Reassessing vernacular building envelopes for energy efficiency in hot-dry climates: a case study from Diyarbakır

Öz

The building sector is a sector that consumes high levels of energy and has intensive environmental impacts throughout its entire life cycle, from design to construction, use, demolition and recycling. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), the share of the residential sector in global energy consumption has increased significantly. This situation necessitates sustainable design strategies to increase energy efficiency and a re-evaluation of local building cultures. The study presents a comparative analysis of local (basalt, limestone, adobe) and modern (brick, reinforced concrete) materials used in the building envelope under constant thermal conductivity conditions, taking only the thickness parameter as variable, in terms of energy loads and carbon emissions, based on a traditional courtyard housing typology in Diyarbakır Suriçi, located in a hot-dry climate zone. According to the findings obtained with the DesignBuilder simulation program, basalt stone showed the best performance in terms of both heating-cooling loads and CO₂ emissions. The high thermal masses, low embodied energy values and region-specific production advantages of local materials support energy efficiency, while increasing the thickness of modern materials leads to economic and structural limitations. In this context, the study reveals the impact of building envelope material choices on both operational energy and environmental performance and provides recommendations for future hybrid strategies where modern and local materials are considered together.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Local building materials
• Energy efficiency
• Carbon emissions
• Building envelope performance
• Hot-dry climate

Kaynakça

1. [1] Al-Shatnawi Z, Hachem-Vermette C, Lacasse M, Ziaeemehr B. Advances in cold-climate-responsive building envelope design: A comprehensive review. Buildings 2024; 14(11): 3486.
2. [2] IEA. Buildings—Energy system. International Energy Agency 2024. Available from: https://www.iea.org/energy-system/buildings (Accessed 9 November 2024).
3. [3] IPCC. Climate change: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press 2022.
4. [4] Henna K, Saifudeen A, Mani M. Resilience of vernacular and modernising dwellings in three climatic zones to climate change. Scientific Reports 2021; 11(1): 9172.
5. [5] Chandel SS, Sharma V, Marwah BM. Review of energy efficient features in vernacular architecture for improving indoor thermal comfort conditions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016; 65: 459–477.
6. [6] Fathy, H. (1986). Natural energy and vernacular architecture: Principles and examples with reference to hot arid climates (W. Shearer & A. A. Sultan, Eds.). Chicago, IL: Published for United Nations University by the University of Chicago Press.
7. [7] Zhao, Y., Zhao, K., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., & Du, Z. (2024). Assessment of combined passive cooling strategies for improving outdoor thermal comfort in a school courtyard. Building and Environment, 252: 111247.
8. [8] Kuloğlu Yüksek, F. Ş., Melikoğlu, Y., & Akalp, S. (2024, May 18). Examination of the effect of eyvan orientation on energy efficiency in traditional residential architecture in Şanlıurfa. In Proceedings of the 12th Global Conference on Global Warming (GCGW-2024) (pp. 350–353). Şanlıurfa, Türkiye.

9. [9] Kulshreshtha Y, Mota NJ, Jagadish KS, Bredenoord J, Vardon PJ, van Loosdrecht MC, Jonkers HM. The potential and current status of earthen material for low-cost housing in rural India. Constr Build Mater 2020; 247: 118615.
10. [10] Marsh AT, Kulshreshtha Y. The state of earthen housing worldwide: How development affects attitudes and adoption. Build Res Inf 2022; 50(5): 485–501.
11. [11] Acosta A. El buen vivir, una utopía por (re) construir. Revista Casa de las Américas 2010; 257: 33–46.
12. [12] Johnson DC. The energy efficiency and living comfort of a stabilized rammed earth dwelling in comparison with a traditional stud frame building [Master’s thesis]. West Virginia University; 2020.
13. [13] Hema C, Messan A, Lawane A, Soro D, Nshimiyimana P, Van Moeseke G. Improving the thermal comfort in hot region through the design of walls made of compressed earth blocks: An experimental investigation. J Build Eng 2021; 38: 102148.
14. [14] Ouedraogo ALSN, Messan A, Yamegueu D, Coulibaly Y. A model for thermal comfort assessment of naturally ventilated housing in the hot and dry tropical climate. Int J Build Pathol Adapt 2022; 40(2): 183–201.
15. [15] Ozkahraman HT, Bolatturk A. The use of tuff stone cladding in buildings for energy conservation. Constr Build Mater 2006; 20(7): 435–440.
16. [16] López-Buendía AM, Romero-Sánchez MD, Rodes JM, Cuevas JM, Guillem C. Energy efficiency contribution of the natural stone: Approach in processing and application. Proc Global Stone Congress, Alicante 2010; March: 2–5.
17. [17] Lakras T, Bhise AJ. Climate responsive spatial system. 2010.
18. [18] Luo Q, Zhang X, Bai Y, Yang J, Geng G. Reduce the cost and embodied carbon of ultrahigh performance concrete using waste clay. Case Stud Constr Mater 2023; 19: e02670.
19. [19] Gorączko A, Szczepaniak P, Gorączko M. Analysis of the thermal properties of soft silica limestone walls of traditional buildings in Central Poland. Materials 2025; 18(10): 2399.
20. [20] Al-Yasiri Q, Szabó M. Incorporation of phase change materials into building envelope for thermal comfort and energy saving: A comprehensive analysis. J Build Eng 2021; 36: 102122.
21. [21] Gupta V, Deb C. Envelope design for low-energy buildings in the tropics: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2023; 186: 113650.
22. [22] Adeyemi AB, Ohakawa T, Okwandu A, Iwuanyanwu O. Energy-efficient building envelopes for affordable housing: Design strategies and material choices. University of Maryland, College Park 2024. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18836.51842.
23. [23] Tripathi BM, Shukla SK. A comprehensive review of the thermal performance in energy efficient building envelope incorporated with phase change materials. J Energy Storage 2024; 79: 110128.
24. [24] Arminda W, Kamaruddin M. Heat transfer through building envelope materials and their effect on indoor air temperatures in tropics. J Sci Appl Technol 2021; 5(2): 403.
25. [25] Rattanongphisat W, Rordprapat W. Strategy for energy efficient buildings in tropical climate. Energy Procedia 2014; 52: 10–17.
26. [26] Mohson ZH, Ismael ZA, Shalal SS. Comparison between smart and traditional building materials to achieve sustainability. Period Eng Nat Sci (PEN) 2021; 9(3): 808–822.
27. [27] Balo F, Polat H. The impact of traditional natural stones on energy efficiency for sustainable architecture: The case of an authentic restaurant in Harput Region. In: Renewable Energy for Mitigating Climate Change. CRC Press; 2021. p. 85–116.
28. [28] Centofanti M, Brusaporci S, Lucchese V. Architectural heritage and 3D models. In: Computational Modeling of Objects Presented in Images. Springer; 2014. p. 31–49.
29. [29] Uçler K, Kibar A, Ertunç HM, Yiğit KS. Investigation of a heat storage system consisting of basalt stones, water and a phase change material. J Energy Storage 2022; 50: 104196.
30. [30] Albqour N, Shehata M, Elsayad Z, Rababeh S. Sustainable concrete-based structures: Review for the potential benefits of basalt fiber reinforced concrete (BFRC) in enhancing the environmental performance of buildings. Keep On Plannıng For The Real World 2024; April.
31. [31] Häfliger IF, John V, Passer A, Lasvaux S, Hoxha E, Saade MRM, Habert G. Buildings’ environmental impacts' sensitivity related to LCA modelling choices of construction materials. J Clean Prod 2017; 156: 805–816.
32. [32] Tubelo R, Rodrigues L, Gillott M, Zune M. Comfort within budget: Assessing the cost-effectiveness of envelope improvements in single-family affordable housing. Sustainability 2021; 13(6): 3054.
33. [33] Tabet Aoul KA, Hagi R, Abdelghani R, Syam M, Akhozheya B. Building envelope thermal defects in existing and under-construction housing in the UAE: Infrared thermography diagnosis and qualitative impacts analysis. Sustainability 2021; 13(4): 2230.
34. [34] Stasi R, Ruggiero F, Berardi U. Influence of cross-ventilation cooling potential on thermal comfort in high-rise buildings in a hot and humid climate. Build Environ 2024; 248: 111096.
35. [35] Natural Stone Institute. Stone of the Year 2023. Available from: https://www.naturalstoneinstitute.org/about/stone-of-the-year/2023-stone-of-the-year/.
36. [36] Sari LH, Wulandari E, Idris Y. An investigation of the sustainability of old traditional mosque architecture: Case study of three mosques in Gayo Highland, Aceh, Indonesia. J Asian Archit Build Eng 2024; 23(2): 528–541.
37. [37] Toy S, Koç A. Termal band analizlerinin farklı alan kullanımlarına göre değerlendirilmesinde Diyarbakır il örneğinin incelenmesi. 1. Uluslararası Mimarlık Sempozyumu 2018; October.
38. [38] Erdemir İ. Sıcak-kuru iklim bölgelerinde enerji korunumu-yerleşme dokusu-form etkileşimi: geleneksel Diyarbakır evleri örneği. Master Thesis, İstanbul Technical University,2014.
39. [39] Gaisma. Diyarbakır solar data. Available from: https://www.gaisma.com/en/.
40. [40] Weather Atlas. Diyarbakır weather information. Available from: https://www.weather-atlas.com/.
41. [41] Demir H. Dicle (On Gözlü) Köprüsü’nün somut ve somut olmayan miras olarak korunması. Milli Folklor 2021; 17(132): 226–249.
42. [42] Bekleyen, A., Melikoğlu, Y. (2021). An investigation on the thermal effects of windcatchers. Journal of Building Engineering, 34, 101942.
43. [43] Oruç ŞE. Diyarbakır Suriçi bölgesindeki geleneksel konut mimarisinde iklimsel faktörlerin rolü. Dicle Univ Müh Fak Müh Derg 2017; 8(2): 383–394.
44. [44] Tuncer OC. Diyarbakır Evleri. Diyarbakır Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kültür ve Sanat Yayınları; 1999.
45. [45] Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü. Diyarbakır Bölgesi. Available from: https://www.mta.gov.tr/v3.0/bolgeler/diyarbakir.
46. [46] Payaslı Oğuz G, Halifeoğlu FM. Geleneksel Diyarbakır evlerinde yapım tekniği ve malzemede koruma sorunları. DÜMF Müh Derg 2017; 8(2): 345–358.
47. [47] Stendal MF. BIM and BEM integration in the early design phases for energy-efficient architectural design. 2024.
48. [48] Farzaneh A, Monfet D, Forgues D. Review of using Building Information Modeling for building energy modeling during the design process. J Build Eng 2019; 23: 127–135.
49. [49] Attia SG, Beltrán L, De Herde A, Hensen JLM. “Architect friendly”: A comparison of ten different building performance simulation tools. In: Proc 11th Int IBPSA Building Simulation Conf, Glasgow, UK; 2009. p. 204–211.
50. [50] Di Biccari C, Abualdenien J, Borrmann A, Corallo A. A BIM-based framework to visually evaluate circularity and life cycle cost of buildings. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 2019; 290(1): 012043.
51. [51] DOE US. Building energy software tools directory. 2010. Available from: https://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/tools_directory/ (Accessed 1 March 2011).
52. [52] Pan Y, Zhu M, Lv Y, Yang Y, Liang Y, Yin R, et al. Building energy simulation and its application for building performance optimization: A review of methods, tools, and case studies. Adv Appl Energy 2021; 3: 100050.
53. [53] Mendes VF, Cruz AS, Gomes AP, Mendes JC. A systematic review of methods for evaluating the thermal performance of buildings through energy simulations. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2024; 189: 113875.
54. [54] Moussa RR, Moawad DR. Investigating the efficiency of building energy simulation software on architectural design process. In: Proc 9th Int Conf Software and Information Engineering (ICSIE) 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3436829.3436860.
55. [55] Ayçam I, Akalp S, Görgülü LS. The application of courtyard and settlement layouts of the traditional Diyarbakır houses to contemporary houses: A case study on the analysis of energy performance. Energies 2020; 13(3): 587.
56. [56] Abba HY, Majid RA, Ahmed MH, Gbenga O. Validation of DesignBuilder simulation accuracy using field measured data of indoor air temperature in a classroom building. Management 2022; 7(27): 171–178.