Securitization and Unlawful Interferences in Civil Aviation
Öz
The industry of civil aviation has suffered from international politics since almost the beginning. Although the necessary amendments, conventions and agreements were realized by participants of the international civil aviation system, the impacts of unlawful interferences never found an end. The political, economic and technological structure of civil aviation is suitable for the development of unlawful interferences. This research aims to shed more light on the relationship between international politics and civil aviation by utilising securitization and current comprehension of the theory of securitization. The research findings show that securitization is used in the civil aviation industry by aviational intellectuals in specific matters such as race and gender discrimination. Moreover and more importantly, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), national, regional and international institutions utilized securitization. At the end of the research, it is concluded that unlawful interferences such as complex terrorist actions and hijacking activities should be subjects of daily and structured speeches, conversations and rhetoric of aviational intellectuals to create a more secure sphere or context
Anahtar Kelimeler
Security, Civil Aviation, The theory of securitization, Unlawful Interferences
Kaynakça
- Abeyratne, R. (2011). Cyber terrorism and aviation—national and international responses. Journal of Transportation Security, 4, 337-349.
- Arasly, J. (2005). Terrorism and civil aviation security: Problems and trends. Connections, 4(1), 75-90.
- Baysal, B., & Lüleci, Ç. (2015). Kopenhag okulu ve güvenlikleştirme teorisi. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 11(22), 61-96.
- Bertrand, S. (2018). Can the subaltern securitize? Postcolonial perspectives on securitization theory and its critics. European journal of international security, 3(3), 281-299.
- Buzan, B. (1991) People, States and Fear: An Agenda for Security Analysis in the Post-Cold War Era. Brighton: Weatsheaf.
- Buzan, B., Waever, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Pub. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=j4BGr-Elsp8C,
- EASA Gender Equality Plan 2024-2027 - European Union, Access time: 27.07.2024.
- Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M. (2022). Ordering global governance complexes: The evolution of the governance complex for international civil aviation. The Review of International Organizations, 17(2), 293-322.
- Ejdus, F. (2009). Dangerous liaisons: securitization theory and Schmittian legacy. Western Balkans Security Observer-English Edition, (13), 9-16.
- Elisov, L., Ovchenkov, N., & Gorbachenko, V. (2021). The paradoxes of aviation security and some approaches to their formal description. Transportation Research Procedia, 54, 726-732.