Araştırma Makalesi

Problematising the Policies' Purposes of Adult Education: A Semiological Approach to the 'NEAAL' and Its Lifelong Learning Reductionist Mindset

Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2 31 Aralık 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

Problematising the Policies' Purposes of Adult Education: A Semiological Approach to the 'NEAAL' and Its Lifelong Learning Reductionist Mindset

Öz

The study seeks to redefine the purposes of Adult Education Policies (AEP) at the EU level, moving beyond traditional views focused on qualifications and economic adaptation, and instead advocating for a socio-ethical-political framework. This framework incorporates critical, creative, and existential dimensions. Drawing on Biesta's critique of the democratic deficit in lifelong learning, the study calls for re-evaluating AEP through three educational domains: qualification, socialisation, and subjectification. The analysis centres on the "Council Resolution on a new European Agenda for Adult Learning 2021-2030" (NEAAL 2030), using content analysis and a semiological approach, with MAXQDA for analysing predefined categories from the theoretical framework. The investigation reveals that crucial concepts such as "education", "learning", "training", and "skills" are reduced in meaning, aligning with Barthes's critique of mythologies. This reduction perpetuates a normalised discourse in AEP, resulting in a democratic deficit and a limited teleological approach. Despite its purported neutrality, NEAAL 2030 endorses a reductionist regime that overlooks pluralistic perspectives and fails to foster relationality within the EU's adult education. The research challenges this normalisation and reductionism, advocating for a comprehensive and democratic framework that empowers individuals and recognises diverse perspectives in EU adult education policies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

University of Coimbra

Etik Beyan

No ethical reports are necessary for this paper

Kaynakça

  1. Barros, R. (2012). From lifelong education to lifelong learning: Discussion of some effects of today’s neoliberal policies. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 3(2), 119–134.
  2. Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. The Noonday Press.
  3. Biesta, G. (2004). Against learning: Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning. Nordisk Pedagogik, 23, 70–82.
  4. Biesta, G. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Paradigm Publishers.
  5. Biesta, G. (2013). Interrupting the politics of learning. Power and Education, 5, 4–15.
  6. Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109
  7. Biesta, G. (2018). O dever de resistir: Sobre escolas, professores e sociedade. Educação, 41(1), 21–29.
  8. Biesta, G. (2020). Risking ourselves in education: Qualification, socialization, and subjectification revisited. Educational Theory, 70(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Hayat Boyu Öğrenme, Yetişkin Eğitimi, Eğitim Politikası

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Maria Das Dores Formosınho Sanches Sımões Bu kişi benim
0000-0002-0697-3327
Portugal

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

20 Şubat 2025

Kabul Tarihi

27 Eylül 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
De Sousa Reis, C. F., & Formosınho Sanches Sımões, M. D. D. (2025). Problematising the Policies’ Purposes of Adult Education: A Semiological Approach to the ’NEAAL’ and Its Lifelong Learning Reductionist Mindset. International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership, 11(2), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.25233/ijlel.1589941
AMA
1.De Sousa Reis CF, Formosınho Sanches Sımões MDD. Problematising the Policies’ Purposes of Adult Education: A Semiological Approach to the ’NEAAL’ and Its Lifelong Learning Reductionist Mindset. IJLEL. 2025;11(2):75-87. doi:10.25233/ijlel.1589941
Chicago
De Sousa Reis, Carlos Francisco, ve Maria Das Dores Formosınho Sanches Sımões. 2025. “Problematising the Policies’ Purposes of Adult Education: A Semiological Approach to the ’NEAAL’ and Its Lifelong Learning Reductionist Mindset”. International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership 11 (2): 75-87. https://doi.org/10.25233/ijlel.1589941.
EndNote
De Sousa Reis CF, Formosınho Sanches Sımões MDD (01 Aralık 2025) Problematising the Policies’ Purposes of Adult Education: A Semiological Approach to the ’NEAAL’ and Its Lifelong Learning Reductionist Mindset. International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership 11 2 75–87.
IEEE
[1]C. F. De Sousa Reis ve M. D. D. Formosınho Sanches Sımões, “Problematising the Policies’ Purposes of Adult Education: A Semiological Approach to the ’NEAAL’ and Its Lifelong Learning Reductionist Mindset”, IJLEL, c. 11, sy 2, ss. 75–87, Ara. 2025, doi: 10.25233/ijlel.1589941.
ISNAD
De Sousa Reis, Carlos Francisco - Formosınho Sanches Sımões, Maria Das Dores. “Problematising the Policies’ Purposes of Adult Education: A Semiological Approach to the ’NEAAL’ and Its Lifelong Learning Reductionist Mindset”. International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership 11/2 (01 Aralık 2025): 75-87. https://doi.org/10.25233/ijlel.1589941.
JAMA
1.De Sousa Reis CF, Formosınho Sanches Sımões MDD. Problematising the Policies’ Purposes of Adult Education: A Semiological Approach to the ’NEAAL’ and Its Lifelong Learning Reductionist Mindset. IJLEL. 2025;11:75–87.
MLA
De Sousa Reis, Carlos Francisco, ve Maria Das Dores Formosınho Sanches Sımões. “Problematising the Policies’ Purposes of Adult Education: A Semiological Approach to the ’NEAAL’ and Its Lifelong Learning Reductionist Mindset”. International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership, c. 11, sy 2, Aralık 2025, ss. 75-87, doi:10.25233/ijlel.1589941.
Vancouver
1.Carlos Francisco De Sousa Reis, Maria Das Dores Formosınho Sanches Sımões. Problematising the Policies’ Purposes of Adult Education: A Semiological Approach to the ’NEAAL’ and Its Lifelong Learning Reductionist Mindset. IJLEL. 01 Aralık 2025;11(2):75-87. doi:10.25233/ijlel.1589941