Representation of Students with Special Educational Needs in Language Testing Research

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3, 124 - 132, 01.07.2022

Taylor Hallenbeck Rashed Alqahtani

https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.1053605

Öz

The presence of students identified as English Language Learners (ELL) and Special Education Students (SES) in mainstream settings is growing. However, representation of these populations within language testing research remains unknown. This is important because language testing scores are increasingly used to evaluate student learning, teacher quality, and school quality. This meta-synthesis examined the representation of these two exceptional populations within the mainstream language testing literature published in two language testing journals. This meta-synthesis utilized inductive analysis and descriptive statistics. Findings indicated highly skewed representations of ELL and SES within the research corpus of the reviewed journals. Further analysis of participant demographics, research settings, test formats and test modalities are reported and discussed. Results highlight critical needs for the fields of exceptional education regarding the language testing of ELL and SES populations. The paper closes with suggestions regarding such needed research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Meta-synthesis, Exceptional students, Language testing, Accommodations

Kaynakça

• AERA, APA, NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.
• AERA. (2013). American educational research association statement on human rights. http://www.aera.net/Portals/38/docs/AERA%20Statement%20on%20Human%20Rights%20final.pdf.
• United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (2017). Occupational outlook handbook. Retrieved from https://bls.gov/ooh/education-training-and-library/special-education-teachers.htm#tab-7
• Chalhoub-Deville, M. & Deville, C. (2008). Psychometrics in language testing journals. In Shohamy E. & Hornberger, N. H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education: Language Testing and Assessment (pp. 211-224). New York, NY: Springer.
• Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2009). Standards-based assessment in the U.S.: Social and educational impact. In Taylor, L. & Weir, C. J. (Eds.), Language testing matters: Investigating the wider social and educational impact of assessment (pp. 281-300). Cambridge University Press and Cambridge ESOL.
• Commonwealth Government. (2006) Disability standards for education 2005. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Accessed on 01/09/2021 at http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2014C00013
• Copland, F., & Garton, S. (2014). Key themes and future directions in teaching English to young learners: Introduction to the special issue. ELT journal, 68(3), 223-230.
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Davison, C. (2004). The contradictory culture of teacher-based assessment: ESL teacher assessment practices in Australian and Hong Kong secondary schools. Language Testing 21(3), 305-334.
• Department for Education. (2017). Special educational needs in England: January 2017. Reference SFT 37/2017. www.gov.uk.government/uploads/attachment_data/file/633031/SFT37_2017_Main_text. pdf
• Department for Education. (2015). Schools, pupils, and their characteristics: January 2015: Reference SR 16/2015. www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/433680/SFR16_2 015_Main_Text.pdf
• Department for Education. (2015). Special educational needs and disability code of practice: 0 to 25 years: Reference DFE-00205-2013. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/398815/SEND_Code_of_Practice_January_2015.pdf
• Francis, D. J., Rivera, M., Lesaux, N., Kieffer, M., & Rivera, H. (2006). Practical guidelines for the education of english language learners: Research-based recommendations for the use of accommodations in large-scale assessments: Book 3. Center on Instruction
• Fry, R. (2007). How Far behind in Math and Reading Are English Language Learners? Pew Hispanic Center. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509863.pdf
• Genesee, F., Lindholm-Leary, K., Saunders, W, Christian, D. (2005). English language learners in U.S. schools: An overview of research findings. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10, 363-385. https://10.1207/sl5327671esprl004_2
• Government of South Australia - Department for education and child development. (2017). English as an additional language or dialect (EALD). https://www.decd.sa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net691/f/eald-2017-report.pdf
• Haug, T., Batty, A. O., Venetz, M., Notter, C., Girard-Groeber, S., Knoch, U., & Audeoud, M. (2020). Validity evidence for a sentence repetition test of Swiss German sign language. Language Testing, 37(3), 412–434.
• Howell, D. C. (2012). Statistical methods for psychology (8th ed.). Wadsworth.
• Kieffer, M. J., Lesaux, N. K., Rivera, M., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Accommodations for English language learners taking large-scale assessments: A meta-analysis on effectiveness and validity. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1168-1201.
• Kieffer, M. J., Rivera, M., & Francis, D. J. (2012). Practical guidelines for the education of english language learners: Research-based recommendations for the use of accommodations in large-scale assessments: Book 4. Center on Instruction.
• Mann, W., Roy, P., & Morgan, G. (2016). Adaptation of a vocabulary test from British Sign Language to American Sign Language. Language Testing, 33(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215575627
• McFarland, J., Hussar, B., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Wang, K., Rathbun, A., Barmer, A., Forrest Cataldi, E., & Bullock Mann, F. (2018). The Condition of Education 2018 (NCES 2018-144). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED583502.pdf
• McLeskey, J., Landers, E., Williamson, P., & Hoppey, D. (2012). Are we moving toward educating students with disabilities in less restrictive settings? The Journal of Special Education, 46(3), 131–140.
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
• Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional children, 71(2), 137-148.
• Ontario Ministry of Education (2008). Supporting English language learners: A practical guide for Ontario educators. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/esleldprograms/guide.pdf
• Ontario Ministry of Education (2017). Special education in Ontario kindergarten to grade 12: Policy and resource guide. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/policy/os/2017/SpecEdFinal2018.pdf
• Plonsky, L. (2015). Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Secondary National Strategy for School Improvement. (March 2007). Ensuring the attainment of pupils learning English as an additional language A management guide: Reference 00011-2007BKT-EN. https://www.naldic.org.uk/Resources/NALDIC/Teaching%20and%20Learning/ks3_ws_eal_mgmt_gd_sch_strat.pdf
• Victoria State Government, Department of Education and Training. (2015). The EAL handbook: Advice to schools on programs for supporting students learning English as an additional language. https://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/school/teachers/teachingresources/diversity/eal/eslhandbook.pdf