Development of a Turkish Occupational Health and Safety Perceived Competency Scale

Öz

This study aimed to develop a Turkish Occupational Health and Safety Perceived Competency Scale (OHSPCS) about the perceived competency in Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) on employees of a faculty of a public university. Identifying OHS-related problems at workplaces and taking necessary precautions are essential. No studies from Turkey are available about assessing perceived competency in OHS and the respective scales. OHS has recently been included in the public sector agenda but the implementation of OHS has not been completed and related studies have not been conducted yet. This is a methodological study with a cross-sectional design. The first version of the scale comprised 55 items scored on a five-point Likert scale. The "alpha internal consistency coefficient" test was used to study the reliability of Turkish OHSPCS. Due to the results of preliminary analysis it was decided that to compose Turkish OHSPCS as 29 items. Then it as applied to the main study group. By this study, a valid and reliable scale aiming to measure perceived OHS competence on employees of a chosen public university faculty was developed. This new scale will help activate strategies and policies about OHS and determine the current situation and perceptions about OHS in organizational structuring, human resources, and current legislation. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Public employees
• occupational health and safety
• competence perception
• perceived competence scale

Kaynakça

1. Abrahms HK (2001). A short history of occupational health, Journal of Public Health Policy. 22 (1): 34-80.
2. Ahmad I, Sattar A and Nawaz A (2016). Occupational health and safety in industries in developing World. Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences, 14 (4): 223-228.
3. Akbulut T (2001). Ramazzini’den Aksoy’a, Turk Tabipleri Birligi Mesleki Saglik ve Guvenlik Dergisi, Ekim: 11-13.
4. Bilir N ve Yildiz AN (2014). İSG. 3. Baski. Hacettepe Universitesi Yayinları (Ankara): 42-46.
5. Bilir N (2016). ISG. Gunes Tip Kitabevleri (Ankara): 33-35.
6. Bonifay WE, Reise SP, Scheines R and Meijer RR (2015). When are multidimensional data unidimensional enough for structural equation modelling? An evaluation of the detect multidimensionality index, structural equation modelling. A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22 (4): 504-516.
7. Cokluk O, Sekercioglu G ve Buyukozturk S (2014). Sosyal bilimler icin cok degiskenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi: 9-12.
8. Comrey AL and Lee HB (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum: 78-81:299-320.

9. Casgem (2017). Turkiye’de ISG Algisi. Ankara: Cagem Arastirma Raporu: 24-30.
10. Casgem (2018). ISG ILO Standartlar: Saglikli ve Guvenli Bir Calisma Ortaminin Gelistirilmesi. Ankara: Casgem Yayinlari: 23-28.
11. Devellis RF (2012). Scale Development Theory and Applications. 3rd Ed. Thousand Oaks, United States: SAGE Publications Inc, XVIII: 206.
12. International Labour Organization (ILO) (2019). Safety and Health At The Heart Of The Future Of Work: Building on 100 years of experience. ILO Cataloguing in Publication Data: 1-82.
13. OHS Vulnerability Measure. Institute for Work & Health. Reached at: [https://www.iwh.on.ca/sites/iwh/files/iwh/tools/ohs_vulnerability_measure_guide_2017.pdf] on 10 February 2021:1-4.
14. Ozturk H ve Babacan E. Hemsirelikte Egitim ve Arastirma Dergisi 2012; 9 (1): 36-42.
15. Reise SP, Scheines R., Widaman KF and Haviland MG (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modelling: A bifactor perspective, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1): 5-26.
16. Robinson JP, Shaver PR and Wrightsman LS (1991). Criteria for Scale Selection and Evaluation. In Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, San Diego, CA, Academic Press: 10-11.
17. Rodriguez A, Reise SP and Haviland MG (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures, Journal of personality assessment, 98(3): 223-237.
18. Rosenau MJ (1935). Preventive Medicine and Hygiene. 6th Ed., New York: Appleton- Century.
19. Saygun M (2019). Iş Sagligi Guvenligi ve Meslek Hastaliklari Konularinda Uluslararası Yaklaşimlar, Reached at: [http://www.hisam.hacettepe.edu.tr/ismeslekhastaliklari/97MeralSaygun.pdf]. on 15/05/2020.
20. Tabachnick BG and Fidell LS (2012). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th Ed). Courier Companies, Inc., United States: 257-258.
21. Tektas N, Ceviz NO ve Tektas M (2018). ISG algisi duzeylerinin belirlenmesine yonelik alan arastirmasi: hazir giyim sektoru, Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / The Journal of Social Science, Yıl: 5, Sayı: 31:146-156.
22. WHO (2006). Constitution of the World Health Organisation. Forty-fifth Edition. (Basic Documents): 9-11.
23. Yu CY (2002). Evaluating cut-off criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.: 432-433.