ATIK BERTARAF TESİS YER SEÇİMİNDE ETKİLİ OLAN KRİTERLERİN FUCOM YÖNTEMİYLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Öz

Artan nüfusun etkisiyle birlikte oluşan atık miktarlarındaki değişim nedeniyle toplumlar çevresel, sosyal ve ekonomik anlamda çeşitli etkilerle karşı karşıya kalmaktadır. Bu nedenle atık bertaraf tesis yerleri hem bireyler hem de ülkeler açısından daha önemli bir konumda yer almaktadır. Buna paralel olarak atıklarla mücadele konusunda karşılaşılacak zorluklarla mücadele edilebilmesi için atık bertaraf tesis yer seçimi çalışmalarının arttırılması önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışmada temel amaç atık bertaraf tesis yer seçim probleminde etkili olan kriterlerin belirlenerek önem derecelerinin hesaplanmasıdır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda atık bertaraf tesis yer seçimini etkileyen kriterler detaylı bir literatür araştırması sonucunda belirlenmiştir. İlgili kriterlerin önem derecelerinin hesaplanmasında Full Consistency Method (FUCOM) yönteminden faydalanılmıştır. Gerçekleştirilen uygulama doğrultusunda elde edilen sonuçlara göre, atık bertaraf tesis yer seçiminde etkili olan kriterler içerisinde önem ağırlığı açısından en etkili kriterin 0,33527 önem ağırlığı ile Arazi Özellikleri (K1) olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Atık Bertaraf
• ÇKKV
• FUCOM
• Tesis Yer Seçimi

EVALUATION OF THE CRITERIA WHICH EFFECTIVE IN LOCATION SELECTION OF THE WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY BY FUCOM METHOD

Öz

Societies come up against various environmental, social and economic impacts due to change in the amounts of waste generated with the effect of increasing population. For this reason, locations of the waste disposal facility has been taked part to more important location for both individiuals and countries. In this context, it is important to increase the studies which location selection of waste disposal facility to cope with the difficulties that in the matter of the struggle with wastes. The primary aim of the study is to specify the criteria which effective in location selection of the waste disposal facility and calculate significance level of the criteria. For this purpose, the criteria which effecting the location selection of the waste disposal facility are specified via an elaborative literature search. Full Consistency Method (FUCOM) is used to importance weight of the relevant criteria. According to the results obtained in line with the application carried out, it was determined that the most effective criterion in terms of importance weight among the criteria effective in waste disposal facility site selection was Land Properties (K1) with 0.33527 importance weight.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Waste Disposal
• MCDM
• FUCOM
• Facility Location Selection

Kaynakça

1. Abad, P. M. S., Pazira, E., Abadi, M. H. M., & Abdinezhad, P. (2021). Application ahp‑promethee technic for landfill site selection on based assessment of aquifers vulnerability to pollution. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 45, 1011-1030. Afzali, A., Sabri, S., Rashid, M., Samani, J. M. V., & Ludin, A. N. M. (2014). Inter-municipal landfill site selection using analytic network process. Water Resources Management, 28, 2179-2194.
2. Alam, M. U., Rahman, M., Al-Masud, A., Islam, M. A., Asaduzzaman, M., Sarker, … Unicomb, L. (2019). Human exposure to antimicrobial resistance from poultry production: Assessing hygiene and waste-disposal practices in Bangladesh. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 222(8), 1068-1076.
3. Alkan, N., & Kahraman, C. (2022). An intuitionistic fuzzy multi-distance based evaluation for aggregated dynamic decision analysis (IF-DEVADA): Its application to waste disposal location selection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 111, 1-25.
4. Ayyıldız, E., & Erdoğan, M. (2023). A decision support mechanism in the determination of organic waste collection and recycling center location: A sample application for Turkiye. Applied Soft Computing, 147, 1-20.
5. Bahrani, S., Ebadi, T., Ehsani, H., Yousefi, H., & Maknoon, R. (2016). Modeling landfill site selection by multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy functions in GIS, case study: Shabestar, Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75, 1-14.
6. Banar, M., Kose, B. M., Ozkan, A., & Acar, I. P. (2007). Choosing a municipal landfill site by analytic network process. Environmental Geology, 52, 747-751.
7. Bayhan, M. (2015). Analitik network prosesi (anp) yöntemi kullanılarak ankara ili için entegre katı atık tesisi uygun yer tayini. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Aksaray Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Aksaray.
8. Beskese, A., Demir, H. H., Özcan, H. K., & Ökten, H. E. (2015). Landfill site selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS: A case study for Istanbul. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73, 3513-3521.

9. Chakraborty, S., Raut, R. D., Rofin, T. M., & Chakraborty, S. (2023). A grey ordinal priority approach for healthcare waste disposal location selection. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 13(4), 767-784.
10. Chang, N. B., Parvathinathan, G., & Breeden, J. B. (2008). Combining gis with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. Journal of Environmental Management, 87(1), 139-153.
11. Chen, T. Y. (2023). An advanced approach to multiple criteria optimization and compromise solutions under circular intuitionistic fuzzy uncertainty. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 57, 1-43.
12. Cobbinah, P. B., Addaney, M., & Agyeman, K. O. (2017). Locating the role of urbanites in solid waste management in Ghana. Environmental Development, 24, 9-21.
13. Donevska, K. R., Gorsevski, P. V., Jovanovski, M., & Pesevski, I. (2012). Regional non-hazardous landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, ahp and geographic information systems. Environmental Earth Sciences, 67, 121-131.
14. Ecer, F. (2021). Fucom sübjektif ağırlıklandırma yöntemi ile rüzgâr çiftliği yer seçimini etkileyen faktörlerin analizi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 27(1), 24-34.
15. Effat, H. A., & Hegazy, M. N. (2012). Mapping potential landfill sites for north sinai cities using spatial multicriteria evaluation. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 15(2), 125-133.
16. Eghtesadifard, M., Afkhami, P., & Bazyar, A. (2020). An integrated approach to the selection of municipal solid waste landfills through GIS, K-Means and multi-criteria decision analysis. Environmental Research, 185, 1-16.
17. Ekmekçioğlu, M., Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2010). Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste. Waste Management, 30(8-9), 1729-1736.
18. Ferreti, V. (2011). A multicriteria spatial decision support system development for siting a landfill in the province of Torino (Italy). Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 18(5-6), 231-252.
19. Gebremedhin, E. G., Tekile, A. K., & Reddythota, D. (2023). Identification of suitable solid waste disposal site by using gis based multi criteria: A case study of Adama town, Ethiopia. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, DOI: 10.1080/24749508.2023.2245188.
20. Gorsevski, P. V., Donevska, K. R., Mitrovski, C. D., & Frizado, J. P. (2012). Integrating multi-criteria evaluation techniques with geographic information systems for landfill site selection: A case study using ordered weighted average. Waste Management, 32(2), 287-296.
21. Hanine, M., Boutkhoum, O., Maknissi, A. E., Tikniouine, A., & Agouti, T. (2016). Decision making under uncertainty using PEES–fuzzy AHP–fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for landfill location selection. Environment Systems and Decisions, 36, 351-367.
22. Isalou, A. A., Zamani, V., Shahmoradi, B., & Alizadeh, H. (2013). Landfill site selection using integrated fuzzy logic and analytic network process (F-ANP). Environmental Earth Scicences, 68, 1745-1755.
23. Karasan, A., Ilbahar, E., & Kahraman, C. (2019). A novel pythagorean fuzzy AHP and its application to landfill site selection problem. Soft Computing, 23, 10953-10968.
24. Kebede, H. A., & Ayenew, W. A. (2023). Solid waste disposal site selection analysis using geospatial technology in Dessie city Ethiopia. Heliyon, 9(8), 1-12.
25. Kemeç, S., & Abdalla, L. H. (2019). Academic research in science and engineering. İçinde M. Dalkılıç (Ed.). Katı atık miktarının kestirimi ve cbs destekli çok ölçütlü karar verme analizi ile depolama alanı yer seçimi; Süleymaniye / Irak örneği (s. 95-104). Ankara: Gece Kitaplığı.
26. Khodaparast, M., Rajabi, A. M., & Edalat, A. (2018). Municipal solid waste landfill siting by using GIS and analytical hierarchy process (AHP): A case study in Qom city, Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77(52), 1-12.
27. Khorsandi, H., Faramarzi, A., Aghapour, A. A., & Jafari, S.J. (2019). Landfill site selection via integrating multi-criteria decision techniques with geographic information systems: A case study in Naqadeh, Iran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191, 1-16.
28. Kumar, S., & Hassan, M. I. (2013). Selection of a landfill site for solid waste management: An application of ahp and spatial analyst tool. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 41, 45-56.
29. Liu, H. C., You, J. X., Chen, Y. Z., & Fan, X. J. (2014b). Site selection in municipal solid waste management with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Environmental Earth Sciences, 72, 4179-4189.
30. Liu, H. C., You, J. X., Fan, X. J., & Chen, Y. Z. (2014a). Site selection in waste management by the VIKOR method using linguistic assessment. Applied Soft Computing, 21, 453-461.
31. Llurdés, J. C., Sauri, D., & Cerdan, R. (2003). Ten years wasted: The failure of siting waste facilities in central catalonia, spain. Land Use Policy, 20(4), 335-342.
32. Makan, A., Malamis, D., Assobhei, O., Loizidou, M., & Mountadar, M. (2012). Multi-criteria decision analysis for the selection of the most suitable landfill site: Case of Azemmour, Morocco. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 7(2), 96-109.
33. Makonyo, M., & Msabi, M. M. (2022). Potential landfill sites selection using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis in Dodoma capital city, central Tanzania. GeoJournal 87, 2903-2933.
34. Mallick, J. (2021). Municipal solid waste landfill site selection based on fuzzy-ahp and geoinformation techniques in Asir region Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 13(3), 1-29.
35. Mishra, A. R., & Rani, P. (2021). Multi-criteria healthcare waste disposal location selection based on Fermatean fuzzy WASPAS method. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7, 2469-2484.
36. Mussa, A., & Suryabhagavan, K. V. (2021). Solid waste dumping site selection using GIS-based multi-criteria spatial modeling: a case study in Logia town, Afar region, Ethiopia. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, 5(3), 186-198.
37. Nazari, A., Salarirad, M. M., & Bazzazi A. A. (2012). Landfill site selection by decision-making tools based on fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method. Environmental Earth Sciences, 65, 1631-1642.
38. Nemati, A., Zolfani, S. H., & Khazaelpour, P. (2023). A novel gray FUCOM method and its application for better video games experiences. Expert Systems with Applications, 234, 1-20.
39. Önüt, S., & Soner, S. (2008). Transshipment site selection using the ahp and topsis approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Management, 28(9), 1552-1559.
40. Özkan, B., Özceylan, E., & Sarıçiçek, İ. (2019). Gıs-based mcdm modeling for landfill site suitability analysis: A comprehensive review of the literature. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 30711-30730.
41. Özkan, B., Sarıçiçek, İ., & Özceylan, E. (2020). Evaluation of landfill sites using GIS-based MCDA with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 42908-42932.
42. Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., & Sremac, S. A. (2018). New model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in mcdm models: Full consistency method (fucom). Symmetry, 10(9), 1-22.
43. Rezaeisabzevar, Y., Bazargan, A., & Zohourian, B. (2020). Landfill site selection using multi criteria decision making: Influential factors for comparing locations. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 93, 170-184.
44. Sadeghi, H., Darzi, A. G., Voosoghi, B., Garakani, A. A., Ghorbani, Z., & Mojtahedi, S. F. F. (2023). Assessing the vulnerability of Iran to subsidence hazard using a hierarchical FUCOM-GIS framework. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 31, 1-20.
45. Sevindi, C., Demir, Ş., & Bekar, Ö. A. (2019, Mart). Erzincan Belediyesi Kentsel Katı Atık Yönetim Planı Kapsamında Yeni Depolama Alanlarının Tespiti ve Haritalanması. I. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Kongresinde sunulmuş bildiri, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi-Kilis Üniversitesi, Mersin.
46. Soroudi, M., Omrani, G., Moataar, F., & Jozi, S. A. (2018). A comprehensive multi-criteria decision making-based land capability assessment for municipal solid waste landfill sitting. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 27877-27889.
47. Şener, E., & Şener, Ş. (2020). Landfill site selection using integrated fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process (ahp) in lake basins. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13, 1-16.
48. Şener, Ş., Şener, E., Nas, B., & Karagüzel, R. (2010). Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: A case study in the lake Beyşehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey). Waste Management, 30(11), 2037-2046.
49. Tutak, E. (2023). Denizcilik politikalarının ağ yönetimi yaklaşımıyla kamu politikası açısından değerlendirilmesi: AB örneği. UPA Strategic Affairs, 4(1), 129-159.
50. Umar, U. M., & Naibbi, A. I. (2021). Analysis and suitability modeling of solid waste disposal sites in Kano metropolis, Nigeria. Geocarto International, 36(12), 1409-1427.
51. Uyan, M., & Yalpır, Ş. (2016). Çok kriterli karar verme modeli ve cbs entegrasyonu ile tıbbi atık sterilizasyon tesislerinin yer seçimi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(3), 642-654.
52. Uzun, O., Aksoy, N., & Karagül, R. (2010). Düzce ili olası katı atık bertaraf tesisi sahalarının yer seçimi kriterleri açısından değerlendirilmesi. Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 6(2), 23-29.
53. Wanore, T. D., Angello, Z. A., & Fetanu, Z. M. (2023). Optimized landfill site selection for municipal solid waste by integrating gis and multicriteria decision analysis (mcda) technique, Hossana Town, Southern Ethiopia. Heliyon, 9(11), 1-18.
54. Wichapa, N., & Khokhajaikiat, P. (2018). A hybrid multi-criteria analysis model for solving the facility location-allocation problem: A case study of infectious waste disposal. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 50(5), 698-718.
55. Yao, L., Xu, Z., & Zeng, Z. (2020). A soft-path solution to risk reduction by modeling medical waste disposal center location-allocation optimization. Risk Analysis, 40(9), 1863-1886.
56. Yazdani, M., Tavana, M., Pamučar, D., & Chatterjeee, P. (2020). A rough based multi-criteria evaluation method for healthcare waste disposal location decisions. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 143, 1-25.
57. Zarin, R., Azmat, M., Naqvi, S. R., Saddique, Q., & Ullah, S. (2021). Landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP, and WLC method based on multi-criteria decision analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 19726-19741.
58. Zewdie, M. M., & Yeshanew, S. M. (2023). GIS based MCDM for waste disposal site selection in Dejen town, Ethiopia. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 18, 1-18.
59. Zhang, C., Hu, Q., Zeng, S. ve Su, W. (2021). IOWLAD-based MCDM model for the site assessment of a household waste processing plant under a Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 1-11.