“Science Teaching and Science Teachers” from Students’ Point of View

Abstract

The current study investigated the opinions of secondary school students taking the science course from different science teachers about the science course and science teachers. The current study was conducted with the participation of 32 students instructed by different science teachers and attending different secondary schools in the fall term of 2018-2019 academic year. The data of the current study were collected by means of semi-structured interviews. In the analysis of the data, the descriptive analysis technique was used. The findings of the current study have revealed that high majority of the students love their science classes and science teachers, that in science classes, lecturing, question-answer and note-taking are methods widely employed, that if there is a smart board in the class, then Okulistik or EBA computer program is on, that the assignments given are from the textbook, that the most frequently adopted behavior by the teachers in the face of any discipline problem is warning and that informal learning environments are not used much. Moreover, it was found that projects are rarely assigned to students and the projects assigned are given as homework. A great majority of the students expect their teachers to be entertaining, they want their lessons to be instructed through games and experiments, and they do not want to write a lot in their classes.

Keywords

• Science course,students’ opinions,secondary school students

Kaynakça

1. Akcoltekin, A., & Dogan, S. (2013). Ilkogretim 6.sinif ogrencilerinin fen bilgisi dersine iliskin kaygilarinin farkli degiskenler acisindan incelenmesi [The Analysis of the concerns of the 6th grade students towards the course of science and technology in terms of different variables]. International Journal of Social Science, 6(2), 13-29.
2. Aktepe, V., & Aktepe, L. (2009). Fen ve teknoloji ogretiminde kullanilan ogretim yontemlerine iliskin ogrenci gorusleri: Kirsehir BILSEM ornegi [Teaching method using science and technology education on students’ aspects: The example of Kirsehir BILSEM]. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kirsehir Educational Faculty (KEFAD), 10(1), 69-80.
3. Alabay, A. (2015). Ortaogretim ogretmenlerinin ve ogrencilerinin EBA (egitimde bilisim agi) kullanimina iliskin gorusleri uzerine bir arastirma [A research into secondary education teachers' and students' views on EBA (education information network) usage] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey.
4. Aladag, C., & Dogu, S. (2009). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde verilen odevlerin ogrenci goruslerine gore degerlendirilmesi [The evaluation of homework which are given at secondary school according to students views]. Selcuk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 21, 15-23.
5. Altiparmak, K., Aklar, M., & Dursun, G. (2017). Bir gunlugune matematik ogretmeni olsaydim, neler yapardim/yapmazdim: Ogrenci gorusleri [If I were a math teacher for a day, what would I do/ what would not I do: Student perspectives]. YYU Journal of Educational Faculty, 14(1), 1117-1140.
6. Aydin, B. (2003). Bilgi toplumu olusumunda bireylerin yetistirilmesi ve matematik ogretimi [Training individuals in the process of forming knowledge society and teaching of mathematics]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 14(14), 183-190.
7. Bardak, S., & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2016). Fen bilimleri ogretmenlerinin kullandiklari ogretim strateji, yontem ve tekniklerin pedagojik alan bilgisi baglaminda incelenmesi [Investigation about using strategies, methods and techniques of science teachers based on pedagogical content knowledge]. Avrasya Education Journal, 5(2), 567-605.
8. Bayat, S., Kilicaslan, H., & Senturk, S. (2014). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde egitsel oyunlarin yedinci sinif ogrencilerinin akademik basarisina etkisinin incelenmesi [Analysing the effects of educational games in science and technology course on seventh grade students’ academic achievements]. Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Education, 14(2), 204-216.

9. Bozdogan, A. E., Okur, A., & Kasap, G. (2015). Planli bir alan gezisi icin ornek uygulama: Bir fabrika gezisi [A sample application for a planned field trip: A factory trip]. The Black Sea Journal of Social Sciences, 7(14), 1-12.
10. Buyuktokatli, N. (2009). Ilkogretimde ev odevi uygulamalarina iliskin ogretmen goruslerinin incelenmesi [Examining teachers' opinions on homework practices in primary education] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
11. Byers, A., & Fitzgerald, M. A. (2002). Networking for leadership, inquiry, and systemic thinking: A new approach to inquiry-based learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(1), 81-91.
12. Can, E., & Arslan, B. (2018). Ogretmenlerin sinif yonetimi yeterliklerine iliskin ogrenci gorusleri [Students’ opinions related to the teacher competences on classroom management]. The Black Sea Journal of Social Sciences, 10(18), 95-219.
13. Carrier, S. J. (2009). The effects of outdoor science lessons with elementary school students on preservice teachers’ self-efficacy. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2),35-48.
14. Cakici, Y., & Ilgaz, G. (2011). An analysis of dissertations about 2004 primary science and technology curriculum in Turkey, from 2005 through 2010. The paper was presented as poster in World Conference on New Trends in Science Education (WCNTSE), Kusadasi, Turkey.
15. Cakmak, M. (2011). Sinif yonetimi [Classroom management]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem.
16. Cetin, B. (2013). Sinifta istenmeyen ogrenci davranislariyla ilgili sinif ogretmenlerinin karsilastiklari sorunlar ve cozum onerileri [Problems that class teachers faced in the classroom related to undesired behaviors and their solutions]. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 14(1), 255-269.
17. Cicek, O., & Sarac, E. (2017). Fen bilimleri ogretmenlerinin okul disi ogrenme ortamlarindaki yasantilari ile ilgili gorusleri [Science teachers' opinions about experience in out of school learning environments]. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kirsehir Educational Faculty, 18(3), 504-522.
18. DeBoer, G. E. (2006). Historical perspectives on inquiry teaching in schools. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
19. Emre, I., Kaya, Z., Ozdemir, T. Y., & Kaya, O. N. (2011). Akilli tahta kullaniminin fen ve teknoloji ogretmen adaylarinin hucre zarinin yapisi konusundaki basarilarina ve bilgi teknolojilerine karsi tutumlarina karsi etkileri [The Success of Prospective Science and Technology Teachers on the Structure of Cell Membrane] The paper was presented in 6th International Advanced Technologies Symposium (IATS’11), Elazig, Turkey.
20. Elban, L. (2009). Ilkogretimdeki ogretmenlerin istenmeyen ogrenci davranislariyla karsilasma ve cozum bulma durumlarinin incelenmesi [Searching of unwanted student behaviours faced by elementary school teachers and searching of finding solution situations] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
21. Erduran-Avci, D., & Akcay, T. (2012). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde yazma etkinlikleri uzerine ogretmen gorusleri [Teachers' views on writing activities in science and technology course]. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 10(2), 48-65.
22. Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171-190.
23. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College.
24. Gomleksiz, M. N., & Yuksel, Y. (2003). IIkogretim 4. ve 5. sinif ogrencilerinin fen bilgisi dersine iliskin kaygilari (Elazig ili ornegi). [The anxiety of the fourth and fifth grade students in elementary schools towards science course (Sample of Elazig city)]. Surveys in Eastern Anatolia Region, 3, 71-81.
25. Guvendi, G. M. (2014). Milli Egitim Bakanligi’nin ogretmenlere sunmus oldugu cevrimici egitim ve paylasim sitelerinin ogretmenlerce kullanim sikliginin belirlenmesi: Egitim bilisim Agi (EBA) [Determination of teachers' usage frequency of online education and sharing websites supplied by the ministry of education: An example of Education Information Technologies Network (EBA)] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.
26. Gunel, M., Atila, M. E., & Buyukkasap, E. (2009). Farkli betimleme modlarinin ogrenme amacli yazma aktivitelerinde kullanimlarinin 6. sinif yasamimizdaki elektrik unitesinin ogrenimin etkisi [The impact of using multi modal representations within writing to learn activities on learning electricity unit at 6th grade]. Elementary Education Online, 8(1), 183-199.
27. Gunes, H., & Karasah, S. (2016). The studies in science education from the past to the present and the importance of science education. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 5(3), 122-136.
28. Harlen, W. (2004). A systematic review of the evidence of reliability and validity of assessment by teachers used for summative purposes. London, UK: EPPI-Centre.
29. Herr, N. (2008). The sourcebook for teaching science strategies, activities and instructional resources. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass A Wiley.
30. Kaya, H., & Boyuk, U. (2011a). Fen bilimleri ogretmenlerinin laboratuvar calismalarina yonelik yeterlikleri [Qualifications of science lectures teachers towards laboratory studies]. Erciyes University Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 27(1), 126-134.
31. Kaya, H., & Boyuk, U. (2011b). Ilkogretim II. kademe ogrencilerinin fen ve teknoloji dersine ve fen deneylerine karsi tutumlari [Attitudes towards science and technology course and science experiments of the middle school students. Journal of TUBAV Science, 4(2), 120-130.
32. Kayri, M., Elkonca, F., Sevgin, H., & Ceyhan, G. (2014). Ortaokul ogrencilerinin fen ve teknoloji dersine yonelik tutumlarinin Chaid analizi ile incelenmesi [The investigation of secondary school students' attitudes towards science and technology using CHAID analysis]. Journal of Educational Science Research, 4(1), 301-316.
33. Keles, E., & Turan, E. (2015) Ogretmenlerin firsatlari arttirma ve teknolojiyi iyilestirme hareketi (FATIH) hakkindaki gorusleri [Teachers’ opinions on increasing opportunities and improving technology movement (FATIH)]. The Turkish Journal of Education, 4(2), 17-28.
34. Keskin, M. A. (2002). Sinif ogretmenlerinin karsilastiklari istenmeyen ogrenci davranislari ve kullandiklari bas etme yollari [Student misbehaviours that classroom teachers confront and the ways they use to cope with them]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
35. Keys, C. W. (2000). Investigating the thinking processes of eighth grade writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 676-690.
36. Kozcu-Cakir, N., Senler, B., & Gocmen-Taskin, B., (2007). Ilkogretim II. kademe ogrencilerinin fen bilgisi dersine yonelik tutumlarinin belirlenmesi [Determining the attitudes towards science course of second grade students in middle school]. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 5(4), 637-655.
37. Kurtdede-Fidan, N., Erbasan, O., & Kolsuz, S. (2016). Sinif ogretmenlerinin egitim bilisim agindan (EBA) yararlanmaya iliskin gorusleri [Views of primary school teachers about the use of education information network]. The Journal of International Social Research, 9(45), 626-637.
38. Kucukahmet, Leyla (2005). 2004 Hayat Bilgisi programinin degerlendirilmesi [2004 evaluation of Life Science program] The paper was presented in Reflections in Education: 8th Symposium on New Elementary Education Programs, Kayseri, Turkey.
39. Lederman, N. G.,Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138-147.
40. MoE - [Ministry of Education] (2005). Fen dersi ogretim programi (6, 7 ve 8. siniflar). [Science teaching program (6, 7 and 8th grades)]. Ankara, Turkey: Ministry of Education.
41. MoE - [Ministry of Education] (2018). Fen dersi ogretim programi [Science teaching program]. Ankara, Turkey: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Programlar.aspx
42. Moseley, C., Reinke, K., & Bookout, V. (2002). The effect of teaching outdoor environmental education on preservice teachers’ attitudes toward self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(1), 9-15.
43. Nitko, A. J. (2004). Educational assessment of students (4th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
44. National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Retrieved from https://www.csun.edu/science/ref/curriculum/reforms/nses/nses-complete.pdf
45. National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9596/inquiry-and-the-national-science-education-standards-a-guide-for
46. Oh, P. S., & Kim, K. S. (2013). Pedagogical transformations of science content knowledge in Korean elementary classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1590-1624.
47. Orion, N., Hofstein, A., Tamir, P., & Giddings, G. J. (1997) Development and validation of an instrument for assessing the learning environment of outdoor science activities. Science Education, 81, 161-171.
48. Ozata-Yucel, E., & Ozkan, M (2011). SBS fen bilimleri testindeki basarinin dusuk olma nedenleriyle ilgili ogretmen ve ogrenci gorusleri [The view of students and teachers about the reason for low success science tests in SBS exams]. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 24(2), 537-562.
49. Puvirajah, A. (2007). Exploring the quality and credibility of students’ argumentation: Teacher facilitated technology embedded scientific inquiry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wayne State University, Decroit, Michigan, USA.
50. Storey, L. (2007). Doing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (p.51-64). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
51. Senler, B. (2017). Examination of pre-service science teachers’ science teaching self-efficacy beliefs and views about scientific inquiry. Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research, 3(2), 50-59.
52. Simsek, H., Hirca, N., & Coskun, S. (2012). Ilkogretim Fen ve Teknoloji ogretmenlerinin ogretim yontem ve tekniklerini tercih ve uygulama duzeyleri: Sanliurfa ili ornegi [Primary Science and Technology teachers' selection of using teaching methods and techniques and the levels of their applications: The sample of Sanliurfa city]. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(18), 249-268.
53. Tutar, M. (2015). Egitim bilisim agi (EBA) sitesine yonelik olarak ogretmenlerin goruslerinin degerlendirilmesi [The evaluation of teachers' perceptions towards education information network (EIN)] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Karadeniz Teknik University, Trabzon, Turkey.
54. Turkmen, H. (2010). Informal (sinif disi) fen bilgisi egitimine tarihsel bakis ve egitimimize entegrasyonu [Informal (out of the class) science education integration into our historical look and education]. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 3(39), 46-59.
55. Ulucinar, S., Cansaran, A., & Karaca, A. (2004). Fen bilimleri laboratuvar uygulamalarinin degerlendirilmesi. [The evaluation of laboratory studies in science]. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 2(4), 465-475.
56. Uzal, G., Erdem, A., & Ersoy, Y. (2015). Bir grup matematik ve fen bilimleri ogretmeninin sinif icinde gerceklestirdikleri ogretim etkinliklerin incelenmesi [A study on teaching activities performed by a group of mathematics and science teachers in classrooms]. The Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, (40), 64-85.
57. Warnock, S. H., Boykin, N. J., & Tung, W. C. (2011). Assessment of the impact of smart board technology system use on student learning, satisfaction, and performance. Journal of Research in Education, 21(1), 1-20.
58. Yaman S., Deniz M., & Akyigit, G. (2010). Ilkogretim birinci kademe ogrencilerinin fen ogrenmeye yonelik motivasyonlari ile cevreye iliskin tutumlari arasindaki iliski [The relationship between primary school first grade students' motivation towards science learning and their attitudes towards environment]. The paper was presented in IX. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Izmir, Turkey.
59. Yapici, M., & Demirdelen, C. (2007). Ilkogretim 4. sinif sosyal bilgiler ogretim programina iliskin ogretmen gorusleri [Teachers’ views with regard to the primary 4th grade social sciences curriculum]. Elementary Education Online, 6(2), 204-212.
60. Yildirim, H. I. (2017). Ortaokul ogrencilerinin fen dersine yonelik tutum duzeylerinin bazi degiskenler acisindan incelenmesi-1 [Investigation of secondary school students’ attitudes towards science course according to some variables–1]. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, (60), 17-40.
61. Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara, Turkey: Seckin.
62. Yildiz, E., Simsek, U., & Araz, H. (2016). Dolasim sistemi konusunda egitsel oyun yonteminin kullanilmasinin ogrencilerin akademik basari ve fen ogrenimi motivasyonu uzerine etkisi [The effect of the educational game method on academic achievement and motivation towards science learning in teaching of circulatory system]. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 13(36), 20-32.
63. Yilmaz, B. (2005). Ogretmenlik nasil bir meslektir? [What kind of a profession is teaching?]. In A. M. Sunbul (Ed.), Ogretmenin dunyasi [Teacher's world] (p. 7-22). Ankara, Turkey: Mikro.
64. Yilmaz, T. (2013). Kavram karikaturleriyle desteklenmis bilimsel hikayelerin ogrencilerin akademik basarilari, tutumlari ve motivasyonlari uzerine etkisi [The effect of the science stories supported with concept cartoons on the students’ academic achievement, attitudes and motivations] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.