Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Ability Prospective Teachers Biology Education Department In Jakarta Indonesia

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 114 - 123, 01.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.1050594

Öz

The era of globalization and pandemic has greatly affected education, especially in the teaching and learning processes. Offline learning system must be changed to an online learning system. Prospective teachers are required to explore both knowledge and technology, so that effective and meaningful learning can be created. This research was a descriptive study with a quantitative approach to determine, analyze, and describe the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) abilities of prospective teachers of the Biology Education Department A private university in Jakarta, Indonesia. The research subjects were 8th semester students totaling 197 students. The instrument for collecting data on the TPACK ability of prospective teachers was questionnaires distributed through Google Forms. The results of questionnaire analyzed seven aspects of the TPACK abilities of prospective Biology teachers, including Technological Knowledge (TK), Content Knowledge (CK), Pedagogical Knowledge (PK), Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK), Technological Content Knowledge (TCK), Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK), and Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPCK). The results of this study indicated that the TPCK ability of prospective teachers is in sufficient criteria with an average value of 3.15. This showcases that it is still necessary to improve the TPACK abilities of prospective teachers in several aspects, namely mastery of content, pedagogy, and technology. ICT-based educational innovation is also needed to develop learning tools and instruments based on TPCK for prospective teachers of Biology Education Department A private university in Jakarta, Indonesia.

Destekleyen Kurum

Muhammadiyah University of Prof. Dr. Hamka

Proje Numarası

(021) 8400341

Teşekkür

Thanks

Kaynakça

  • Agustina, P. (2015). Pengembangan PCK (pedagogical content knowledge) mahasiswa calon guru biologi fkip universitas muhammadiyah surakarta melalui simulasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 1(1),1-15.
  • Bhakta, K & Dutta, N. (2016). Impact of information technology on teaching-learning process. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies, 2 (11), 131-138.
  • Chai, C. S., Tsai, C. C., and Koh, J. H. L. (2016). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology and Society, 16 (2), 31-51.
  • Elvianasti. M., Amirullah, G., Pramudiani, P. (2019). Profil kemampuan mengajar calon guru biologi pada mata kuliah pembinaan kompetensi mengajar. Jurnal Pembelajaran Biologi. Kajian Biologi dan Pembelajaran, 6 (2),11-23.
  • Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for science education: Implications of a teacher trainers’ preparation program. Proceedings of Information Science and IT Education Conference (InSITE). 597-607.
  • Husein, U. (2011). Metode Penelitian untuk skripsi dan tesis bisnis. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  • Irdalisa. (2019). Pengembangan model inkuiri terbimbing berbantuan ict untuk meningkatkan kemampuan technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK), kps, curiosity mahasiswa jurusan pendidikan biologi universitas syiah kuala. [Disertasi, Universitas Negeri yogyakarta.
  • Irdalisa, Paidi, Djukri, (2020). Implementation of technology-based guided inquiry to improve tpack among prospective biology teachers. International Journal of Instruction,13 (2),33-44.
  • Irmita, L & Atun, S. (2018). The influence of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (tpack) approach on science literacy and social skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15 (3), 27-40.
  • Koehler, M. J., P. Mishra, Kristen K., Tae Seob Shin, Charles R. G. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. Newyork: Springer Science Business Media.
  • Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (1), 60-70.
  • Kriek, J. & Coetzee, A. (2016). Development of a technology integrated intervention in tertiary education. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 15 (6),712-724.
  • Mario H, Tobias P, and Boris O. (2016). Desain principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Meenakshi. (2013). Importance of ict in education. Journal of Research and Method in Education. 1 (4), 2320-73788.
  • Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Reord. 108 (6),1017-1054.
  • Mulyasa. (2009). Standar kompetensi dan sertifikasi guru . Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  • Paidi, Bambang S., & Luisa D. H. (2021). The mastery of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge among indonesian biology teachers. European Journal of Educational Research. 10 (3), 1063-1073.
  • Raja, R & Nagasubramani, P. C. (2018). Impact of modern technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research. 3 (1), 33-35.
  • Rahmadi, F. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis pemecahan masalah berorientasi pada kemampuan penalaran dan komunikasi matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10 (2), 137-145.
  • Sani, R.A. (2013). Inovasi pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  • Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for pre-service teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 42(2),123-149.
  • Suyanto, J., Masykuri, M., Sarwanto. (2020). Analisis kemampuan technolgical, pedagogical, and content, knowledge guru biologi SMA dalam menyusun perangkat pembelajaran materi sistem peredaran darah. Inkuir: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA. 9 (1), 46-57.
  • Yaumi, M. (2011). Integrasi teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam pembelajaran. Lentera Pendidikan. 6 (108), 1017-1054.
Yıl 2022, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 114 - 123, 01.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.1050594

Öz

Proje Numarası

(021) 8400341

Kaynakça

  • Agustina, P. (2015). Pengembangan PCK (pedagogical content knowledge) mahasiswa calon guru biologi fkip universitas muhammadiyah surakarta melalui simulasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 1(1),1-15.
  • Bhakta, K & Dutta, N. (2016). Impact of information technology on teaching-learning process. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies, 2 (11), 131-138.
  • Chai, C. S., Tsai, C. C., and Koh, J. H. L. (2016). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology and Society, 16 (2), 31-51.
  • Elvianasti. M., Amirullah, G., Pramudiani, P. (2019). Profil kemampuan mengajar calon guru biologi pada mata kuliah pembinaan kompetensi mengajar. Jurnal Pembelajaran Biologi. Kajian Biologi dan Pembelajaran, 6 (2),11-23.
  • Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for science education: Implications of a teacher trainers’ preparation program. Proceedings of Information Science and IT Education Conference (InSITE). 597-607.
  • Husein, U. (2011). Metode Penelitian untuk skripsi dan tesis bisnis. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  • Irdalisa. (2019). Pengembangan model inkuiri terbimbing berbantuan ict untuk meningkatkan kemampuan technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK), kps, curiosity mahasiswa jurusan pendidikan biologi universitas syiah kuala. [Disertasi, Universitas Negeri yogyakarta.
  • Irdalisa, Paidi, Djukri, (2020). Implementation of technology-based guided inquiry to improve tpack among prospective biology teachers. International Journal of Instruction,13 (2),33-44.
  • Irmita, L & Atun, S. (2018). The influence of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (tpack) approach on science literacy and social skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15 (3), 27-40.
  • Koehler, M. J., P. Mishra, Kristen K., Tae Seob Shin, Charles R. G. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. Newyork: Springer Science Business Media.
  • Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (1), 60-70.
  • Kriek, J. & Coetzee, A. (2016). Development of a technology integrated intervention in tertiary education. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 15 (6),712-724.
  • Mario H, Tobias P, and Boris O. (2016). Desain principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Meenakshi. (2013). Importance of ict in education. Journal of Research and Method in Education. 1 (4), 2320-73788.
  • Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Reord. 108 (6),1017-1054.
  • Mulyasa. (2009). Standar kompetensi dan sertifikasi guru . Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  • Paidi, Bambang S., & Luisa D. H. (2021). The mastery of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge among indonesian biology teachers. European Journal of Educational Research. 10 (3), 1063-1073.
  • Raja, R & Nagasubramani, P. C. (2018). Impact of modern technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research. 3 (1), 33-35.
  • Rahmadi, F. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis pemecahan masalah berorientasi pada kemampuan penalaran dan komunikasi matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10 (2), 137-145.
  • Sani, R.A. (2013). Inovasi pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  • Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for pre-service teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 42(2),123-149.
  • Suyanto, J., Masykuri, M., Sarwanto. (2020). Analisis kemampuan technolgical, pedagogical, and content, knowledge guru biologi SMA dalam menyusun perangkat pembelajaran materi sistem peredaran darah. Inkuir: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA. 9 (1), 46-57.
  • Yaumi, M. (2011). Integrasi teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam pembelajaran. Lentera Pendidikan. 6 (108), 1017-1054.
Toplam 23 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Irdalisa Irdalisa 0000-0003-2523-6039

Tuti Marjan Fuadi Bu kişi benim

Mega Elvianasti Bu kişi benim

Bagus Endri Yanto Bu kişi benim

Proje Numarası (021) 8400341
Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mart 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Irdalisa, I., Fuadi, T. M., Elvianasti, M., Yanto, B. E. (2022). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Ability Prospective Teachers Biology Education Department In Jakarta Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 7(2), 114-123. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.1050594
AMA Irdalisa I, Fuadi TM, Elvianasti M, Yanto BE. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Ability Prospective Teachers Biology Education Department In Jakarta Indonesia. IJERE. Mart 2022;7(2):114-123. doi:10.24331/ijere.1050594
Chicago Irdalisa, Irdalisa, Tuti Marjan Fuadi, Mega Elvianasti, ve Bagus Endri Yanto. “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Ability Prospective Teachers Biology Education Department In Jakarta Indonesia”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 7, sy. 2 (Mart 2022): 114-23. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.1050594.
EndNote Irdalisa I, Fuadi TM, Elvianasti M, Yanto BE (01 Mart 2022) Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Ability Prospective Teachers Biology Education Department In Jakarta Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Research Review 7 2 114–123.
IEEE I. Irdalisa, T. M. Fuadi, M. Elvianasti, ve B. E. Yanto, “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Ability Prospective Teachers Biology Education Department In Jakarta Indonesia”, IJERE, c. 7, sy. 2, ss. 114–123, 2022, doi: 10.24331/ijere.1050594.
ISNAD Irdalisa, Irdalisa vd. “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Ability Prospective Teachers Biology Education Department In Jakarta Indonesia”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 7/2 (Mart 2022), 114-123. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.1050594.
JAMA Irdalisa I, Fuadi TM, Elvianasti M, Yanto BE. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Ability Prospective Teachers Biology Education Department In Jakarta Indonesia. IJERE. 2022;7:114–123.
MLA Irdalisa, Irdalisa vd. “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Ability Prospective Teachers Biology Education Department In Jakarta Indonesia”. International Journal of Educational Research Review, c. 7, sy. 2, 2022, ss. 114-23, doi:10.24331/ijere.1050594.
Vancouver Irdalisa I, Fuadi TM, Elvianasti M, Yanto BE. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Ability Prospective Teachers Biology Education Department In Jakarta Indonesia. IJERE. 2022;7(2):114-23.

International Journal of Educational Research Review (ISSN:2458-9322)
International Journal of Educational Research Review publishes scholarly articles that are of general significance to the education research community and that come from a wide range of areas. The International Journal of Educational Research Review aims to provide a forum for scholarly understanding of the field of education. Articles focus upon concepts, research, review and practices that emphasizes the intersections between education research and other fields, raises new questions, and develops innovative approaches to our understandings of pressing issues.
The range of topics covered in the International Journal of Educational Research Review include; read full aims and scope; https://www.ijere.com/page/journal-scopes
Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal will undergo initial editor screening, rigorous double-anonymous peer review, and review by the editorial board.
Double-blind peer review
International Journal of Educational Research Review follows a double-blind reviewing procedure. This means that the author will remain anonymous to the reviewers throughout peer review. It is the responsibility of the author to anonymize the manuscript and any associated materials. read full Peer Review Policy; https://www.ijere.com/page/peer-review-policy
Ownership and management
IJERE journal is hosted by Dergipark/Tubitak. IJERE Journal is published with the support of Sakarya University Faculty of Education/TURKEY.
Governing body
Editor in Chief
Dr. Serhat Arslan, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey (serhat.arslan@erbakan.edu.tr)
read full Governing body /Ownership and management/ Editorial board member ; https://www.ijere.com/page/editorial-board
Copyright and licensing
Copyright Statement
Copyright violation is an important, and possibly related, ethical issue. Authors should check their manuscripts for possible breaches of copyright law (e.g., where permissions are needed for quotations, artwork or tables taken from other publications or from other freely available sources on the Internet) and secure the necessary permissions before submission to International Journal of Educational Research Review.
read full Copyright and licensing; https://www.ijere.com/page/copyright-and-licensing-open-access-statement