Biyoloji Öğretiminde Gerekli Görülen Öğretim Stratejilerinin Belirlenmesi

Yıl 2023, , 51 - 67, 30.08.2023

Zarovsan Babayeva

https://doi.org/10.47806/ijesacademic.1273224

Öz

Determination of Teaching Strategies Considered Necessary in Teaching Biology

Öz

The article talks about the necessity of defining a suitable strategy for teaching biology and other natural sciences with various experiments and research methods, which has a positive effect on the clear understanding of biological concepts in the teaching of biology for the 21st century education. In addition to basic education, traditional methods and tools, methodology, application of methodology at the level of modern standards, new training technologies, and the use of rapidly changing digitalization opportunities have gained relevance in higher and secondary educational institutions. For this, the pedagogical staff's methodical approaches to the evaluation of the students' activities should be changed, and the transformation of biological education into skills should be in the center of attention. It is known that various methods, tools and technologies are used to study living things. Of these, observation, experiment, measurement, microscopy research method, etc. as a basic tool allows for more detailed learning. With these research methods, the researcher obtains wider scientific knowledge about the object or event he is studying. The article also includes interesting examples, tables, schemes that can positively affect the formation of biological knowledge, skills and habits in the teaching of biology.

Anahtar Kelimeler

biological, education, research

Kaynakça

• Babayeva, Z. (2011) Use of ICT in Biology teaching: interactive and conventional (education tuto¬ri¬al) “Tehsil” NPS, Baku, 178 p.
• Babayeva, Z. (2016). Condition of using innovations in teaching biology. Transylvanian Re¬vi-ew journal, (ISSN 1221-1249). Tomson Reuters:Vol XXIV, No.06, p.346-353
• Babayeva, Z. (2020). The school of the digital age - electronic educational resources in the teaching of biology. "Scientific works" of Nakhchivan State University. Nature and Medicine Series 3 (104), 238-241
• Babayeva, Z. (2021) Prospects for the application of the STEAM method in teaching biology. I International Scientific and Practical Conference "Scientific Goals and Purposes in XXI Century", USA https://www.interconf.top/archive.html
• Babayeva, Z. (2021). Concept of a modern course in teaching biology. VIII International Scientific-Practical Conference "International forum: Problems and scientific solutions" (September 6-8, 2021 Melbourne, Australia)
• Babayeva, Z. (2023). Biology teaching methodology, textbook. Baku, "Zangezurda" printing house, 260 pages.
• Babayeva, Z. (2023). New challenges in education - turning biological knowledge into skills. www.ustac.az https://yazarlar.az
• Babayeva, Z. (2023). Use of new learning technologies in biology teaching. Monograph, Baku, "Zangezurda" publishing house, 260 pages.
• Dyachkova, M.A. (2016) О.N. Tomuk, “Innovations and Philosophical Education in a Modern University”, Philosophy in the XXI century: challenges, values, prospects: Collection of articles. O. N. Tomyuk and A. V. Loginov, Eds. Ekaterinburg: Max-Info Publishing and Printing Enterprise, pp. 104-108.
• EU Commission. (2015). What is LifeLong Learning? http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/lll/life/what_islll_en.html. 10.09.2019
• Gardiner, P. (2017). Playwriting and flow: The interconnection between creativity, engagement and skill development. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 18(6).
• Hua, M. (2022). Pathways to successful transformation of basic education amid educational crises: A case study of the experiments in educational reform by 271 Education Group. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 13(2), 1899-1909.
• Huseynov A.M., Abdullayeva T. Modern methodology of teaching biology. Textbook, printing house of ADPU, 2012, 184 pages.
• Iowa State University. (2022). Informed consent templates. Informed Consent Templates | Office of Research Ethics. (October 19). from https://www.compliance.iastate.edu/committees/irb/informed-consent-templates
• Jackson, N. (2011). The lifelong and lifewide dimensions of living and learning. In N. Jackson (Eds.), Learning for a complex world (p.22-38). USA: Author House.
• Jin, H. Y., Su, C. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2021). Perceptions of teachers regarding the perceived implementation of creative pedagogy in “making” activities. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(1), 29-39.
• Kettler, T., Lamb, K. N., Willerson, A., & Mullet, D. R. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of creativity in the classroom. Creativity Research Journal, 30(2), 164-171.
• Langley, D. W. (2018). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of creativity in middle and high school choral ensembles. Music Education Research, 20(4), 446-462.
• Lee, I., & Park, J. (2021). Student, Parent and Teacher Perceptions on the Behavioral Characteristics of Scientific Creativity and the Implications to Enhance Students' Scientific Creativity. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(1), 67-79.
• McCallum, A. (2016). Dangerous and uncontrollable: the politics of creativity in secondary English. English in Education, 50(1), 72-84.
• Miyoung, H. & Kang, N.-H. (2009). South Korean and the US secondary school science teachers’ conceptions of creativity and teaching for creativity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(5), 821-843. ENMU Golden Library.
• Ndeke, G.C.W., Okere, M.I.O. & Keraro, F.N. (2016). Secondary school biology teachers’ perceptions of scientific creativity. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1). ENMU Golden Library. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n1p31
• Polat, M. & Kontaş, H. (2018). Critical thinking dispositions of classroom teachers examination. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 17(65), 142-159.
• Sahin, F., & Sasmaz Oren, F. (2022). Laboratory as an Instrument in Improving the Scientific Reasoning Skills of Pre-Service Science Teachers with Different Cognitive Styles. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 13(2), 1875-1897.
• Shaughnessy, M.F., Brazzolotto, M. & Phelps, C. (2022). Curriculum: Development & education of creativity. Overarching components of creative curriculum concerns [Symposium]. Marconi Institute for Creativity Conference, Bologna, Italy.
• Tümkaya, S. & Ulum, H. (2019). Investigation of Organizational Commitment in Teachers in Terms of Various Variables: A Meta-Analysis Study. Kastamonu Journal of Education , 27 (3) , 1103-1121.
• UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. UNESCO. (2021-11-2). Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707?3=null&queryld=28abb3be44fa-41c8-accc-004b75d2ad95
• Wilson, A. & Myhill, D.A. (2012). Ways with words: Teachers’ personal epistemologies of the role of metalanguage in the teaching of poetry writing. Language and Education, 26(6), 553-568. ENMU Golden Library. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2012.669768
• Yılmaz, A. (2009). Public policies and public library-emergent literacy relationship in the USA. Knowledge World, 10, 80-94. http://www.bd.org.tr/
• Yılmaz, B., Köse, E. & Korkut, Ş. (2008). A study on the reading habits of Hacettepe University and Bilkent University students. Turkish Librarianship, 23, 22-51. http://www.tk.org.tr