Relationship Between Globalization and Financial Development: An Empirical Study on Brics-T Countries

Öz

The aim of this research is to investigate the relationship between financial development and economic globalization, social globalization and politic globalization index in BRICS-T countries for the 1990-2014 period. In the research two different development indicators -banking development and stock market development- were used. Augmented Mean Group (AMG) and Common Correlated Effects Mean Group (CCEMG) were used as the estimators in the research. Also, causality test which was developed by Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) was used in the research. As a result of the analyses, it was determined that globalization had an impact on the financial development levels of BRICS-T countries. In addition, while causality relationship was determined from GDP to financial development indicators, causality relationship from financial indicators to GDP couldn’t be determined. Also, two-way causality was determined between politic globalization and financial development indicators. One-way causality relationship was determined from economic globalization and politic globalization to financial development indicators. The results of the research are important in terms of examining the effects of globalization on financial markets and explaining how the financial development levels of countries are affected by globalization. In this context, it contributes to politicians and policy makers in terms of creating globalization policies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Globalization
• KOF index
• financial development
• banking
• stock market
• BRICS-T

Küreselleşme ve Finansal Gelişmişlik Arasındaki İlişki: Brics-T Ülkeleri Üzerine Ampirik Bir Çalışma

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı finansal gelişmişlik ile ekonomik küreselleşme, sosyal küreselleşme ve politik küreselleşme endeksi arasındaki ilişkiyi BRICS-T ülkeleri çerçevesinde 1990-2014 dönemi için araştırmaktır. Çalışmada iki farklı gelişim göstergesi – bankacılık gelişimi ve menkul kıymetler piyasası gelişimi– kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada Augmented Mean Group (AMG) ve Common Correlated Effects Mean Group (CCEMG) tahmincilerinden yararlanılmıştır. Bunun yanında Dumitrescu ve Hurlin (2012) tarafından geliştirilen nedensellik testinden de çalışmada yararlanılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, küreselleşmenin BRICS-T ülkelerinin finansal gelişmişlik düzeyinde etkili olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bunun yanı sıra GDP’den finansal gelişmişlik göstergelerine doğru bir nedensellik ilişkisi belirlenmişken finansal göstergelerden GDP’ye doğru bir nedensellik ilişkisi tespit edilememiştir. Aynı zamanda politik küreselleşme ve finansal gelişmişlik göstergeleri arasında iki yönlü bir nedensellik belirlenmiştir. Ekonomik ve politik küreselleşmeden finansal gelişmişlik göstergelerine doğru ise tek yönlü bir nedensellik tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları küreselleşmenin finansal piyasalar üzerindeki etkilerini incelemesi ve ülkelerin finansal gelişmişlik düzeylerinin küreselleşmeden ne yönde etkilendiğini açıklaması bakımından önemlidir. Bu kapsamda küreselleşme politikalarının oluşturulması bakımından siyasilere ve politika yapıcılara katkı sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• KOF ENdeksi
• Küreselleşme
• Finansal Gelişme
• Bankacılık
• Borsa
• BRICS-T

Kaynakça

1. Aggarwal, R., Goodell, J.W (2009). Markets and Institutions in Financial Intermediation: National Characteristics As Determinants. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(1), 1770-1780.
2. Bond, S., Eberhardt, M (2009). Cross-Section Dependence in Nonstationary Panel Models: A Novel Estimator. Paper presented at the Nordic Econometrics Conference in Lund.
3. DPT (2000). Küreselleşme Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu. Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı. DPT: 2544-ÖİK:560.
4. Dreher, A (2006). Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence From A New Index of Globalization, Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091-1110.
5. Dreher, A., Gaston, N., Martens, P (2008). Measuring Globalisation: Gauging Its Consequences, New York: Springer
6. Dumitrescu, E. I., Hurlin, C (2012). Testing for Granger Non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460.
7. Eberhardt, M., Teal, F (2010). Productivity Analysis in Global Manufacturing Production. Economics Series Working Papers 515, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
8. Eruygur H. O., Özokcu S (2016). Türkiye’de İklim Değişikliğinin Buğday Verimi Üzerine Etkileri: Bir Heterojen Panel Çalışması. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 27(10), 219-255.

9. Falahaty, M., Law, S.H (2012). The Effect of Globalization on Financial Develeopment in MENA Region. Transition Studies Review, 19(2), 205-223.
10. Garcia, E.D.T. (2012). Financial Globalization and Financial Development in Transition Countries. National Research University, Higher School of Economics, 36, 155-178. Moscow, Russia.
11. Giddens, A. (1991). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press: 70-78.
12. Gurgul, H., Lach, L (2014). Globalization and Economic Growth: Evidence From Two Decades of Transition in CEE. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), Paper No. 52231.
13. Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., Sturm, J.E (2019). The KOF Globalization Index-Revisited. The Review of International Organizations, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2.
14. Hayaloğlu, P., Kalaycı, C., Artan, S (2015). Küreselleşme Farklı Gelir Grubundaki Ülkelerde Ekonomik Büyümeyi Nasıl Etkilemektedir? Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 10(1), 119-152.
15. Heinemann, F., Tanz, B. (2008). The Impact of Trust on Reforms. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 11(3), 173-185.
16. Kandil, M., Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S (2013). The Interaction Between Globalization And Financial Development: New Evidence From Panel Co-İntegration And Causality Analysis. MPRA (Munich Personel RePEc Archive, Paper No. 52148.
17. Kazar, A., Kazar, G. (2016). Globalization, Financial Development and Economic Growth. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(2), 578-587.
18. Kılıç, C., Bayar, Y., Özekicioğlu, H (2014). Araştırma Geliştirme Harcamalarının Yüksek Teknoloji Ürün İhracatı Üzerindeki Etkisi: G–8 Ülkeleri İçin Bir Panel Veri Analizi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 44, 115-130.
19. Kılıçarslan, Z., Dumrul, Y (2018). The Impact of Globalization on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence From Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(5), 115-123.
20. Klomp, J. (2010). Causes of Banking Crises Revisited. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 21(1), 1-30.
21. Leitao, N.C. (2013). Cultural Globalization and Economic Growth. The Romanian Economic Journal, 16(7), 17-48.
22. Mishkin, F. (2009). Globalization and Financial Development. Journal of Development Economics, 89(2), 164-169.
23. Potrafke, N. (2014). Did Globalization Influence Credit Market Deregulation? Working Paper University of Munich, Mimeo.
24. Samimi, P., Lim, G.C., Buang. A.A. (2011). Globalization Measurement: Notes on Common Globalization Indexes. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 1(7), 1-20.
25. Samimi, P., Jenatabadi, H.S. (2014). Globalization and Economic Growth: an Empirical Evidence on the Role of Complementarities. PLoS One, 9(4), 1-7.
26. Sinn, H.W. (2010). Casino Capitalism: How The Financial Crisis Came About And What Needs to Be Done Now. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
27. Sufian F., Kamarudin, F., Nassir. A.M. (2017). Globalization and Bank Efficiency Nexus: Emprical Evidence from the Malaysian Banking Sector. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(5), 1269-1290.
28. Sufian, F., Kamarudin, F. (2016). The Impact of Globalization on the Performance of Banks in South Africa. Rewiev of International Business and Strategy, 26(4), 517-542.
29. Tekbaş, M. (2019). BRICS-T Ülkelerinde Ekonomik Büyüme ve Küreselleşme İlişkisi. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi (FESA), 4(3), 397-412 . DOI: 10.29106/fesa.615249
30. Ying, Y.H., Chang, K., Lee, C.H. (2014). The Impact of Globalization on Economic Growth, Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 17(2), 25-34.