Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Comparison of innovative and traditional method for optimizing the efficiency of photovoltaic panels

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 45 - 49, 30.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.1082277

Öz

Obtaining energy with high efficiency from solar panels, which are an endless source of energy, is one of the important research topics today. There are many methods applied both in manufacturing and after manufacturing to increase efficiency in solar panels. One of the methods that affect the efficiency of solar panels is the removal of dirt from the panels. The method is preferred since it does not affect the manufacturing cost and is for old panel users. Innovative panel cleaning method affects maintenance costs. This article presents a new approach to improving the efficiency of solar panels versus traditional method cost analysis. In this study, which includes an experimental approach, 10W solar panels with equal parameters were used. The correlation between the gain and the cost of the efficiency increase in the solar panel coated with rain-slip solution, which is a new approach, has been examined. Cost benefit analysis in this study will guide both small-scale and large-scale solar panel users.

Kaynakça

  • Marathe S. A. and Patil B. P. 2021. Performance of solar panel in presence and absence of dust. 2021 International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT), 25-27 June, Hubli, India, 1-5.
  • Kawamoto H. and Guo B. 2018. Improvements of an electrostatic cleaning systems for removal of dust from solar panels. Science Direct Journal of Electrostatics, 91, 28-33.
  • Majeed R., Waqas A., Sami H., Ali M. and Shahzad N. 2020. Experimental investigation of soiling losses and a novel cost-effective cleaning system for PV modules. Solar Energy, 201, 298-306.
  • Sevim, İ. and Ozel, S. 2020. Experimental examination of a thin-film photovoltaic panel power characteristics under constant load during October-March period in Mersin province. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 7 (2), 20-24.
  • Steven O., Peter M.and Cyrus W. 2021. Effect of Enhanced Heat Transfer on Photovoltaic/ Thermal Collector Efficiency. IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica, 1-5.
  • Makki A, Omer S and Sabir H. 2015. Advancements in Hybrid photovoltaic systems for enhanced solar cell performance. Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 41, 658-684.
  • Abhilash B. and Panchal A. K. 2016. Self-cleaning and tracking solar photovoltaic panel for improving efficiency. 2nd International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Electronics, Information, Communication and Bio-Informatics (AEEICB), 27-28 Feb., Chennai, India,1-4.
  • Ölmez, B. B., Ergezer, Ö. and Güğül, G. N. 2021. Autonomous solar panel cleaning robot with rubber wheeled and air-absorbing motor. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 8 (4) , 182-187.
  • Pawale T. P., Motekar R., Chakrasali R. L., Hugar P. and Halabhavi S. B. 2020. Implementation of a Novel Self-Cleaning Roof Top PV Cells using Protective Film Coating. Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), 20-22 Aug., Tirunelveli, India, 455-459.
  • Gostein M. et al. 2016. Soiling measurement station to evaluate anti-soiling properties of PV module coatings. 2016 IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 5-10 June, Portland, OR, USA, 3129-3131.
  • Nakagawa H., Mathuoka K. and Yonemori H. 2014. A study about the self-cleaning of a PV module surface using photocatalyst. 2014 IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10 HTC), 6-9 Aug., Chennai, India, 82-87.
  • Despeisse M. et al. 2018. Engineering of Thin-Film Silicon Materials for High Efficiency Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells. 2018 IEEE 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC) (A Joint Conference of 45th IEEE PVSC, 28th PVSEC & 34th EU PVSEC), 10-15 June, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 3888-3889.
  • Tejwani R. and Solanki C. S. 2010. 360° sun tracking with automated cleaning system for solar PV modules. 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 20-25 June, Honolulu, HI, USA, 2895-2898.
  • Vidyanandan K.V. 2017. An Overview of Factors Affecting the Performance of Solar PV Systems. Energy Scan (A house journal of Corporate Planning, NTPC Ltd.). 27, 2-8.
  • Mani M., Pillai R. 2010. Impact of dust on solar photovoltaic (PV) performance: Research status, challenges and recommendations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14 (9), 3124-3131.
  • Santhosh N. and Prasad B. 2016. Efficiency improvement of a solar PV-panel through spectral sharing by combination of different panels. IEEE Students' Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS), 5-6 March, Bhopal, India, 1-4.
  • Konjare S. S., Shrivastava R. L., Chadge R. B. and Kumar V. 2015. Efficiency improvement of PV module by way of effective cooling - a review. 2015 International Conference on Industrial Instrumentation and Control (ICIC), 28-30 May, Pune, India,1008-1011.
  • Dubey S., Sarvaiya J. N. and Seshadri B. 2013. Temperature Dependent Photovoltaic (PV) Efficiency and Its Effect on PV Production in the World A Review. Science direct Energy Procedia, 33, 311 – 321.
  • Jones R. K. et al. 2016. Optimized Cleaning Cost and Schedule Based on Observed Soiling Conditions for Photovoltaic Plants in Central Saudi Arabia. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 6(3), 730-738.
  • Bianchini A., Gambuti M., Pellegrini M., and Saccani C. 2016. Performance analysis and economic assessment of different photovoltaic technologies based on experimental measurements. Renewable Energy, 85, 1–11.
Yıl 2022, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 45 - 49, 30.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.1082277

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Marathe S. A. and Patil B. P. 2021. Performance of solar panel in presence and absence of dust. 2021 International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT), 25-27 June, Hubli, India, 1-5.
  • Kawamoto H. and Guo B. 2018. Improvements of an electrostatic cleaning systems for removal of dust from solar panels. Science Direct Journal of Electrostatics, 91, 28-33.
  • Majeed R., Waqas A., Sami H., Ali M. and Shahzad N. 2020. Experimental investigation of soiling losses and a novel cost-effective cleaning system for PV modules. Solar Energy, 201, 298-306.
  • Sevim, İ. and Ozel, S. 2020. Experimental examination of a thin-film photovoltaic panel power characteristics under constant load during October-March period in Mersin province. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 7 (2), 20-24.
  • Steven O., Peter M.and Cyrus W. 2021. Effect of Enhanced Heat Transfer on Photovoltaic/ Thermal Collector Efficiency. IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica, 1-5.
  • Makki A, Omer S and Sabir H. 2015. Advancements in Hybrid photovoltaic systems for enhanced solar cell performance. Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 41, 658-684.
  • Abhilash B. and Panchal A. K. 2016. Self-cleaning and tracking solar photovoltaic panel for improving efficiency. 2nd International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Electronics, Information, Communication and Bio-Informatics (AEEICB), 27-28 Feb., Chennai, India,1-4.
  • Ölmez, B. B., Ergezer, Ö. and Güğül, G. N. 2021. Autonomous solar panel cleaning robot with rubber wheeled and air-absorbing motor. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 8 (4) , 182-187.
  • Pawale T. P., Motekar R., Chakrasali R. L., Hugar P. and Halabhavi S. B. 2020. Implementation of a Novel Self-Cleaning Roof Top PV Cells using Protective Film Coating. Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), 20-22 Aug., Tirunelveli, India, 455-459.
  • Gostein M. et al. 2016. Soiling measurement station to evaluate anti-soiling properties of PV module coatings. 2016 IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 5-10 June, Portland, OR, USA, 3129-3131.
  • Nakagawa H., Mathuoka K. and Yonemori H. 2014. A study about the self-cleaning of a PV module surface using photocatalyst. 2014 IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10 HTC), 6-9 Aug., Chennai, India, 82-87.
  • Despeisse M. et al. 2018. Engineering of Thin-Film Silicon Materials for High Efficiency Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells. 2018 IEEE 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC) (A Joint Conference of 45th IEEE PVSC, 28th PVSEC & 34th EU PVSEC), 10-15 June, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 3888-3889.
  • Tejwani R. and Solanki C. S. 2010. 360° sun tracking with automated cleaning system for solar PV modules. 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 20-25 June, Honolulu, HI, USA, 2895-2898.
  • Vidyanandan K.V. 2017. An Overview of Factors Affecting the Performance of Solar PV Systems. Energy Scan (A house journal of Corporate Planning, NTPC Ltd.). 27, 2-8.
  • Mani M., Pillai R. 2010. Impact of dust on solar photovoltaic (PV) performance: Research status, challenges and recommendations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14 (9), 3124-3131.
  • Santhosh N. and Prasad B. 2016. Efficiency improvement of a solar PV-panel through spectral sharing by combination of different panels. IEEE Students' Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS), 5-6 March, Bhopal, India, 1-4.
  • Konjare S. S., Shrivastava R. L., Chadge R. B. and Kumar V. 2015. Efficiency improvement of PV module by way of effective cooling - a review. 2015 International Conference on Industrial Instrumentation and Control (ICIC), 28-30 May, Pune, India,1008-1011.
  • Dubey S., Sarvaiya J. N. and Seshadri B. 2013. Temperature Dependent Photovoltaic (PV) Efficiency and Its Effect on PV Production in the World A Review. Science direct Energy Procedia, 33, 311 – 321.
  • Jones R. K. et al. 2016. Optimized Cleaning Cost and Schedule Based on Observed Soiling Conditions for Photovoltaic Plants in Central Saudi Arabia. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 6(3), 730-738.
  • Bianchini A., Gambuti M., Pellegrini M., and Saccani C. 2016. Performance analysis and economic assessment of different photovoltaic technologies based on experimental measurements. Renewable Energy, 85, 1–11.
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Elektrik Mühendisliği
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Ali Sinan Çabuk 0000-0002-6329-3715

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 3 Mart 2022
Kabul Tarihi 15 Haziran 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Çabuk, A. S. (2022). Comparison of innovative and traditional method for optimizing the efficiency of photovoltaic panels. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 9(2), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.1082277
AMA Çabuk AS. Comparison of innovative and traditional method for optimizing the efficiency of photovoltaic panels. IJEAT. Haziran 2022;9(2):45-49. doi:10.31593/ijeat.1082277
Chicago Çabuk, Ali Sinan. “Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Method for Optimizing the Efficiency of Photovoltaic Panels”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 9, sy. 2 (Haziran 2022): 45-49. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.1082277.
EndNote Çabuk AS (01 Haziran 2022) Comparison of innovative and traditional method for optimizing the efficiency of photovoltaic panels. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 9 2 45–49.
IEEE A. S. Çabuk, “Comparison of innovative and traditional method for optimizing the efficiency of photovoltaic panels”, IJEAT, c. 9, sy. 2, ss. 45–49, 2022, doi: 10.31593/ijeat.1082277.
ISNAD Çabuk, Ali Sinan. “Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Method for Optimizing the Efficiency of Photovoltaic Panels”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 9/2 (Haziran 2022), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.1082277.
JAMA Çabuk AS. Comparison of innovative and traditional method for optimizing the efficiency of photovoltaic panels. IJEAT. 2022;9:45–49.
MLA Çabuk, Ali Sinan. “Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Method for Optimizing the Efficiency of Photovoltaic Panels”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, c. 9, sy. 2, 2022, ss. 45-49, doi:10.31593/ijeat.1082277.
Vancouver Çabuk AS. Comparison of innovative and traditional method for optimizing the efficiency of photovoltaic panels. IJEAT. 2022;9(2):45-9.