THE VALUATION OF THE ARCHAEOPARKS IN THE SCOPE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE: KÜÇÜKYALI ARKEOPARK

Öz

The archaeoparks are seen as recreative areas that provide information about the culture and life of the past civilizations and enable people to experience the old cultures on the spot. The main reason for the formation of the archaeoparks is to protect the cultural heritage. The sustainability of these areas can only be ensured by informing the local people on this issue and opening them to the world at international level. The archaeoparks, which are taken into account in the context of cultural heritage, gain not only a cultural value but also an economic value with the protection and use consciousness thanks to tourism. In Turkey this area is assessed as more archaeological sites are converted to archaeoparks in recent years.  One of these archaeoparks is the Küçükyalı Archaeological Park, which is located in the living area of the Anatolian side of Istanbul.

The main aim of the study is to evaluate the perception of the local people towards the cultural heritage in the region. Another aims of the study are to determine the national awareness for archaeoparks and how the archaeoparks are evaluated in terms of tourism. Achieve the desired objectives archaeoparks in Turkey were examined and the focus is on Küçükyalı Arkeopark 10 open-ended questions for the local people in the region of Küçükyalı Arkeopark were prepared and one-to-one interview method was applied. The answers were evaluated, and recommendations were presented.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cultural Heritage,Tourism,Turkey

Kaynakça

1. Bayraktar, S. (2010). “Kentsel Alanda Arkeolojik Park Tasarımı: Küçükyalı ve Saraçhane Arkeolojik Parklarının Değerlendirilmesi”, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
2. Boylu, A. (1994). “Urban Archaeology (A Visionary Framework for Urban Archaeology in Turkey)”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi, Ankara.
3. Erder, C. (2007). Tarihi Çevre Bilinci, ODTU Mimarlık Fakültesi, Ankara.
4. İSMEP, (2014). Kültürel Mirasın Korunması, İstanbul Valiliği, İstanbul Proje Koordinasyon Birimi (İPKB) tarafından yürütülen, İstanbul Sismik Riskin Azaltılması ve Acil Durum Hazırlık Projesi, İstanbul.
5. Li W., Mın Q. And Sun Y. (2006), Discussion on the scientific research of natural and cultural heritage. Geographical Research 25: s. 561–569
6. Sarfatij, H., Mell, P. (1999), “Archaeology and The Town”, Report on the Situation of Urban Archaeology in Europe, Council of Europe Publishing, s.13- 29.
7. Tuna, A., Erdoğan, E. (2016). “Arkeolojik Sitlerin Sürdürülebilirliği Kapsamında Arkeolojik Parklar”, Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 13 (02), s:110-122.
8. Parlıtı, U. (2017). Turizm, Arkeopark ve Rekreasyon Projelerinin Kırsal Yerleşime Katkısı: Ayanis Örneği, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı 34, s.11-30.

9. Aktüel Arkeoloji, http://aktuelarkeoloji.com.tr/kucukyali-arkeopark, (20.03.2019)
10. Archaeology (2009). Volume 62 number 4, july/august 2009, http://archive.archaeology.org/0907/, (01.03.2019)
11. Blake, J.(2000), “On Defining the Cultural Heritage.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 49, 61–85, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/article/on-defining-theculturalheritage/93909A5DCDC2A7F6A65 E08897A9C9155. (20.05.2019).
12. Aktüel Arkeoloji, http://aktuelarkeoloji.com.tr/kucukyali-arkeopark, (20.03.2019)
13. Archaeology (2009). Volume 62 number 4, july/august 2009, http://archive.archaeology.org/0907/, (01.03.2019)
14. Blake, J.(2000), “On Defining the Cultural Heritage.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 49, 61–85,
15. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/article/on-defining-theculturalheritage/93909A5DCDC2A7F6A65 E08897A9C9155. (20.05.2019).
16. Culturel in Development, What is Cultural Heritage?, http://www.cultureindevelopment.nl/Cultural_Heritage/What_is_Cultural_Heritage, (02.03.2019).
17. İzmir, Türkiye’nin İlk Arkeoparkı, https://www.visitizmir.org/tr/ilce/menderes/nasil-gelmeli/tuerkiyenin-ilk-arkeoparki, (10.04.2019)
18. Kaderli L., (2015), "Kültürel Miras Koruma Yaklaşımlarının Tarihsel Gelişimi", TUBA-KED, pp.29-42, 2015, http://tubaked.tuba.gov.tr/index.php/tubaked/article/view/123. (20.05.2019).
19. Kilsan Blog, Pavlov Arkeopark, https://www.kilsanblog.com/mimarlik-farkli-ilginc-yapilar/pavlov-arkeopark/; (15.04.2019)
20. Küçükyalı Arkeopark, https://kyap.ku.edu.tr, (20.03.2019)
21. Maltepe Belediyesi, AB ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Merkezi, http://www. Abmaltepe.org/tr/sayfa/1 173/kucukyali-arkeopark-ziyarete-acildi, (20.03.2019).
22. T.C. Turizm ve Kültür Bakanlığı, Kültür Varlıkları Ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü, http://kulturvarliklari.gov.tr/TR-105374/kucukyali-arkeopark-yonetim-planina-iliskinprotokol -im-.html, (10.04.2019)
23. T.C. Turizm ve Kültür Bakanlığı, Şanlıurfa Arkeoloji ve Haleplibahçe Mozaik Müzesi, http://sanliurfamuzesi.gov.tr/TR-178651/arkeopark.html, (01.04.2019).
24. http://www.unesco.org.tr/Pages/176/18/Somut-K%C3%BClt%C3%BCrel-Miras-%C4%B0htisas-Komitesi, Erişim (21.04.2019).
25. Yapı, http://www.yapi.com.tr/haberler/mahalle-arasinda-arkeolojikucuk yaliarke opark_12 52 67.html, (25.03.2019).
26. UNESCO, Birleşmiş Milletler Eğitim, Bilim ve Kültür Kurumu Türkiye Milli Komisyonu, “Dünya Kültürel ve Doğal Mirasının Korunmasına Dair Sözleşme”,