Mali Sürdürülebilirlik Alanındaki Araştırma Eğilimlerinin Analizi: Bibliyometrik Bir Yaklaşım

Öz

Küresel ekonomik krizler, artan kamu borçları, nüfusun yaşlanması ve iklim değişikliği gibi mali baskılar, mali sürdürülebilirlik kavramını kamu maliyesi literatürünün temel araştırma alanlarından biri haline getirmiştir. Bu çalışma, mali sürdürülebilirlik alanında yayımlanan akademik çalışmaların bibliyometrik yöntemlerle incelenmesini amaçlamaktadır. Web of Science veri tabanından elde edilen yayınlar kullanılarak alanın gelişim süreci, yayın eğilimleri, en üretken yazarlar, kurumlar, ülkeler, dergiler ve anahtar kelime ağları analiz edilmektedir. Analiz sonuçlarına dayanılarak, bu alanda en etkili yazarın Antonio Afonso, en çok yayın yapılan derginin Sustainability, en yüksek üretime sahip ülkenin Amerika ve en çok yayına sahip kurumun IMF olduğunu söylemek mümkündür. Ayrıca bulgular, mali sürdürülebilirlik araştırmalarının 2008 Küresel Finans Krizi’nden sonra gündeme geldiğini, özellikle 2012 sonrası önemli ölçüde arttığını ve mevcut literatürün kamu borcu, mali disiplin, mali kural, bütçe dengesi ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma kavramlarının etrafında şekillendiğini göstermektedir. Bu bilgiler ışığında, çalışmanın, alanın gelişim eğilimlerini ortaya koymak suretiyle gelecekte yapılacak araştırmalara yol gösterici nitelikte olduğu düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mali sürdürülebilirlik
• kamu maliyesi
• bibliyometrik analiz
• VOSviewer

Destekleyen Kurum

Bu çalışma kamusal, ticari ya da kar amacı gütmeyen sektördeki herhangi bir kurumdan destek almamıştır.

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmanın hazırlanma sürecinde bilimsel ve etik ilkelere uyulduğu ve yararlanılan tüm çalışmaların kaynakçada belirtildiği beyan olunur.

Analysis of Research Trends in Financial Sustainability: A Bibliometric Approach

Öz

Fiscal pressures such as global economic crises, increasing public debt, population aging, and climate change have made the concept of fiscal sustainability one of the key research areas in public finance literature. This study aims to examine academic studies published in the field of fiscal sustainability using bibliometric methods. Using publications obtained from the Web of Science database, the development process of the field, publication trends, most prolific authors, institutions, countries, journals, and keyword networks are analyzed. Based on the analysis results, it can be stated that the most influential author in this field is Antonio Afonso, the journal with the most publications is Sustainability, the country with the highest output is the United States, and the institution with the most publications is the IMF. Furthermore, the findings indicate that fiscal sustainability research emerged after the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, increased significantly, especially after 2012, and that the current literature revolves around the concepts of public debt, fiscal discipline, fiscal rules, budget balance, and sustainable development. In light of this information, it is believed that this study will guide future research by revealing the development trends in the field.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Financial sustainability
• public finance
• bibliometric analysis
• VOSviewer

Destekleyen Kurum

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Etik Beyan

It is declared that scientific and ethical principles have been followed while carrying out and writing this study and that all the sources used have been properly cited.

Kaynakça

1. Afonso, A. (2005). Fiscal sustainability: The unpleasant European case. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, 19-44.
2. Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Fiscal discipline and the budget process. The American Economic Review, 86(2), 401-407.
3. Artis, M., & Marcellino, M. G. (2000). The solvency of government finances in Europe. In Fiscal Sustainability Conference (p. 210).
4. Bailey, D. (2015). The environmental paradox of the welfare state: The dynamics of sustainability. New political economy, 20(6), 793-811.
5. Balassone, F., & Franco, D. (2000). Assessing fiscal sustainability: a review of methods with a view to EMU. In Fiscal Sustainability Conference (p. 21).
6. Bergman, U. M., Hutchison, M. M., & Jensen, S. E. H. (2016). Promoting sustainable public finances in the European Union: The role of fiscal rules and government efficiency. European Journal of Political Economy, 44, 1-19.
7. Blanchard, O. J. (1990). Suggestions for a new set of fiscal indicators (No. 79). OECD Publishing.
8. Bohn, H. (1998). The behavior of U.S. public debt and deficits. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 949–963. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555793

9. Brady, G. L., & Magazzino, C. (2018). Government debt in EMU countries. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 18, e00096.
10. Buiter, W. H. (1985). A guide to public sector debt and deficits. Economic policy, 1(1), 13-61.
11. Chalk, N., & Hemming, R. (2000). Assessing fiscal sustainability in theory and practice (IMF Working Paper No. WP/00/81). International Monetary Fund.
12. Chapman, J. I. (2008). State and local fiscal sustainability: The challenges. Public Administration Review, 68, S115-S131.
13. Cottarelli, C. (2021). Euro Area fiscal policies and capacity in post-pandemic times. IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS Requested by the ECON committee.
14. Davig, T., Leeper, E. M., & Walker, T. B. (2011). Inflation and the fiscal limit. European Economic Review, 55(1), 31-47.
15. Debrun, X., Ostry, J. D., Willems, T., & Wyplosz, C. (2019). Debt sustainability. Sovereign debt: A guide for economists and practitioners, 151, 151-191.
16. Dirik, D., Eryılmaz, İ., & Erhan, T. (2023). Post-truth kavramı üzerine yapılan çalışmaların vosviewer ile bibliyometrik analizi. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, 4(2), 164-188.
17. Doi, T., Hoshi, T., & Okimoto, T. (2011). Japanese government debt and sustainability of fiscal policy. Journal of the Japanese and international economies, 25(4), 414-433.
18. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
19. European Commission. (2021). The 2021 Ageing Report: Economic and Budgetary Projections for the EU Member States (2019–2070). Brussels: European Commission.
20. Faguet, J. P. (2014). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53, 2-13.
21. Ghosh, A. R., Kim, J. I., Mendoza, E. G., Ostry, J. D., & Qureshi, M. S. (2013). Fiscal fatigue, fiscal space and debt sustainability in advanced economies. The Economic Journal, 123(566), F4-F30.
22. Golpe, Antonio A. & Sánchez-Fuentes, A. Jesus & Vides, José Carlos, 2023. "Fiscal sustainability, monetary policy and economic growth in the Euro Area: In search of the ultimate causal path," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1026-1045.
23. Gomez-Gonzalez, J. E., Valencia, O. M., & Sánchez, G. A. (2022). How fiscal rules can reduce sovereign debt default risk. Emerging Markets Review, 50, 100839.
24. Hamilton, J. D., & Flavin, M. A. (1986). On the limitations of government borrowing: A framework for empirical testing. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 808-819.
25. Heller, M. P. S. (2005). Understanding fiscal space. International Monetary Fund.
26. Horne, J. (1991). Indicators of fiscal sustainability (IMF Working Paper No. WP/91/5). International Monetary Fund.
27. Geithner, T. (2002). Assessing sustainability. International Monetary Fund, Policy Development and Review Department, 1-60.
28. Kose, M. A., Kurlat, S., Ohnsorge, F., & Sugawara, N. (2022a). A cross-country database of fiscal space. Journal of International Money and Finance, 128, 102682.
29. Kose, M. A., Ohnsorge, F. L., Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2022b). The aftermath of debt surges. Annual Review of Economics, 14(1), 637-663.
30. Kousenidis, D. V., Ladas, A. C., & Negakis, C. I. (2013). The effects of the European debt crisis on earnings quality. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30, 351-362.
31. Legatum Institute. (2023). The Legatum Prosperity Index™ 2023: Creating the pathways from poverty to prosperity. Legatum Institute. https://index.prosperity.com/about-prosperity/prosperity-index
32. Li, T., & Du, T. (2021). Vertical fiscal imbalance, transfer payments, and fiscal sustainability of local governments in China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 74, 392-404.
33. Merigó, J. M., Mulet-Forteza, C., Valencia, C., & Lew, A. A. (2019). Twenty years of tourism geographies: A bibliometric overview. Tourism Geographies, 21(5), 881–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2019.1666913
34. Narin, F., Olivastro, D., & Stevens, K. A. (1994). Bibliometrics/theory, practice and problems. Evaluation Review, 18(1), 65–76.
35. Öztürk, N., & Kurutkan, M. N. (2020). Kalite yönetiminin bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile incelenmesi. Journal of Innovative Healthcare Practices, 1(1), 1-13.
36. Patel, N., & Alva, M. A. P. (2024). Public debt dynamics and the impact of fiscal policy. International Monetary Fund.
37. Pradhan, K. (2019). Analytical framework for fiscal sustainability: A review. Review of Development and Change, 24(1), 100–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972266119845951
38. Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2010). Growth in a Time of Debt. American economic review, 100(2), 573-578.
39. Regan, M., Smith, J., & Love, P. (2011). Infrastructure procurement: learning from private–public partnership experiences ‘down under’. Environment and planning C: Government and policy, 29(2), 363-378.
40. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
41. Şeref, İ., ve Karagöz, B. (2019). Türkçe eğitimi akademik alanına ilişkin bir değerlendirme: Web of Science veri tabanına dayalı bibliyometrik inceleme. Journal of Language Education and Research, 5(2), 213-231.
42. Tanner, E. C. (2013). Fiscal sustainability: A 21st century guide for the perplexed (IMF Working Paper No. 13/89). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484381991.001
43. WoS1, 2026 https://a8f59890210bb2a36cc265c34c80a801c14e01d5.vetisonline.com/wos/woscc/summary/ec8168de-5eab-4b92-b295-37f13c9d29b4-019f11e405/times-cited-descending/1
44. WoS2, 2026 https://a8f59890210bb2a36cc265c34c80a801c14e01d5.vetisonline.com/wos/woscc/citation-report/ec8168de-5eab-4b92-b295-37f13c9d29b4-019f11e405
45. WoS3, 2026 https://a8f59890210bb2a36cc265c34c80a801c14e01d5.vetisonline.com/wos/woscc/citation-report/84ad19d8-e2ed-4e15-adbb-5d36520e5e8e-019f3eada7?page=1
46. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
47. Yu, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Gu, Z., Zhong, H., Zha, Q., ... & Chen, E. (2020). A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on COVID-19. Annals of translational medicine, 8(13).
48. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629