NORM AKTİVASYON TEORİSİNDE BİLİŞSEL, DUYGUSAL, SOSYAL VE DURUMSAL FAKTÖRLERİN ETKİLERİ: GERİ DÖNÜŞÜM DAVRANIŞINA İLİŞKİN BULGULAR

Yıl 2024, , 44 - 60, 30.10.2024

İnci Dursun , Hediye Yürüyen Kılıç , Ebru Tümer Kabadayı , Dilara Dönmez

https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.1498346

Öz

Norm aktivasyon teorisi (NAT), geri dönüşüm gibi çevreci tüketici davranışlarının anlaşılmasında etkili bir yaklaşım sunmaktadır. Teori, davranışın birincil itici gücünün kişisel normlar olduğunu ve bu normların sonuçların farkındalığı (AC) ve sorumluluk kabulü (AR) ile güçlendiğini ileri sürmektedir. Bu çalışma, bilişsel, duygusal, sosyal ve durumsal faktörlerin etkilerini de kapsayan genişletilmiş bir norm aktivasyon modeli sunmayı ve model için geri dönüşüm bağlamında ampirik kanıt ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Daha özelde, araştırma öznel ve nesnel bilginin, çevresel bozulmaya karşı duygusal tepkilerin, öznel normların, algılanan davranış maliyetinin ve hane halkı desteğinin norm aktivasyonu ve geri dönüşüm davranışındaki rollerine odaklanmıştır. Türkiye’deki 531 tüketiciden çevrimiçi anket yönetimiyle veri toplanmıştır. Analiz sonuçları, AC ve AR’nin etkilerinin yanı sıra öznel normların, öznel bilginin, davranışsal maliyetin, hane halkı desteğinin ve duygusal tepkilerin ahlaki norm aktivasyonu üzerinde etkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca, ahlaki normların etkisinin yanında, öznel ve nesnel bilgi, algılanan maliyet ve hane halkı desteğinin geri dönüşüm davranışı üzerinde etkili olduğu bulunmuştur. Bulgular, NAT çerçevesi aracılığıyla geri dönüşüm davranışının daha derinlemesine anlaşılmasına katkıda bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Norm aktivasyon teorisi, Geri dönüşüm, Duygusal tepkiler, Sosyal norm, Geri dönüşümün algılanan maliyeti

ROLES OF COGNITIVE, AFFECTIVE, SOCIAL, AND SITUATIONAL FACTORS IN NORM ACTIVATION THEORY: EVIDENCE FOR RECYCLING BEHAVIOR

Öz

Norm activation theory (NAT) provides an effective approach to understanding pro-environmental consumer behaviors such as recycling. The theory proposes that the primary driver of behavior is personal norms, which are promoted by awareness of consequences (AC) and ascription of responsibility (AR). This study aims to offer an extended norm activation model by incorporating cognitive, affective, social, and situational factors and to provide empirical evidence for the model within the context of recycling. Particularly, the study focuses on the roles of subjective and objective knowledge, emotional reactions to environmental degradation, subjective norms, perceived behavioral cost, and household support for norm activation and recycling behavior. Data was collected through an online survey with 531 consumers in Türkiye. Analysis results showed that subjective norms, subjective knowledge, behavioral cost, household support, and emotional reactions are influential for moral norm activation in the recycling context, in addition to the impacts of AC and AR. Besides, subjective and objective knowledge, perceived cost, and household support were found to be influential on recycling behavior, in addition to the impact of moral norms. Findings contribute to a deeper understanding of recycling behavior through the NAT framework.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Norm activation theory, Recycling, Emotional reactions, Social norm, Perceived cost of recycling

Kaynakça

• Aguilar‐Luzón, M. D. C., García‐Martínez, J. M. Á., Calvo‐Salguero, A., & Salinas, J. M. (2012). Comparative study between the theory of planned behavior and the value–belief–norm model regarding the environment, on s panish housewives' recycling behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(11), 2797-2833.
• Ajzen I., (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann Salthouse (Eds.), Action Control.
• Springer. Ajzen I., (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organization Behaviour and Human Decision Process, 50(2), 179-211.
• Alhassan, H., Asante, F. A., Oteng-Ababio, M., & Bawakyillenuo, S. (2018). Application of theory of planned behaviour to households’ source separation behaviour in Ghana. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(4), 704-721.
• Andersson, M., & von Borgstede, C. (2010). Differentiation of determinants of low-cost and high-cost recycling. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 402-408.
• Ando, K., Yorifuji, K., Ohnuma, S., Matthies, E., & Kanbara, A. (2015). Transmitting pro‐environmental behaviours to the next generation: A comparison between Germany and Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(2), 134-144.
• Arkorful, V. E., Shuliang, Z., & Lugu, B. K. (2023). Investigating household waste separation behavior: The salience of an integrated norm activation model and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(10), 2195-2221.
• Assadourian, E. (2010). Transforming cultures: From consumerism to sustainability. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(2), 186-191.
• Baek, T. H., & Yoon, S. (2017). Guilt and shame: Environmental message framing effects. Journal of Advertising, 46(3), 440-453.
• Bamberg S., & Möser G., (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25.
• Barr, S. (2007). Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: A UK case study of household waste management. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 435-473.
• Bayraktar, S., & Çobanoğlu, E. (2016). Türkiye’de geri dönüşüm: 2006 ve 2012 yılları arasında tüketici motivasyonu, tutum ve davranışlarının karşılaştırmalı analizi. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 16(33), 1-33.
• Berger, I. E., & Corbin, R. M. (1992). Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11(2), 79-89.
• Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 234-248.
• Boldero, J. (1995). The prediction of household recycling of newspapers: The role of attitudes, intentions, and situational factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(5), 440-462
• . Boluda-Verdu, I., Senent-Valero, M., Casas-Escolano, M., Matijasevich, A., & Pastor-Valero, M. (2022). Fear for the future: Eco-anxiety and health implications, a systematic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, 101904.
• Botetzagias, I., Dima, A. F., & Malesios, C. (2015). Extending the theory of planned behavior in the context of recycling: The role of moral norms and of demographic predictors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 95, 58-67.
• Bratt, C. (1999). The impact of norms and assumed consequences on recycling behavior. Environment and behavior, 31(5), 630-656.
• Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1-16.
• Chen, F., Chen, H., Yang, J., Long, R., & Li, W. (2019). Impact of regulatory focus on express packaging waste recycling behavior: Moderating role of psychological empowerment perception. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 8862-8874.
• Chen, M. F., & Tung, P. J. (2010). The moderating effect of perceived lack of facilities on consumers’ recycling intentions. Environment and Behavior, 42(6), 824-844.
• Cho, M. (2019). Campus sustainability: An integrated model of college students’ recycling behavior on campus. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(6), 1042-1060.
• Chu, P. Y., & Chiu, J. F. (2003). Factors influencing household waste recycling behavior: Test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(3), 604-626.
• Chung, S. S., & Poon, C. S. (1994). Recycling behaviour and attitude: The case of the Hong Kong people and commercial and household wastes. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 1(2), 130-145.
• Contreras, A., Blanchard, M. A., Mouguiama-Daouda, C., & Heeren, A. (2024). When eco-anger (but not eco-anxiety nor eco-sadness) makes you change! A temporal network approach to the emotional experience of climate change. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 102, 102822.
• Cooper, K. E., & Nisbet, E. C. (2016). Green narratives: How affective responses to media messages influence risk perceptions and policy preferences about environmental hazards. Science Communication, 38(5), 626-654.
• Corral-Verdugo, V. (1997). DUAL ‘Realities’of conservation behavior: Self-reports vs observations of re-use and recycling behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(2), 135-145.
• Çimen, O., & Yılmaz, M. (2016). Predictors of behavior factors of high school students against recycling. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 6(1), 17-27.
• Davies, J., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. (2002). Beyond the intention–behaviour mythology: An integrated model of recycling. Marketing Theory, 2(1), 29-113.
• De Groot, J. I., & Steg, L. (2009). Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(4), 425-449.
• Delcea, C., Crăciun, L., Ioanăș, C., Ferruzzi, G., & Cotfas, L. A. (2020). Determinants of individuals’ E-waste recycling decision: A case study from Romania. Sustainability, 12(7), 2753.
• Duran, M. S., & Bozkaya, Ş. (2024). Sürdürülebilir büyüme için döngüsel ekonominin teşvik edici rolü: AB 27’den ampirik kanıtlar. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 20(2), 221-236.
• Dursun, I., Kabadayi, E. T., & Tuger, A. T. (2017, September). Application of value-belief-norm theory to responsible post consumption behaviors: Recycling and reuse. In Proceedings of the International Congress of the New Approaches and Technologies for Sustainable Development (pp. 21-24), Isparta, Turkey.
• Dursun, İ. (2019). Psychological barriers to environmentally responsible consumption. Ethics, Social Responsibility and Sustainability in Marketing, 103-128.
• Dursun, İ., Tümer Kabadayı, E., & Tuğer, A. T. (2019). Overcoming the psychological barriers to energy conservation behaviour: The influence of objective and subjective environmental knowledge. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 43(4), 402-416.
• Dursun, İ., Kabadayı, E. T., & Yürüyen, H. (2022). Bilimsel araştırmalarda internet temelli anketlerin kullanımı: Akademisyenlerin görüş, tercih ve kaygıları. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(1), 1-23.
• Ebreo, A., & Vining, J. (2001). How similar are recycling and waste reduction? Future orientation and reasons for reducing waste as predictors of self-reported behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33(3), 424-448.
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859.
• Echegaray, F., & Hansstein, F. V. (2017). Assessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: The case of Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 180-190.
• Ekinci, Ş., Savaşkan, A. G., & Çatı, K. (2021). Geri dönüşümün planlanmış davranış teorisi ile açıklanması: İnönü üniversitesi örneği. Uluslararası Anadolu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(3), 868-884.
• Elgaaied, L. (2012). Exploring the role of anticipated guilt on pro‐environmental behavior–a suggested typology of residents in France based on their recycling patterns. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(5), 369-377.
• Ellen, P. S. (1994). Do we know what we need to know? Objective and subjective knowledge effects on pro-ecological behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 30(1), 43-52.
• Fornara, F., Carrus, G., Passafaro, P., & Bonnes, M. (2011). Distinguishing the sources of normative influence on proenvironmental behaviors: The role of local norms in household waste recycling. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 623–635.
• Friant, M. C., Vermeulen, W. J., & Salomone, R. (2021). Analysing European Union circular economy policies: Words versus actions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 337-353.
• Frick J., Kaiser F. G., & Wilson M., (2004). Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(8), 1597-1613.
• Gadiraju, T. (2016). Investigating the determinants of recycling behavior in youth by using theory of planned behavior (Graduate thesis and dissertations). Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6085 Accessed 06.06.2024.
• Garcés, C., Lafuente, A., Pedraja, M., & Rivera, P. (2002). Urban waste recycling behavior: Antecedents of participation in a selective collection program. Environmental Management, 30(3), 378-390.
• Geiger, J. L., Steg, L., Van Der Werff, E., & Ünal, A. B. (2019). A meta-analysis of factors related to recycling. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 64, 78-97.
• Gifford R., (2014). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice. 5th Edition, Optimal Books. Grob A., (1995). A structural model of environmental attitudes and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 209-220.
• Grønhøj, A. (2006). Communication about consumption: A family process perspective on ‘green’consumer practices. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 5(6), 491-503.
• Grønhøj, A., & Thøgersen, J. (2012). Action speaks louder than words: The effect of personal attitudes and family norms on adolescents’ pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1), 292-302.
• Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. A. (1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12), 2505-2528.
• He, X., & Zhan, W. (2018). How to activate moral norm to adopt electric vehicles in China? An empirical study based on extended norm activation theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3546-3556.
• Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.
• Huang, L., Wen, Y., & Gao, J. (2020). What ultimately prevents the pro-environmental behavior? An in-depth and extensive study of the behavioral costs. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 158, 104747.
• Jackson, A. L., Olsen, J. E., Granzin, K. L., & Burns, A. C. (1993). An investigation of determinants of recycling consumer behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1).
• Johnson, M. K., & Parrott, K. R. (1995). A logistic regression analysis of factors affecting recycling behavior in apartment communities. Housing and Society, 22(3), 41-52.
• Kaiser, F. G., & Fuhrer, U. (2003). Ecological behavior's dependency on different forms of knowledge. Applied Psychology, 52(4), 598–613.
• Katz‐Gerro, T., Greenspan, I., Handy, F., & Vered, Y. (2020). Environmental behavior in three countries: The role of intergenerational transmission and domains of socialization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101343–304.
• Klaiman, K., Ortega, D. L., & Garnache, C. (2017). Perceived barriers to food packaging recycling: Evidence from a choice experiment of US consumers. Food Control, 73, 291-299.
• Klöckner, C. A., & Ohms, S. (2009). The importance of personal norms for purchasing organic milk. British Food Journal, 111(11), 1173-1187.
• Knickmeyer, D. (2020). Social factors influencing household waste separation: A literature review on good practices to improve the recycling performance of urban areas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118605.
• Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.
• Lange, F., Brückner, C., Kröger, B., Beller, J., & Eggert, F. (2014). Wasting ways: Perceived distance to the recycling facilities predicts pro-environmental behavior. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 92, 246-254. Lee, K. (2014). Predictors of sustainable consumption among young educated consumers in Hong Kong. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 26(3), 217-238.
• Lee, M., Choi, H., & Koo, Y. (2017). Inconvenience cost of waste disposal behavior in South Korea. Ecological Economics, 140, 58-65.
• Lee, S. H., Chang, H. J. J., & Zhao, L. (2023). The importance of personal norms and situational expectancies to sustainable behaviors: The norm activation and situational expectancy-value theories. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, 103371.
• Li, S. (2003). Recycling behavior under China’s social and economic transition: The case of metropolitan Wuhan. Environment and Behavior, 35(6), 784-801.
• Lindsay, J. J., & Strathman, A. (1997). Predictors of recycling behavior: An application of a modified health belief model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(20), 1799-1823.
• López-Mosquera, N., Lera-López, F., & Sánchez, M. (2015). Key factors to explain recycling, car use and environmentally responsible purchase behaviors: A comparative perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 99, 29-39.
• Ma, Y., Koondhar, M. A., Liu, S., Wang, H., & Kong, R. (2020a). Perceived value influencing the household waste sorting behaviors in rural China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 6093.
• Ma, Y., Wang, H., & Kong, R. (2020b). The effect of policy instruments on rural households’ solid waste separation behavior and the mediation of perceived value using SEM. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 19398-19409.
• Mamun, A. A., Saufi, R. A., Mohiuddin, M., & Fazal, S. A. (2019). Recycling intentions and behaviors among informal micro-entrepreneurs in Kelantan, Malaysia. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 15(2), 123-138.
• Matthies, E., Selge, S., & Klöckner, C. A. (2012). The role of parental behaviour for the development of behaviour specific environmental norms–The example of recycling and re-use behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 277-284.
• McCarty, J. A., & Shrum, L. J. (1994). The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations, and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior. Journal of Business Research, 30(1), 53- 62.
• McCarty, J. A., & Shrum, L. J. (2001). The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behavior. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20(1), 93-104.
• Meneses, G. D. (2010). Refuting fear in heuristics and in recycling promotion. Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 104-110.
• Meng, X., Tan, X., Wang, Y., Wen, Z., Tao, Y., & Qian, Y. (2019). Investigation on decision-making mechanism of residents’ household solid waste classification and recycling behaviors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 140, 224-234.
• Miafodzyeva, S., & Brandt, N. (2013). Recycling behaviour among householders: Synthesizing determinants via a meta-analysis. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 4, 221-235.
• Moorman C., Diehl K., Brinberg D., & Kidwell B. (2004). Subjective knowledge, search locations, and consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 673- 680.
• Moschis, G. P. (1985). The role of family communication in consumer socialization of children and adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 898-913.
• Mosler, H.-J., Tamas, A., Tobias, R., Rodríguez, T. C., & Miranda, O. G. (2008). Deriving interventions on the basis of factors influencing behavioral intentions for waste recycling, composting, and reuse in Cuba. Environment and Behavior, 40(4), 522–544.
• Mutang, J. A., & Haron, S. A. (2012). Factors predicting recycling behaviour among Malaysian. Southeast Asia Psychology Journal, 1.
• Mutang, J. A., Ismail, R., Seok, C. B., Bahari, F., Madlan, L., Wider, W., & Das, R. (2015). Recycling motivations and barriers in Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. International Journal of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, 9(8), 2911-2915.
• Muthukumari, W. A. C. S., Ahn, J., & Kim, M. (2024). Impact of information publicity on Korean residents’ E-waste recycling intentions: Applying the norm activation model and theory of planned behavior. Heliyon, 10(14).
• Nketiah, E., Song, H., Cai, X., Adjei, M., Obuobi, B., Adu-Gyamfi, G., & Cudjoe, D. (2022). Predicting citizens' recycling intention: incorporating natural bonding and place identity into the extended norm activation model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 377, 134425.
• Ng, S. L. (2019). Predicting multi-family dwelling recycling behaviors using structural equation modelling: A case study of Hong Kong. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 149, 468-478.
• Nguyen, H. T. T. (2023). Integrating the valence theory and the norm activation theory to understand consumers’e-waste recycling intention. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 21(1), 26-36.
• Nguyen, H. T. T., Hung, R. J., Lee, C. H., & Thi Thu Nguyen, H. (2018). Determinants of residents’ E-waste recycling behavioral intention: A case study from Vietnam. Sustainability, 11(1), 164.
• Nguyen, T. N., Nguyen, H. V., Lobo, A., & Dao, T. S. (2017). Encouraging Vietnamese household recycling behavior: Insights and implications. Sustainability, 9(2), 179.
• Nketiah, E., Song, H., Cai, X., Adjei, M., Obuobi, B., Adu-Gyamfi, G., & Cudjoe, D. (2022). Predicting citizens' recycling intention: Incorporating natural bonding and place identity into the extended norm activation model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 377, 134425.
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Ojala, M. (2008). Recycling and ambivalence: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of household recycling among young adults. Environment and Behavior, 40(6), 777-797.
• Özbakır Umut, M., Topuz, Y., & Velioğlu, M. N. (2015). Çöpten geri dönüşüme giden yolda sürdürülebilir tüketiciler. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 263-288.
• Özbakır Umut, M., & Nurtanış Velioğlu, M. (2024). A recycling story: Developing recycling behavior in Turkey with social marketing program. Journal of Public Affairs, 24(1), e2900.
• Özkan, P., & Yücel, E. K. (2020). Linear economy to circular economy: Planned obsolescence to cradle-to-cradle product perspective. In Handbook of research on entrepreneurship development and opportunities in circular economy (pp. 61-86). IGI Global.
• Park, C. W., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Feick, L. (1994). Consumer knowledge assessment. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 71-82.
• Park, J., & Ha, S. (2014). Understanding consumer recycling behavior: Combining the theory of planned behavior and the norm activation model. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 42(3), 278-291.
• Perrin, D., & Barton, J. (2001). Issues associated with transforming household attitudes and opinions into materials recovery: A review of two kerbside recycling schemes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 33(1), 61-74.
• Peter, J. P., & Tarpey Sr, L. X. (1975). A comparative analysis of three consumer decision strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(1), 29-37.
• Popescu, S., Rusu, D., Dragomir, M., Popescu, D., & Nedelcu, Ș. (2020). Competitive development tools in identifying efficient educational interventions for improving pro-environmental and recycling behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 156.
• Rastegari Kopaei, H., Nooripoor, M., Karami, A., Petrescu-Mag, R. M., & Petrescu, D. C. (2021). Drivers of residents’ home composting intention: Integrating the theory of planned behavior, the norm activation model, and the moderating role of composting knowledge. Sustainability, 13(12), 6826.
• Rivera, J. L., & Lallmahomed, A. (2016). Environmental implications of planned obsolescence and product lifetime: A literature review. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 9(2), 119-129.
• Roeser, S. (2012). Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: A role for emotions. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(6), 1033-1040.
• Russell, S. V., Young, C. W., Unsworth, K. L., & Robinson, C. (2017). Bringing habits and emotions into food waste behaviour. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 125, 107-114.
• Salazar, C., Jaime, M., Leiva, M., & González, N. (2022). From theory to action: Explaining the process of knowledge attitudes and practices regarding the use and disposal of plastic among school children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 80, 101777.
• Saphores, J. D. M., Ogunseitan, O. A., & Shapiro, A. A. (2012). Willingness to engage in a pro-environmental behavior: An analysis of e-waste recycling based on a national survey of US households. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 60, 49-63.
• Satyro, W. C., Sacomano, J. B., Contador, J. C., & Telles, R. (2018). Planned obsolescence or planned resource depletion? A sustainable approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 744-752.
• Setiawan, B. (2021). Personal norm and pro-environmental consumer behavior: An application of norm activation theory. ASEAN Marketing Journal, 13(1), 40-49.
• Schwartz S. H., (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press.
• Sidique, S. F., Lupi, F., & Joshi, S. V. (2010). The effects of behavior and attitudes on drop-off recycling activities. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(3), 163-170.
• Stanley, S. K., Hogg, T. L., Leviston, Z., & Walker, I. (2021). From anger to action: Differential impacts of eco-anxiety, eco-depression, and eco-anger on climate action and wellbeing. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 1, 100003. Steg, L., & Nordlund, A. (2012). Models to Explain Environmental Behaviour. In Environmental Psychology. Linda Steg, Agnes E. Van den Berg, & Judith I. M. De Groot (Eds), BPS Blackwell: London, 185-197. Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 65-84.
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27(6), 723-743.
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25(5), 322-348.
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 81-97.
• Strydom, W. F. (2018). Barriers to household waste recycling: Empirical evidence from South Africa. Recycling, 3(3), 41.
• Tonglet, M., Phillips, P. S., & Read, A. D. (2004). Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: A case study from Brixworth, UK. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41(3), 191-214.
• Tran, V. C. M., Le, H. S., & Matsui, Y. (2019). Current status and behavior modeling on household solid-waste separation: a case study in Da Nang city, Vietnam. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 21(6), 1462-1476.
• Tuğer, A. T., Dursun, İ., & Kabadayı, E. T. (2018). Çevreci tüketim davranışı: Etkili faktörler ve teorik açıklamalar. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(4), 2978-3007.
• Tumer Kabadayi, E., Dursun, İ., Gökmen Köksal, C., Durmaz, A., & Yüksel, M. (2023). Bireysel geri dönüşüm davranışı önündeki engeller üzerine sistematik literatür taraması. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences (IJOESS), 14(52), 800-835.
• Tümer, E., Dursun, İ., Gökmen Köksal, C., & Durmaz, A. (2024). Conceptualizing barriers to ındividual recycling: A qualitative study with multiple stakeholders in Türkiye. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 1-37.
• Uehleke, R., & Hüttel, S. (2019). The free-rider deficit in the demand for farm animal welfare-labelled meat. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(2), 291-318. Vandenbergh, M. P. (2005). Order without social norms: How personal norm activation can protect the environment. Northwestern University Law Review., 99 (3), 1101.
• Wan, C., Shen, G. Q., & Yu, A. (2014). The moderating effect of perceived policy effectiveness on recycling intention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 55-60.
• Wang, B., Ren, C., Dong, X., Zhang, B., & Wang, Z. (2019). Determinants shaping willingness towards on-line recycling behaviour: An empirical study of household e-waste recycling in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 143, 218-225.
• Wang, D., Xu, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2024). What determines the batteries recycling behavior of e-bike citizens in Guangzhou?: Integrating place identity and environmental concern into the extended norm activation model. Heliyon, 10(9).
• Wang, S., Wang, J., Zhao, S., & Yang, S. (2019). Information publicity and resident’s waste separation behavior: An empirical study based on the norm activation model. Waste Management, 87, 33-42.
• Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Yin, J., & Zhang, X. (2011). Willingness and behavior towards e-waste recycling for residents in Beijing city, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(9-10), 977-984.
• Wiek A., Withycombe L., & Redman C. L., (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203-218.
• Yılmaz, V., & Doğan, A. G. M. (2016). Planlanmış davranış teorisi kullanılarak önerilen bir yapısal eşitlik modeli ile geri dönüşüm davranışlarının araştırılması. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(Özel Sayı), 191-206.
• Yüce, A. (2013). Kollektivist kültür değerinin sosyal sorumlu tüketim üzerine etkisini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma/A Study to determine the effect of the value of collectivist culture on socially responsible consumption. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(2).
• Yürüyen-Kılıç, H., Kabadayı, E. T., & Dursun, İ. (2022, October). Extending normative approach for promoting distinct sustainable consumption practices: Cost-Benefit evaluations. 8th International Congress on Economy Administration and Market Surveys, İstanbul.
• Zeier, P., & Wessa, M. (2024). Measuring eco-emotions: A German version of questionnaires on eco-guilt, ecological grief, and eco-anxiety. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 29.
• Zhang, X., Gong, X., & Jiang, J. (2021). Dump or recycle? Nostalgia and consumer recycling behavior. Journal of Business Research, 132, 594-603.
• Žukauskienė, R., Truskauskaitė-Kunevičienė, I., Gabė, V., & Kaniušonytė, G. (2021). “My words matter”: The role of adolescents in changing pro-environmental habits in the family. Environment and Behavior, 53(10), 1140-1162.