Araştırma Makalesi

INSTITUTIONAL HANDICAPS OF BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT AND ITS RECONCEPTUALISATION: THE CASE OF SOUTH AFRICA

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1 15 Ocak 2020
PDF İndir
TR EN

INSTITUTIONAL HANDICAPS OF BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT AND ITS RECONCEPTUALISATION: THE CASE OF SOUTH AFRICA

Öz

As an initiative to transform the economic order of the new democratic government post-1994, Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) was adopted as a strategy to include those who were marginalised by apartheid, in South Africa.   However, an evaluation of the BEE strategy indicates that macro-economic implications of the strategy are still not making the socio-economic impact it ought to have had in the third decade into democracy.

Current research indicates that a serious   reconceptualization and reformulation of the streategy is required in order to reach a more accurate and favorable understanding of BEE, and for it to deliver on its initial vision. When the strategy is evaluated from an institutional perspective, it is noted that economic structure, globalisation, administrative weaknesses and quality of management, as well as inadequacies of targeted population are regarded as contributors towards South Africa’s socio-economic landscape which affect the performance of BEE strategy.

This article uses a literature review that evaluates role of the BEE strategy in improving the lot of South Africa’s previously disadvantaged communities.  Furthermore, the article aims to analyze the effects of institutional factors on the strategy in a holistic way in order to develop policy recommendations to supplement the current BEE strategy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

Tübitak and University of Johannesburg

Proje Numarası

1059B191600922

Teşekkür

This study was prepared in scope of a post-doctorate research fellowship program supported by TUBITAK and University of Johannessburg. The authors sincerily thanks to TUBITAK and University of Johannesburg for their supports.

Kaynakça

  1. Acemoglu, D. & Robinson. J. (2008). The Role of Institutions in Growth and Development. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank (On behalf of the Commission on Growth and Development), W. P. No: 10. Accessed on: 6 November 2017. Available at: http://www.rei.unipg.it/rei/article/download/14/22
  2. African Communist Editorial – ACE. (2017). Inequality is no Longer Just About Race - African Communist. African Communist 1st Quarter 2017, Issue 194. Accessed on: 6 November 2017. Available at: http://www.politicsweb.co.za/opinion/inequality-is-no-longer-just-about-race--african-c
  3. African National Congress – ANC. (2017). Economic Transformation Discussion Document. Accessed on: 10 February 2018. Available at: http://www.anc.org.za/sites/default/files/National%20Policy%20Conference%202017%20Economic%20Transformation_1.pdf
  4. Andrews, M. (2008). Is Black Economic Empowerment a South African Growth Catalyst? (Or Could it Be…). Working Paper No. 170, Center For International Development, Harvard University. Accessed on: 10 February 2018. Available at: https://www.innovations.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/2606408.pdf
  5. Amenta, E & Carruthers, B. G. (1998). The formative Years of US. Social Spending Policies: Theories of The Welfare State And The American States During The Great Depression. American Sociological Review. 53(5):661-678.
  6. Antonio, R. & Kellner, D. (No date). Modernity, Modern Social Theory, and the Postmodern Critique. Accessed on: 10 October 2017. Available at: https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/modsoctheory80s.pdf.
  7. Bernstein, A., Kadt, J., Roodt, M. & Schirmer, S. (2014). South Africa and the Pursuit of Inclusive Growth, Democracy Works. Country Report. The Centre for Development and Enterprise & The Legatum Institute. Accessed on: 15 January 2018. Available at: http://www.cde.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/democracy-works---south-africa-country-report---south-africa-and-the-pursuit-of-inclusive-growth-pdf-.pdf
  8. Bernstein, H. (2013). Commercial Agriculture in South Africa Since 1994: ‘Natural, Simply Capitalism’. Journal of Agrarian Change. 13(1): 23–46.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

15 Ocak 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

31 Ekim 2019

Kabul Tarihi

13 Ocak 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Öztürk, Ş., & Jarbandhan, D. B. (2020). INSTITUTIONAL HANDICAPS OF BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT AND ITS RECONCEPTUALISATION: THE CASE OF SOUTH AFRICA. Uluslararası Ekonomi Siyaset İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(1), 1-23. https://izlik.org/JA94DE86CS
AMA
1.Öztürk Ş, Jarbandhan DB. INSTITUTIONAL HANDICAPS OF BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT AND ITS RECONCEPTUALISATION: THE CASE OF SOUTH AFRICA. IJEPHSS. 2020;3(1):1-23. https://izlik.org/JA94DE86CS
Chicago
Öztürk, Şenol, ve D B Jarbandhan. 2020. “INSTITUTIONAL HANDICAPS OF BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT AND ITS RECONCEPTUALISATION: THE CASE OF SOUTH AFRICA”. Uluslararası Ekonomi Siyaset İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi 3 (1): 1-23. https://izlik.org/JA94DE86CS.
EndNote
Öztürk Ş, Jarbandhan DB (01 Ocak 2020) INSTITUTIONAL HANDICAPS OF BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT AND ITS RECONCEPTUALISATION: THE CASE OF SOUTH AFRICA. Uluslararası Ekonomi Siyaset İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi 3 1 1–23.
IEEE
[1]Ş. Öztürk ve D. B. Jarbandhan, “INSTITUTIONAL HANDICAPS OF BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT AND ITS RECONCEPTUALISATION: THE CASE OF SOUTH AFRICA”, IJEPHSS, c. 3, sy 1, ss. 1–23, Oca. 2020, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA94DE86CS
ISNAD
Öztürk, Şenol - Jarbandhan, D B. “INSTITUTIONAL HANDICAPS OF BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT AND ITS RECONCEPTUALISATION: THE CASE OF SOUTH AFRICA”. Uluslararası Ekonomi Siyaset İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi 3/1 (01 Ocak 2020): 1-23. https://izlik.org/JA94DE86CS.
JAMA
1.Öztürk Ş, Jarbandhan DB. INSTITUTIONAL HANDICAPS OF BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT AND ITS RECONCEPTUALISATION: THE CASE OF SOUTH AFRICA. IJEPHSS. 2020;3:1–23.
MLA
Öztürk, Şenol, ve D B Jarbandhan. “INSTITUTIONAL HANDICAPS OF BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT AND ITS RECONCEPTUALISATION: THE CASE OF SOUTH AFRICA”. Uluslararası Ekonomi Siyaset İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 3, sy 1, Ocak 2020, ss. 1-23, https://izlik.org/JA94DE86CS.
Vancouver
1.Şenol Öztürk, D B Jarbandhan. INSTITUTIONAL HANDICAPS OF BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT AND ITS RECONCEPTUALISATION: THE CASE OF SOUTH AFRICA. IJEPHSS [Internet]. 01 Ocak 2020;3(1):1-23. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA94DE86CS

International Journal of Economics, Politics, Humanities & Social Sciences – IJEPHSS Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.