TÜRKİYE’DE ELEKTRİKLİ ARAÇ TERCİHLERİNİN ARDINDAKİ ÇEVRECİ MOTİVASYONU KEŞFETMEK: BİREYSEL VE POLİTİK ÇEVRECİ TUTUMLAR AÇISINDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Öz

Ulaşımdan kaynaklanan emisyonların azaltılması, iklim kriziyle mücadelenin en kritik odaklarından birisidir. Ulaşımdan kaynaklı emisyonların azaltmasında elektrikli araçlar (EV'ler) önemli bir seçenek olarak ön planda çıkmaktadır. Birçok hükümet iklim politikalarının bir parçası olarak fosil yakıtlı araçların kullanımını kısıtlarken, EV’lerin benimsenmesini ve yayılımını destekleyen politikalar geliştirmektedir. Bununla birlikte bu politikaların sürekliliği açısından, bu politikalara yönelik halk desteği konusunda bir geri bildirim sağlamak son derece önemlidir. İklim ve çevre politikalarına daha spesifik olarak EV’lere ilişkin halk desteği konusunda fikir sahibi olmak, çevreciliğin siyasal hayatta geri planda kaldığı ülkeler için özellikle önemlidir. Çalışma bu soruna ışık tutmak için, elektrikli araç tercihinin ardındaki bireysel ve politik çevreci tutumların belirlenmesini amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda Türkiye’nin öğrenci sayısı itibariyle en büyük üniversitelerinden biri olan Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi’nde eğitim gören 1.300 lisans öğrencisine anket uygulanmıştır. Anket sonuçları çoklu regresyon analiziyle değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, gençlerin EV tercihinde bireysel ve politik çevreci tutumlarının etkisi olduğunu ve pozitif bir eğilime sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. İlaveten sonuçlar, gençlerin EV tercihinde politik çevreci tutumlarının bireysel çevreci tutumlarından daha güçlü bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuçlar, EV tercihine yönelik pazar araştırmalarına yeni bir boyut eklediği gibi karar alıcılar açısından sürdürülebilir ulaşım politikalarının desteklenmesi konusunda güçlü bir altlık sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Elektrikli Araç Tercihi
• Bireysel Çevre Tutumu
• Politik Çevre Tutumu
• Gençlerin Tutumları
• Sürdürülebilir Ulaşım

Destekleyen Kurum

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu ve Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi

Proje Numarası

1. Proje Numarası: 22AG001; 2. Proje Numarası: SGA-2024-1513

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmanın araştırma ve yayın etiği ilke ve standartlara uyulduğu beyan edilmektedir.

Teşekkür

Bu çalışma, Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu tarafından desteklenen 22AG001 numaralı “Elektrikli Taşıtlar için Batarya Teknolojileri Araştırma ve Geliştirme Platformu – Toplumsal Etki Projesi” kapsamında üretilmiştir. Projeye verdiği destekten ötürü Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu’na teşekkür ederiz. Bu çalışma, Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi – Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi tarafından desteklenen SGA-2024-1513 numaralı proje kapsamında üretilmiştir. Projeye verdiği destekten ötürü Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi’ne teşekkür ederiz.

EXPLORING THE ENVIRONMENTAL MOTIVATIONS BEHIND ELECTRIC VEHICLE PREFERENCES IN TURKEY: AN ASSESSMENT OF INDIVIDUAL AND POLITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES

Öz

Reducing transportation-related emissions is a critical component of combating the climate crisis, and electric vehicles (EVs) have emerged as a key solution in this context. While many governments are implementing policies that restrict the use of fossil-fuel vehicles and promote EV adoption, the sustainability of these policies largely depends on public support. This issue is particularly relevant in countries where environmentalism is politically marginalized and ideological polarization is pronounced. This study examines how personal and political environmental attitudes influence individuals’ preferences for EVs. A survey of 1,300 undergraduate students at Bursa Uludağ University was conducted, and the data were analyzed using multiple regression techniques. The findings indicate that young people demonstrate a positive inclination toward EV adoption, with both personal and political environmental attitudes playing significant roles. Notably, political environmental attitudes exert a stronger influence than personal attitudes. These results contribute to market research on EV adoption and provide valuable insights for policymakers seeking to design and sustain effective sustainable transportation strategies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Electric Vehicle Preference
• Personal Environmental Attitude
• Political Environmental Attitude
• Youth Attitudes
• Sustainable Transportation

Destekleyen Kurum

The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye and Bursa Uludağ University

Proje Numarası

1. Proje Numarası: 22AG001; 2. Proje Numarası: SGA-2024-1513

Etik Beyan

It is hereby declared that this study complies with research and publication ethics principles and standards.

Teşekkür

This study was produced within the scope of the “Research and Development Platform for Battery Technologies for Electric Vehicles – Social Impact Project” numbered 22AG001, supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey. We thank Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey for its support of this project. This study was also produced within the scope of project number SGA-2024-1513, supported by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Bursa Uludağ University. We thank Bursa Uludağ University for its support of this project.

Kaynakça

1. Abou-Chadi, T., & Kayser, M. A. (2017). It’s not easy being green: Why voters punish parties for environmental policies during economic downturns. Electoral Studies, 45, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.10.009
2. Aguilar-Luzón, M. C., Carmona, B., Calvo-Salguero, A., & Castillo Valdivieso, P. A. (2020). Values, environmental beliefs, and connection with nature as predictive factors of the pro-environmental vote in Spain. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01043
3. Automotive Distributors’ and Mobility Association. (2025). Makroekonomik değerlendirme haziran 2025. https://www.odmd.org.tr/folders/2837/categorial1docs/5920/Makroekonomik%20Değerlendirme.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 06.09.2025
4. Automotive Industry Exporters’ Association. (2025). Elektronik kütüphane. https://oib.org.tr/tr/elektronik-kutuphane.html?t=İstatistikler sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 01.10.2025
5. Axsen, J., Goldberg, S., & Bailey, J. (2016). How might potential future plug-in electric vehicle buyers differ from current “Pioneer” owners? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 47, 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.05.015
6. Barbarossa, C., De Pelsmacker, P., & Moons, I. (2017). Personal values, green self-identity and electric car adoption. Ecological Economics, 140, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.015
7. Bjerkan, K. Y., Nørbech, T. E., & Nordtømme, M. E. (2016). Incentives for promoting battery electric vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 43, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.002
8. Brückmann, G., Willibald, F., & Blanco, V. (2021). Battery electric vehicle adoption in regions without strong policies. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 90, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102615

9. Buhmann, K. M., Rialp-Criado, J., & Rialp-Criado, A. (2024). Predicting consumer intention to adopt battery electric vehicles: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Sustainability, 16(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031284
10. Cantillo, J., Astorino, L., & Tsana, A. (2025). Determinants of pro-environmental attitude and behaviour among European Union (EU) residents: differences between older and younger generations. Quality & Quantity, 59(3), 2623–2659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02089-8
11. Carroll, P., Casswell, S., Huakau, J., Perry, P., & Chapman, P. H. (2009). Environmental attitudes, beliefs about social justice and intention to vote Green: lessons for the New Zealand Green Party? Environmental Politics, 18(2), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802682635
12. Cecere, G., Corrocher, N., & Guerzoni, M. (2018). Price or performance? A probabilistic choice analysis of the intention to buy electric vehicles in European countries. Energy Policy, 118, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.034
13. Chen, Y., Cramton, P., List, J. A., & Ockenfels, A. (2021). Market design, human behavior, and management. Management Science, 67(9), 5317–5348. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3659
14. Coffman, M., Bernstein, P., & Wee, S. (2017). Electric vehicles revisited: a review of factors that affect adoption. Transport Reviews, 37(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1217282
15. Cologna, V., Berthold, A., Kreissel, A. L., & Siegrist, M. (2024). Attitudes towards technology and their relationship with pro-environmental behaviour: Development and validation of the GATT scale. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 95, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102258
16. Cordera, R., dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., & Ortúzar, J. de D. (2019). Demand for environmentally friendly vehicles: A review and new evidence. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(3), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1459969
17. D’Ecclesiis, E. A. R., Levi, E., & Patriarca, F. (2025). Exploring the multifaceted relationship between environmental attitudes and political voting. Ecological Economics, 230, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108518
18. Dagsvik, J. K., Wennemo, T., Wetterwald, D. G., & Aaberge, R. (2002). Potential demand for alternative fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 36(4), 361–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(01)00013-1
19. Davis, L., Li, J., & Springel, K. (2025). Political ideology and U.S. electric vehicle adoption. https://doi.org/10.3386/w33591
20. Daziano, R. A., & Bolduc, D. (2013). Incorporating pro-environmental preferences towards green automobile technologies through a Bayesian hybrid choice model. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 9(1), 74–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/18128602.2010.524173
21. Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy, 48, 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009
22. Ewing, G., & Sarigöllü, E. (2000). Assessing consumer preferences for clean-fuel vehicles: A discrete choice experiment. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.19.1.106.16946
23. Franke, T., & Krems, J. F. (2013). What drives range preferences in electric vehicle users? Transport Policy, 30, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.07.005
24. Griebenow, D., Neugart, M., & Pichler, S. (2024). Voting green (pp. 1–35). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4966233
25. Hardman, S., Jenn, A., Tal, G., Axsen, J., Beard, G., Daina, N., Figenbaum, E., Jakobsson, N., Jochem, P., Kinnear, N., Plötz, P., Pontes, J., Refa, N., Sprei, F., Turrentine, T., & Witkamp, B. (2018). A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 62, 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.002
26. Hardman, S., Shiu, E., & Steinberger-Wilckens, R. (2016). Comparing high-end and low-end early adopters of battery electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 88, 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.03.010
27. Hasan, F., Danish Kirmani, M., Zaidi, N., & Rehman, A. (2024). Environmental concern and price value in electric vehicle adoption: Examining intentions of Indian consumers. Journal of Sustainable Marketing, 196–216. https://doi.org/10.51300/JSM-2024-131
28. Haustein, S., & Jensen, A. F. (2018). Factors of electric vehicle adoption: A comparison of conventional and electric car users based on an extended theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(7), 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1398790
29. Hayashida, S., La Croix, S., & Coffman, M. (2021). Understanding changes in electric vehicle policies in the U.S. states, 2010–2018. Transport Policy, 103, 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.001
30. He, X., Hu, Y., & Hong, Z. (2023). Consumers’ intention to purchase electric vehicles: the moderating role of environmental awareness. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 68(4), 935–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2276060
31. Hidrue, M. K., Parsons, G. R., Kempton, W., & Gardner, M. P. (2011). Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resource and Energy Economics, 33(3), 686–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.02.002
32. Higueras-Castillo, E., Guillén, A., Herrera, L.-J., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2021). Adoption of electric vehicles: Which factors are really important? International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(10), 799–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1818330
33. Higueras-Castillo, E., Kalinic, Z., Marinkovic, V., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J. (2020). A mixed analysis of perceptions of electric and hybrid vehicles. Energy Policy, 136, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111076
34. Higueras-Castillo, E., Molinillo, S., Coca-Stefaniak, J. A., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2019). Perceived value and customer adoption of electric and hybrid vehicles. Sustainability, 11(18), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184956
35. Hoffmann, R., Muttarak, R., Peisker, J., & Stanig, P. (2021). Voting for tomorrow: Climate change, environmental concern, and green voting. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–60. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3868754
36. Jia, W., & Chen, T. D. (2021). Are Individuals’ stated preferences for electric vehicles (EVs) consistent with real-world EV ownership patterns? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 93, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102728
37. Kahn, M. E. (2007). Do greens drive hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 54(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2007.05.001
38. Knez, M., Jereb, B., & Obrecht, M. (2014). Factors influencing the purchasing decisions of low emission cars: A study of Slovenia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 30, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.007
39. Lane, B., & Potter, S. (2007). The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: exploring the consumer attitude–action gap. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11–12), 1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.026
40. Langbroek, J. H. M., Franklin, J. P., & Susilo, Y. O. (2016). The effect of policy incentives on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 94, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.050
41. Lee, S. S., Kim, Y., & Roh, T. (2023). Pro-environmental behavior on electric vehicle use intention: Integrating value-belief-norm theory and theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138211
42. Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., & Geng, J. (2017). A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.076
43. Liao, F., Molin, E., & van Wee, B. (2017). Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: a literature review. Transport Reviews, 37(3), 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1230794
44. Mandys, F. (2021). Electric vehicles and consumer choices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 142, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110874
45. Mannoni, E. (2024). Pro-environmental voting: What it is, how to measure it, and its determinants among contemporary European voters. Parliamentary Affairs, 78(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsae017
46. Mersky, A. C., Sprei, F., Samaras, C., & Qian, Z. (Sean). (2016). Effectiveness of incentives on electric vehicle adoption in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 46, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.03.011
47. Moons, I., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2012). Emotions as determinants of electric car usage intention. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 195–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.659007
48. Morton, C., Anable, J., & Nelson, J. D. (2016). Exploring consumer preferences towards electric vehicles: The influence of consumer innovativeness. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 18, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.01.007
49. Mutavdžija, M., Kovačić, M., & Buntak, K. (2022). Assessment of selected factors influencing the purchase of electric vehicles—a case study of the Republic of Croatia. Energies, 15(16), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15165987
50. Our World in Data. (2025). CO₂ emissions by sector, world. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co-emissions-by-sector sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 03.09.2025
51. Ozaki, R. (2011). Adopting sustainable innovation: what makes consumers sign up to green electricity? Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.650
52. Prasanna, S., Rangarajan, V., Khan, M., & Ahmed, K. A. A. (2021). Examining the factors influencing consumers’ choice for electric vehicles in India. International Journal of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles, 13(3/4), 302. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEHV.2021.123482
53. Raudsepp, M. (2001). Some socio-demographic and socio-psychological predictors of environmentalism. Trames. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(4), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2001.4.06
54. Rehman, A. (2025). Impact of environmental values, pro-environmental behavior, and pricing on purchase intention of electric vehicles. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-025-00449-6
55. Republic of Turkiye Ministry of Industry and Technology. (2025). Mobilite araç ve teknolojileri yol haritası. https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/assets/pdf/plan-program/MobiliteAracveTeknolojileriYolHaritasi.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 06.09.2025
56. Rezagholizadeh, E. (2023). On the gap between awareness and voting behavior: Are US citizens who believe in climate change voting for green parties? (Master's thesis). https://www.modul.ac.at/uploads/files/Theses/Master/Grad_2023/MSC_2023/62004296_REZAGHOLIZADEH_Elmira_Thesis.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 15.05.2024
57. Ritchie, H. (2020, Ekim). Cars, planes, trains: where do CO₂ emissions from transport come from? OurWorldinData.Org. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-from-transport sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 03.09.2025
58. Ritchie, H., Rosado, P., & Roser, M. (2023). CO₂ and greenhouse gas emissions. OurWorldinData.Org. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 06.09.2025
59. Salari, N. (2022). Electric vehicles adoption behaviour: Synthesising the technology readiness index with environmentalism values and instrumental attributes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 164, 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.07.009
60. Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004
61. Schumacher, I. (2014). An empirical study of the determinants of green party voting. Ecological Economics, 105, 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.007
62. She, Z.-Y., Qing Sun, Ma, J.-J., & Xie, B.-C. (2017). What are the barriers to widespread adoption of battery electric vehicles? A survey of public perception in Tianjin, China. Transport Policy, 56, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.001
63. Sintov, N. D., Abou-Ghalioum, V., & White, L. V. (2020). The partisan politics of low-carbon transport: Why democrats are more likely to adopt electric vehicles than Republicans in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 68, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101576
64. Sovacool, B. K., Kester, J., Noel, L., & de Rubens, G. Z. (2018). The demographics of decarbonizing transport: The influence of gender, education, occupation, age, and household size on electric mobility preferences in the Nordic region. Global Environmental Change, 52, 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.06.008
65. Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
66. Sun, W., Zhang, X., Li, H., Wu, J., & Zheng, S. (2018). Environmental ideology and household energy conservation in Beijing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1600–1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.065
67. T.C. Ministry of Environment Urbanisation and Climate Change. (2023, May 12). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti güncellenmiş birinci ulusal katkı beyanı. https://iklim.gov.tr/db/turkce/dokumanlar/turkiye-cumhuriyeti--8230-102-20230512125223.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 05.09.2025
68. T.C. Ministry of Environment Urbanisation and Climate Change. (2024). İklim değişikliği azaltım stratejisi ve eylem planı (2024-2030). https://iklim.gov.tr/db/turkce/icerikler/files/İklim Değişikliği Azaltım Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı (2024-2030).pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 05.09.2025
69. Turkish Exporters Assembly. (2025). İhracat rakamları. https://tim.org.tr/tr/ihracat-rakamlari sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 01.10.2025
70. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2025, July 18). Motorlu kara taşıtları. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Motorlu-Kara-Tasitlari-Haziran-2025-54042 sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 06.09.2025
71. Uludag Exporters’ Associations. (2025). İhracat rakamları. https://uib.org.tr/tr/ihracat-ihracat-rakamlari sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 01.10.2025
72. Wang, S., Fan, J., Zhao, D., Yang, S., & Fu, Y. (2016). Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation, 43(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9567-9
73. Wang, S., Li, J., & Zhao, D. (2017). The impact of policy measures on consumer intention to adopt electric vehicles: Evidence from China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 105, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.08.013
74. Wee, S., Coffman, M., & La Croix, S. (2018). Do electric vehicle incentives matter? Evidence from the 50 U.S. states. Research Policy, 47(9), 1601–1610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.003
75. White, L. V., & Sintov, N. D. (2017). You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle adoption intentions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 99, 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.008
76. Whitehead, J., Washington, S. P., & Franklin, J. P. (2019). The impact of different incentive policies on hybrid electric vehicle demand and price: An international comparison. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 10(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj10020020
77. Zhang, K., Guo, H., Yao, G., Li, C., Zhang, Y., & Wang, W. (2018). Modeling acceptance of electric vehicle sharing based on theory of planned behavior. Sustainability, 10(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124686
78. Zhao, H., Furuoka, F., Rasiah, R. A., & Shen, E. (2024). Consumers’ purchase intention toward electric vehicles from the perspective of perceived green value: An empirical survey from China. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15060267
79. Ziefle, M., Beul-Leusmann, S., Kasugai, K., & Schwalm, M. (2014). Public perception and acceptance of electric vehicles: Exploring users’ perceived benefits and drawbacks. In Aaron Marcus (Ed.), International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability (pp. 628–639). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07635-5