TR
EN
THE CURVILINEAR INFLUENCE OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY SCOPE ON TECHNOLOGICAL VERSUS ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION
Abstract
The adoption of digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence, cloud computing, smart devices, robotics, and blockchain has been an important topic for firms and organizations. This study examines the link between digital technology scope and innovation by highlighting differences between technological and organizational innovation. Existing studies have proposed that digital technologies have positive influence on innovation. However, some studies have also highlighted the dark sides of digitalization. In particular, this study argues that firms using a wide range of digital technologies experience negative returns on innovation after a certain point. This study also proposes that this negative return is more likely to happen for organizational innovation. This study tests its hypotheses by using the Eurostat Flash Eurobarometer No. 486 dataset, with a final sample of 15,448 firms from EU and non-EU countries. The hypotheses are supported. The results suggest that digital technology scope negatively influences innovation after a certain point and this negative curvilinear effect is more pronounced for organizational innovation than technological innovation. This study advances the digitalization literature by highlighting the negative returns of digital technologies. It also contributes to digitalization literature by highlighting the differences between technological and organizational innovation when investigating the impact of digital technologies.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Ancillai, C., Sabatini, A., Gatti, M., & Perna, A. (2023). Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122307.
- Arroyabe, M. F., Arranz, C. F., De Arroyabe, I. F., & de Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2024). Analyzing AI adoption in European SMEs: A study of digital capabilities, innovation, and external environment. Technology in Society, 79, 102733.
- Athaide, G. A., Jeon, J., Raj, S. P., Sivakumar, K., & Xiong, G. (2025). Marketing innovations and digital technologies: A systematic review, proposed framework, and future research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 42(1), 144-165.
- Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299-1315.
- Benitez, J., Arenas, A., Castillo, A., & Esteves, J. (2022). Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Information & Management, 59(2), 103590.
- Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, A. (2013). Digital business strategy: Towards a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471-482.
- Birkinshaw, M. M. J. (2006). How management innovation happens. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(4), 81-88.
- Birkinshaw, M. M. J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825-845.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
İşletme
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Erken Görünüm Tarihi
29 Eylül 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Eylül 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi
13 Ocak 2025
Kabul Tarihi
24 Haziran 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2025 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3
