Revisiting the Work–Life Balance through Workaholism and Work Engagement Concepts: A Theoretical Perspective

Öz

This conceptual research paper discusses the work-life balance (WLB) within the context of work engagement and workaholism. WLB has always taken the attention of researchers, Human Resource (HR) professionals, managers, employers, organizations and trade unions. This extensive attention is due to its reflection on all aspects of both business and society because good WLB, which also means a fulfilled life inside and outside paid work, provides mutual benefit for the individual, business, and society as well. However, workaholism, which also defines work-life imbalance, is the extreme level of work engagement and has negative effects on both individual and the workplace culture. Indeed, work engagement is defined as a positive, affective, motivational mood of increased energy associated with higher levels of dedication and strong focus on work. However, it is also important for WLB because engaged employees can prioritize work-life balance and can disconnect from work during their off-hours. To sum up, this study focuses on to provide a conceptual framework on WLB from the point of work engagement and workaholism and offers solutions to both employees and executives to gain new perspective in order to tackle with the problems which are originated from poor WLB.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Work-life balance
• workaholism
• work engagement

İşkoliklik ve İşe Bağlılık Kavramları Bağlamında İş-Yaşam Dengesinin İncelenmesi: Teorik Bir Perspektif

Öz

Özet Bu kavramsal araştırma makalesi, işe bağlılık ve işkoliklik bağlamında iş-yaşam dengesini (İYD) tartışmaktadır. İYD her zaman araştırmacıların, İnsan Kaynakları (İK) uzmanlarının, yöneticilerin, işverenlerin, örgütlerin ve sendikaların dikkatini çekmiştir. Bu yoğun ilgi hem iş dünyasının hem de toplumun tüm yönlerine yansımasından kaynaklanmaktadır; çünkü aynı zamanda ücretli iş içinde ve dışında tatmin edici bir yaşam anlamına gelen iyi İYD, bireye, iş dünyasına ve topluma da karşılıklı fayda sağlar. Ancak iş-yaşam dengesizliğini de tanımlayan işkoliklik, işe bağlılığın aşırı düzeyidir ve hem bireysel hem de işyeri kültürü üzerinde olumsuz etkileri vardır. Gerçekten de işe bağlılık, daha yüksek düzeyde adanmışlık ve işe güçlü odaklanma ile ilişkili artan enerjinin olduğu olumlu, duygusal, motivasyonel bir ruh hali olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Ancak, İYD için de önemlidir çünkü işine bağlı çalışanlar İYD’ ne öncelik verebilir ve mesai saatleri dışında işten uzak kalabilirler. Özetle bu çalışma, İYD' ye işe bağlılık ve işkoliklik açısından kavramsal bir çerçeve sağlamaya odaklanmakta ve yetersiz kaynaklanan sorunların üstesinden gelmek için hem çalışanlara hem de yöneticilere yeni bakış açısı kazandıracak çözümler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İş-yaşam dengesi
• İşkoliklik
• İşe tutkunluk

Kaynakça

1. Bakker, A. B. (2022). The social psychology of work engagement: state of the field. Career Development International, 27(1), 36-53.
2. Bakker, A.B. & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: current trends. Career Development International, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0207.
3. Başoda, A. (2017). İşe Tutkunluk: Kavramsal açıdan bir değerlendirme. The Pursuit of History, 17. pp.71-98.
4. Caesens, G., Stinglhamber, F., & Luypaert, G. (2014). The impact of work engagement and workaholism on well-being: The role of work-related social support. Career Development International, 19(7), 813-835.
5. Clark, M. A., Michel, J. S., Zhdanova, L., Pui, S. Y., & Baltes, B. B. (2016). All work and no play? A meta-analytic examination of the correlates and outcomes of workaholism. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1836-1873.
6. Clark, M. A., Michel, J. S., Stevens, G. W., Howell, J. W., & Scruggs, R. S. (2014). Workaholism, work engagement and work–home outcomes: Exploring the mediating role of positive and negative emotions. Stress and Health, 30(4), 287-300.
7. Dhas, B. (2015). A report on the importance of work-life balance. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 10(9), 21659-21665.
8. Di Stefano, G., & Gaudiino, M. (2019). Workaholism and work engagement: How are they similar? How are they different? A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(3), 329-347.

9. Gillet, N., Morin, A. J., Sandrin, E., & Houle, S. A. (2018). Investigating the combined effects of workaholism and work engagement: A substantive-methodological synergy of variable-centered and person-centered methodologies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 109, 54-77.
10. Gilson, L. L., & Goldberg, C. B. (2015). Editors’ comment: so, what is a conceptual paper?. Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 127-130.
11. Hakanen, J., & Peeters, M. (2015). How do work engagement, workaholism, and the work-to-family interface affect each other? A 7-year follow-up study. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 57(6), 601-609.
12. Huang, S. Y., Huang, C. H., & Chang, T. W. (2022). A new concept of work engagement theory in cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, and physical engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 663440.
13. Jaharuddin, N. S., & Zainol, L. N. (2019). The impact of work-life balance on job engagement and turnover intention. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 13(1), 7.
14. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS review, 10(1), 18-26.
15. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 692-724.
16. Lee, Y., Lee, J. Y., & Lee, J. (2022). The relationship between work engagement and workaholism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(9), 996-1028.
17. Leiter, M. P., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Work engagement: introduction. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, 1(9). Psychology Press.
18. Lupu, I., & Castro, M. R. (2021). Work-life balance is a cycle, not an achievement. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/01/work-life-balance-is-a-cycle-not-an-achievement. Retrieved on March 01, 2024.
19. Malinowska, D., & Tokarz, A. (2014). The structure of workaholism and types of workaholics. Polish Psychological Bulletin. vol 45(2), pp. 211-222 DOI - 10.2478/ppb-2014-0027.
20. Matuska, K. M. (2010). Workaholism, life balance, and well‐being: a comparative analysis. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(2), 104-111.
21. Meier, E., Aziz, S., Wuensch, K., & Dolbier, C. (2021). Work hard, play hard… or maybe not: A look at the relationships between workaholism, work-leisure conflict, and work stress. Journal of Leisure Research, 52(3), 330-346.
22. Schaufeli, W.B. & Bakker, A. B. (2022). Work Engagement: A Critical Assessment of the Concept and Its Measurement. Chapter 15. 273-299. Handbook of Positive Psychology Assessment. Ruch, W., Bakker, A. B., Tay, L., & Gander, F. (Eds.). Hogrefe Publishing GmbH.
23. Sussman, S. (2012). Workaholism: A Review. Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy, 6(1). doi:10.4172/2155-6105.S6-001.
24. Ten Brummelhuis, L., & Rothbard, N. P. (2018). How being a workaholic differs from working long hours—And why that matters for your health. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr. org/2018/03/how-being-a-workaholic-differs-from-working-long-hours-and-why-that-matters-for-your-health. Retrieved on Februray 19, 2024.
25. Torp, S., Lysfjord, L., & Midje, H. H. (2018). Workaholism and work–family conflict among university academics. Higher Education, 76, 1071-1090.
26. Tóth-Király, I., Morin, A. J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2021). A longitudinal perspective on the associations between work engagement and workaholism. Work & Stress, 35(1), 27-56.
27. Wilding, M. (2023). How to Work with a Workaholic Colleague. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2023/02/how-to-work-with-a-workaholic-colleague. Retrieved on January 29, 2024.
28. Yang, X., Qiu, D., & Lau, M. C. (2020). The mediation role of work-life balance stress and chronic fatigue in the relationship between workaholism and depression among Chinese male workers in Hong Kong. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 9 (2): 483–490