BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 466 - 475, 01.06.2013

Öz

The main purpose of the present study was to investigate the capabilities of two generations of models such as those based on dynamic neural network (e.g., Nonlinear Neural network Auto Regressive or NNAR model) and a regressive (Auto Regressive Fractionally Integrated Moving Average model which is based on Fractional Integration Approach) in forecasting daily data related to the return index of Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). In order to compare these models under similar conditions, Mean Square Error (MSE) and also Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) were selected as criteria for the models’ simulated out-of-sample forecasting performance. Besides, fractal markets hypothesis was examined and according to the findings, fractal structure was confirmed to exist in the time series under investigation. Another finding of the study was that dynamic artificial neural network model had the best performance in out-of-sample forecasting based on the criteria introduced for calculating forecasting error in comparison with the ARFIMA model.

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 466 - 475, 01.06.2013

Öz

Toplam 0 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA49DY44YZ
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Majid Delavari Bu kişi benim

Nadiya Gandali Alikhani Bu kişi benim

Esmaeil Naderi Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2013
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Delavari, M., Alikhani, N. G., & Naderi, E. (2013). Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(2), 466-475.
AMA Delavari M, Alikhani NG, Naderi E. Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?. IJEFI. Haziran 2013;3(2):466-475.
Chicago Delavari, Majid, Nadiya Gandali Alikhani, ve Esmaeil Naderi. “Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 3, sy. 2 (Haziran 2013): 466-75.
EndNote Delavari M, Alikhani NG, Naderi E (01 Haziran 2013) Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 3 2 466–475.
IEEE M. Delavari, N. G. Alikhani, ve E. Naderi, “Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?”, IJEFI, c. 3, sy. 2, ss. 466–475, 2013.
ISNAD Delavari, Majid vd. “Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 3/2 (Haziran 2013), 466-475.
JAMA Delavari M, Alikhani NG, Naderi E. Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?. IJEFI. 2013;3:466–475.
MLA Delavari, Majid vd. “Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, c. 3, sy. 2, 2013, ss. 466-75.
Vancouver Delavari M, Alikhani NG, Naderi E. Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?. IJEFI. 2013;3(2):466-75.