Araştırma Makalesi

Comparative Analysis of YOLOv5–YOLOv11 Models for Automated Wheat Quality Assessment with Detection of Sunn Pest Damage and Foreign Materials

Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 30 Haziran 2026
PDF İndir
TR EN

Comparative Analysis of YOLOv5–YOLOv11 Models for Automated Wheat Quality Assessment with Detection of Sunn Pest Damage and Foreign Materials

Öz

In the agricultural sector, product quality and food safety are of the utmost importance, particularly for staple food products such as wheat. Wheat quality control is approached as a process that involves identifying weevil damage and foreign materials. In traditional methods, these detection processes are mostly carried out using techniques that rely on manual methods, which can lead to time loss and human errors. This study proposes to identify sunn pest damage and foreign materials by replacing manual processing steps with an automated system using an AI-based integrated image processing system. YOLO-based deep learning models were used in the proposed system for object detection. In this context, the YOLOv5, YOLOv7, YOLOv8, and YOLOv11 variants were compared. A unique multi-class dataset consisting of wheat photographs obtained under various conditions was created for this study. In addition to the images obtained from this dataset, data augmentation methods were employed to enhance the model’s generalization capability. Experimental results indicate that the YOLOv11-L model demonstrated the best performance with accuracy of 97.1%, precision of 95.8%, recall of 94.6%, and an F1-score of 95.2%. Furthermore, it demonstrated superior performance compared to other models, achieving a 96.8% mAP@0.5 and a 75.4% mAP@0.5:0.95. The results obtained demonstrate that the designed system is feasible for real-time implementation and that AI-powered object detection techniques provide an effective solution for agricultural quality control processes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Deep Learning, Object Detection, Sunn Pest, Wheat Quality Control

Kaynakça

  1. Davari, A., & Parker, B. L. (2018). A review of research on Sunn Pest {Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae)} management published 2004–2016. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 21(1), 352-360.
  2. Dizlek, H., & Özer, M. S. (2016). Effects of sunn pest (Eurygaster integriceps) damage ratio on physical, chemical, and technological characteristics of wheat. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods, 8(1), 145-156.
  3. Filip, E., Woronko, K., Stępień, E., & Czarniecka, N. (2023). An overview of factors affecting the functional quality of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). International journal of molecular sciences, 24(8), 7524.
  4. Konarev, A., Dolgikh, V., Senderskiy, I., Konarev, A., Kapustkina, A., & Lovegrove, A. (2019). Characterisation of proteolytic enzymes of Eurygaster integriceps Put.(Sunn bug), a major pest of cereals. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 22(1), 379-385.
  5. Shokraie, M., Salehifar, M., & Pazhooh, R. A. (2018). Rheological and Quality Characteristics of Pasta Produced from Sunn Pest Damaged Wheat Flour and Ascorbic Acid. Journal of Agricultural Science & Technology, 20(5).
  6. Stankevych, G., Borta, A., & Penaki, A. (2019). Research of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of gluten of wheat grains damaged by the wheat bug. Grain Products & Mixed Fodder's, 19(3).
  7. Yandamuri, R. C. (2011). Cloning and expression of the prolyl endoprotease from Eurygaster integriceps. Stephen F. Austin State University.
  8. Varzakas, T. (2016). Quality and safety aspects of cereals (wheat) and their products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 56(15), 2495-2510.
  9. Nadimi, M., Hawley, E., Liu, J., Hildebrand, K., Sopiwnyk, E., & Paliwal, J. (2023). Enhancing traceability of wheat quality through the supply chain. Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 22(4), 2495-2522.
  10. Sarkar, A., & Fu, B. X. (2022). Impact of quality improvement and milling innovations on durum wheat and end products. Foods, 11(12), 1796.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Curum, Y., Yüzgeç Özdemir, E., & Özyurt, F. (2026). Comparative Analysis of YOLOv5–YOLOv11 Models for Automated Wheat Quality Assessment with Detection of Sunn Pest Damage and Foreign Materials. International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications, 10(1), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.46460/ijiea.1928199
AMA
1.Curum Y, Yüzgeç Özdemir E, Özyurt F. Comparative Analysis of YOLOv5–YOLOv11 Models for Automated Wheat Quality Assessment with Detection of Sunn Pest Damage and Foreign Materials. ijiea, IJIEA. 2026;10(1):83-89. doi:10.46460/ijiea.1928199
Chicago
Curum, Yusuf, Esra Yüzgeç Özdemir, ve Fatih Özyurt. 2026. “Comparative Analysis of YOLOv5–YOLOv11 Models for Automated Wheat Quality Assessment with Detection of Sunn Pest Damage and Foreign Materials”. International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications 10 (1): 83-89. https://doi.org/10.46460/ijiea.1928199.
EndNote
Curum Y, Yüzgeç Özdemir E, Özyurt F (01 Haziran 2026) Comparative Analysis of YOLOv5–YOLOv11 Models for Automated Wheat Quality Assessment with Detection of Sunn Pest Damage and Foreign Materials. International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications 10 1 83–89.
IEEE
[1]Y. Curum, E. Yüzgeç Özdemir, ve F. Özyurt, “Comparative Analysis of YOLOv5–YOLOv11 Models for Automated Wheat Quality Assessment with Detection of Sunn Pest Damage and Foreign Materials”, ijiea, IJIEA, c. 10, sy 1, ss. 83–89, Haz. 2026, doi: 10.46460/ijiea.1928199.
ISNAD
Curum, Yusuf - Yüzgeç Özdemir, Esra - Özyurt, Fatih. “Comparative Analysis of YOLOv5–YOLOv11 Models for Automated Wheat Quality Assessment with Detection of Sunn Pest Damage and Foreign Materials”. International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications 10/1 (01 Haziran 2026): 83-89. https://doi.org/10.46460/ijiea.1928199.
JAMA
1.Curum Y, Yüzgeç Özdemir E, Özyurt F. Comparative Analysis of YOLOv5–YOLOv11 Models for Automated Wheat Quality Assessment with Detection of Sunn Pest Damage and Foreign Materials. ijiea, IJIEA. 2026;10:83–89.
MLA
Curum, Yusuf, vd. “Comparative Analysis of YOLOv5–YOLOv11 Models for Automated Wheat Quality Assessment with Detection of Sunn Pest Damage and Foreign Materials”. International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications, c. 10, sy 1, Haziran 2026, ss. 83-89, doi:10.46460/ijiea.1928199.
Vancouver
1.Yusuf Curum, Esra Yüzgeç Özdemir, Fatih Özyurt. Comparative Analysis of YOLOv5–YOLOv11 Models for Automated Wheat Quality Assessment with Detection of Sunn Pest Damage and Foreign Materials. ijiea, IJIEA. 01 Haziran 2026;10(1):83-9. doi:10.46460/ijiea.1928199