SELECTION OF A SOLAR POWER PLANT LOCATION BY USING AHP METHOD

Öz

In recent years, investments of Solar Power Plant (SPP) have increased since the cost of photovoltaic has decreased.  Nevertheless, feasibility studies remain important as the cost of installation is still relatively high. One of the most important parameters in the feasibility studies is the appropriate location selection. In this study, the appropriate location selection for the SPP was studied with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) which is one of the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. For the application, Elazığ, Kahramanmaraş and Malatya cities, which are located on the same plane, are selected as examples. As criteria, solar energy potential, earth slopes and feeder capacities, which are important in feasibility studies, are considered. In the results of the study, Kahramanmaraş is found as the most suitable city for establishment of SPP. It is followed by the cities of Malatya and Elazığ. The results are approved by considering the data of cities' sunshine duration and radiation value in Solar Energy Potential Atlas (GEPA). It is also proven that the method may be recommended for SPP installations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Renewable energy,Solar power plant,Multi Criteria Decision Making,Analytic Hierarchy Process

Kaynakça

1. Sindhu, S., Nehra V., Luthra, S., 2017, “Investigation of feasibility study of solar farms deployment using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS analysis: Case study of India”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 73, 496-511.
2. Sanchez-Lozano, J. M., Garcia-Casceles, M. S., Lamata, M. T., 2015, “Evaluation of suitable locations for the installation of solar thermoelectric power plants”, Computer & Industrial Engineering, vol. 87, 343-355.
3. Balo, F., Şağbanşua, L., 2016, “The selection of the best solar panel for the photovoltaic system design by using AHP,” Energy Procedia, vol. 100, 50-53.
4. Aragones-Beltran, P., Chaparro-Gonzales, F., Pastor-Ferrando, J. P, Rodriguez-Pozo, F., 2010, “An ANP-based approach for the selection of photovoltaic solar power plant investment projects,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 14, 249-264.
5. Aragones-Beltran, P., Chaparro-Gonzalez, F., Pastor-Ferrando, J. P., Pla-Rubio, A., 2014, “An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects,” Energy, vol. 66, 222-238.
6. Liu, J., Xu, F., Lin, S., 2017, “Site Selection of photovoltaic power plants in a value chain based on grey cumulative prospect theory for sustainability: A case study in Northwest Chinao,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 148, 386-397.
7. Directorate General of Renewable Energy website, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://www.eie.gov.tr/MyCalculator/Default.aspx.
8. Energy Institute website,2017, [Online]. Available: http://enerjienstitusu.com/2016/03/21/teias-ges-res-trafo-merkezi-kapasiteleri-mart-2016/

9. Noorollahi, E., Fadai, D., Shirazi, M. A., Ghodsipour, S. H., 2016, “Land Suitability Analysis for Solar Farms Exploitation Using GIS and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP)-A Case Study of Iran,” Energies, 9, 643; doi:10.3390/en9080643.
10. Wheatbelt Development Commission, 2010, “Site Options for Concentrated Solar Power Generation in the Wheatbelt,” Final Report, Northam, Australia.
11. Elibüyük, M., Yılmaz, E., 2010, “Altitude Steps and Slope Groups of Turkey in Comparison with Geographical Regions and Sub-Regions,” Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 8 (1), 27-55.
12. Saaty, T. L., 1994, “Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, 1st ed. RWS Publications.
13. Akkaş, Ö. P., Erten, M. Y., Çam, E., İnanç, N., 2017, “Optimal Site Selection for a Solar Power Plant in the Central Anatolian Region of Turkey,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2017, Article ID 7452715, 13 pages, doi:10.1155/2017/7452715.
14. Chen, C., 2006, “Applying the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach to Convention Site Selection,” Journal of Travel Research, vol. 45, 167-174.