An Evalution on American Teaching Style in Latvian Universities’Classrooms

Öz

The first problem that arose in my freshman (first year) courses that I have taught at the University of Rhode Island and at the Rochester Institute of Technology: student attendance and the percent of students who performed poorly. Now the question to ask: how to start correcting the problem? Try to implement new ideas as active class engagement and creating a hands-on atmosphere in each course vs. a theoretical course (practice makes perfect). How successfully were these ideas implemented in my classrooms in the American universities and furthermore, how successfully will these ideas work in classrooms of Latvian universities?

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Evaluation, Teaching style, Latvian universities

Kaynakça

1. Effects of communication aids and strategies on cooperative teaching; Donald F. Dansereau, Dianna Newbern, Michael E. Patterson; Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 84, no. , 453 – 461, 1992: DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.453
2. The promise of action research for critically reflective teacher education; Todd Dinkelman, The teacher Educator, v. 32, no. 4, 250 – 274, 1997. DOI: 10.1080/08878739709555151
3. Realism, Deweyan Pragmatism, and Educational Research; Jim Garrison, Educational Researcher; v. 23, no. 1, 5 – 14, 1994.
4. Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environments; Michael J. Hannafin, Kathleen M. Hannafin, Susan M. Land, Kevin Oliver; Educational Technology Research and Development, v. 45, no. 3, 101 – 117, 1997.
5. Teaching with and for discussion; Diana Hess, Walter C. Parker, Teaching and Teacher Education, v. 17, no. 3, 273 – 289, 2001.
6. Career change teachers: pragmatic choice or a vocation postponed? Mari Horne, Madelein Mattarozzi Laming, Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice; v. 19, no. 3, 326 – , 2013. DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2012.754163
7. Barriers to Effective Special Education Consultation; Lawrence J. Johnson, Diana J. Hammitte, Marlene C. Pugach; Remedial and Special Education, November/December 1988, vol. 9, no. 641-47; DOI: 10.1177/074193258800900609.
8. Ironic Schooling: Socrates, Pragmatism and the Higher Learning; Alvin Neiman, Educational Theory; v. 41, no. 4, 371 – 384, 1991.

9. A Pragmatic Approach on Epistemology, Teaching, and Learning; Leif Ostman, Per-Olof Wickman, Science Education; v. 98, no. 3, 375 – 382, 2014.
10. American teaching style in Latvian universities’ classrooms; Michael Radin, The Baltic Course; March 2016. http://www.baltic-course.com/eng/direct_speech/?doc=118650
11. A Pragmatic Approach to the Teaching of Values; Marion Rhodes Brown, Educational Horizons, v. 36, no. 3, 137 – 139, 1958.
12. A Pragmatic Teaching Philosophy; Patricia M. Shields, Journal of Public Affairs Education; v. 9, no. 1, 7 – 12, 2003.
13. Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching; Ernst Von Glasersfeld, Synthese; v. 80, no. 1, 121 – 140, 1989.
14. Teaching Pragmatic: Preparing Teaching Materials; Crystal Zheng, American International Journal of Social Science, v. 3, no. 4, 147 – 151, 2014.