Intransitive Indifferences

Öz

In this paper, we analyze preferences that exhibit intransitive indifference, which are often observed in real life, but rather overlooked by economic theory. After providing a detailed description and a literature review, we generalize a standard result in Nash implementation to the case of preferences that exhibit intransitive indifference. We present some open problems regarding preferences that exhibit intransitive indifference. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first Turkish article in this field.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Intransitive Indifference
• Semi-order
• Risk and Uncertainty
• Expected Utility Theory
• Scott-Suppes Representation
• Nash Implementation.

Geçişsiz Kayıtsızlıklar

Öz

Bu makalede gerçek hayatta sık gözlemlenen fakat iktisat kuramı tarafından genelde göz ardı edilen geçişsiz kayıtsızlıklara sahip tercihler ele alınmaktadır. Geçişsiz kayıtsızlıklar detaylı bir şekilde açıklandıktan ve literatür taraması yapıldıktan sonra Nash uygulaması üzerine standart bir sonucun bu tarz tercihlere nasıl genelleşebileceği gösterilmiştir. Geçişsiz kayıtsızlıklar ile ilgili bazı açık problemler sunulmuştur. Bildiğimiz kadarıyla bu çalışma bu konuda yazılan ilk Türkçe makaledir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Geçişsiz Kayıtsızlık
• Yarı-Sıralamalar
• Risk ve Belirsizlik
• Beklenen Fayda Teorisi
• Scott-Suppes Gösterimi
• Nash Uygulaması

Kaynakça

1. Acemoglu, D., Laibson, D., ve List, J. (2015). Economics. Pearson.
2. Aleskerov, F., Bouyssou, D., ve Monjardet, B. (2007). Utility maximization, choice and preference. Springer Science & Business Media.
3. Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’ecole Americaine. Econometrica, 21, 503–546.
4. Barlo, M., ve Dalkiran, N. A. (2009). Epsilon-Nash implementation. Economics Letters, 102(1), 36–38.
5. Candeal, J. C., ve Induráin, E. (2010). Semiorders and thresholds of utility discrimination: Solving the Scott–Suppes representability problem. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54(6), 485–490.
6. Dalkıran, N. A., Dokumacı, O. E., ve Kara, T. (2018). Expected Scott–Suppes utility representation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 86, 30–40.
7. Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 643–669.
8. Fechner, G. (1860). Elemente der psychophysik. Breitkopf and Hartel. Vol. 1 Translated by H. E. Adler (1966). Elements of Psychophysics.

9. Fishburn, P. C. (1968). Semiorders and risky choices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 5(2), 358–361.
10. Fishburn, P. C. (1970a). Intransitive indifference in preference theory: a survey. Operations Research, 18(2), 207–228.
11. Fishburn, P. C. (1970b). Intransitive indifference with unequal indifference intervals. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 7(1), 144–149.
12. Glimcher, P. W., ve Fehr, E. (2013). Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain. Academic Press.
13. Kahneman, D., ve Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.
14. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin.
15. Luce, R. D. (1956). Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica, 178–191.
16. Manders, K. L. (1981). On jnd representations of semiorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 24(3), 224–248.
17. Maskin, E. (1999). Nash equilibrium and welfare optimality. The Review of Economic Studies, 66(1), 23–38.
18. Nakamura, Y. (1988). Expected utility with an interval ordered structure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 32(3), 298–312.
19. Pirlot, M., ve Vincke, P. (1997). Semiorders: properties, representations, applications. Springer Science & Business Media.
20. Poincaré , H. (1905). La valeur de la science. Paris: Flammarion.
21. Radner, R. (1980). Collusive behavior in noncooperative epsilon-equilibria of oligopolies with long but finite lives. Journal of Economic Theory, 22(2), 136–154.
22. Savage, J. L. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: John Wiley.
23. Scott, D., ve Suppes, P. (1958). Foundational aspects of theories of measurement. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23(2), 113–128.
24. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.
25. Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76 (1), 31–48.
26. Vincke, P. (1980). Linear utility functions on semiordered mixture spaces. Econometrica, 771–775.
27. Von Neumann, J., ve Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
28. Weber, E. (1834). De Tactu. Leipzig, Koehler.