Araştırma Makalesi

Assessment of thermal comfort preferences of industrial facility workers

Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4 25 Aralık 2024
PDF İndir
EN

Assessment of thermal comfort preferences of industrial facility workers

Abstract

Ensuring thermal comfort in industrial facilities enhances worker productivity and well-being. Achieving optimal conditions necessitates efficient utilisation of HVAC systems. Therefore, ongoing monitoring and improvement are essential to maintain suitable thermal environments within workspaces. This study focused on evaluating the environmental conditions of a facility located in Bolu province about its workforce. Measurements and surveys were conducted to assess conditions separately during summer, winter, and spring. Evaluations considered factors such as age, gender, clothing, and activity levels of the workers. Further analysis of PMV values showed significant differences in thermal comfort, except during heating and autumn, with workers’ subjective perceptions aligning closely with their acceptance of thermal conditions. Individual preferences were especially influential, particularly outside of cooling periods. While no significant differences were found based on gender or age, activity levels significantly affected thermal comfort, highlighting the importance of considering these factors in industrial settings.

Keywords

Etik Beyan

The necessary ethical approval document and permissions for the survey and measurements applied in the study were obtained from the company.

Kaynakça

  1. [1] Omidvar A, Jungsoo K. Modification of sweat evaporative heat loss in the PMV/PPD model to improve thermal comfort prediction in warm climates. Building and Environment 2020; 176: 106868.
  2. [2] Wu Q, Jianhua L, Liang Z, Jiawen Z, Linlin J. Study on thermal sensation and thermal comfort in environment with moderate temperature ramps. Building and Environment 2020; 171: 106640.
  3. [3] ISO 7730. Ergonomics of the thermal environment-assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1995.
  4. [4] ASHRAE-55 Standard. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. ANSI/ASHRAE, 55, 5, 2013.
  5. [5] Langevin J, Gurian P L, Wen J. Tracking the human-building interaction: a longitudinal field study of occupant behavior in air-conditioned offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2015; 42: 94-115.
  6. [6] Langevin J, Wen J, Gurian P L. Modeling thermal comfort holistically: bayesian estimation of thermal sensation, acceptability, and preference distributions for office building occupants. Building and Environment 2013; 69: 206-226.
  7. [7] Enescu D. A review of thermal comfort models and indicators for indoor environments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017; 79: 1353-1379.
  8. [8] Ismail A R, Jusoh N, Nuawi M, Deros B, Makhtar N, Rahman A R. Assessment of thermal comfort at manual car body assembly workstation. International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering 2009; 3: 690-694.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Makine Mühendisliği (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

25 Aralık 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

15 Temmuz 2024

Kabul Tarihi

16 Ekim 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Caner, İ., Özbağ, Ş., & İlten, N. (2024). Assessment of thermal comfort preferences of industrial facility workers. International Journal of Energy Studies, 9(4), 849-865. https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1516469
AMA
1.Caner İ, Özbağ Ş, İlten N. Assessment of thermal comfort preferences of industrial facility workers. International Journal of Energy Studies. 2024;9(4):849-865. doi:10.58559/ijes.1516469
Chicago
Caner, İsmail, Şükran Özbağ, ve Nadir İlten. 2024. “Assessment of thermal comfort preferences of industrial facility workers”. International Journal of Energy Studies 9 (4): 849-65. https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1516469.
EndNote
Caner İ, Özbağ Ş, İlten N (01 Aralık 2024) Assessment of thermal comfort preferences of industrial facility workers. International Journal of Energy Studies 9 4 849–865.
IEEE
[1]İ. Caner, Ş. Özbağ, ve N. İlten, “Assessment of thermal comfort preferences of industrial facility workers”, International Journal of Energy Studies, c. 9, sy 4, ss. 849–865, Ara. 2024, doi: 10.58559/ijes.1516469.
ISNAD
Caner, İsmail - Özbağ, Şükran - İlten, Nadir. “Assessment of thermal comfort preferences of industrial facility workers”. International Journal of Energy Studies 9/4 (01 Aralık 2024): 849-865. https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1516469.
JAMA
1.Caner İ, Özbağ Ş, İlten N. Assessment of thermal comfort preferences of industrial facility workers. International Journal of Energy Studies. 2024;9:849–865.
MLA
Caner, İsmail, vd. “Assessment of thermal comfort preferences of industrial facility workers”. International Journal of Energy Studies, c. 9, sy 4, Aralık 2024, ss. 849-65, doi:10.58559/ijes.1516469.
Vancouver
1.İsmail Caner, Şükran Özbağ, Nadir İlten. Assessment of thermal comfort preferences of industrial facility workers. International Journal of Energy Studies. 01 Aralık 2024;9(4):849-65. doi:10.58559/ijes.1516469