Araştırma Makalesi

THE CURVILINEAR INFLUENCE OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY SCOPE ON TECHNOLOGICAL VERSUS ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION

Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3 30 Eylül 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

THE CURVILINEAR INFLUENCE OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY SCOPE ON TECHNOLOGICAL VERSUS ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION

Abstract

The adoption of digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence, cloud computing, smart devices, robotics, and blockchain has been an important topic for firms and organizations. This study examines the link between digital technology scope and innovation by highlighting differences between technological and organizational innovation. Existing studies have proposed that digital technologies have positive influence on innovation. However, some studies have also highlighted the dark sides of digitalization. In particular, this study argues that firms using a wide range of digital technologies experience negative returns on innovation after a certain point. This study also proposes that this negative return is more likely to happen for organizational innovation. This study tests its hypotheses by using the Eurostat Flash Eurobarometer No. 486 dataset, with a final sample of 15,448 firms from EU and non-EU countries. The hypotheses are supported. The results suggest that digital technology scope negatively influences innovation after a certain point and this negative curvilinear effect is more pronounced for organizational innovation than technological innovation. This study advances the digitalization literature by highlighting the negative returns of digital technologies. It also contributes to digitalization literature by highlighting the differences between technological and organizational innovation when investigating the impact of digital technologies.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Ancillai, C., Sabatini, A., Gatti, M., & Perna, A. (2023). Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122307.
  2. Arroyabe, M. F., Arranz, C. F., De Arroyabe, I. F., & de Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2024). Analyzing AI adoption in European SMEs: A study of digital capabilities, innovation, and external environment. Technology in Society, 79, 102733.
  3. Athaide, G. A., Jeon, J., Raj, S. P., Sivakumar, K., & Xiong, G. (2025). Marketing innovations and digital technologies: A systematic review, proposed framework, and future research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 42(1), 144-165.
  4. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299-1315.
  5. Benitez, J., Arenas, A., Castillo, A., & Esteves, J. (2022). Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Information & Management, 59(2), 103590.
  6. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, A. (2013). Digital business strategy: Towards a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471-482.
  7. Birkinshaw, M. M. J. (2006). How management innovation happens. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(4), 81-88.
  8. Birkinshaw, M. M. J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825-845.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

İşletme

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

29 Eylül 2025

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Eylül 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

13 Ocak 2025

Kabul Tarihi

24 Haziran 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Öztürk Köse, E. (2025). THE CURVILINEAR INFLUENCE OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY SCOPE ON TECHNOLOGICAL VERSUS ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 21(3), 1127-1145. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.1618857


88x31.png