TR
EN
Comparison of Modified DNA Isolation Methods for the Detection of GMO in Processed Foods
Öz
The highly degraded DNA content in processed food samples results in limited efficiency in detecting GMOs. Generally, conventional DNA isolation techniques from transgenic plant seeds or raw materials are available in the literature, but studies on DNA isolation techniques from processed food samples are more limited. Also, many processed food products contain genomic DNA from numerous complex plants or animal sources. This study proposed some beneficial modifications for high-quality DNA isolation of processed foods such as biscuits, cakes, crackers, corn chips, and flours. For this purpose, isolation protocols were investigated to obtain high molecular weight and quality DNA from food samples, the first step in GMO analysis to study processed foods. PCR detection was performed with soybean and corn-specific primers to control the gene region of the target organism of expected length from the obtained DNA samples and compare them with DNA isolation yields. Among the four isolation methods tested, the modified Wizard-CTAB method showed better results in most of the tested food products. Results showed that the modified Wizard-CTAB could be used for selection can be made in different food products for studies on corn and soybean specific genes and GMO detection.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Destekleyen Kurum
Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University Scientific Research Projects Commission
Proje Numarası
03-D-21
Teşekkür
This study was supported by Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University Scientific Research Projects Commission (Project No: 03-D-21). In this article, data belonging to the study of Begum TERZI AKSOY's doctoral thesis were used.
Kaynakça
- 1. ISAAA, ISAAA Brief 55-2019: Executive Summary Biotech Crops Drive Socio-Economic Development and Sustainable Environment in the New Frontier. 2011. In: https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/55/executivesummary/default.asp.
- 2. Gryson, N., Effect of food processing on plant DNA degradation and PCR-based GMO analysis: a review. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2010. 396(6): p. 2003-2022.
- 3. Linnhoff, S., et al., An examination of millennials’ attitudes toward genetically modified organism (GMO) foods: is it Franken-food or super-food? International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 2017. 13(4): p. 371.
- 4. Sönmezoğlu, Ö. and H. Keskin, Determination of genetically modified corn and soy in processed food products. Journal of Applied Biology & Biotechnology, 2015. (3): p. 32-37.
- 5. Arun, Ö.Ö., The effect of heat processing on PCR detection of genetically modified soy in bakery products. Journal of Food and Health Science, 2016. p. 130-139.
- 6. Pacheco Coello, R., et al. Comparison of three DNA extraction methods for the detection and quantification of GMO in Ecuadorian manufactured food. BMC Research Notes, 2017. 10(1): p. 758.
- 7. Saadedin, S., M. Abbas and A. Suleiman, Detection of CaMV-35S Promoter and NOS Terminator in Genetically Modified Tomato Seed in Iraqi Markets. Iraqi journal of biotechnology, 2019. 18(2).
- 8. Matthes, N., et al. Validation of a modified CTAB method for DNA extraction from protein-rich maize feedstuffs. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, 2020. 15(4): p. 331-340.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Endüstriyel Biyoteknoloji
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
15 Aralık 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi
24 Ağustos 2022
Kabul Tarihi
30 Eylül 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2022 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3
APA
Terzi Aksoy, B., & Ateş Sönmezoğlu, Ö. (2022). Comparison of Modified DNA Isolation Methods for the Detection of GMO in Processed Foods. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, 5(3), 546-561. https://doi.org/10.38001/ijlsb.1166275
AMA
1.Terzi Aksoy B, Ateş Sönmezoğlu Ö. Comparison of Modified DNA Isolation Methods for the Detection of GMO in Processed Foods. Int J. Life Sci. Biotechnol. 2022;5(3):546-561. doi:10.38001/ijlsb.1166275
Chicago
Terzi Aksoy, Begüm, ve Özlem Ateş Sönmezoğlu. 2022. “Comparison of Modified DNA Isolation Methods for the Detection of GMO in Processed Foods”. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology 5 (3): 546-61. https://doi.org/10.38001/ijlsb.1166275.
EndNote
Terzi Aksoy B, Ateş Sönmezoğlu Ö (01 Aralık 2022) Comparison of Modified DNA Isolation Methods for the Detection of GMO in Processed Foods. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology 5 3 546–561.
IEEE
[1]B. Terzi Aksoy ve Ö. Ateş Sönmezoğlu, “Comparison of Modified DNA Isolation Methods for the Detection of GMO in Processed Foods”, Int J. Life Sci. Biotechnol., c. 5, sy 3, ss. 546–561, Ara. 2022, doi: 10.38001/ijlsb.1166275.
ISNAD
Terzi Aksoy, Begüm - Ateş Sönmezoğlu, Özlem. “Comparison of Modified DNA Isolation Methods for the Detection of GMO in Processed Foods”. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology 5/3 (01 Aralık 2022): 546-561. https://doi.org/10.38001/ijlsb.1166275.
JAMA
1.Terzi Aksoy B, Ateş Sönmezoğlu Ö. Comparison of Modified DNA Isolation Methods for the Detection of GMO in Processed Foods. Int J. Life Sci. Biotechnol. 2022;5:546–561.
MLA
Terzi Aksoy, Begüm, ve Özlem Ateş Sönmezoğlu. “Comparison of Modified DNA Isolation Methods for the Detection of GMO in Processed Foods”. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, c. 5, sy 3, Aralık 2022, ss. 546-61, doi:10.38001/ijlsb.1166275.
Vancouver
1.Begüm Terzi Aksoy, Özlem Ateş Sönmezoğlu. Comparison of Modified DNA Isolation Methods for the Detection of GMO in Processed Foods. Int J. Life Sci. Biotechnol. 01 Aralık 2022;5(3):546-61. doi:10.38001/ijlsb.1166275
Cited By
Enhancing the authenticity of animal by-products: harmonization of DNA extraction methods from novel ingredients
Frontiers in Chemistry
https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2024.1350433An integrated microfluidic platform for on-site qPCR analysis: food allergen detection from sample to result
Lab on a Chip
https://doi.org/10.1039/D4LC00570HComparison of DNA isolation methods for GMO detection from biscuit samples
Anatolian Journal of Botany
https://doi.org/10.30616/ajb.1527481