Child as a Mathematics Teacher: I’m Playing Teaching with my Family

Öz

In the study, the children had a mathematics teacher mission of their parents. The purpose of the study is to identify whether this mission provides the children cognitive and affective improvements in their mathematical understanding or not. To this aim, various activities were prepared in line with the program in collaboration with the teacher. These activities were shared with the parents and the children at home. The sample consists of 3 students from 3 different classes, their parents and their teachers. Observations, semi-structured interviews, interviews with parents and students achievement tests were used as the instruments of the study. The study is a mixed method study with the emphasis on qualitative part. Single case experimental design was used in the quantitative part of the method. Case study design was used in the qualitative part of the study. The data obtained from the achievements tests were evaluated by using measures of central tendency. The remaining data were analyzed through content analysis. In line with the findings, the results show that this method increased the students’ achievement in terms of cognitive aspect and made a positive impact on students’ affective aspects. Additionally, the method provided self-confidence, created studying with joy and improved the communication among teacher-student-parents.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mathematics education, Teaching action, Child, Student as a guide, Parent as a student

Kaynakça

1. Alkan, V. (2011). Etkili matematik öğretiminin gerçekleştirilmesindeki engellerden biri: Kaygı ve nedenleri.
2. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 89-107.
3. Al-Mahdi, O. (2010). A qualitative investigation of home-school relationships and children's mathematics learning in–and out-of-school in Bahrain. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 427-438.
4. Anderson, A. (1997). Families and mathematics: A study of parent-child interactions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 28(4). 484-511.
5. Aydın,O.(2016). Çocuğunuzun Beynini Geliştirecek 10 Yöntem. http://www.cocukgelisimi.gen.tr. Ulaşım tarihi: 15.05.2016.
6. Creswell, J.W.(2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. (4.Ed.) Boston: Pearson Education.
7. Creswell, J.W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, USA.
8. Civil, M. (1998). Bridging in-school mathematics and out-of-school mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Retrieved July 12, 2014 from http://math.arizona.edu/

9. Güneş, A.(2016). Eğitimde Kalıcı Başarı İçin Edinerek Öğrenme. İstanbul. Işık Yayınları.
10. Halat, E. and Kay, O. (2009). Yeni 2005 ilköğretim matematik öğretim programının veli görüşleri doğrultusunda değerlendirilmesi: Eğitim düzeyi. The assessment of the new elementary school mathematıcs teaching program through parents. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2).
11. Marguez, G.G.(2016). Anlatmak İçin Yaşamak. (Çeviren. P. Savaş). 12. Baskı. İstanbul: Can Yayınları (2002). Senemoğlu,N.(2001). Gelişim, Öğrenme ve Öğretim.Ankara. Gazi Kitapevi Yayınları.
12. Şişman, M.(2002). Eğitimde Mükemmellik Arayışı. Ankara. Pegem A Yayınları.
13. Topu, F. B., Baydaş, Ö., Turan, Z., and Göktaş, Y. (2013). Öğretim teknolojisi araştırmalarında geçerlik ve güvenirlik önlemleri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 42(1), 110-126
14. Yenilmez, K., Özer, M. N. and Yıldız, Z. (2006). Velilerin çocuklarının matematik eğitimine karşı yaklaşım ve katkılarının incelenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7 (1), 151-170.