Data Fusion of Maintainability Analysis of a Military Aircraft Modernization Project

Öz

For military Airborne Early Warning and Control (AEW&C) aircraft undergoing system modernization, this study explores the use of data fusion models, particularly Kalman filtering, to forecast maintainability parameters in modernization of communication systems with different alternatives. sThese parameters are used to compare with legacy communication system values to be compared. Mean Time to Repair (MTTR), the crucial maintainability statistic once mission equipment is modified or replaced, is the subject of the study. Accurate maintainability projection for updated Airborne Early Warning & Control (AEW&C) systems is crucial for operational mission success and sustainability as military operations rely more and more on cutting-edge technology. The approach estimates maintainability characteristics for freshly manufactured equipment without past failure data by utilizing engineering evaluations, manufacturer data, and maintenance records via a Bayesian filtering framework. Data from the Peace Eagle (E-7T) modernization project is used to validate the method by contrasting several options for equipment purchasing. The findings show that data fusion based on Kalman filters yields accurate maintainability predictions that meet system requirements and allow for quantitative comparison of various modernization strategies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• MTTR
• AEW&C Systems
• Kalman Filter
• Data Fusion
• Maintainability
• and Modernization of Military Aircraft

Kaynakça

1. [1] Ayyıldız M., “ABD’nin Havadan Erken İhbar Uçağı Tercihi E-7 Wedgetail”, 28 April 2022, ref: https://www.savunmasanayist.com/abdnin-havadan-erken-ihbar-ucagi-tercihi-e-7-wedgetail/
2. [2] Lalli R. V., Packard. H. M., “Designing for Maintainability and System Availability”, NASA Technical Memorandum 107398-IEEE-155NO897-5000 , The International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity, January 1997
3. [3] A. Desai and A. V. Mital, “Design for maintenance: Basic concepts and review of literature,” International Journal of Product Development, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 77–121, 2006.
4. [4] D. A. Wahab, K. E. Ching, T. A. Boay, R. Ramli, and A. V. Hussain, "Product redesign for ease of maintenance: A case study," International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 153-159, 2008
5. [5] A.Coulibaly, R. Houssin, and B. Mutel, "Maintainability and safety indicators at design stage for mechanical products," Computers in Industry, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 438-449, 2008
6. [6] ISO, “ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2023 Systems and Software Engineering-System life cycle processes” vol. 2023, ISO, 2023
7. [7] Sarkka S., “Bayesian Filtering and Smoothing”, pp.56 Cambridge University Press, 2013
8. [8] SAE International, SAE 4761 Guidelines and Methods for Conducting the Safety Assessment Process on Civil Airborne System and Equipment, SAE International 1996

9. [9] US Department of Defence, MIL-HDBK-472 Military Standardization Handbook: Maintainability Prediction, US Department of Defence, 1966
10. [10] M. Buderath and C. Stolz, “NATO AVT-223: Future Services based on Integrated Vehicle Health Management and Prognostic Health Management and its Certification Challenge, “NATO, 2014
11. [11] C. Stolz und M. Buderath, “Verification and Validation Framework for Certification of Integrated Vehicle Health Management and Prognostic Health Management, “IWSHM Conference, Stanford, 2015
12. [12] SAE Aerospace, SAE ARP4754 Guidelines for Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems, SAE Aerospace, 2010
13. [13] IBM, “The Harmony Process, “IBM,10 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSB2MU_8.3.0/com.btc.tcatg.user.doc/topics/atgreqcov_SecSysControllerHarmony.html.
14. [14] Anderson R. T., “Reliability Design Handbook”, Reliability Analysis Center, Catalog No. RDH-376, June 1977
15. [15] Rome Laboratory, “The Rome Laboratory Reliability Engineer’s Toolkit”, April 1993
16. [16] Robinson J., “Reliability, Maintainability and Supportability of the Royal Canadian Air Force Future Fighter Capability”, Canadian Forces College, Canada, 2016
17. [17] Kumar U. D., “Reliability Maintenance and Logistic Support: A Life Cycle Approach”, Boston MA, Kluwer Academic, 2000
18. [18] Defence Research and Development Canada, “Comparative analysis of minimum resource requirements for single and mixed fleets for the national fighter procurement evaluation of options”, ref: http://forces.gc.ca/assets/FORCES_Internet/docs/en/about-reports-pubs/06%2005%20Mixed%20Fleet%20(En)%20-%20final.pdf
19. [19] Esperon-Miguez, M., P. “The Effect of Current Military Maintenance Practices and Regulations on the Implementation of Integrated Vehicle Health Management Technology”, Cranfield University, 2012
20. [20] Parker, I., “Avionics Crown Typhoon Performance: Electronic Systems Make Europe's Latest Fighter a Formidable Opponent”, Avionics Magazine, Aviation Today, Aug. 2006. http://aviationweek.com/awin/f-35-s-ambitious-new-fleet-management-system