Experimental investigation of the synthesis gas purification using the PSA method to isolate hydrogen

Abstract

This study experimentally investigates the purification of synthesis gas using the pressure swing adsorption (PSA) method to isolate H₂. The effects of different pressures and flow rates on adsorption durations has been examined. The lowest adsorption capacity has been observed at 5 bar, while the highest has been recorded at 15 bar. It has been observed that the column adsorption capacity increases with increasing pressure. The results indicate an increase in column retention capacity with pressure. The optimum adsorption duration has been found to be 3 minutes at 5 bar and 9 minutes at 15 bar. Additionally, significant effects of p/f ratio and pressurization direction on H₂ purity has been observed. These findings are consistent with the study’s objective which is to provide insights on optimization of PSA parameters and enhancing hydrogen purity. The results support a broader understanding of PSA technology and potential applications of hydrogen purification in industrial areas and paves the way for further progress. Future research suggests that modeling studies could provide further insights and the use of different adsorbents may enhance H₂ purity.

Keywords

• Hydrogen purification
• Pressure swing adsorption
• Active carbon

Kaynakça

1. [1] Lorenz TB, Jiang L, Fox VG. Recent Advances in Simulation and Optimal Design of Pressure Swing Adsorption Systems. Separation & Purification Reviews. 2005;33(1):1-39.
2. [2] Zhang R, Shen Y, Tang Z, Li W, Zhang D. A Review of Numerical Research on the Pressure Swing Adsorption Process. Processes. 2022;10(5):812.
3. [3] Voss C. Applications of Pressure Swing Adsorption Technology. Adsorption. 2005;11:527-9.
4. [4] Riboldi L, Bolland O. Overview on Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) as CO2 Capture Technology: State-of-the-Art, Limits and Potentials. Energy Procedia. 2017;114:2390-400.
5. [5] Zhu X, Li S, Shi Y, Cai N. Recent advances in elevated-temperature pressure swing adsorption for carbon capture and hydrogen production. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2019;75:100784.
6. [6] Shabbani HJ, Othman MR, Al-Janabi SK, Barron AR, Helwani Z. H2 purification employing pressure swing adsorption process: Parametric and bibliometric review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2024;50:674-99.
7. [7] Abdeljaoued A, Relvas F, Mendes A, Chahbani MH. Simulation and experimental results of a PSA process for production of hydrogen used in fuel cells. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2017;5(12):10.
8. [8] Yang SI, Choi DY, Jang SC, et al. Hydrogen separation by multi-bed pressure swing adsorption of synthesis gas. Adsorption. 2008;14(5-6):583-90.

9. [9] Choi WK, Kwon TI, Yeo YK, et al. Optimal operation of the pressure swing adsorption (PSA) process for CO2 recovery. Korean J Chem Eng. 2003;20(4):617-23.
10. [10] De Witte N, Denayer JFM, Van Assche TRC. Effect of adsorption duration and purge flowrate on pressure swing adsorption performance. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2021;60(37):13684-91.
11. [11] Beeyani A, Singh K, Vyas R, Kumar S, Kumar S. Parametric studies and simulation of PSA process for oxygen production from air. Pol J Chem Technol. 2010;12(1):18-28.
12. [12] Sarker AI, Aroonwilas A, Veawab A. Equilibrium and Kinetic Behaviour of CO2 Adsorption onto Zeolites, Carbon Molecular Sieve and Activated Carbons. Energy Procedia. 2017;114:2450 9.
13. [13] Fletcher FB, Leitch HR. Hydrogen Embrittlement of Austenitic Stainless Steels. Metallurgical Transactions A. 1974;5(7):1757-65.
14. [14] Gangloff RP. Hydrogen-Assisted Cracking. In: Sedriks AJ, editor. Stress Corrosion Cracking: Theory and Practice. Houston: NACE International; 1990. p. 55-77.
15. [15] Xiao J, Peng Y, Benard P, Chahine R. Thermal effects on breakthrough curves of pressure swing adsorption for hydrogen purification. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2015;40(9):3706-13.
16. [16] Sarker AI, Aroonwilas A, Veawab A. Equilibrium and kinetic behaviour of CO2 adsorption onto zeolites, carbon molecular sieve and activated carbons. Energy Procedia. 2017;114:2450-9.
17. [17] Abdeljaoued A, Relvas F, Mendes A, Chahbani MH. Simulation and experimental results of a PSA process for production of hydrogen used in fuel cells. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2017;5:1250-9.
18. [18] Liu Y, Shen X, Ding W, Hou J. Adsorption of CO2 and CH4 on shale under high pressure: An experimental study and thermodynamic modeling. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2021;66(1):185-94.
19. [19] Khosravi Z, Rajabzadeh A, Bahrami S. Adsorption behavior of carbon dioxide on chemically modified activated carbons: A study on equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic properties. Adsorption Science & Technology. 2019;37(1-2):181-97.
20. [20] Lillo-Ródenas MA, Fletcher AJ, Thomas KM, Cazorla-Amorós D, Linares-Solano A. Competitive adsorption of a binary mixture of gases on activated carbon: Effects of surface chemistry. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2018;263:169-79.
21. [21] Sircar S, Golden TC. Pressure swing adsorption technology for hydrogen production. Adsorption. 2000;6(4):283-300.
22. [22] Yang RT. Gas separation by adsorption processes. Butterworth-Heinemann; 1987.