).
76. You, Y., Vadakkepatt, G. G., & Joshi, A. M. (2015). A meta-analysis of electronic word-of-mouth elasticity. Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 19-39.