Impact of Innovation Initiatives on Renewable Energy Production in Brazil

Öz

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of innovation on biofuel production in Brazil, a country that has significant competitive strength in renewable energy production today. In line with the objective of the study, plans, programs, and policies implemented by Brazil to understand its development in biofuel production, as well as innovations that support this process and sustainable competitive strategies, have been examined. After explaining Brazil's regarding biofuel production, the impact of innovation, noted for its significant impact on sustainable production and competition, on biofuel production has been econometrically tested using time series analysis. The analysis, covering the years 1990-2021, revealed a long-term relationship between biofuel production and innovation indicators. The results from impulse-response functions and variance decomposition analysis showed that government expenditures had the most significant positive effect on biofuel production. Finally, the Toda-Yamamoto causality test was conducted to provide additional insights, revealing that the BC, CO2, and GE variables were Granger causes of biofuel production.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Brazil
• Renewable Energy
• Biofuel Energy
• Energy Production
• Energy Sustainability

Brezilya’da Yenilenebilir Enerji Üretiminde İnovasyon Girişimlerinin Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, günümüzde yenilenebilir enerji üretiminde önemli rekabet gücüne sahip bir ülke olan Brezilya'da inovasyonun biyoyakıt üretimi üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktır. Çalışmanın amacı doğrultusunda, Brezilya'nın biyoyakıt üretimindeki gelişimini anlamak için uyguladığı planlar, programlar ve politikalar ile bu süreci destekleyen inovasyonlar ve sürdürülebilir rekabet stratejileri incelenmiştir. Brezilya'nın biyoyakıt üretiminde uyguladığı politikalar açıklandıktan sonra, sürdürülebilir üretim ve rekabet üzerinde en büyük etkiye sahip olduğu belirlenen inovasyonun biyoyakıt üretimi üzerindeki etkisi, zaman serisi analizi kullanılarak ekonometrik olarak test edilmiştir. 1990-2021 yıllarını kapsayan analiz neticesinde biyoyakıt üretimi ile inovasyon göstergeleri arasında uzun dönemli ilişkinin olduğu saptanmış ve etki-tepki fonksiyonları ile varyans ayrıştırma analiz sonuçlarına göre biyoyakıt üretiminde en yüksek pozitif etkiye devlet harcamalarının sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Son olarak farklı bir bakış açısı ve değerlendirmenin yapılabilmesi için Toda Yamamoto nedensellik testi yapılmış ve test sonuçlarında BC, CO2 ve GE değişkenlerin biyoyakıt üretiminin Granger nedeni olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Brezilya
• Yenilenebilir Enerji
• Biyoyakıt Enerjisi
• Enerji Üretimi
• Enerji Sürdürülebilirliği

Kaynakça

1. Acharya, R. N. and Perez-Pena, R. (2020). Role of comparative advantage in biofuel policy adoption in Latin America. Sustainability, 1-13. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1411 retrieved.
2. Akyüz, H. E. (2018). Vektör otoregresyon (VAR) modeli ile iklimsel değişkenlerin istatistiksel analizi. Uluslararası Mühendislik Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dergisi, 10(2), 183-192. https://doi.org/10.29137/umagd.402272.
3. Atioğlu, E. (2022). İnsansız hava aracı sistemlerinin ithalat üzerine etkisi: etki-tepki ve varyans ayrıştırması analizi. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 15(89), 379-390.
4. Bamati, N. and Raoofl, A. (2020). Development level and the ımpact of technological factor on renewable energy production. Renewable Energy, 151, 946-955.
5. Bera, T., Inglett, K. S. and Wilkie, A. C. (2020). Biofuel: Concepts and considerations. UF/IFAS Extension, 1-7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345893977_Biofuel_Concepts_and_Considerations adresinden alındı.
6. Bozkurt, H. Y. (2002). Türkiye Ekonomisi'nde iktisadi kriz ve büyüme analizinin vektör otoregresif modeller ile incelenmesi (Cilt Doktora Tezi). İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi.
7. BP. (2022). bp statistical review of world energy june 2022. Londra: bp.
8. BP. (2024). Biofuel consuption . https://www.bp.com retrieved.

9. BP. (2024). Biofuel production. https://www.bp.com retrieved.
10. BP. (2024). Carbon dioxide emission from energy. https://www.bp.com adresinden alındı.
11. Chen, W. and Lei, Y. (2018). The impacts of renewable energy and technological innovation on environment-energy-growth nexus: New evidence from a panel quantile regression. Renewable Energy, 123, 1-14.
12. Costa, J. A. (2019). From sugarcane to ethanol: The historical process that transformed Brazil ınto a biofuel superpower. Mapping Politics, 10-19.
13. Çoban, M. N., Kangal, N., Yeter, F. and Eroğlu, İ. (2021). İnovasyonun yenilenebilir enerji üretimine etkisi: IEA üyesi ülkeler üzerine panel veri analizi. Aydin Faculty of Economics Journal, 21-31.
14. Danyal, Y. ve Gümüş, U. T. (2022). VAR analizi. Ankara: İKSAD.
15. Degreenia, J., & Wynne, G. (2023). Biofuels annual: Brazil. USDA-GAIN. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Biofuels%20Annual_Brasilia_Brazil_BR2023-0018#:~:text=Report%20Highlights%3A,increase%20in%20corn%20ethanol%20production. adresinden retrieved.
16. Furtadoa, A. T., Hekkert, M. P. and Negro, S. O. (2020). Of actors, functions, and fuels: Exploring a second generation ethanol transition from a technological ınnovation systems perspective in Brazil. Energy Research & Social Science, 1-15.
17. Geng, J. and Ji, Q. (2016). Technological ınnovation and renewable energy development: Evidence based on patent counts. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 15(3), 217-234.
18. International Energy Agency. (2023). IEA market report series: Renewables 2023. France: International Energy Agency. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/cee44c95-84c9-4bb9-8b21-1427a658a52b/Documentation-IEAMarketReportSeriesRenewables2023.pdf retriewed.
19. International Energy Agency. (2024). Renewables 2023:Analysis and forecasts to 2028. France: International Energy Agency. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/96d66a8b-d502-476b-ba94-54ffda84cf72/Renewables_2023.pdf retrieved.
20. International Energy Agency. (2023). Latin Amercia energy outlook. overview: Brazil. Paris: International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/brazil-energy-profile retrieved.
21. IRENA. (2024). Sustainable bioenergy pathways in Latin America: : Promoting bioenergy ınvestment and sustainability. Abu Dhabi.: International Renewable Energy Agency. https://www.irena.org/Publications/2024/Jan/Sustainable-bioenergy-pathways-in-Latin-America-Promoting-bioenergy-investment-and-sustainability retrieved.
22. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysisof cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control ,12(2), 231-254.
23. Khattak, S. I., Ahmad, M., Khan, Z. U. and Khan, A. (2020). Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: new evidence from the BRICS economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(12), 13866-13881. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-020-07876-4 retrieved.
24. Kılınç, E. C. and Kılınç, N. Ş. (2021). Ar-Ge ve inovasyonun yenilenebilir enerji üretimi üzerindeki etkisi: Panel Veri Analizi. Alanya Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 5(2), 1087-1105.
25. Langeveld, J. and Quist- Wessel, P. (2014). Biofuel Production in Brazil. J. Langeveld, J. Dixon, & H. v. Keulen (Ed.) In, Biofuel Cropping Systems: Carbon, land and food (s. 63-86). New York: Earthscan from Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260342344_Biofuel_production_in_Brazil?enrichId=rgreq-bf74968afb11031f29c023f78b06cd21-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI2MDM0MjM0NDtBUzoxMTgyODQ4NTY0MzY3MzY0QDE2NTkwMjQ0ODIzNDM%3D&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf adresinden alındı.
26. Lee, C.-C., Yuan, Z., Lee, C.-C. and Chang, Y.-F. (2022). The impact of renewable energy technology innovation on energy poverty: Does climate risk matter? Energy Economics, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106427 retrieved.
27. Lucon, O. (No Date). Sustainability of biofuels production in Latin America. BioTop WP4, 1-36. https://smastr16.blob.core.windows.net/etanolverde/BioTopWP4.pdf retrieved.
28. Masiero, G. (2011). Developments of biofuels in Brazil And East Asia: Experiences and challenges. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 97-117. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/358/35821119005.pdf retrieved.
29. Mengova, E. and Green, D. (2023). The role of ınnovation and technology in renewable energy. The International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 9(2), 1-26.
30. Ministério de Minas e Energia. (2023). Combustível do futuro. www.gov.br: https://www.gov.br/mme/pt-br/assuntos/secretarias/petroleo-gas-natural-e-biocombustiveis/combustivel-do-futuro retrieved.
31. Ministério de Minas e Energia. (2023). Secretaria nacional de petróleo, gás natural e biocombustíveis . www.gov.br: https://www.gov.br/mme/pt-br/assuntos/secretarias/petroleo-gas-natural-e-biocombustiveis retrieved.
32. Ministério de Minas e Energia. (2024). RenovaBio. www.gov.br: https://www.gov.br/mme/pt-br/assuntos/secretarias/petroleo-gas-natural-e-biocombustiveis/renovabio-1 retrieved.
33. Nelson, K. P., Parton, L. C.and Brown, Z. S. (2022). Biofuels policy and innovation impacts: Evidence from biofuels and agricultural patent indicators. Energy Policy, 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112767 retrieved.
34. OECD, & FAO. (2020). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2020-2029. Paris: Rome/OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1112c23b-en. retrieved.
35. Opoku, E. E. O., Acheampong, A. O., Dogah, K. E. and Koomson, I. (2024). Energy ınnovation ınvestment and renewable energy in OECD Countries. Energy Strategy Reviews, 54, 1-15. Article 101462.
36. Önal, M. (2020). Sürdürülebilir kalkınmada yenilenebilir enerjinin önemi: Türkiye üzerine bir değerlendirme. Turkish Business Journal, 1(1), 7897.
37. Özbektaş, S., Şenel, M. C. and Sungur, B. (2023). Dünyada ve Türkiye'de yenilenebilir enerji durumu ve kurulum maliyetleri. Mühendis ve Makina / Engineer and Machinery, 64, 317-351.
38. Özcan, B., & Arı, A. (2013). Para talebinin belirleyenleri ve istikrarı üzerine bir uygulama: Türkiye örneği. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 20(2), 105-120.
39. Öztürk, M., Aras, O. N., & Kadı, O. S. (2012). AB borç krizi ve bunun Türk dış ticaretine olan etkileri. Ekonomi Bilimler Dergisi, 4(1), 77-89. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ebd/issue/4859/66847.
40. Pistonesi, H., Nadal, G., Bravo, V. and Bouille, D. (2008). The contribution of biofuels to the sustainability of development in Latin America and the Caribbean: elements for formulating public policy. United Nations, Santiago, Chile.: Economic commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).
41. Silva, D. F., Bomtempo, J. V. and Alves, F. C. (2019). Innovation opportunities in the Brazilian sugar-energy sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 871-879. https://www.gee.ie.ufrj.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Jof-CP-2019-Daniella.pdf retrieved.
42. Solarin, S. A., Bello, M. O., & Tiwari, A. K. (2022). The impact of technological innovation on renewable energy production: accounting for the roles of economic and environmental factors using a method of moments quantile regression. Heliyon, 8(7). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.heliyon.2022.e09913.
43. The World Bank. (2024). GDP per capita. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators retrieved.
44. The World Bank. (2024). Governent expenditure. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators retrieved.
45. The World Bank. (2024). Industry value added. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators retrieved.
46. Toparlak, E., & Susam, N. (2023). Yenilenebilir enerji üzerine uygulanan kamu politikalarının teknolojik inovasyon üzerine etkisi Türkiye ve Ab ülkeleri üzerine bir inceleme. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 180–192.
47. Türkmen, S. and Ağır, H. (2022). Analysis of the relationship between green ınnovation and renewable energy: empirical evidence from BRİCS-T countries. Academic Social Resources Journal, 7 (4), 1634-1640.
48. Vaia. (2024). Brazil biofuel case study overview. https://www.vaia.com/en-us/explanations/geography/global-resource-management/brazil-biofuel-case-study/#:~:text=Brazil's%20biofuel%20sector%20is%20burgeoning,waste%20and%20non%2Dedible%20sources. retrieved.
49. Weil, H. B., Sabhlok, V. P. and Cooney, C. L. (2014). The dynamics of ınnovation ecosystems: A case study of the US biofuel market. Energy Strategy Reviews, 3, 88-99.