An Examination of Business Ethics Attitudes Through Major Philosophical Categories

Öz

This study aims to assess the attitudes of associate degree students, who are prospective employees in the business world, towards work ethics. It investigates whether these attitudes differ based on various factors, including gender, department, and work experience. Additionally, the study evaluates participants' attitudes through the lens of major business ethics philosophies—Machiavellianism, Social Darwinism, Ethical Relativism, Moral Objectivism, and Legalism. The findings indicate a significant difference in business ethics attitudes between students enrolled in administrative programs and those in tourism programs. However, no clear distinction was observed in the participants' business ethics attitudes when analyzed according to different ethical philosophies. Following statistical analysis, attitudes towards business ethics were categorized into two factors: "benefit-based business ethics" and "behavior-based business ethics." The results demonstrate that male students exhibit higher benefit-based work ethic attitudes compared to their female counterparts. Furthermore, students with no job experience tend to exhibit stronger self-interest-based business ethics attitudes. Conversely, students from administrative and tourism programs display distinct business ethics attitudes, influenced by both benefit and behavior considerations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ethics;
• ethical attitude
• business ethics
• business ethics philosophy
• ATBEQ

Kaynakça

1. Aksaraylı, M. F. & Cevher, E. (2014). Mesleki yükseköğrenimde mesleki etik eğitimine yönelik bir araştırma. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(8), 115-126.
2. Al-Mutairi, A., Naser, K. & Al-Najjar, H. (2021). Business students attitude towards business ethics: evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(7), 1-15.
3. Arlow, : (1991). Personal characteristics in college students' evaluations of business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(1), 63-69.
4. Avcı, M. & Yıldız, E. (2022). Ayn rand düşüncesinde objektivizm bağlamında rasyonel egoizm. Temaşa Erciyes Üniversitesi Felsefe Bölümü Dergisi, (17), 205-215. doi:10.55256/temasa.1113203
5. Aydın, İ. (2010). Yönetsel, mesleki ve örgütsel etik. Ankara: Pegem Yayınevi.
6. Bageac, D., Furrer, O. & Reynaud, E. (2011). Management students’ attitudes toward business ethics: A comparison between France and Romania. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 391-406.
7. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice hall.
8. Barry, V. (1979). Moral issues in business, Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

9. Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D. M., & Tucker, J. S. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 707-721. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.707
10. Bebeau, M. J., Rest, J. R., & Narvaez, D. (1995). Beyond the promise: A perspective on research in moral education. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research, and applications (Vol. 2, p: 315-332).
11. Becker, G. (1996) Accounting for tastes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Berényi, L., & Deutsch, N. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and business philosophies among Hungarian business students. Sustainability, 13(17), 9914. doi:10.3390/su13179914
13. Boulding, K. E. (1985). Etyka i biznes. In K. E. Boulding (Ed.), Ponad ekonomią (s. 59–69). Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
14. Burkhardt, M. A. & Nathaniel, A. K. (2008). Ethics and Issues in Contemporary Nursing, New York: Thomson Delmar Learning.
15. Büyüköztürk Ş.(2006). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
16. Cengiz, E., Ferman, M. ve Akyuz, I. (2012). Business ethics: Exploring the differences about perceptions of business ethics among selected Turkish financial specialists. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 6(4), 96-106.
17. Christie, R. & F. Geis (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press,
18. Clark, D., Tanner, T., Pham, L. N., Lau, W. K. & Nguyen, L. D. (2020). Attitudes toward business ethics: empirical investigation on different moral philosophies among business students in Vietnam. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 14(2), 123-143. doi: 10.1504/ıjbge.2020.10023486
19. Clegg, S., Kornberger, M. & Rhodes, C. (2007). Business ethics as practice. British Journal of Management, 18(2), 107-122. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00493.x.
20. Constantin, G. D., Mazilescu, C. A., Hoinoiu, T., Hoinoiu, B., Luca, R. E., Viscu, L. I., ... & Oancea, R. (2023). Attitude of Romanian Medical Students and Doctors toward Business Ethics: Analyzing the Influence of Sex, Age, and Ethics Education. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(8), 1452-1466. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13080103
21. Crane, A. & Matten, D. (2007) Business ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
22. Dalton, D., Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender Differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias. J Bus Ethics, 103, 73–93. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0843-8
23. De George, R. T. (1987). The status of business ethics: Past and future. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(3), 201-211.
24. Deloitte. (2023). 2023 Gen Z and Millennial Concerns survey. Deloitte Global. Retrieved May 12, 2024, from https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/genzmillennial-survey-2023.html
25. Duska, R. (2000). Business ethics: Oxymoron or good business? Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 111-129. doi: 10.2307/3857699.
26. Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 283-308. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283.
27. Epstein, E. M. (1989). Business ethics, corporate good citizenship and the corporate social policy process: A view from the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(8), 583-595.
28. Erturhan, H. &Filizöz, B. (2011). İş etiği ve bankacılık sektöründe bir araştırma. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 12(2), 139-157.
29. Fettahoğlu-Hallier, M. (2020). Felsefe’de egoizm. Gorgon Dergisi. 11, 78-90.
30. Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175-184. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.1.175
31. Gasparski, W. W. (2017). Brief history of business ethics here and now. Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym, 20(7), 7-21. doi: 10.18778/1899-2226.20.7.01
32. Geis, F. L. ve &Moon, T. H. (1981). Machiavellianism and deception, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 766-775. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.766
33. Gill, M. (2009) Accountants’ truth: knowledge and ethics in the financial world, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: women's conceptions of self and morality". Harvard Educational Review 47 (4)
35. Gözüm, A. G. (2016). Banka çalışanlarının demografik özelliklerine göre iş ahlakı tutumlarının incelenmesi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 293-306. doi: 10.20491/isarder.2016.180
36. Gull, S., & Doh, J. : (2018). The impact of institutional pressures, organizational size, and age on mandatory CSR disclosure by multinational corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), 449-470. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3215-0
37. Güğerçin, U. & Ay, Ü.(2017). Etik konum ölçeği’nin faktör analitik yapısı: Banka çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(4), 53-78. doi:10.17065/huniibf.372386
38. Gündoğdu, H. (2017). Güçlü psikolojik egoizm ahlâkın temeli olabilir mi? Kutadgubilig: Felsefe Bilim Araştırmaları, (36), 53-85.
39. Güner, F. & Özturan, H. (2022). Immanuel Kant bir faydacı olabilir mi? Kant’ın, deneyci ahlâk teorilerine yönelik eleştirileri. Eskiyeni, (47), 489-516. doi:10.37697/eskiyeni.1016150
40. Hair J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
41. Ibarra-Colada, E. (2002). Organizational paradoxes and business ethics: In search of new modes of existence. In: S. R. Clegg (ed.), Management and organization paradoxes, (s. 165–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
42. Jennings, M. M. (2006). Business ethics: case studies and selected readings. South-Western College Pub.
43. Kırel, Ç. (2000). Örgütlerde etik davranışlar, yönetimi ve bir uygulama çalışması. Eskişehir: T.C. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
44. Kidwell, S. L., Young, M. E., Hinkle, L. D., Ratliff, A. D., Marcum,M.E., & Martin, C. N. (2010). Emotional competence and behavior problems: Differences across preschool assessment of attachment classifications. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 15(3), 391–406. doi: 10.1177/1359104510376458
45. Kish-Gephart, J.J., Treviño, L.K., Chen, A. & Tilton, J. (2019), Behavioral business ethics: The journey from foundations to future, Business Ethics (Business and Society 360), 3. 3-34. doi: 10.1108/s2514-175920190000003001
46. Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In T. Lick- ona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: theory, research, and social issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
47. Kuçuradi, İ. (2003). Etik ve etikler. Türkiye Mühendislik Haberleri, 423(1), 7-9.
48. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford University Press.
49. Mahmutoğlu, A. (2009). Etik ve ahlâk; benzerlikler, farklılıklar ve ilişkiler. Türk İdare Dergisi, 81. 225-249.
50. McDonald, G. (2009). Ethical relativism vs absolutism: Research implications. European Business Review, 22(4), 446-464. doi: 10.1108/09555341011056203
51. Michaelson, C., Pratt, M. G., Grant, A. M., & Dunn, C. P. (2013). Meaningful work: Connecting business ethics and organization studies. Journal of Business Ethics, 121, 77-90.doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1675-5
52. Miesing, P. & Preble, J. F. (1985). A comparison of five business philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(6), 465-476.
53. Moore, R. S. & Radloff, S. E. (1996). Attitudes towards business ethics held by South African students. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(8), 863-869.
54. Neumann, Y., & Reichel, A. (1987). The development of Attitudes Toward Business Ethics Questionnaire (ATBEQ): Concepts, dimensions, and relations to work values. Working P. Dep. of Ind. Eng. Manage. Ben Gurion University of Negev, Israel.
55. Nguyen, L. D., Mujtaba, B. G., Tran, C. N. & Tran, Q. H. (2013). Sustainable growth and ethics: A study of business ethics in Vietnam between business students and working adults. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 7 (1), 41-56. doi: 10.21002/seam.v7i1.1525
56. Norman, W. (2013). Business ethics. International encyclopedia of ethics. Oxford: Blackwall Publishing. Oruç, İ. & Tonus, Z. (2011). Business ethics application in business and the role of HRM. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 3(2), 87-95.
57. Pham, L. N., Nguyen, L. D. & Favia, M. J. (2015). Business students’ attitudes toward business ethics: An empirical investigation in Vietnam. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 9(3), 289-305.
58. Pieper, A. (2012). Etiğe giriş. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
59. Preble, J.F. & Reichel, A. (1988). Attitudes towards business ethics of future managers in the U.S. and Israel. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(12), 941-949.
60. Premeaux, S. R., & Mondy, R. W. (1993). The ethical context of organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 3(3), 343-366. doi: 10.2307/3857347
61. Price, G. & Van der Walt, A. J. (2013). Changes in attitudes towards business ethics held by former South African business management students. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(3), 429-440. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1314
62. Ralston, D. A., Egri, C. :, de la Garza Carranza, M. T., Ramburuth, :, Terpstra-Tong, J., Pekerti, A. A. ve &Wallace, A. (2009). Ethical preferences for influencing superiors: A 41-society study. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6), 1022-1045.
63. Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. : (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal Of Business Ethics, 9, 639-653. doi: 10.1007/BF00382969.
64. Rest, J. R., & Narvaez, D. (1994). Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
65. Rodriguez, C., Kulesza, M. & Kusaila, M. (2021). An examination of factors related to attitudes towards business ethics amongst accounting students at a united states public university. Journal of Accounting, Ethics and Public Policy, 22(2), 207-237.
66. Rodríguez, C., Maksy, M. M., & Shahid, N. U. (2024). An Examination of the Association of Work Experience to Ethical Attitudes and Machiavellianism of Accounting Students. Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics, 21(1). doi: 10.33423/jlae.v21i1.5024
67. Rokeach, M. (1973). Nature of human values. New York: The Free Press
68. Rizvi, S., Tanveer, M. A., Saleem, U. & Latif, M. (2012). Business students’ attitude towards business ethics in Pakistan. European Scientific Journal, 8(25). 178-188.
69. Ruegger, D. & King, E. W. (1992). A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. Journal of Business ethics, 11(3) 179-186.
70. Seema, M. & Khan, I. H. (2020). A study on Indian and Omani business management undergraduate students attitude towards business ethics. Shanlax International Journal of Management, 8(2), 90-102. doi: 10.34293/management.v8i2.3426
71. Sezici, E. & Kara, H. (2016). İş etiğine ilişkin tutumlar ve başlıca felsefi kategorileri özelinde yönetici-çalışan algısı üzerinde karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(Özel Sayı), 147-160. doi:10.18037/ausbd.417442
72. Sims, R. L. & Gegez, A. E. (2004). Attitudes towards business ethics: A five nation comparative study. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(3), 253-265.
73. Small, M. W. (1992). Attitudes towards business ethics held by Western Australian students: A comparative study. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 745-752.
74. Smith, C. A., & Rogers, D. (2000). Ethics in decision making: A gender perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(1), 97-114. doi: 10.1023/A:1006158627192
75. Stevens, E. (1979) Business ethics, New York: Paulist Press.
76. Stroll, A., Long, A. A., Bourke, V. J., Campbell, R. (2008). Etik kuramları. Ankara: Lotus Yayınevi.
77. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review, 20(3), 571-610. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
78. TDK -Türk Dil Kurumu-Turkish Language Association https://sozluk.gov.tr/
79. Treviño, L. K., & Brown, M. E. (2004). Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 69-81. doi: 10.5465/AME.2004.13837412.
80. Tormo-Carbó, G., Seguí-Mas, E. ve & Oltra, V. (2016). Accounting ethics in unfriendly environments: The educational challenge. Journal of business ethics, 135(1), 161-175. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2455-6.
81. Tuulik, K., Õunapuu, T., Kuimet, K. & Titov, E. (2016). Rokeach’s instrumental and terminal values as descriptors of modern organisation values. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 5, 151-161. doi: 10.33844/ijol.2016.60252.
82. Van Maanen, J. E., & Schein, E. H. (1977). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. http//efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/1934/?sequence=1.
83. Van Staveren, I. (2007). Beyond utilitarianism and deontology: Ethics in economics. Review of Political Economy, 19(1), 21-35. doi: 10.1080/09538250601080776
84. Van Stekelenburg, L., Smerecnik, C., Sanderse, W., & de Ruyter, D. J. (2023). How do students use their ethical compasses during internship? An empirical study among students of universities of applied sciences. International Journal of Ethics Education, 8(1), 211-240. Doi:10.1007/s40889-023-00161-1
85. Velasquez, M., Andre, C., Shanks, T. & Meyer, M. (1992). Ethical relativism. Issues in Ethics, 5(2), 1-5.
86. Yazıcı, S. & Sınıksaran, E. (2012). Working life matters: On the comparison of the attitudes of students and employees towards business ethics. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, (46). 61-74.
87. Yazıcı, M. (2014). Değerler ve toplumsal yapıda sosyal değerlerin yeri. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 24 (1), 209-223. doi:10.18069/fusbed.10221
88. Yıldırım, M. H. & Uğuz, Ş. (2012). İş etiği ve üniversite öğrencilerinin etik algılarını ölçmeye yönelik bir araştırma. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 177-187.
89. Yücel, R. & Çiftci, G. E. (2012). İş görenin iş etiği tutum ve davranış algısı. İş Ahlakı Dergisi, 5(9), 131-161.